Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Last week, Rachel Maddow on MSNBC had a couple of particularly good segments detailing what a shameless, pathological liar Mitt Romney is. Of course, lying is commonplace in American politics, but Romney takes it to a whole new level.
Maddow started off by showing several video clips of Romney on the campaign trail saying over and over "President Obama didn't start this recession, but he made it worse". Then Maddow showed another video clip of a reporter asking Romney why he keeps saying this, when the economy has improved substantially since Obama took office in January 2009, when hundreds of thousands of jobs were being lost each at the beginning of 2009.
Romney replied to the reporter, "I never said that Obama made the economy worse", after Maddow played several clips showing that's EXACTLY what Romney said!!
Maddow also showed a Romney ad in which an audio of Obama's voice is heard saying "if we talk about the economy, we lose the election". However, what the ad fails to explain is this -- Obama said this back in 2008, and OBAMA WAS QUOTING WHAT JOHN MCCAIN HAD SAID about the McCain/Palin campaign for President!! This is as pathetic and dishonest as it gets.
I'm convinced that Romney is a pathological liar and that he would be a particularly bad President, right up there with George W. Bush. The only constant about Etch-A-Scetch Man is that he feels lying is as necessary as breathing and eating. He is an absolute shameless fraud.
Thank God Romney has virtually no chance of defeating Obama.
I dont think even my fellow conservatives would contest that Romney is an opportunistic liar. In other words, congratulations, youve found common ground. I don't suppose you would say the same thing about Obama?
A vote for the idiot obamaturd is a vote for socialism. As bad as I dislike Romney, he is still better than obamaturd.Only in the mind of someone that thinks government should be more like a business.
Not sure Obama is willing to stop at socialism. But hopefully we will never find out.
And that would be a step up from Obama.
Only in the mind of someone that thinks government should be more like a business.
What exactly do you have against running a government efficiently and keeping spending below revenues?
Just provide an example or two of Obama shamelessly lying like Romney. That's all I ask.
Too bad none of the dishonest Repug assholes on this board have been able to provide an example yet. That says a lot more about you all than it does about me.
Liberal hack nonsense.Last week, Rachel Maddow on MSNBC had a couple of particularly good segments detailing what a shameless, pathological liar Mitt Romney is. Of course, lying is commonplace in American politics, but Romney takes it to a whole new level.
Maddow started off by showing several video clips of Romney on the campaign trail saying over and over "President Obama didn't start this recession, but he made it worse". Then Maddow showed another video clip of a reporter asking Romney why he keeps saying this, when the economy has improved substantially since Obama took office in January 2009, when hundreds of thousands of jobs were being lost each at the beginning of 2009.
Romney replied to the reporter, "I never said that Obama made the economy worse", after Maddow played several clips showing that's EXACTLY what Romney said!!
Maddow also showed a Romney ad in which an audio of Obama's voice is heard saying "if we talk about the economy, we lose the election". However, what the ad fails to explain is this -- Obama said this back in 2008, and OBAMA WAS QUOTING WHAT JOHN MCCAIN HAD SAID about the McCain/Palin campaign for President!! This is as pathetic and dishonest as it gets.
I'm convinced that Romney is a pathological liar and that he would be a particularly bad President, right up there with George W. Bush. The only constant about Etch-A-Scetch Man is that he feels lying is as necessary as breathing and eating. He is an absolute shameless fraud.
Thank God Romney has virtually no chance of defeating Obama.
Liberal hack nonsense.Last week, Rachel Maddow on MSNBC had a couple of particularly good segments detailing what a shameless, pathological liar Mitt Romney is. Of course, lying is commonplace in American politics, but Romney takes it to a whole new level.
Maddow started off by showing several video clips of Romney on the campaign trail saying over and over "President Obama didn't start this recession, but he made it worse". Then Maddow showed another video clip of a reporter asking Romney why he keeps saying this, when the economy has improved substantially since Obama took office in January 2009, when hundreds of thousands of jobs were being lost each at the beginning of 2009.
Romney replied to the reporter, "I never said that Obama made the economy worse", after Maddow played several clips showing that's EXACTLY what Romney said!!
Maddow also showed a Romney ad in which an audio of Obama's voice is heard saying "if we talk about the economy, we lose the election". However, what the ad fails to explain is this -- Obama said this back in 2008, and OBAMA WAS QUOTING WHAT JOHN MCCAIN HAD SAID about the McCain/Palin campaign for President!! This is as pathetic and dishonest as it gets.
I'm convinced that Romney is a pathological liar and that he would be a particularly bad President, right up there with George W. Bush. The only constant about Etch-A-Scetch Man is that he feels lying is as necessary as breathing and eating. He is an absolute shameless fraud.
