Mittens releases one gtax return and who cares?

Just giving ammunition to his brain dead supporters to go along with their incoherent screaming about birth certificates and death panels. Of course he released the records from the time after he pulled all the economic corruption, but most of his supporters aren't intelligent enough to comprehend that.
 
Just giving ammunition to his brain dead supporters to go along with their incoherent screaming about birth certificates and death panels. Of course he released the records from the time after he pulled all the economic corruption, but most of his supporters aren't intelligent enough to comprehend that.

Witness the post just above yours.

Brainless twits who don't want to be confused with facts. My bet is, they won't even read the article.

As Santorum said, 'they'll never get the smart ones'.
 
Just giving ammunition to his brain dead supporters to go along with their incoherent screaming about birth certificates and death panels. Of course he released the records from the time after he pulled all the economic corruption, but most of his supporters aren't intelligent enough to comprehend that.

Witness the post just above yours.

Brainless twits who don't want to be confused with facts. My bet is, they won't even read the article.

As Santorum said, 'they'll never get the smart ones'.

Dudley...for a guy who identified himself as an "Independent" in that poll a week or so ago....you sure as hell never have ANYTHING even kinda good to say about anything on the right....but boy you sure as hell NEVER have anything even kind of bad to say about anything on the Left.....Independent my ass.......Far Leftist more like it.....
 
It's amazing how there's a clear divide in politics in this country and the line for that divide is largely contingent on one's intelligence.

Yes there is and that divide is between those who actually are smart, intelligent, and well informed and those who think insulting and name calling those they disagree with passes for being smart, intelligent, and well informed.
 
It's amazing how there's a clear divide in politics in this country and the line for that divide is largely contingent on one's intelligence.

Yes there is and that divide is between those who actually are smart, intelligent, and well informed and those who think insulting and name calling those they disagree with passes for being smart, intelligent, and well informed.

Brain dead is a sufficient term for an individual who believes the birther or death panel crap.
 
Mark Gongloff: Mitt Romney Releases The One Tax Return We Don't Care About

For once, this is actually fairly smart. He usually does such dumb stuff that its east to miss it when someone gives him good advise.

And, rw's will just bob their sheeple heads up and down and never figure it out.


I read it and another try to be hit piece by the Huff Po, nothing substantial in that article, but reading the comments was interesting, I really like this one:
Charitable donations that outpace taxation are a problem. That policy is simply selective taxation, and does not fairly deal with the things society NEEDS, and instead allows the rich to finance what they WANT. As the majority of us pay our taxes through payroll, sales and housing taxes, we have no say as to how our money is spent, outside of our vote. It is unfair to have a system where the wealthy get to select where their 'tax dollars' (charitable contributions) are spent, while the rest of us take the shaft and OUR dollars pay for the rich man's wars, gluttony and greed (tax breaks for the wealthy, subsidies to large corporations), and then suffer under austerity measures that gut education, infrastructure and social programs.

That's what conservatives have long thought liberals were like. Liberals hate charities and want the government to control the money. Again it looks like the liberals are anti-choice.....it's amazing they are anti-choice on everything but abortion....hmmmmm
 
It's amazing how there's a clear divide in politics in this country and the line for that divide is largely contingent on one's intelligence.

Yes there is and that divide is between those who actually are smart, intelligent, and well informed and those who think insulting and name calling those they disagree with passes for being smart, intelligent, and well informed.

Brain dead is a sufficient term for an individual who believes the birther or death panel crap.

It's also a sufficient term for those who think a bullying incident 50 years ago or how many years of tax returns Romney chooses to release is actually important especially given the fact that no candidate is required to release any tax returns and those who think everything in Romney's past is so important were not interested in anything about Obama's past four year's ago and still aren't Today.
 
Yes there is and that divide is between those who actually are smart, intelligent, and well informed and those who think insulting and name calling those they disagree with passes for being smart, intelligent, and well informed.

Brain dead is a sufficient term for an individual who believes the birther or death panel crap.

It's also a sufficient term for those who think a bullying incident 50 years ago or how many years of tax returns Romney chooses to release is actually important especially given the fact that no candidate is required to release any tax returns and those who think everything in Romney's past is so important were not interested in anything about Obama's past four year's ago and still aren't Today.

Considering a big part of Romney's campaign is contingent on the idea that he's some kind of businessman when in reality he only raided and destroyed other companies and American jobs while pulling all kinds of financial corruption (which is what his tax records would show and why he's not releasing them) those tax records are relevant. You'd have to be brain dead to think otherwise or not see this for what it is.

What in Obama's past is in doubt?
 
Last edited:
Brain dead is a sufficient term for an individual who believes the birther or death panel crap.

It's also a sufficient term for those who think a bullying incident 50 years ago or how many years of tax returns Romney chooses to release is actually important especially given the fact that no candidate is required to release any tax returns and those who think everything in Romney's past is so important were not interested in anything about Obama's past four year's ago and still aren't Today.

Considering a big part of Romney's campaign is contingent on the idea that he's some kind of businessman when in reality he only raided and destroyed other companies and American jobs while pulling all kinds of financial corruption (which is what his tax records would show and why he's not releasing them) those tax records are relevant. You'd have to be brain dead to think otherwise or not see this for it is.

What in Obama's past is in doubt?

