Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Certainly changes the racial profiling and innocent kid narrative. This was predictable.You avoided the question. I have gotten into it as a teenager with Asian store owners that start shit with you so I know the type. Where does it show him robbing the store? Why is there no video?
Whether Brown robbed the store or not has absolutely no bearing on the shooting.
There is a video. It will be released today. Even Asian store owners start shit when they are robbed.
They also start shit because they get mad. This happens even if you dont rob them.
Comedy Gold!!
Will you be here all week?
They were stealing the cigars to make marijuana blunts. That's why they took a box of cigars.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blunt_(marijuana_cigar)
They also start shit because they get mad. This happens even if you dont rob them.
Because they have experience in getting robbed or shoplifted by thugs. Realize that it's not personal to you if you aren't doing anything wrong. I used to get followed around stores when I was young because the way I looked fit into a category of potential troublemaker. It used to piss me off, but as a man of some seasoning now, I understand it more.
Everyone is not a thug. As a teenager I took it personally and got into it with a couple of Asian store owners. 1 called the cops on me. Luckily I still had my receipt to show I paid for my stuff.
They were stealing the cigars to make marijuana blunts. That's why they took a box of cigars.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blunt_(marijuana_cigar)
Even Assleper knows this is true. But he'll never admit it.
God, you'd think they would have learned after the Trayvon fiasco. Another really stupid shit thug ffs!
And?
If there were no imminent threats to law enforcement or public safety, the shooting is not justified.
That one might be suspected of a crime does not warrant the killing of that suspect.
The photographs from the convenience store are irrelevant, all thats relevant is what occurred during the encounter with police just before shots were fired.
They also start shit because they get mad. This happens even if you dont rob them.
Comedy Gold!!
Will you be here all week?
You still havent provide anything that convinces me he was actually stealing something. Why not?
I see him pushing a guy off him. Where is the theft?
Certainly changes the racial profiling and innocent kid narrative. This was predictable.Whether Brown robbed the store or not has absolutely no bearing on the shooting.
Well no. It doesn't.
No one questioned to kid to determine whether he was even there. And if he was? What exactly transpired.
The kid is dead.
And the police are already engaged in "trying" him.
IF IF IF IF IF IF IF
Why can't everyone wait for the facts?
Okay..
Thus far here's the facts.
A cop shot a kid.
And the kid was unarmed.
That's what we know now.
The police force has been real short on "facts" on the policeman or the way this kid died.
But they are releasing all sorts of things on the kid to make him look bad.
You dig?
Why are there bad things to release?
To pick their fights more carefully. Race pimps, Martin and this latest dumb shit are among the lowest brow of humanity. Include yourself if you wish, as a kindred spirit and intellect.God, you'd think they would have learned after the Trayvon fiasco. Another really stupid shit thug ffs!
Learned what?
God, you'd think they would have learned after the Trayvon fiasco. Another really stupid shit thug ffs!
Learned what?
Please post the video of Brown actually robbing a store.
Thanks.
That's not even the issue.
The officer was well in keeping with his job to stop, question and if he thought he had a reasonable cause, arrest this man.
He was not, in the scope of his duties, allowed to kill him, if he was unarmed, fleeing or had given up.
IF IF IF IF IF IF IF
Why can't everyone wait for the facts?
Michael Brown had robbed a Quick Trip just before the fatal shooting Reply to Thread
If true it'll be irrelevant to the officer's use of lethal force unless the officer knew about it and was detaining he and his aquaintance for questioning about it. Report I heard, the officer detained them both for j-walking. In the process of that, Mr. Brown physically assaulted the officer pushing on his car door whereupon a physical struggle ensued resulting in the officer using lethal force as was his right legally as per Missouri statute 563.046
Did you actually read it?
Law enforcement officer's use of force in making an arrest.
563.046. 1. A law enforcement officer need not retreat or desist from efforts to effect the arrest, or from efforts to prevent the escape from custody, of a person he reasonably believes to have committed an offense because of resistance or threatened resistance of the arrestee. In addition to the use of physical force authorized under other sections of this chapter, he is, subject to the provisions of subsections 2 and 3, justified in the use of such physical force as he reasonably believes is immediately necessary to effect the arrest or to prevent the escape from custody.
2. The use of any physical force in making an arrest is not justified under this section unless the arrest is lawful or the law enforcement officer reasonably believes the arrest is lawful.
3. A law enforcement officer in effecting an arrest or in preventing an escape from custody is justified in using deadly force only
(1) When such is authorized under other sections of this chapter; or
(2) When he reasonably believes that such use of deadly force is immediately necessary to effect the arrest and also reasonably believes that the person to be arrested
(a) Has committed or attempted to commit a felony; or
(b) Is attempting to escape by use of a deadly weapon; or
(c) May otherwise endanger life or inflict serious physical injury unless arrested without delay.
4. The defendant shall have the burden of injecting the issue of justification under this section.
A fleeing unarmed suspect doesn't meet this criteria.
Certainly changes the racial profiling and innocent kid narrative. This was predictable.
Well no. It doesn't.
No one questioned to kid to determine whether he was even there. And if he was? What exactly transpired.
The kid is dead.
And the police are already engaged in "trying" him.
Supposedly the "kid" has a rap sheet with the police and a long history of thuggery. It appears he's "tried" himself
Comedy Gold!!
Will you be here all week?
You still havent provide anything that convinces me he was actually stealing something. Why not?
I see him pushing a guy off him. Where is the theft?
This shit is great!!
So what are you going to say when the vid shows him abusing the old man?
I cant wait to hear it!! It's like watching a "To be continued" comedy!!
That's not even the issue.
The officer was well in keeping with his job to stop, question and if he thought he had a reasonable cause, arrest this man.
He was not, in the scope of his duties, allowed to kill him, if he was unarmed, fleeing or had given up.
IF IF IF IF IF IF IF
Why can't everyone wait for the facts?
Coming from you, this is very funny.
Wasn't it you who wrote the subject line for this thread?
Michael Brown had robbed a Quick Trip just before the fatal shooting Reply to Thread
