More GOP Pres. Candidates?

Lumpy 1

Diamond Member
Jun 19, 2009
42,420
16,806
2,290
We need them...

This Obama subservient liberal media outrage of personal attack politics is taking it's shameless toll..
 
Yeah, that's what the GOP needs...more clowns in the car...

clown-car1.jpg
 
We need them...

This Obama subservient liberal media outrage of personal attack politics is taking it's shameless toll..

You think the so-called liberal media is being unfair?

What is the so-called liberal media doing towards Republicans that the conservative media doesn't do towards Democrats?
 
We need them...

This Obama subservient liberal media outrage of personal attack politics is taking it's shameless toll..

You think the so-called liberal media is being unfair?

What is the so-called liberal media doing towards Republicans that the conservative media doesn't do towards Democrats?

The leftist media didn't giver yer boy Obama the anal exam they give everyone else...and they are still protecting him.
 
We need them...

This Obama subservient liberal media outrage of personal attack politics is taking it's shameless toll..

You think the so-called liberal media is being unfair?

What is the so-called liberal media doing towards Republicans that the conservative media doesn't do towards Democrats?

The leftist media didn't giver yer boy Obama the anal exam they give everyone else...and they are still protecting him.

And the conservative media is doing that to Cain, and Perry, and Gingrich, etc? The conservative media is going after them the same way they've gone after Obama?
 
Robin Hood Was Right


Then why are you stealing for government?

That is funny about the left, isn't it? They think they are Robin Hood by supporting the Sheriff of Nottingham. They suck at analogies.

The analogy is about income inequality.

Since we are making sweeping generalizations, what's funny about the right is that they support candidates that don't support them and don't believe the income inequality matters.

All the current GOP candidates are there to represent, support and legislate for the 1% and don't give a shit about the rest of us.
 
You think the so-called liberal media is being unfair?

What is the so-called liberal media doing towards Republicans that the conservative media doesn't do towards Democrats?

The leftist media didn't giver yer boy Obama the anal exam they give everyone else...and they are still protecting him.

And the conservative media is doing that to Cain, and Perry, and Gingrich, etc? The conservative media is going after them the same way they've gone after Obama?

Is that crickets I hear?
 
The analogy is about income inequality

the right ... don't believe the income inequality matters

The difference is we support equal opportunity and you support equal results. Income distribution is not a matter for government, it's a matter for marketplaces. By endlessly redistributing income you incent what you don't want, laziness, and disincent what you do, work. If you don't see that, your eyes are glued shut.

All the current GOP candidates are there to represent, support and legislate for the 1% and don't give a shit about the rest of us.

Sure, all us Republicans are the top 1%. Gotcha. Only the top 1% want to be free to earn what they can free from the greed of politicians.
 
We need them...

This Obama subservient liberal media outrage of personal attack politics is taking it's shameless toll..

You think the so-called liberal media is being unfair?

What is the so-called liberal media doing towards Republicans that the conservative media doesn't do towards Democrats?

What has the so-called liberal media done towards the Republican Candidates that other Republican Candidates haven't?:razz:
 
We need them...

This Obama subservient liberal media outrage of personal attack politics is taking it's shameless toll..

You think the so-called liberal media is being unfair?

What is the so-called liberal media doing towards Republicans that the conservative media doesn't do towards Democrats?

What has the so-called liberal media done towards the Republican Candidates that other Republican Candidates haven't?:razz:

So you compare the media to the opponent of a candidate? Shouldn't the media just be reporting?

Frankly I'd be OK with the media being opponents of Republican candidates if they applied the same standard to Democratic candidates. The problem is they are opponents of Republicans and purring kittens to Democrats.
 
The analogy is about income inequality

the right ... don't believe the income inequality matters

The difference is we support equal opportunity and you support equal results. Income distribution is not a matter for government, it's a matter for marketplaces. By endlessly redistributing income you incent what you don't want, laziness, and disincent what you do, work. If you don't see that, your eyes are glued shut.

All the current GOP candidates are there to represent, support and legislate for the 1% and don't give a shit about the rest of us.

Sure, all us Republicans are the top 1%. Gotcha. Only the top 1% want to be free to earn what they can free from the greed of politicians.

Where has that worked...letting the "marketplace" determine income equality? Where has unregulated corporatism and capitalism worked for a country?

How will the "marketplace" reverse the astronomical income inequality in this country?
 
Where has that worked...letting the "marketplace" determine income equality? Where has unregulated corporatism and capitalism worked for a country?
That's the standard? I can support your removal of any choice from the marketplace or I can support a completely unregulated market? I reject the question as the crap that it is. Only government can remove choice. No company can force you to buy from them accept through government power. By not having government remove your choice, other companies will start to compete with them and take their business from them. Government removes competitors.

If you have any intellectual integrity perform this exercise. You have to complete step 1 before starting step 2.

#1) List the businesses you feel abuse customers the most

#2) Note they are in fact the most regulated and not least regulated industries.

#3) Re-read your quote

How will the "marketplace" reverse the astronomical income inequality in this country?

It won't. Again, you're looking for equality of results, I'm looking for equality of opportunity.

Winston Churchill: The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal distributions of blessings. The inherent virtue of socialism is the equal distribution of misery.

That is the end of your solution supporting the Sheriff of Nottingham.
 
Where has that worked...letting the "marketplace" determine income equality? Where has unregulated corporatism and capitalism worked for a country?
That's the standard? I can support your removal of any choice from the marketplace or I can support a completely unregulated market? I reject the question as the crap that it is. Only government can remove choice. No company can force you to buy from them accept through government power. By not having government remove your choice, other companies will start to compete with them and take their business from them. Government removes competitors.

If you have any intellectual integrity perform this exercise. You have to complete step 1 before starting step 2.

#1) List the businesses you feel abuse customers the most

#2) Note they are in fact the most regulated and not least regulated industries.

#3) Re-read your quote

How will the "marketplace" reverse the astronomical income inequality in this country?

It won't. Again, you're looking for equality of results, I'm looking for equality of opportunity.

Winston Churchill: The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal distributions of blessings. The inherent virtue of socialism is the equal distribution of misery.

That is the end of your solution supporting the Sheriff of Nottingham.

Let's try this again...we've had similar income inequality in our country before. What caused it? What "fixed" it? When did the United States have the strongest middle class? How did that come about? What changed it?

richer-us.png
 
Sure, all us Republicans are the top 1%. Gotcha. Only the top 1% want to be free to earn what they can free from the greed of politicians.

I was speaking, specifically, of the GOP candidates...you know, the people the thread is about. They are there to represent the top 1%...especially reversible Mittens and the Newtie.
 

Forum List

Back
Top