TheMoreYouKnow
Silver Member
- Dec 14, 2017
- 1,246
- 181
- 110
- Banned
- #1
President Donald Trumpās personal attorney Michael Cohen addressed the payment of $130,000 that went to former pornographic film star Stephanie Clifford (aka Stormy Daniels) in 2016. Cohen said that the payment to Clifford, who had claimed she had an affair with Trump soon after his wife Melania Trump gave birth to their son, came directly from him. In an apparent effort to show that the payment was legal, he made it clear that Trumpās campaign was not involved in the transaction. Ironically, however, Cohenās very explanation could land Trump in serious trouble, and possibly vulnerable to criminal charges.
āNeither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign was a party to the transaction with Ms. Clifford,ā Cohen told the New York Times, āand neither reimbursed me for the payment, either directly or indirectly.ā Cohen would not say what the payment was for, but other outlets have reported it was to prevent Clifford from speaking publicly about the alleged affair.
While Cohen was probably trying to put Trump in the clear by saying he had nothing to do with it, his very explanation paints a picture very similar to that of former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards.
Edwards faced charges after it was alleged that he accepted and tried to conceal hundreds of thousands of dollars that came from outside sources that were then used to cover up an affair he was having. Edwards was running for president at the time of the payments, and federal prosecutors claimed that the money should have been reported as campaign contributions. Such contributions also would have been in excess of the maximum amount allowed by individual donors, in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act.
more
https://lawandcrime.com/trump/micha...ave-just-left-trump-open-to-criminal-charges/
1...2...3...GO!
āNeither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign was a party to the transaction with Ms. Clifford,ā Cohen told the New York Times, āand neither reimbursed me for the payment, either directly or indirectly.ā Cohen would not say what the payment was for, but other outlets have reported it was to prevent Clifford from speaking publicly about the alleged affair.
While Cohen was probably trying to put Trump in the clear by saying he had nothing to do with it, his very explanation paints a picture very similar to that of former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards.
Edwards faced charges after it was alleged that he accepted and tried to conceal hundreds of thousands of dollars that came from outside sources that were then used to cover up an affair he was having. Edwards was running for president at the time of the payments, and federal prosecutors claimed that the money should have been reported as campaign contributions. Such contributions also would have been in excess of the maximum amount allowed by individual donors, in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act.
more
https://lawandcrime.com/trump/micha...ave-just-left-trump-open-to-criminal-charges/
1...2...3...GO!