Thank God Romney has virtually no chance of defeating Obama.
Rachel Maddow..She is a flaming lib with a pro Obama agenda. NO credibility whatsoever and the tiny audience to prove it.
Nobody watches her program.
This is real funny. While on the Howard Stern show Weds morning she was discussing tv ratings. She admitted that Sean Hannity's show which is up against hers gets far better ratings. Her spin on that was that "cartoon network beats all cable news shows."...
Irrelevant in that adults are not the demographic for Sponge Bob.
Nice try Rachel. But that analogy is a loser.
Only in the mind of someone that thinks government should be more like a business.
What exactly do you have against running a government efficiently and keeping spending below revenues?
The ONLY time you care about this is when Democrats are in power.
When Bush was President he doubled the national debt -- he increased the national debt more than the PREVIOUS 42 PRESIDENTS COMBINED. And I seriously doubt you gave a fuck, because you are an intellectually dishonest tea bagger piece of shit.
Kerry won the 2004 election. The exit polls indicated that he won and even Fox News announced on election night at 8 pm that Kerry was going to win, if the exit polls were correct. And there has NEVER been a SHRED of evidence that the exit polls were wrong. The election was stolen from Kerry, especially in the rural counties of Ohio, where at least 80,000 votes were switched from Kerry to Bush.
Yep. Not a single shred of evidence that the exit polls were wrong, you know, except the ACTUAL VOTE.
But clearly we should ignore the actual voting results because you're unhappy with reality.
Easier to deny that the sun is shining in at noon day than to accept you were wrong about something that happened almost 8 years ago.
Seriously, how pathetic is it to continually lie to yourself despite reality?
You're comparing Rhodes scholar, Stanford graduate, and Oxford Phd Rachel Maddow to a dishonest, racist, college dropout like Hannity. Bravo, dipshit.
If Maddow can't be believed, then provide an example or two of when she has been incorrect in the past. If you can't, then kindly shut the fuck up.
Not only are you fucking stupid, but you're intellectually lazy and your false equivalency bullshit proves it.
Yep, I'm vulgar as hell and I hate you Repug mother fuckers....but I am smarter than you, nonetheless.
Yes. How dare he compare two pundits. The audacity of him to compare two people who have essentially the same exact profession. Where on earth does he get off doing that?
Do you have the intellectual capacity to write a single post that isn't merely you swearing about how stupid everyone but you is?
A vote for the idiot obamaturd is a vote for socialism. As bad as I dislike Romney, he is still better than obamaturd.
Not sure Obama is willing to stop at socialism. But hopefully we will never find out.
Half of all Americans now express unfavorable views of Mitt Romney, a new high for the GOP presidential hopeful in Washington Post-ABC News polling.
Romneys negative numbers have jumped around this election cycle, but the overall pattern is similar to his trajectory four years ago: As he became better known, his unfavorables shot up far more rapidly than his positive numbers. Negative impressions are up eight percentage points in the past week, nudging past the previous high, which occurred about the time Romney suffered a big loss in the South Carolina primary.
In the new poll, 50 percent of all adults and 52 percent of registered voters express unfavorable opinions of Romney, both higher than Obama has received in Post-ABC polling as far back as late 2006.
The biggest difference between Romney and Obama is on the other side of the ledger: 53 percent of Americans hold favorable views of the president; for Romney, that number slides to 34 percent.
In the new poll, Romney is underwater with independents: 35 percent view him favorably, 52 percent unfavorably.
Independents are more evenly divided on the president 50 percent favorable, 46 percent unfavorable, about where theyve been in recent polls.
Only in the mind of someone that thinks government should be more like a business.
What exactly do you have against running a government efficiently and keeping spending below revenues?
The ONLY time you care about this is when Democrats are in power.
When Bush was President he doubled the national debt -- he increased the national debt more than the PREVIOUS 42 PRESIDENTS COMBINED. And I seriously doubt you gave a fuck, because you are an intellectually dishonest tea bagger piece of shit.
A vote for the idiot obamaturd is a vote for socialism. As bad as I dislike Romney, he is still better than obamaturd.
Not sure Obama is willing to stop at socialism. But hopefully we will never find out.
Half of all Americans now express unfavorable views of Mitt Romney, a new high for the GOP presidential hopeful in Washington Post-ABC News polling.
Romneys negative numbers have jumped around this election cycle, but the overall pattern is similar to his trajectory four years ago: As he became better known, his unfavorables shot up far more rapidly than his positive numbers. Negative impressions are up eight percentage points in the past week, nudging past the previous high, which occurred about the time Romney suffered a big loss in the South Carolina primary.
