Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Bachmann flubs Revolutionary War geography in NH - Yahoo! News
This isn't the first time she has had fucked up like this, first history and now geography, with a teabag in her hand. This is the shit that Repugs get when they select what they perceive to be beauty over brains, even though Bachmann is by no means a pretty woman to most people.
At least she has heart, her gaffe notwithstanding and she does the will of her Constituients and acknowleges her oath and adheres to it unlike many electeds on the left that ignore their oath and do what the hell they want to spite their oath.
ETA: And she doesn't see the Constitution as a damned nuscience, a wall that must be gotten around or destroyed...
Bachmann doesn't have a clue as to what is in the Constitution only what she wants it to say
Bachmann flubs Revolutionary War geography in NH - Yahoo! News
This isn't the first time she has had fucked up like this, first history and now geography, with a teabag in her hand. This is the shit that Repugs get when they select what they perceive to be beauty over brains, even though Bachmann is by no means a pretty woman to most people.
At least she has heart, her gaffe notwithstanding and she does the will of her Constituients and acknowleges her oath and adheres to it unlike many electeds on the left that ignore their oath and do what the hell they want to spite their oath.
ETA: And she doesn't see the Constitution as a damned nuscience, a wall that must be gotten around or destroyed...
Bachmann doesn't have a clue as to what is in the Constitution only what she wants it to say
At least she has heart, her gaffe notwithstanding and she does the will of her Constituients and acknowleges her oath and adheres to it unlike many electeds on the left that ignore their oath and do what the hell they want to spite their oath.
ETA: And she doesn't see the Constitution as a damned nuscience, a wall that must be gotten around or destroyed...
Bachmann doesn't have a clue as to what is in the Constitution only what she wants it to say
Bachmann kicked the left's ass in November. The Tea Party kicked your asses real good and real hard. You're still feeling it. It's just now sinking in. All the hollering and screaming because the Tea Party is doing exactly what they said they would do and that is why the American people voted for Bachmann and those like her. Cry me a river. All you pissants on the left are getting exactly what you deserve.
But, she is good looking and isn't that really all that matters?
AND what will curry favor w/ the tea partiers. She's an opportunist.Bachmann flubs Revolutionary War geography in NH - Yahoo! News
This isn't the first time she has had fucked up like this, first history and now geography, with a teabag in her hand. This is the shit that Repugs get when they select what they perceive to be beauty over brains, even though Bachmann is by no means a pretty woman to most people.
At least she has heart, her gaffe notwithstanding and she does the will of her Constituients and acknowleges her oath and adheres to it unlike many electeds on the left that ignore their oath and do what the hell they want to spite their oath.
ETA: And she doesn't see the Constitution as a damned nuscience, a wall that must be gotten around or destroyed...
Bachmann doesn't have a clue as to what is in the Constitution only what she wants it to say
At least she has heart, her gaffe notwithstanding and she does the will of her Constituients and acknowleges her oath and adheres to it unlike many electeds on the left that ignore their oath and do what the hell they want to spite their oath.
ETA: And she doesn't see the Constitution as a damned nuscience, a wall that must be gotten around or destroyed...
Bachmann doesn't have a clue as to what is in the Constitution only what she wants it to say
Right, because you can "read between the lines" and she can't. You find lots of things in the Constitution, the right to welfare, government redistribution of wealth, an abortion, confiscate and spend other people's money on earmarks and anything else Congress dreams up, ignore State rights and destroy individual freedoms. She doesn't realize like you do that just because they aren't enumerated in the Constitution doesn't mean they aren't in there, you can find them just fine. What's her problem? She only sees what she wants to see when she doesn't find these things in the Constitution where as you find what isn't in there because you don't just see what you want to like she does.
AND what will curry favor w/ the tea partiers. She's an opportunist.At least she has heart, her gaffe notwithstanding and she does the will of her Constituients and acknowleges her oath and adheres to it unlike many electeds on the left that ignore their oath and do what the hell they want to spite their oath.
ETA: And she doesn't see the Constitution as a damned nuscience, a wall that must be gotten around or destroyed...
Bachmann doesn't have a clue as to what is in the Constitution only what she wants it to say
Bachmann doesn't have a clue as to what is in the Constitution only what she wants it to say
Right, because you can "read between the lines" and she can't. You find lots of things in the Constitution, the right to welfare, government redistribution of wealth, an abortion, confiscate and spend other people's money on earmarks and anything else Congress dreams up, ignore State rights and destroy individual freedoms. She doesn't realize like you do that just because they aren't enumerated in the Constitution doesn't mean they aren't in there, you can find them just fine. What's her problem? She only sees what she wants to see when she doesn't find these things in the Constitution where as you find what isn't in there because you don't just see what you want to like she does.
If you have ever read the Constitution you would know there is not much there. The writers intended you to " read between the lines" within a broad framework of government roles and responsibilities. We have established a court system to define where those lines are
I thought Flaylo was leaving?
Bachmann doesn't have a clue as to what is in the Constitution only what she wants it to say
Right, because you can "read between the lines" and she can't. You find lots of things in the Constitution, the right to welfare, government redistribution of wealth, an abortion, confiscate and spend other people's money on earmarks and anything else Congress dreams up, ignore State rights and destroy individual freedoms. She doesn't realize like you do that just because they aren't enumerated in the Constitution doesn't mean they aren't in there, you can find them just fine. What's her problem? She only sees what she wants to see when she doesn't find these things in the Constitution where as you find what isn't in there because you don't just see what you want to like she does.
