Milk, it does the body good?? really?

deorro 1

Senior Member
Aug 22, 2019
454
18
51
1 Peter 2:2 "as newborn babes, desire the pure milk of the word, that you may grow thereby,"


is this true? That milk is good? That milk is 'good' enough to be sought after? As in, run to the nearest grocery store and drink at least 1 glass of 'milk' a day? Because after all, 'milk, it does the body good', right?


Well, maybe back in the times(s) when The Epistle of 1 Peter was written, maybe, milk might have been 'that' good but today the composition of 'milk' has changed. The 'milk' purchased then is not the same 'milk' available today.


Homogeneous milk,, unadulterated.. haha.. non adulterous... haha...

Maybe that's where the word 'homogeneous' came from... 'homo', as in one/same/of the same/...


So, homogeneous milk.... Milk that has not been adultered ....


If you really look at it, is this statement true? Is today's 'milk', unadulterated?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
The same applies for societal views of what is and what is not 'good'.


One society says that to 'ask' is better than not to ask...
Another says that to ask is absolutely wrong. That things should not need to be 'asked' for.


In the first case, if a person 'forgot' to ask for a particular 'thing', then although all the others could have been wonderully 'provided' for, because they forgot to 'ask' for a certain 'hidden' disease, which they knew of, to be 'fixed', they ended up falling by the wayside because they 'forgot' to ask for that healing.


In the second case, if a person has a certain 'hidden' disease, that they know of, because they believe to 'ask' is wrongful, they never ask for it to be healed.


Although not for every small thing 'asking' should be needed 'asking', in general, should also not be seen as unnecessary..
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
adulterated... almost completely adultered.

adultered... having become adultered..

adulterated... having become completely 'adultered'.



polluted... having becoming polluted.

having almost or having becoming completely polluted... adulterated.



adulterated.... being 'in the state' of....

adultered... being in the 'process' of.

adulterated... 'adultered-ness' having been committed in its 'past'.



lawless-ness.... being in the 'process' of becoming ...lawless.... or having been (made) lawless....'lawlessed'....
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
homogeneous

- of the same kind; alike.

- consisting of parts all of the same kind.

  • Mathematics
    - containing terms all of the same degree.
early 17th century (as homogeneity): from medieval Latin homogeneus, from Greek homogenēs, from homos ‘same’ + genos ‘race, kind’.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjy6uKNl6fkAhWTHjQIHbKuByAQvecEMAB6BAgAEC4&url=http://english.oxforddictionaries.com/homogeneous&usg=AOvVaw10Gc1NANYkZx6Xjdclv5wf


(what is Lexico... Powered by Oxford)?

Oh, I see.... homogeneous 'milk' is more mathematical than homogenous?


Oxford

  1. A city in Oxfordshire, England, famous for its university.
  2. Oxford University.
  3. An English habitational surname derived from the city in England.
  4. A city in Mississippi; the county seat of Lafayette County; named for the city in England.
  5. A city in Ohio.
  6. A city in Alabama.
  7. A town in Massachusetts.
  8. A town in Connecticut; named for the city in England.
  9. A town in North Carolina; the county seat of Granville County.
  10. A borough of Pennsylvania.
  11. A town in Maine; named for the city in England.
  12. A town and village in New York; named for the town in Massachusetts.
  13. A village in Michigan.
  14. A neighborhood of Edmonton, Alberta.
  15. A city in Georgia, United States; named for the university.
  16. A town in Nova Scotia.
  17. A town in Indiana.
  18. A CDP in New Jersey.
  19. A city in Kansas.
  20. A city in Iowa; named for its township, itself named for the town in New York.
  21. A village in Nebraska.
  22. A city in Arkansas.
  23. A town in Maryland.
  24. A town and village in Wisconsin.
  25. A city in Idaho.
  26. A settlement on Saint Croix, in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
  27. An unincorporated community in Colorado.
  28. An unincorporated community in Florida.
  29. An unincorporated community in Kentucky.
  30. An unincorporated community in West Virginia.

    Oxford - Wiktionary

220px-Wingoxford.jpg


An Oxford shoe



9_l.jpg



cov-2-768x408.jpg




Look at the 'Chef' 'eyeing' the Prime Minister of Japan..






5abac8ee8c43961e008b4864-750-563.jpg




Dang it! he keeps saying... Stop accusing me, already.... Geesh!