In the new poll, 50 percent of all adults and 52 percent of registered voters express unfavorable opinions of Romney, both higher than Obama has received in Post-ABC polling as far back as late 2006.
The biggest difference between Romney and Obama is on the other side of the ledger: 53 percent of Americans hold favorable views of the president; for Romney, that number slides to 34 percent.
In the new poll, Romney is underwater with independents: 35 percent view him favorably, 52 percent unfavorably.
Independents are more evenly divided on the president 50 percent favorable, 46 percent unfavorable, about where theyve been in recent polls.
You're comparing Rhodes scholar, Stanford graduate, and Oxford Phd Rachel Maddow to a dishonest, racist, college dropout like Hannity. Bravo, dipshit.
If Maddow can't be believed, then provide an example or two of when she has been incorrect in the past. If you can't, then kindly shut the fuck up.
Not only are you fucking stupid, but you're intellectually lazy and your false equivalency bullshit proves it.
Yep, I'm vulgar as hell and I hate you Repug mother fuckers....but I am smarter than you, nonetheless.
Yes. How dare he compare two pundits. The audacity of him to compare two people who have essentially the same exact profession. Where on earth does he get off doing that?
Do you have the intellectual capacity to write a single post that isn't merely you swearing about how stupid everyone but you is?
Well, lightweight, I offer the same challenge to you that I offered to snakedick -- provide an example or two of where Maddow has been wrong in the past or shut the fuck up.
I, on the other hand, can provide dozens of examples of falsehoods that the dickhead Hannity has stated. However, your unremarkable lazy ass will have to provide examples first.
Just because God told you Maddow isn't telling the truth doesn't make it so, you stupid fucking Jesus freak.
Just like your idiotic belief that tax cuts for the rich creates jobs doesn't make it so, you stupid fucking Jesus freak. If that were true, the economy would be kicking ass right now after 8 years of Bush's tax cuts and its not. But don't let facts get in the way of your delusions, idiot fucking tea bagger.
The fewer LIBERAL voters like him.Not sure Obama is willing to stop at socialism. But hopefully we will never find out.
Half of all Americans now express unfavorable views of Mitt Romney, a new high for the GOP presidential hopeful in Washington Post-ABC News polling.
Romneys negative numbers have jumped around this election cycle, but the overall pattern is similar to his trajectory four years ago: As he became better known, his unfavorables shot up far more rapidly than his positive numbers. Negative impressions are up eight percentage points in the past week, nudging past the previous high, which occurred about the time Romney suffered a big loss in the South Carolina primary.
In the new poll, 50 percent of all adults and 52 percent of registered voters express unfavorable opinions of Romney, both higher than Obama has received in Post-ABC polling as far back as late 2006.
The biggest difference between Romney and Obama is on the other side of the ledger: 53 percent of Americans hold favorable views of the president; for Romney, that number slides to 34 percent.
In the new poll, Romney is underwater with independents: 35 percent view him favorably, 52 percent unfavorably.
Independents are more evenly divided on the president 50 percent favorable, 46 percent unfavorable, about where theyve been in recent polls.
The bottom line is that the more voters get to know Romney, the less they like him. This is a major reason why he has no chance of defeating Obama.
Ahh yes. Your irrational hatred of all things and all people not liberal is noted.A vote for the idiot obamaturd is a vote for socialism. As bad as I dislike Romney, he is still better than obamaturd.Only in the mind of someone that thinks government should be more like a business.
Yes, of course you are a correct, unsophisticated white trash tea bagger dumb fuck -- President Obama, who received more money from Wall Street than any candidate in HISTORY, is a socialist.That's some astute analysis, lightweight.
Did I mention that you are an unsophisticated white trash tea bagger dumb fuck?? Well, that goes without saying.
You couldn't kick your way out of a wet paper bag even if we spotted you the open end.Obamaturd fits your description to a tee. Who cares what that idiot maddow says.Last week, Rachel Maddow on MSNBC had a couple of particularly good segments detailing what a shameless, pathological liar Mitt Romney is. Of course, lying is commonplace in American politics, but Romney takes it to a whole new level.
Maddow started off by showing several video clips of Romney on the campaign trail saying over and over "President Obama didn't start this recession, but he made it worse". Then Maddow showed another video clip of a reporter asking Romney why he keeps saying this, when the economy has improved substantially since Obama took office in January 2009, when hundreds of thousands of jobs were being lost each at the beginning of 2009.
Romney replied to the reporter, "I never said that Obama made the economy worse", after Maddow played several clips showing that's EXACTLY what Romney said!!
