More civilian casualties caused by US airstrikes

[Bleipriester]

Spoiler: Western News

Massive use of MOABs (Mother of all Barrels) against civilians has risen the civilian death toll in rebel held Raqqa. Raqqa, where many people travel to, is considered the "hotel of the revolution".

ISIS hospital treating victims of bombing, mostly women and children

The rebel coalition of FSA, Nusra and ISIS, three of the most secular and democratic movements in the entire Middle East, that liberated Raqqa from the Assad Regime, said that the indiscriminate use of advanced barrel bombs by the Trump Regime against the populace is an effort to display the Assad Regime as the lesser evil of the both.

Rebels celebrate the liberation of Raqqa

In the long term, the Coalition stresses, the goal of the Trump Regime is to make the people demand the departure of the rebels to stop the barrel onslaught.

This is Greg Burdette, WWN, somewhere in the Mediterranean.

No, seriously, it is time to point out that those who accuse the Syrian government of bombing civilians are - proven by history and present - the unchallenged masters of bombing civilians. All the tears they shed when new al-Qaeda propaganda comes in - disgusting hypocrisy.

+18 graphic video: ISIS hospital full on injured children following US airstrikes on Raqqa

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

IF ISIS wouldn't hide behind their women and children, their women and children would not be casualties.

 

[Bleipriester]

IF ISIS wouldn't hide behind their women and children, their women and children would not be casualties.

This is true and there is no choice in the end. The double morale standards, however, don´t qualify the West to fight terrorism in Syria.

 

[Ringel05]

IF ISIS wouldn't hide behind their women and children, their women and children would not be casualties.

This is true and there is no choice in the end. The double morale standards, however, don´t qualify the West to fight terrorism in Syria.

Unfortunately for you you're "slightly" biased in this area (cough, cough)......... Hence you'll have few agreeing with your "assessment".

 

[Bleipriester]

IF ISIS wouldn't hide behind their women and children, their women and children would not be casualties.

This is true and there is no choice in the end. The double morale standards, however, don´t qualify the West to fight terrorism in Syria.

Unfortunately for you you're "slightly" biased in this area (cough, cough)......... Hence you'll have few agreeing with your "assessment".

There is no real bias as my opinion results from the facts and not the other way round.

Here are some videos for you:

Azaz, northern Aleppo: "Moderate rebels" threaten to kill US soldiers, who were tasked to support them:



"Rebel school" in Aleppo city when liberated by the Syrian army. A chemical weapon depot:



"Rebel hospital" in Aleppo city when liberated by the Syrian army. A sharia court with cells:


So, with that information, how to justify the support for the terrorists by our regimes?

 

[miketx]

Spoiler: Western News

Massive use of MOABs (Mother of all Barrels) against civilians has risen the civilian death toll in rebel held Raqqa. Raqqa, where many people travel to, is considered the "hotel of the revolution".

ISIS hospital treating victims of bombing, mostly women and children

The rebel coalition of FSA, Nusra and ISIS, three of the most secular and democratic movements in the entire Middle East, that liberated Raqqa from the Assad Regime, said that the indiscriminate use of advanced barrel bombs by the Trump Regime against the populace is an effort to display the Assad Regime as the lesser evil of the both.

Rebels celebrate the liberation of Raqqa

In the long term, the Coalition stresses, the goal of the Trump Regime is to make the people demand the departure of the rebels to stop the barrel onslaught.

This is Greg Burdette, WWN, somewhere in the Mediterranean.

No, seriously, it is time to point out that those who accuse the Syrian government of bombing civilians are - proven by history and present - the unchallenged masters of bombing civilians. All the tears they shed when new al-Qaeda propaganda comes in - disgusting hypocrisy.

+18 graphic video: ISIS hospital full on injured children following US airstrikes on Raqqa

The difference which you omit on purpose is we aren't bombing them on purpose.

 

[Bleipriester]

Spoiler: Western News

Massive use of MOABs (Mother of all Barrels) against civilians has risen the civilian death toll in rebel held Raqqa. Raqqa, where many people travel to, is considered the "hotel of the revolution".

ISIS hospital treating victims of bombing, mostly women and children

The rebel coalition of FSA, Nusra and ISIS, three of the most secular and democratic movements in the entire Middle East, that liberated Raqqa from the Assad Regime, said that the indiscriminate use of advanced barrel bombs by the Trump Regime against the populace is an effort to display the Assad Regime as the lesser evil of the both.

Rebels celebrate the liberation of Raqqa

In the long term, the Coalition stresses, the goal of the Trump Regime is to make the people demand the departure of the rebels to stop the barrel onslaught.

This is Greg Burdette, WWN, somewhere in the Mediterranean.

No, seriously, it is time to point out that those who accuse the Syrian government of bombing civilians are - proven by history and present - the unchallenged masters of bombing civilians. All the tears they shed when new al-Qaeda propaganda comes in - disgusting hypocrisy.

+18 graphic video: ISIS hospital full on injured children following US airstrikes on Raqqa

The difference which you omit on purpose is we aren't bombing them on purpose.

So you claim the Syrian people bombs itself on purpose? So you claim al-Qaeda propaganda is true?

 

[Ringel05]

IF ISIS wouldn't hide behind their women and children, their women and children would not be casualties.

This is true and there is no choice in the end. The double morale standards, however, don´t qualify the West to fight terrorism in Syria.

Unfortunately for you you're "slightly" biased in this area (cough, cough)......... Hence you'll have few agreeing with your "assessment".

There is no real bias as my opinion results from the facts and not the other way round.

Here are some videos for you:

Azaz, northern Aleppo: "Moderate rebels" threaten to kill US soldiers, who were tasked to support them:



"Rebel school" in Aleppo city when liberated by the Syrian army. A chemical weapon depot:



"Rebel hospital" in Aleppo city when liberated by the Syrian army. A sharia court with cells:


So, with that information, how to justify the support for the terrorists by our regimes?

You keep telling yourself that Sparkette........

http://pages.ucsd.edu/~mckenzie/nickersonConfirmationBias.pdf