Michelle Obama Hopes To Take Over Grocery Stores In Next Four Years…

Republican faux outrage; the real gift that keeps on giving.

candycorn-albums-triton-picture4731-gop-tears.jpg

Nothing "faux" about it. Usurpation of power is pretty much always cause for REAL outrage.

You'll still be able to purchase whatever you want. Our First Lady is susggesting healthier alternatives be offered in the supermarkets. In minds that decry such complications, this probably means Nazi Germany is alive in well. For most non-mouth breathers, it's just another "who cares" moment brought to us by republicans who have gone from being a once serious political party to people who largely can be dismissed as idiots.
 
Do you ever read the things you post TM?
Laura an her girlfriend went to the hospital to be treated for injuries.

Oh really , what were the injuries?

Oh bumps and bruises.


Not a head injury like Kennedy had huh?


it was a clear night and there were NO obstructions to veiwing the oncoming car.

Laura had a stop sign and the boy did not.


Rich white boy. Drunk. Kills woman in car, walks away, does not help get her out, lets her drown.Hits his head.
Rich Daddy, gets him off scott free.
Karma is a bitch.
Later dies of brain tumor.

Laura Bush,was not drinking or speeding,did not walk away from accident.It was a horrible accident.
No proof that it was done deliberately.
She is still alive and well.
If it was done deliberately, Karma will get her too, eventually.
 
Last edited:
Republican faux outrage; the real gift that keeps on giving.

candycorn-albums-triton-picture4731-gop-tears.jpg

Nothing "faux" about it. Usurpation of power is pretty much always cause for REAL outrage.

You'll still be able to purchase whatever you want. Our First Lady is susggesting healthier alternatives be offered in the supermarkets. In minds that decry such complications, this probably means Nazi Germany is alive in well. For most non-mouth breathers, it's just another "who cares" moment brought to us by republicans who have gone from being a once serious political party to people who largely can be dismissed as idiots.

"Suggesting" isn't the usual method of Democrats. Nobody's got a problem with "suggesting". What they do typically though is manipulate what they can legislatively and decree by fiat what they can't. There's ZERO federal authority for telling grocery stores what to stock and where to stock it. ANY mandate to do so would be tyrannous.
 
Nothing "faux" about it. Usurpation of power is pretty much always cause for REAL outrage.

You'll still be able to purchase whatever you want. Our First Lady is susggesting healthier alternatives be offered in the supermarkets. In minds that decry such complications, this probably means Nazi Germany is alive in well. For most non-mouth breathers, it's just another "who cares" moment brought to us by republicans who have gone from being a once serious political party to people who largely can be dismissed as idiots.

"Suggesting" isn't the usual method of Democrats. Nobody's got a problem with "suggesting". What they do typically though is manipulate what they can legislatively and decree by fiat what they can't. There's ZERO federal authority for telling grocery stores what to stock and where to stock it. ANY mandate to do so would be tyrannous.

Yes, I know...which is why you're whipping up your false tears for no reason. Save them for the "concern" you show for seniors, women, Hispanics, blacks, etc... Some fools may believe you then.
 
Nothing "faux" about it. Usurpation of power is pretty much always cause for REAL outrage.

You'll still be able to purchase whatever you want. Our First Lady is susggesting healthier alternatives be offered in the supermarkets. In minds that decry such complications, this probably means Nazi Germany is alive in well. For most non-mouth breathers, it's just another "who cares" moment brought to us by republicans who have gone from being a once serious political party to people who largely can be dismissed as idiots.

"Suggesting" isn't the usual method of Democrats. Nobody's got a problem with "suggesting". What they do typically though is manipulate what they can legislatively and decree by fiat what they can't. There's ZERO federal authority for telling grocery stores what to stock and where to stock it. ANY mandate to do so would be tyrannous.

And yet that's exactly what they want.

In a nutshell.
 
Let her worry about her and Oprah's big ole fat asses. Leave the People alone. They don't want her Food Nazi shite.
 
You'll still be able to purchase whatever you want. Our First Lady is susggesting healthier alternatives be offered in the supermarkets. In minds that decry such complications, this probably means Nazi Germany is alive in well. For most non-mouth breathers, it's just another "who cares" moment brought to us by republicans who have gone from being a once serious political party to people who largely can be dismissed as idiots.

"Suggesting" isn't the usual method of Democrats. Nobody's got a problem with "suggesting". What they do typically though is manipulate what they can legislatively and decree by fiat what they can't. There's ZERO federal authority for telling grocery stores what to stock and where to stock it. ANY mandate to do so would be tyrannous.

And yet that's exactly what they want.

In a nutshell.

Of course it is. The whole point of being a socialist is to macromanage the public by means of government in order to achieve whatever arbitrary collectivist goals the powers that be decide upon.
 
As a "hard core" liberal, when I read about the First Lady wanting to "impact the nature of food in grocery stores", I think of things like the labeling used in the UK or encouraging more locally grown produce.

Never do I even consider prohibiting the item, just educating on it.
 
Now what did the left do with this information?



What would you people be doing weith this information if it were Mrs Obama?


look into your hearts oh family first fake christains.


Your insides are showing

We'd be unsuccessfully searching the interwebs in search of any remaining references to the issue after it being scoured from all sites.
And then you're going to drag Christians into your rant as well? FFS TruthFuckingEscapesMe, ADD much?
 
As a "hard core" liberal, when I read about the First Lady wanting to "impact the nature of food in grocery stores", I think of things like the labeling used in the UK or encouraging more locally grown produce.

Never do I even consider prohibiting the item, just educating on it.

And as an intelligent human being I think of the biggest tax increase in American history being dumped on the nation under the guise of, "I'm gonna help y'all".
 
When government controls food you're in big fucking shit.

I suggest people start planting gardens and stashing livestock in their basements if they want to make it through any more Obama years.
 
The first lady works to improve nutrition and you people LIE and fake all kinds of bullshit into that.


Your last first lady killed a man with neglect and it was barely ever mentioned.


If it were Mrs Obama you people would be on it non stop.

we all know it

They don't want anyone telling them to eat healthy. It's obvious. Look how they didn't need any urging to rush to Chick-fil-A.
 
They won't be telling them to eat healthy.

They will be withholding food FROM them, and shutting down the industries that produce foods they don't approve of.
 

Forum List

Back
Top