And so... as life continued and when The Prime Minister of Japan finally was released from the accusation, everyone began to wonder how the 'eyeing' was made possible?


Ties between Japan and The United States of America began to be seen in a new light.. As Japan was known for being one of the 'fathers' of/to modern technology, they began to regain their lead in advancing 'technology' into its future; correctly, which had been handed to other 'leaders', yet, mistakenly.


And for those that constantly made writing errors, yet non intentionally, Grammarly, with its software homogeneouity of the English vocabulary began to be used by many who had a desire to use the English Language properly..


grammarly.png
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
Minds began seeking.. 'Why would such a thing happen'? Why and why Japan of all places, IF, it was accused that Japan had a part in this whole world wide 'aghastation'. The world, for a few days, was aghast... Although Afghanistan had a foothold within the technological sectors, namely laptops and programmings to such 'home' computers, surely this was not a competition between any and Afghanistan.. Afghanistan, although having their inner paradigm problems of their own, surely, they would not seek to add more burden to their already heavy load, would they? Surely not... Who does?

So still, what could it have been? Who and the pointing of finger was no longer seen as necessary. The minds had moved onward from playing the 'pointing, laughing, scoffing' and 'blame' game.

The Christ Messiah had already been taken down from the Cross. Christ Messiah had already been buried in the tomb by (J)oseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus. Life moved onward.. Those past ways of having 'self-worth' had almost become 'barbaric' even when compared to supposedly prehistoric 'cavemen'..

And so.. 'why', these civil minds began to preponder.. Why of all, a return to those barbaric ways?? Why??


After all, is not civility in much higher standards than 'those times'??


preponderance:
the quality of being greater in weight, force, influence
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
And one began to take a closer look...

X supposedly always marked the spot...

The two cup flags, which was seen as the table center piece, perhaps thrown into a coffee cup, for such an important fine cooked dinner, did truly form an 'X'.

And if X supposedly always marked the spot, what did that 'X' on that table have to reveal?


Personally, I don't necessary subscribe to Feng shui type logic and myth. Personally I do not.. but many time, I truly cannot explain why the sun always seems to rise from a certain given direction.. Although I do not believe in such 'atmospherical' realities, I still cannot explain why certain atmospheric realities occur...



And herein was the question...

The United States of America Flag had 'ways' to identify the trueness of the flag.. In other words, the flag had measurements to which to identify its trueness.. inches wide, versus inches high, etc... was like a fine measured 'piece' that needed precision, almost that of an engineer's.

Yet the Star of David... That flag that was part of that X on that table... Did/does that Star of David have the same type(s) of measurement(s) which differentiates between the 'real' and the 'false'???



Perhaps its true measurements was that all lines were/is/are of equal value.
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
And perhaps, it was from this 'equality', that Leonardo daVinci received knowledge on the sphere of man...

image.jpg




this being untrue... why??


Man is not created from Woman but man, now, comes from woman.​
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
And because there has never been a perfect Man since the first, this sphere can only apply to other 'things', Perfect. And that is what The Star of David was to have pointed to... The ONE, who this 'Star' IS of, not of David, but of The ONE of Y'srael. The HOLY ONE.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
You see, when another supports any idea and even with 'evidences', that the idea is 'true', it is easier to receive those types of support than to receive criticisms against your ideas. And when computer graphics and models provide for those 'ideas/thoughts' to be supported, that person has found a 'friend'. One who is supportive to his or her ideas or thoughts that he or she can mentally grasp or/and even design perfection.

And that is what computers and their abilities can offer... That support which is seen, which is graphic, which can even become a reality. Yet these sorts of 'support' is not true either.. Because although in measurements it could offer support to those theories, seeing that there has been and there will be Perfection, that computer, those graphics cannot provide those measurements of those 'things' 'within' that outward perfection..

So the outwardly can and might be abled to be 'designed' but what might the computer say about how the 'inwardly', in its perfection, IS?



And most surely if anyone, believing themselves as 'perfect', walks in their 'perfection' without having concern to others' imperfections, then surely, that 'outlook' can be seen and received as very 'perfectly irritating'.



That outward perfection going against that inner perfection within that very person...


To err, is to be human.


