More Dinosaur Soft Tissue Finds in 2017

[Weatherman2020]

Evolutionist Dr. Mary Schweitzer shocked the world in 2005 when she discovered soft tissue, including blood vessels and red blood cells, in a supposedly millions-of-years-old T-rex femur. Hers was the first popular discovery of many to come. Soft tissue is now cropping up in a broad variety of fossils at a wide variety of “ages” (the dates evolutionary scientists assign to the fossils). Two such finds appeared in the news just this year.

Another study discovered what appear to be proteins in a supposedly 195-million-year-old Lufengosaurus (a long-necked herbivore). One scientist, who was not involved in the study, said,

"To find proteins in a 195-million-year-old dinosaur fossil is a startling discovery. . . . It almost sounds too good to be true, but this team has used every method at their disposal to verify their discovery, and it seems to hold up."

Fossilised Protein Has Been Discovered Inside a 195-Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Bone

When you start with the assumption that dating of these remains has to be hundreds of millions of years old this is incredible news. But science is about looking at the evidence and then coming to conclusions.

 

[TNHarley]

The same scientist also found that iron preserved the tissue before decay.
The iron causes the proteins and cell membranes to act like formaldehyde.

 

[martybegan]

So when do I get my trainable and ridable T-Rex?

With lasers, of course.

 

[TNHarley]

So when do I get my trainable and ridable T-Rex?

With lasers, of course.

She is working on how to extract the proteins. Has to remove the iron first.
Thinks she even found actual DNA but that has yet to be proven. Maybe there is an update to that, IDK. That was a few years ago.

 

[martybegan]

So when do I get my trainable and ridable T-Rex?

With lasers, of course.

She is working on how to extract the proteins. Has to remove the iron first.
Thinks she even found actual DNA but that has yet to be proven. Maybe their is an update to that, IDK. That was a few years ago.

Soon.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The same scientist also found that iron preserved the tissue before decay.
The iron causes the proteins and cell membranes to act like formaldehyde.

Sure. Put a piece of iron outside for a week, let alone a hundred million years, and let us know what happens.

 

[G.T.]

The same scientist also found that iron preserved the tissue before decay.
The iron causes the proteins and cell membranes to act like formaldehyde.

Sure. Put a piece of iron outside for a week, let alone a hundred million years, and let us know what happens.

You know everything about every subject its amazing.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The same scientist also found that iron preserved the tissue before decay.
The iron causes the proteins and cell membranes to act like formaldehyde.

Sure. Put a piece of iron outside for a week, let alone a hundred million years, and let us know what happens.

You know everything about every subject its amazing.

It is.

 

[TNHarley]

The same scientist also found that iron preserved the tissue before decay.
The iron causes the proteins and cell membranes to act like formaldehyde.

Sure. Put a piece of iron outside for a week, let alone a hundred million years, and let us know what happens.

So, you want to pick and choose what to believe, in regards to her findings?

 

[Weatherman2020]

The same scientist also found that iron preserved the tissue before decay.
The iron causes the proteins and cell membranes to act like formaldehyde.

Sure. Put a piece of iron outside for a week, let alone a hundred million years, and let us know what happens.

So, you want to pick and choose what to believe, in regards to her findings?

I find her theory laughable. We are talking about tissue that is supposed to have been outside for over a hundred million years.

 

[TNHarley]

The same scientist also found that iron preserved the tissue before decay.
The iron causes the proteins and cell membranes to act like formaldehyde.

Sure. Put a piece of iron outside for a week, let alone a hundred million years, and let us know what happens.

So, you want to pick and choose what to believe, in regards to her findings?

I find her theory laughable. We are talking about tissue that is supposed to have been outside for over a hundred million years.

It was buried in sandstone. She also said the sandstone helps keep bacteria and enzymes from deteriorating the bones..

 

[Weatherman2020]

The same scientist also found that iron preserved the tissue before decay.
The iron causes the proteins and cell membranes to act like formaldehyde.

Sure. Put a piece of iron outside for a week, let alone a hundred million years, and let us know what happens.

So, you want to pick and choose what to believe, in regards to her findings?

I find her theory laughable. We are talking about tissue that is supposed to have been outside for over a hundred million years.

It was buried in sandstone. She also said the sandstone helps keep bacteria and enzymes from deteriorating the bones..

Slows the process. But not over 190 million years. That sand was filled with bacteria when it washed over the body. Her theory is laughable.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Evolutionist Dr. Mary Schweitzer shocked the world in 2005 when she discovered soft tissue, including blood vessels and red blood cells, in a supposedly millions-of-years-old T-rex femur. Hers was the first popular discovery of many to come. Soft tissue is now cropping up in a broad variety of fossils at a wide variety of “ages” (the dates evolutionary scientists assign to the fossils). Two such finds appeared in the news just this year.