Again you're full of shit....several companies were helped by him, so which ones did he destroy and lets see the proof. It's funny how liberals can make accusations but cant back them up (harry reid for example)

And what in OBama's past is in doubt? uh his entire life is a mystery, and noone knows anything about him, lets see those school records....what could possibly be so bad about them.
 
It's also a sufficient term for those who think a bullying incident 50 years ago or how many years of tax returns Romney chooses to release is actually important especially given the fact that no candidate is required to release any tax returns and those who think everything in Romney's past is so important were not interested in anything about Obama's past four year's ago and still aren't Today.

Considering a big part of Romney's campaign is contingent on the idea that he's some kind of businessman when in reality he only raided and destroyed other companies and American jobs while pulling all kinds of financial corruption (which is what his tax records would show and why he's not releasing them) those tax records are relevant. You'd have to be brain dead to think otherwise or not see this for it is.

What in Obama's past is in doubt?

Again you're full of shit....several companies were helped by him, so which ones did he destroy and lets see the proof. It's funny how liberals can make accusations but cant back them up (harry reid for example)

And what in OBama's past is in doubt? uh his entire life is a mystery, and noone knows anything about him, lets see those school records....what could possibly be so bad about them.

I like how whenever people like you are confronted by facts you label the person as "DA LIBERALZZZZ" and then spin off into your typical brain dead lies and bullshit.

Ampad and GST Steel for two. Romney was a corporate raider in his private life. How is this even an argument?

Mitt Romney's Private Equity Nightmare - Businessweek
Mitt Romney, Bain Capital Targeted Over GST Steel Plant Closure In New Priorities USA Action Ad [UPDATE]

What would his school records prove? Oh I get it... you're still mad that you were wrong about the birther bullshit.
 
Brain dead is a sufficient term for an individual who believes the birther or death panel crap.

It's also a sufficient term for those who think a bullying incident 50 years ago or how many years of tax returns Romney chooses to release is actually important especially given the fact that no candidate is required to release any tax returns and those who think everything in Romney's past is so important were not interested in anything about Obama's past four year's ago and still aren't Today.

Considering a big part of Romney's campaign is contingent on the idea that he's some kind of businessman when in reality he only raided and destroyed other companies and American jobs while pulling all kinds of financial corruption (which is what his tax records would show and why he's not releasing them) those tax records are relevant. You'd have to be brain dead to think otherwise or not see this for what it is.

What in Obama's past is in doubt?
First the companies that Romney and Bain took over were companies that were already failing some they could save some they could not those they could not save the people were going to lose there jobs anyway that's how our economic system works. As for your financial corruption claim that is your opinion not a fact and util you can provide something to justify the claim it is irrelevant and only a brain dead blind partisan would think otherwise. Lets look into a little bit of the Obama past reverend Wright first the media and the left did there best to downplay that what would the reaction be from the Obama follower's if Romney had a association with a minister who made some of the statements Wright did? Look at the grief he get's over just being a Mormon. Now Bill Ayres granted the connection between them is thin but if Romney had even a paper thin connection to someone like this the Obama backers would label him a radical right wing extremist again no concern over it from the media or Obama supporters. Lets go to drugs and alcohol Obama admits to using both drugs and alcohol a lot during college again not much interest from his backers or the media in fact they try and play that up as a great story of how he overcame his demons now lets go back to the Bush years and the story about a DUI he had and the fact for a time he was drinking pretty heavy that was not played up as a heroic story of someone who overcame their demons which he did but is played up as could he be trusted because of this there was also a accusation of Bush using cocaine never proven by the way the reaction from the left and the media should that disqualify him from being President we never heard anything like that over Obama's drug and alcohol use. Finally let's go to the college records Obama won't release and no one on the left or in the media is clamoring for they can go back 50 years to find the bullying incident I already mentioned but can find out nothing on the Obama college records why is that? My opinion and this is just that my opinion not a fact is that they will show the beginnings of Obama's far left ideology that I believe he still carries to this day and would damage the claims of Obama and his supporters that he is moderate.
 
Considering a big part of Romney's campaign is contingent on the idea that he's some kind of businessman when in reality he only raided and destroyed other companies and American jobs while pulling all kinds of financial corruption (which is what his tax records would show and why he's not releasing them) those tax records are relevant. You'd have to be brain dead to think otherwise or not see this for it is.

What in Obama's past is in doubt?

Again you're full of shit....several companies were helped by him, so which ones did he destroy and lets see the proof. It's funny how liberals can make accusations but cant back them up (harry reid for example)

And what in OBama's past is in doubt? uh his entire life is a mystery, and noone knows anything about him, lets see those school records....what could possibly be so bad about them.

I like how whenever people like you are confronted by facts you label the person as "DA LIBERALZZZZ" and then spin off into your typical brain dead lies and bullshit.

Ampad and GST Steel for two. Romney was a corporate raider in his private life. How is this even an argument?

Mitt Romney's Private Equity Nightmare - Businessweek
Mitt Romney, Bain Capital Targeted Over GST Steel Plant Closure In New Priorities USA Action Ad [UPDATE]

What would his school records prove? Oh I get it... you're still mad that you were wrong about the birther bullshit.

Staples. Romney. And Bain, Fabulous success story.

School records for Obama? Surely you jest.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top