Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
In fairness, it's probably much more likely that they really are just going to push a tax plan that raises the debt by $4.5 trillion.
You mean they wouldn't pull a George W. Bush all over again?
After George W. Bush pulled a Ronald Reagan?
Are you sure?
In vetoing an internal improvements bill in 1817, President Madison wrote that "the terms 'common defence and general welfare'" do not give "to Congress a general power of legislation instead of the defined and limited one hitherto understood to belong to them."
It's not exactly hard to figure out. You seem to be a person of very little quality and do not want to discuss politics or exchange ideas. You want to be a bully and name call and showoff that you know all of the bad words. You're really just a punk.
funny how people bitch about others calling names, and in the same sentence call people names.
dumb ass.
You know nothing about it. When I came on here I was polite to everybody. It was the right wing nuts that called me names and cussed at me. Because I'm a liberal. So you reep what you sew, buddy. Now I treat everybody accordingly. Jerk.
Yeah, the GOP cares about the middle class. Another case of them sucker punching their supporters.
Middle class could face higher taxes under Republican plan, analysis finds
The tax reform plan that House Republicans have advanced would sharply cut taxes for the wealthiest Americans and could leave middle-class households facing much larger tax bills, according to a new analysis set to be released Wednesday.
The report, prepared by Senate Democrats and reviewed by nonpartisan tax experts, marks the first attempt to quantify the trade-offs inherent in the GOP tax package, which would replace the current tax structure with two brackets 25 percent and 10 percent and cut the top rate from 35 percent.
Those changes would benefit virtually every taxpayer, but they also would reduce federal tax collections by about $4.5 trillion over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. To avoid increasing the national debt by that amount, GOP leaders such as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (Wis.) have pledged to get rid of all the special-interest loopholes and tax shelters that litter the code.
Republicans have declined to identify their targets. However, some of the biggest loopholes on the books are popular tax breaks for employer-provided health insurance, mortgage interest, state and local taxes, and retirement savings, which disproportionately benefit the upper middle class.
...
In fairness, it's probably much more likely that they really are just going to push a tax plan that raises the debt by $4.5 trillion.
funny how people bitch about others calling names, and in the same sentence call people names.
dumb ass.
You know nothing about it. When I came on here I was polite to everybody. It was the right wing nuts that called me names and cussed at me. Because I'm a liberal. So you reep what you sew, buddy. Now I treat everybody accordingly. Jerk.
I know enough to know that bitching about people who call names, in the same sentence YOU call someone names, is being hypocritical, dumb ass.
Yeah, the GOP cares about the middle class. Another case of them sucker punching their supporters.
Middle class could face higher taxes under Republican plan, analysis finds
The tax reform plan that House Republicans have advanced would sharply cut taxes for the wealthiest Americans and could leave middle-class households facing much larger tax bills, according to a new analysis set to be released Wednesday.
The report, prepared by Senate Democrats and reviewed by nonpartisan tax experts, marks the first attempt to quantify the trade-offs inherent in the GOP tax package, which would replace the current tax structure with two brackets 25 percent and 10 percent and cut the top rate from 35 percent.
Those changes would benefit virtually every taxpayer, but they also would reduce federal tax collections by about $4.5 trillion over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. To avoid increasing the national debt by that amount, GOP leaders such as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (Wis.) have pledged to get rid of all the special-interest loopholes and tax shelters that litter the code.
Republicans have declined to identify their targets. However, some of the biggest loopholes on the books are popular tax breaks for employer-provided health insurance, mortgage interest, state and local taxes, and retirement savings, which disproportionately benefit the upper middle class.
...
A red flag must go up when a story starts with "The report, prepared by Senate Democrats and reviewed by nonpartisan tax experts".
Non-partisan?
Ever hear of Jamie Gorelick?
You know, that lady that put up the wall between the CIA and the FBI making it harder to pass intel between agencies leading up to 9/11? Jamie Gorelick - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
She's on the board of trustees of the Urban Institute. The tax experts Democrats are claiming said the GOP plan was going to screw the Middle Class. Also Judy Woodruff sits on that board....a journalist at CNN an now PBS. Her monthly podcasts are featured on Bloomberg.com. Judy Woodruff - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Its largest contributors include the Ford Foundation, the Gates Foundation, Sen. Dianne Feinstein and her husband Richard C. Blum, Bank of America, ExxonMobil, Pew Charitable Trusts, the MacArthur Foundation, and the Carnegie Corporation.
Dianne Feinstein
Richard C. Blum, Feinstein's husband
Bill Gates
Jamie Gorelick
Judy Woodruff
The Ford Foundation
If these folks are non-partisan I'm Ike Turner.
You know nothing about it. When I came on here I was polite to everybody. It was the right wing nuts that called me names and cussed at me. Because I'm a liberal. So you reep what you sew, buddy. Now I treat everybody accordingly. Jerk.
I know enough to know that bitching about people who call names, in the same sentence YOU call someone names, is being hypocritical, dumb ass.
I don't care what you think, junior!!! Got it???