To err, is to be human... But what of other lifes? To err,... would that also apply to the other lifes? That to err, for each of the other life groups, would be, to be who or what, they are?


err:
be mistaken or incorrect; make a mistake.
fail to adhere to the proper or accepted standards; do wrong.

and once again.. from Oxford... (reference given above)...




So maybe for the others, the other lifes, for them to 'suffer' is not in their sphere of who or what they are; seeing that suffering usually comes from 'error'.


And herein comes the reasoning... 'But IF God made me perfect, in His image', then surely.... etc....

Yet God made only 1 perfect in the very beginning. Namely the first man, Adam. All others that proceeded was not created exactly as Adam had been. We are not perfectly created as Adam had been.


And although God had made Adam perfect, his inwards also being perfectly made, Adam did not remain within that perfection? Why? In my opinion because of his need for a help meet. And so Adam became imperfect when The LORD God fashioned 'Woman' from one of the ribs 'taken' from the 'perfect' Adam.

Had Adam remained 'Perfect', there would never have been any living soul to become after, that was of Man, unless all were created, 'perfect' as Adam had been, and hence.. 'If God made me perfect, then why...' shows to be wrongfully thought. That idea, question, is a wrong beginning.

We are not made perfect.
 
Last edited:
And perhaps, it was from this 'equality', that Leonardo daVinci received knowledge on the sphere of man...

image.jpg




this being untrue... why??


Man is not created from Woman but man, now, comes from woman.​

Jesus created a woman and she gave birth to him
 
So.. mankind... Civility and order.. Add to that, Leaders' 'jokes' amongst themselves with Dessert filled Oxford's?


Even those with a little is 'better' than they, right?


And as King David was 'moved' by God to write:

Psalm 37:16 "A little that a righteous man hath is better than the riches of many wicked."


why?


Proverbs 16:8 "Better is a little with righteousness than great revenues without right."




So rather viewing the picture only as 'wickedness' or 'wrong doing', looking at the picture as how easily a wrongful 'thing' can be done should also be what is received...


After all, a painting is worth a 1000 words...

"A picture is worth a thousand words" is an English language adage. It refers to the notion that some complex ideas can be conveyed with just a single picture, this picture conveys its meaning or essence more effectively than a description does.

In March 1911, the Syracuse Advertising Men's Club held a banquet to discuss journalism and publicity. In an article on The Post-Standard covering this event, the author quoted Arthur Brisbane as saying: "Use a picture. It's worth a thousand words." [1]

A similar phrase, "One Look Is Worth A Thousand Words", appears in a 1913 newspaper advertisement for the Piqua Auto Supply House of Piqua, Ohio.[2]

Early use of the exact phrase appears in a 1918 newspaper advertisement for the San Antonio Light, which says:

One of the Nation's Greatest Editors Says:

One Picture is Worth a Thousand Words
The San Antonio Light's Pictorial Magazine of the War
Exemplifies the truth of the above statement—judging from the warm


the reception it has received at the hands of the Sunday Light readers.

A picture is worth a thousand words - Wikipedia



Un bon croquis vaut mieux qu'un long discours

Napoleon - Wikipedia

"A good sketch is better than a long speech"
 
Last edited:
7563. rasha

evil (1), evil man (1), evil men (1), guilty (3), man (1), offender (1), ungodly (1), wicked (228), wicked man (21), wicked men (2), wicked one (1), wicked ones (3).


but who in this world isn't, 'brash'?


And to think oneself as not, maybe they should consider if they are being 'rash'.

acting or tending to act too hastily or without due consideration.
characterized by or showing too great haste or lack of consideration:



guilty of sin, against either God or man, wicked:



And so yes, we all are in suffering, even when God IS Perfect and even though God IS Love, because we suffer from errors.

One of the main reasons why we live within this and why this occurs is because not all choose to have Them, The LORD and God and Christ Messiah, as Their Head, agreeably.
 
Last edited:
There was a pastor.. One day he was preparing to go to the local Church and begin preparing for the services which he was preparing the Church for. Although this was very customary, this time, however, he thought he heard a Word come from The Lord telling him to not attend to the matter. The pastor thought this was strange so he continued. Another Word was again given to the pastor.. even all the way up to the day the service was on. And surely, had he listened to the Word given, the pastor would have saved days of preparing.. because on that day, a great storm 'arrived', unannounced, even to the local weather watchers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top