RykerWrite
RykerWrite
I dont know who will win in Iowa
The polls seem to confirm that there is a lot of anti-Mitt feeling out there. Each of the leaders has been a new not Romney candidate who would be replaced by another not Romney candidate.
If Romney wins in Iowa (a distinct possibility) and then in NH strong probability), he will have strong momentum moving toward Michigan (Romney land) and beyond.
This suggests to me that as next Tuesday approaches, the not Romney people will coalesque around one man. That is the 75% of the people who dont like Romney will abandon their favorite to rally around candidate that can beat him in Iowa the 3rd.
I expect that there will be a sharp drop in support for Santorum, and Bauchman ect. and a surge in support for Paul and Gingrich.
Paul will talk to the Amadinajad in Iran while they are delivering nukes to our cities. They can do it from Mexico with trucks. He wants Israel to get out of their own country. I expect that most Americans will perceive that Ron Pauls elevator does not always go all of the way to the top.
Mitt is more level headed, but his religion concerns many evangelicals. His religion started with a man who came up with a lot of special doctrines which are contrary to the Bible. Hence, in many minds, his religion is a cult and is anathema to many Christians.
The Mormon religion gave up on polygamy in 1890 for expedience sake. That was the only way that Utah could become a state. Marriage meant one man, one woman in America then. Times have changed. Our great nation has become increasingly hedonistic. 53% of Americans now think that gay marriage is copacetic. Marriage is no longer one man, one woman.
One man, one woman has not been challenged in the supreme court yet, but a Muslim man or a fringe Mormon group could challenge it.
SO I ASK YOU:
If the Supreme Court decided that marriage was no longer defined as one man, one woman;
If the Mormon religion got another revelation that bigamy was acceptable;
WOULD YOU WANT A MORMON TO BE IN THE WHITE HOUSE AT THAT TIME.
The polls seem to confirm that there is a lot of anti-Mitt feeling out there. Each of the leaders has been a new not Romney candidate who would be replaced by another not Romney candidate.
If Romney wins in Iowa (a distinct possibility) and then in NH strong probability), he will have strong momentum moving toward Michigan (Romney land) and beyond.
This suggests to me that as next Tuesday approaches, the not Romney people will coalesque around one man. That is the 75% of the people who dont like Romney will abandon their favorite to rally around candidate that can beat him in Iowa the 3rd.
I expect that there will be a sharp drop in support for Santorum, and Bauchman ect. and a surge in support for Paul and Gingrich.
Paul will talk to the Amadinajad in Iran while they are delivering nukes to our cities. They can do it from Mexico with trucks. He wants Israel to get out of their own country. I expect that most Americans will perceive that Ron Pauls elevator does not always go all of the way to the top.
Mitt is more level headed, but his religion concerns many evangelicals. His religion started with a man who came up with a lot of special doctrines which are contrary to the Bible. Hence, in many minds, his religion is a cult and is anathema to many Christians.
The Mormon religion gave up on polygamy in 1890 for expedience sake. That was the only way that Utah could become a state. Marriage meant one man, one woman in America then. Times have changed. Our great nation has become increasingly hedonistic. 53% of Americans now think that gay marriage is copacetic. Marriage is no longer one man, one woman.
One man, one woman has not been challenged in the supreme court yet, but a Muslim man or a fringe Mormon group could challenge it.
SO I ASK YOU:
If the Supreme Court decided that marriage was no longer defined as one man, one woman;
If the Mormon religion got another revelation that bigamy was acceptable;
WOULD YOU WANT A MORMON TO BE IN THE WHITE HOUSE AT THAT TIME.
