Modern Day Civil War.

Um... you think this healthcare bill is using the process our Founders gave us??? When the people who govern refuse to actually use the process set up, how you expect anything but open rebellion?

This is insane. I don't want violence. But you've got to be stupid if you think this legislations going in above the board. And you've got to be stupid to think people are just going to bend over and take it.

You're policies will lead to violence. Stop forcing them on the people. If they have merit, the people will adopt it and we can avoid it. if not, let the Republic be. We are better off without your policies, then we are with them forced on us, even if they are good policies. Destroying the Republic is not a good idea.


Yes, it is. The constitution gives the House and the Senate the right to formulate the rules they will operate under. The House created this thing call 'deem passed' and the Senate created this thing called reconcilliation. Just because you dont' like the idea that they are being used on health insurance reform, don't confuse that with it not being a constitutional process.

It's not the policies that will lead to violence, there are just a lot of politically violent people on your side of this issue. You all brought out your weapons even before the 2008 campaign was over.

Wrong, talk of another revolution has been around since the 70's. In truth it's too late. That's why the immigration laws were changed in the 60's. They stopped bringing in people from first would nations who wouldn't put up with crap and would fight for their rights and started bringing in people from 3rd world nations who are used to doing whatever they are told. .


So, that's what you wittle bwain has come up with as the rationale for the changes in immigration law in the 1970's, huh....

I guess it doesn't matter that prior to the 1970's the British who immigrated here were under a more socialist system than we ever will see here. Or that the Germans, had only been free from their monarch and dictators for about 25 years. But like I told someone else, don't let the facts get in the way of a good rant.
 
Last edited:
We have no capable politicians, we need to cut out all the power they think goes with the job and the perks, and the lobbyist.etc,etc,etc.
 
Bring it on ladies...

Love to have another chance to beat on those seceding sons-a-bitches

Right as if a craven like you would EVER fight in a war for your country.
I can see you voting to send others to war, but not actually risking your yellow hide.

I've been waiting for someone to pull this one jackass, thanks for being that one. During the Viet Nam war I could have stayed home, my number was high enough. Although I didn't agree with the war, I enlisted in order to stand by my peers, simple as that. I've got balls big enough to choke the shit out of you and then some. Pray I never cross your path.
Another Internet Bruce Lee.
I was addressing the cowardly little POS known as Rightwinger not you. But if we do cross paths I won't be intimidated by a has been like you.
 
Bring it on ladies...

Love to have another chance to beat on those seceding sons-a-bitches

Right as if a craven like you would EVER fight in a war for your country.
I can see you voting to send others to war, but not actually risking your yellow hide.

I've been waiting for someone to pull this one jackass, thanks for being that one. During the Viet Nam war I could have stayed home, my number was high enough. Although I didn't agree with the war, I enlisted in order to stand by my peers, simple as that. I've got balls big enough to choke the shit out of you and then some. Pray I never cross your path.

What a stupid statement. Your rage may be fueled by steroids, thus your chesticles have increased with your flute and rattle have shrunk. What a moron.
 
Yes, it is. The constitution gives the House and the Senate the right to formulate the rules they will operate under. The House created this thing call 'deem passed' and the Senate created this thing called reconcilliation. Just because you dont' like the idea that they are being used on health insurance reform, don't confuse that with it not being a constitutional process.

It's not the policies that will lead to violence, there are just a lot of politically violent people on your side of this issue. You all brought out your weapons even before the 2008 campaign was over.

Wrong, talk of another revolution has been around since the 70's. In truth it's too late. That's why the immigration laws were changed in the 60's. They stopped bringing in people from first would nations who wouldn't put up with crap and would fight for their rights and started bringing in people from 3rd world nations who are used to doing whatever they are told. .


So, that's what you wittle bwain has come up with as the rationale for the changes in immigration law in the 1970's, huh....

I guess it doesn't matter that prior to the 1970's the British who immigrated here were under a more socialist system than we ever will see here. Or that the Germans, had only been free from their monarch and dictators for about 25 years. But like I told someone else, don't let the facts get in the way of a good rant.

blah, blah, blah ....:eusa_eh:

Got anything intelligent to say?
 
Right as if a craven like you would EVER fight in a war for your country.
I can see you voting to send others to war, but not actually risking your yellow hide.

I've been waiting for someone to pull this one jackass, thanks for being that one. During the Viet Nam war I could have stayed home, my number was high enough. Although I didn't agree with the war, I enlisted in order to stand by my peers, simple as that. I've got balls big enough to choke the shit out of you and then some. Pray I never cross your path.

What a stupid statement. Your rage may be fueled by steroids, thus your chesticles have increased with your flute and rattle have shrunk. What a moron.

