Mohammed Naeem Noor Khan-Mole or Double Agent?

Annie

Diamond Member
Nov 22, 2003
50,848
4,827
1,790
This is all intriguing:

NYT

U.S. Says Man Had Ties to Plot to Disrupt Vote

his article was reported by David Johnston, Thom Shanker and David E. Sanger, and written by Mr. Johnston.

WASHINGTON, Aug. 7 - A Pakistani man whose arrest provided information about the reconnaissance of financial institutions in New York, Newark and Washington was also communicating with Qaeda operatives who the authorities say are plotting to carry out an attack intended to disrupt the fall elections, a senior intelligence official said Saturday.

Senior intelligence and counterterrorism officials said it was not clear whether the people behind the surveillance of the financial institutions and the people involved in the election threat were part of the same group, or belonged to overlapping or separate ones.

The arrest last month of the Pakistani, Mohammed Naeem Noor Khan, had already prompted a search in the United States, Britain and other countries to locate the people behind the surveillance, which took place three or four years ago. Now the authorities say Mr. Khan's arrest is also helping them unravel a threat to carry out an attack this year inside the United States.

It is not clear whether Mr. Khan represents the second channel of intelligence that officials have alluded to in recent days that, they say, convinced them that the reconnaissance of financial institutions was related to current threats.

But he is emerging as a central figure in an expanding web of connections that, the authorities say, indicates that they may have penetrated an operational Qaeda group whose intentions were previously unknown....

...On Saturday, American authorities said they were close to identifying the main figures who conducted reconnaissance of the financial centers. Armed with multiple leads stemming from arrests in Britain and Pakistan, and aided by a wealth of information from forensic studies of computers seized in Pakistan, the authorities have begun a large-scale investigation.

Still frustrating investigators is the uncertainty about whether the surveillance in 2000 and 2001 was part of an ongoing plot. So far, the officials said, no clear evidence has been obtained that indicates whether the plot was ever abandoned.

Increasingly, however, the authorities suspect that the Qaeda figures believed to have been involved in the surveillance were active members of the terrorist network. They say the clandestine manner in which they operated suggested that they wanted to carry out attacks inside the United States...

Among those in custody is a suspect named Babar Ahmed, who was arrested in Britain this week at the request of the United States. Whatever his role in the surveillance, the authorities now say that Mr. Ahmed obtained detailed information about the movements of the Navy aircraft carrier Constellation, including information about the formations used by the carrier and its escort vessels in maneuvers like its passage through the Strait of Hormuz in the Middle East in 2001.

As part of the inquiry, Navy officials examined the record of a sailor aboard the Benfold, a destroyer that was part of the Constellation battle group. Officials said they had found an e-mail message from the sailor - who has since left the service - that was sympathetic to Al Qaeda.

The officials said that a turning point in the surveillance case came with the arrest in Britain, earlier this week, of Abu Issa al-Hindi. The authorities say they believe Mr. Hindi was dispatched to the United States by senior Qaeda leaders to carry out the reconnaissance operation...

One senior counterterrorism official said the outpouring of leads had mushroomed into a sprawling investigation in which agencies in the United States and overseas were struggling to coordinate and share the enormous volume of information.

The inquiry has caused strains between the United States and Britain. There were signs that some British authorities might not have agreed with the White House decision to make public information about the surveillance operations. The news agency Reuters quoted the British home secretary, David Blunkett, as saying that there was "a difference between alerting the public to a specific threat and alarming people unnecessarily by passing on information indiscriminately."

Officials at MI5, the British domestic intelligence agency, have warned that the intense news media coverage in the United States of recent arrests in Britain could interfere with legal efforts to extradite suspects to the United States...

A report by Reuters in Pakistan said Mr. Khan had been secretly funneling information about Al Qaeda to Pakistani authorities and that his arrest and subsequent identification in news accounts may have cost the United States a valuable source.

American officials contacted on Saturday would not confirm whether Mr. Khan was a mole or double agent. They said his arrest had led to intelligence gains of enormous value in uncovering the surveillance operation in the United States.

Intelligence officials have also recently come into possession of information about how much Al Qaeda knew about Navy operations.

According to a statement from United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, British law enforcement authorities, executing search warrants for several locations connected to Mr. Ahmed, "seized, among other things, a document that set forth plans for a U.S. naval battle group operating in the Strait of Hormuz in April 2001. The information contained in the document, which was classified at the time, has been confirmed as legitimate by the U.S. Navy."

The documents, according to the government statement, "included the battle group's planned movements on April 29, 2001, and a drawing of the group's formation. In addition, the document specifically noted that the battle group was tasked both with enforcing sanctions against Iraq, and with conducting operations against Afghanistan and Al Qaeda."

Most important, the statement said, "the document specifically described the battle group's vulnerability to a terrorist attack, and provides specific examples on how the ships might be attacked (e.g., 'they have nothing to stop a small craft with RPG etc, except their Seals' stinger missiles')."

The initials R.P.G. refer to rocket-propelled grenade, and Seals are naval Special Operations Forces...
 

Forum List

Back
Top