Discussion in 'Military' started by jillian, Nov 4, 2006.
It's not gonna happen.....
I'm beginning to think, I should trade some of my stocks, with the people who make razor blades...........
OH... I agree it's not gonna happen. Bush is too ignorant and stubborn to listen to the people who know what they're talking about..... after all, he is the decider :halo:
Of course, it's also why his approval rating is so low he's only allowed to campaign in the most extremist strongholds. :crutch:
Well.....Sweetie....At least now, I hope your seeing the whole picture......
sorry if you Dems. don't want to come over and join......
But, you all have been the total divider, and your party can hardly be even close to being a United.....Even amongst yourselves.......
You all stand behind a dying party.....
But I will not let your unhinged, loony, leftist party come between me an My Country...
If you all could take back your party, the Democrats...
Not the progressives...
Not the Democratics.........
It was once your all proud name.
.But you all allowed them to change your name, and you've also allowed you proud party to be infiltrated, by a way leftist fringe group, and said nothing...
Now you all get to live with....or stand up and say No, no more....
I don't know.....
Maybe that's how you all like to be led around, by the nose ring.????
..You've been taken over by the radical left, and your not even fighting for you party to be taken back.........
Typical. Please tell me how editors equate to "military." Your thread title is just a bold-faced lie.
Bull.... try reading instead of getting your tail feathers in a knot...
from my link:
The people who know what they're doing are begging for a change... they, unlike the "stay the course" brigade, actually DO care about the troops and their well-being.
Now... if you can stop lying about how bad Rummy's doing, maybe there can be an actual dialogue on this subject.
I read the crap. It is the opinions of some editors, not "the military."
And the people who want change and are willing to vote Democrat in order to get it are STUPID. The Republicans may very well give us only half what we want. It's STILL a better deal than the Democrats giving us NONE of what we want.
There can be no actual dialogue of a political nature between you and I because you are so lost in the sauce of political partisanship and have proven yourself time and again incapable of getting anywhere near an unbiased and objective viewpoint.
Bush can campaign anywhere he damn well wants to, as long as he clears it with Rove.
Uhhhh, they don't.
It the timing that's irritating in this latest call for Rumsfeld's head. That same outfit has demanded that Rumsfeld resign before, they'll be ignored now as before.
Response to Army Times Editorial
Nov. 4, 2006
On Saturday, Nov. 4, the Army Times published an editorial titled, Time for Rumsfeld to go. The editorial included a number of inaccurate and misleading statements.
THE ADMINISTRATION HAS PROVIDED A BALANCED PICTURE: The Department has always attempted to clearly and accurately describe the challenges our forces face in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Secretary above all has always been very measured in describing the progress U.S forces are making in what will undoubtedly be a long struggle in the War on Terror.
CHALLENGE THOSE WHO CLAIM ADMINISTRATION OFFERED A ROSY SCENARIO: We challenge those who say the Secretary has ever painted a rosy picture to provide his quotes as well as the full context of those remarks.
THIS IS OLD NEWS MASKED AS NEW NEWS: The new chorus of criticism noted by the editorials is actually old news and does not include commanders in the field, who remain committed to the mission.
INSULTING MILITARY COMMANDERS: The assertion, without evidence, that senior military officers are toeing the line is an insult to their judgment and integrity.
IRAQIS ARE RISKING THEIR LIVES FOR THEIR COUNTRY: Iraqi security forces are making slow but measurable progress. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have made themselves and their families targets and put their lives at risk for their new country. They are increasingly taking the lead in operations. The disparagement of these forces is completely unfounded.
CHALLENGE POSED BY ENEMY IS TOUGH: As long as the enemy is determined to thwart a free and democratic Iraq the stability throughout the country will fluctuate. However, the security situation is not monolithic across the country. Many parts of Iraq are relatively peaceful.
WE WILL GIVE TROOPS WHAT THEY NEED TO WIN: This country and the leadership of the Defense Department are going to ensure that our military forces have the resources to successfully carry out their mission. To suggest otherwise is simply wrong. SPECIFIC CLAIMS REBUTTED:
You can read the rest at the site:
Self-serving garbage from Rummy's department? You having trouble figuring out, Steffie, that Rummy's been saying "all's well" for the past three years? He's been lying about that for three years, too.
Straight from the mouth of Richard Perle, the original neo-con.
Separate names with a comma.