Maddow also showed a Romney ad in which an audio of Obama's voice is heard saying "if we talk about the economy, we lose the election". However, what the ad fails to explain is this -- Obama said this back in 2008, and OBAMA WAS QUOTING WHAT JOHN MCCAIN HAD SAID about the McCain/Palin campaign for President!! This is as pathetic and dishonest as it gets.
I'm convinced that Romney is a pathological liar and that he would be a particularly bad President, right up there with George W. Bush. The only constant about Etch-A-Scetch Man is that he feels lying is as necessary as breathing and eating. He is an absolute shameless fraud.
Thank God Romney has virtually no chance of defeating Obama.
Sigh....another unsophiticated tea bagger lightweight who can provide no examples of Obama lying. This is too easy.
Maddow didn't say anything, dumb fuck...she just showed the video clips indicating what a shameless, pathological liar Romney is.
It's really quite sad how one liberal like myself kicks the living shit out of all you tea bagger fuckholes.
And that would be a step up from Obama.
Only in the mind of someone that thinks government should be more like a business.
Exit polls? Yer kidding, correct?The lefty k00ks prognosticate from here from a position of fAiL. Bottom line for those who have more than a political IQ of a small soap dish is that a sitting president under 50% approval gets schooled in the general for the last 60 years. Why? Because all the undecideds go for the challenger. Fact is, these days, everybody knows a handful of people who voted Obama in 2008 and say they'll vote for Romney. Do the math.........thats all that matters.
Only the nutters think $5.00 gas is a winning hand.
Anyone who thinks 1) that gas will still be $5.00 in November or 2) people are going to vote on the basis of that alone.
I don't know any Obama voters who are chomping at the bit to vote for Romney. I know a LOT of McCain voters who won't vote for Romney. I know I won't.
History shows that the undecideds usually go to the incumbant. The last two incumbants who lost only lost because third party challengers drained away the independent vote.
Furthermore, Americans almost NEVER turn out a party after it's only been in the presidency for four years. The last time it happened was in 1980. The last time it happened before that was 1888, and even that was a bit dicey because there's a question of who actually won that election.
Usually, when the electorate is made enough to toss out an incumbant (Bush-41, Ford, Taft, Hoover) it's because his party has been in charge a good long time.
The other thing to consider is demographics. The GOP was dominant from 1968, when white middle class America shifted the GOP after the hippies took over the Democrats. And they stayed dominant, winning 5 of the 6 elections held between 1968-88. The only one the Democrats won in that time period was 1976 - barely - after an unelected president not wanted by his own party pardoned the previous president who had resigned in disgrace. And Carter ONLY beat Ford 51-49.
Then minorities became a larger slice of the electorate and the middle class whites started shifting back to the Democrats. Democrats won the popular vote from 1992-2008 four out of five times. Of course, we all know what happened in 2000, where we discovered, yeah, that archaic system from the 18th century allowed a loser to win.
The only one the GOP won outright in that period was 2004. That was an incumbant during a war, with a weak challenger,and again, he only won 51-49%.
The GOP can't rely on just Obama's unpopularity. They have to acheive a major demogrpahic shift to win. And Romney ain't the guy to pull that off.
The only one the GOP won outright in that period was 2004. That was an incumbant during a war, with a weak challenger,and again, he only won 51-49%.
Kerry won the 2004 election. The exit polls indicated that he won and even Fox News announced on election night at 8 pm that Kerry was going to win, if the exit polls were correct. And there has NEVER been a SHRED of evidence that the exit polls were wrong. The election was stolen from Kerry, especially in the rural counties of Ohio, where at least 80,000 votes were switched from Kerry to Bush.
Read Was the 2004 Presidential Election Stolen? by MIT Professor Steve Freeman. It most certainly was.
And the Nazi Repug Party is going to attempt to steal this election too, with the same typical voter suppression tactics that they've been using extensively for the past 12 years, such as these ridiculous picture ID requirements that they're trying to implement nationwide.
The simple fact is the Repug Party hasn't one the popular vote for a Presidential election since 1988. That's a long fucking time. Most Americans simply don't agree with their fucked-up beliefs. The only way the Repugs will when this election is if they steal it through voter suppression.
Nice display of the liberal intellect you post a long drawn out post that is nothing but talking points and insults and when it is pointed out your response is more insults if you want to have a real debate try posting something worthy of a debate if your capable of it which I doubt. As the saying goes those who can debate do those who can't insult have a nice day.Oh well...and you're a white trash tea bagger dumb fuck incapable of having a real debate.
So nobody's perfect.
Retard, there are several videos showing Romney saying "Obama didn't start the recession, but he made it worse" and then there is another video that shows Romney denied saying this.
What more evidence do you want of Romney being a liar, lightweight???
Take your disingenuous tea bagger bullshit and shove it up your ass, pussy.