Oh look ... Mr Fuckwad himself speaketh ....:cuckoo:
 
Wrong, talk of another revolution has been around since the 70's. In truth it's too late. That's why the immigration laws were changed in the 60's. They stopped bringing in people from first would nations who wouldn't put up with crap and would fight for their rights and started bringing in people from 3rd world nations who are used to doing whatever they are told. .


So, that's what you wittle bwain has come up with as the rationale for the changes in immigration law in the 1970's, huh....

I guess it doesn't matter that prior to the 1970's the British who immigrated here were under a more socialist system than we ever will see here. Or that the Germans, had only been free from their monarch and dictators for about 25 years. But like I told someone else, don't let the facts get in the way of a good rant.

blah, blah, blah ....:eusa_eh:

Got anything intelligent to say?

Only that, gauging from your post, the truth must really bite!!:razz:
 
Civil wars suck. Seriously suck.

Yes, they do. Unfortunately we have posters and some citizens bantying the idea around as if it's a walk in the park.

No, you have leftwingnuts projecting ....

We have them on both sides. What do you think advocating succession means? Civil war.

If you think it's only the left, just take a look here.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1R2GGLR_enUS330&q=succession+from+the+union&aq=0&aqi=g6&aql=&oq=succession+from+&gs_rfai=
 
Last edited:
We have no capable politicians, we need to cut out all the power they think goes with the job and the perks, and the lobbyist.etc,etc,etc.

capable politician. That's an oxymoron if i've ever heard one.
 
So, that's what you wittle bwain has come up with as the rationale for the changes in immigration law in the 1970's, huh....

I guess it doesn't matter that prior to the 1970's the British who immigrated here were under a more socialist system than we ever will see here. Or that the Germans, had only been free from their monarch and dictators for about 25 years. But like I told someone else, don't let the facts get in the way of a good rant.

blah, blah, blah ....:eusa_eh:

Got anything intelligent to say?

Only that, gauging from your post, the truth must really bite!!:razz:

YOUR truth? Or reality?
 
Yes, they do. Unfortunately we have posters and some citizens bantying the idea around as if it's a walk in the park.

No, you have leftwingnuts projecting ....

We have them on both sides. What do you think advocating succession means? Civil war.

If you think it's only the left, just take a look here.

succession from the union - Google Search

Probably want to read a post or two of mine. I'm not on either side. Oh and Mr Educated, the word wouold be "secession" ...:eusa_eh:

Grow some balls. You think backing the current or past administrations of the US government is upholding and defending the Constitution of the US? I got this West Texas swampland for sale .....:eusa_whistle:
 
It is ILLEGAL to claim one has passed a bill without a vote. That removes the peoples right to proper representation as promised by the Constitution. THAT is reason enough to revolt. I doubt we do, but it is REASON enough.

Thankfully, that's not happening here.

They're voting on the Senate bill and the overhaul bill simultaneously. THAT IS IT. There's no trickery, nothing unconstitutional, nothing unprecedented, nothing un-American about it. It's not a new procedure. It's been done literally HUNDREDS of times.
 
Yes, it is. The constitution gives the House and the Senate the right to formulate the rules they will operate under. The House created this thing call 'deem passed' and the Senate created this thing called reconcilliation. Just because you dont' like the idea that they are being used on health insurance reform, don't confuse that with it not being a constitutional process.

It's not the policies that will lead to violence, there are just a lot of politically violent people on your side of this issue. You all brought out your weapons even before the 2008 campaign was over.

Wrong, talk of another revolution has been around since the 70's. In truth it's too late. That's why the immigration laws were changed in the 60's. They stopped bringing in people from first would nations who wouldn't put up with crap and would fight for their rights and started bringing in people from 3rd world nations who are used to doing whatever they are told. All this in an effort to diffuse the unrest among Americans.

Fascinating assertion. Where do you get that from?

Plus, in the 70's they started a campaign to convince Americans to limit their children to no more than two per family due to over population. We are now living in an America that is 1/3 foreigners. The revolution will not happen. A civil war is still possible as those who are American are rather upset at the numbers of foreigners that are coming in and taking over their country. Of course it's too late and they will lose. We lost when our own government took 5 days to get to the Katrina victims and then marched through their homes and took away their guns. We lost when an official of the Mexican government announced to American citizens "This has been and will again be Mexico" and our government did nothing.

What did you expect our government to do? Assassinate him?

Nope, america is already gone. Long live Cascadia.

So, you don't care what happens in Used-To-Be-America, right?

It's called logic, try it sometime.

No, I expected our government to go to the UN and demand that Mexico clarify their intentions toward our country, demand an apology from that representative of their country and then ship his a$$ back home.

Of course I care, I mourn for the loss of the America I knew.
 

Forum List

Back
Top