If you have ever read the Constitution you would know there is not much there. The writers intended you to " read between the lines" within a broad framework of government roles and responsibilities. We have established a court system to define where those lines are
Bachmann doesn't have a clue as to what is in the Constitution only what she wants it to say
Right, because you can "read between the lines" and she can't. You find lots of things in the Constitution, the right to welfare, government redistribution of wealth, an abortion, confiscate and spend other people's money on earmarks and anything else Congress dreams up, ignore State rights and destroy individual freedoms. She doesn't realize like you do that just because they aren't enumerated in the Constitution doesn't mean they aren't in there, you can find them just fine. What's her problem? She only sees what she wants to see when she doesn't find these things in the Constitution where as you find what isn't in there because you don't just see what you want to like she does.
If you have ever read the Constitution you would know there is not much there. The writers intended you to " read between the lines" within a broad framework of government roles and responsibilities. We have established a court system to define where those lines are
Right, because you can "read between the lines" and she can't. You find lots of things in the Constitution, the right to welfare, government redistribution of wealth, an abortion, confiscate and spend other people's money on earmarks and anything else Congress dreams up, ignore State rights and destroy individual freedoms. She doesn't realize like you do that just because they aren't enumerated in the Constitution doesn't mean they aren't in there, you can find them just fine. What's her problem? She only sees what she wants to see when she doesn't find these things in the Constitution where as you find what isn't in there because you don't just see what you want to like she does.
If you have ever read the Constitution you would know there is not much there. The writers intended you to " read between the lines" within a broad framework of government roles and responsibilities. We have established a court system to define where those lines are
Right winger's DUH moment. And guess why RW?
Brevity is the soul of WIT...
If you have ever read the Constitution you would know there is not much there. The writers intended you to " read between the lines" within a broad framework of government roles and responsibilities. We have established a court system to define where those lines are
Right winger's DUH moment. And guess why RW?
Brevity is the soul of WIT...
Right, because you can "read between the lines" and she can't. You find lots of things in the Constitution, the right to welfare, government redistribution of wealth, an abortion, confiscate and spend other people's money on earmarks and anything else Congress dreams up, ignore State rights and destroy individual freedoms. She doesn't realize like you do that just because they aren't enumerated in the Constitution doesn't mean they aren't in there, you can find them just fine. What's her problem? She only sees what she wants to see when she doesn't find these things in the Constitution where as you find what isn't in there because you don't just see what you want to like she does.
If you have ever read the Constitution you would know there is not much there. The writers intended you to " read between the lines" within a broad framework of government roles and responsibilities. We have established a court system to define where those lines are
Explained like a typical lefty who wants to tell us what the constitution says. No thanks. I am able to comprehend very well without any of the kind of help you offer.
Bachmann flubs Revolutionary War geography in NH - Yahoo! News
NASHUA, N.H. U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota stood before New Hampshire Republicans with a tea bag clutched in her hand Saturday, but her grasp on Revolutionary War geography wasn't quite as tight.
Before headlining a GOP fundraiser, the possible presidential hopeful told a group of students and conservative activists in Manchester, "You're the state where the shot was heard around the world in Lexington and Concord."
But those first shots of the Revolutionary War were fired in Massachusetts, not New Hampshire.
"So I misplaced the battles Concord and Lexington by saying they were in New Hampshire," Bachmann posted on her Facebook page later. "It was my mistake, Massachusetts is where they happened. New Hampshire is where they are still proud of it!"
Though Bachmann probably wasn't the first to confuse Concord, N.H., with Concord, Mass., her mistake was striking given her roots in the tea party movement, which takes its name from the dumping of tea into Boston Harbor by angry American colonists in December 1773, 16 months before the Battle of Lexington Green.
This isn't the first time she has had fucked up like this, first history and now geography, with a teabag in her hand. This is the shit that Repugs get when they select what they perceive to be beauty over brains, even though Bachmann is by no means a pretty woman to most people.
Bachmann flubs Revolutionary War geography in NH - Yahoo! News
NASHUA, N.H. U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota stood before New Hampshire Republicans with a tea bag clutched in her hand Saturday, but her grasp on Revolutionary War geography wasn't quite as tight.
Before headlining a GOP fundraiser, the possible presidential hopeful told a group of students and conservative activists in Manchester, "You're the state where the shot was heard around the world in Lexington and Concord."
But those first shots of the Revolutionary War were fired in Massachusetts, not New Hampshire.
"So I misplaced the battles Concord and Lexington by saying they were in New Hampshire," Bachmann posted on her Facebook page later. "It was my mistake, Massachusetts is where they happened. New Hampshire is where they are still proud of it!"
Though Bachmann probably wasn't the first to confuse Concord, N.H., with Concord, Mass., her mistake was striking given her roots in the tea party movement, which takes its name from the dumping of tea into Boston Harbor by angry American colonists in December 1773, 16 months before the Battle of Lexington Green.
This isn't the first time she has had fucked up like this, first history and now geography, with a teabag in her hand. This is the shit that Repugs get when they select what they perceive to be beauty over brains, even though Bachmann is by no means a pretty woman to most people.
Republicans hate education. 6%