Another study discovered what appear to be proteins in a supposedly 195-million-year-old Lufengosaurus (a long-necked herbivore). One scientist, who was not involved in the study, said,

"To find proteins in a 195-million-year-old dinosaur fossil is a startling discovery. . . . It almost sounds too good to be true, but this team has used every method at their disposal to verify their discovery, and it seems to hold up."

Fossilised Protein Has Been Discovered Inside a 195-Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Bone

When you start with the assumption that dating of these remains has to be hundreds of millions of years old this is incredible news. But science is about looking at the evidence and then coming to conclusions.

Evolutionist Dr. Mary Schweitzer shocked the world in 2005 when she discovered soft tissue, including blood vessels and red blood cells, in a supposedly millions-of-years-old T-rex femur. Hers was the first popular discovery of many to come. Soft tissue is now cropping up in a broad variety of fossils at a wide variety of “ages” (the dates evolutionary scientists assign to the fossils). Two such finds appeared in the news just this year.

Another study discovered what appear to be proteins in a supposedly 195-million-year-old Lufengosaurus (a long-necked herbivore). One scientist, who was not involved in the study, said,

"To find proteins in a 195-million-year-old dinosaur fossil is a startling discovery. . . . It almost sounds too good to be true, but this team has used every method at their disposal to verify their discovery, and it seems to hold up."

Fossilised Protein Has Been Discovered Inside a 195-Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Bone

When you start with the assumption that dating of these remains has to be hundreds of millions of years old this is incredible news. But science is about looking at the evidence and then coming to conclusions.

Right, and the overwhelming preponderance of the evidence (as in, all of it) still points to that fossil being 195 million years old. So the correct thing to do is not to throw out mountains of mutually supportive evidence when surprised by an observation, but rather to first look for explanations which also explain all of the existing evidence.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The same scientist also found that iron preserved the tissue before decay.
The iron causes the proteins and cell membranes to act like formaldehyde.

Sure. Put a piece of iron outside for a week, let alone a hundred million years, and let us know what happens.

What a bizarre thing to say...the iron at question is bound inside molecules. Dude, after repeatedly saying things that are ridiculous and wildly incorrect, have you considered altering your positions? No? Then you are irrational.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The same scientist also found that iron preserved the tissue before decay.
The iron causes the proteins and cell membranes to act like formaldehyde.

Sure. Put a piece of iron outside for a week, let alone a hundred million years, and let us know what happens.

So, you want to pick and choose what to believe, in regards to her findings?

I find her theory laughable. We are talking about tissue that is supposed to have been outside for over a hundred million years.

It was buried in sandstone. She also said the sandstone helps keep bacteria and enzymes from deteriorating the bones..

Slows the process. But not over 190 million years. That sand was filled with bacteria when it washed over the body. Her theory is laughable.

"Slows the process. But not over 190 million years"

...a declaration by you based on exactly zero education or experience in this field. In what universe do you imagine this should be granted one iota of credibility, and not mercilessly ridiculed?

 

[Weatherman2020]

The same scientist also found that iron preserved the tissue before decay.
The iron causes the proteins and cell membranes to act like formaldehyde.

Sure. Put a piece of iron outside for a week, let alone a hundred million years, and let us know what happens.

What a bizarre thing to say...the iron at question is bound inside molecules. Dude, after repeatedly saying things that are ridiculous and wildly incorrect, have you considered altering your positions? No? Then you are irrational.

Tell me, when did Fe become a stable atomic structure that would be a preservative of tissue for 190 million years?

 

[TNHarley]

http://www4.ncsu.edu/~lezanno/Research_files/SchweitzerEtAl2012.pdf
What is there to dispute?

 

[TNHarley]

The same scientist also found that iron preserved the tissue before decay.
The iron causes the proteins and cell membranes to act like formaldehyde.

Sure. Put a piece of iron outside for a week, let alone a hundred million years, and let us know what happens.

What a bizarre thing to say...the iron at question is bound inside molecules. Dude, after repeatedly saying things that are ridiculous and wildly incorrect, have you considered altering your positions? No? Then you are irrational.

Tell me, when did Fe become a stable atomic structure that would be a preservative of tissue for 190 million years?

So we can use that argument with everything new we discover?

 

[Weatherman2020]

http://www4.ncsu.edu/~lezanno/Research_files/SchweitzerEtAl2012.pdf
What is there to dispute?

It says they found DNA and it also says the half life of DNA is 521 years.

 

[TNHarley]

http://www4.ncsu.edu/~lezanno/Research_files/SchweitzerEtAl2012.pdf
What is there to dispute?

It says they found DNA and it also says the half life of DNA is 521 years.

They dont know where it came from.
Im pretty sure my great great great great greta grandfather wasnt dodging t-rexes when he was deer hunting.