Men's 1st contact with porn dramatically impacts how they view women

[danielpalos]

All I get in the "fuck you" threads is mostly all talk and mostly no action. Comer over here and say that, women.

 

[Moonglow]

Hell, I had it in my mind females were for intercourse way before I ever saw any porn, Giggidy..

 

[danielpalos]

Women should be trolling for guys with blue balls on a full moon, just to have a Blue Moon beer.

 

[Toro]

The age at which males are first exposed to porn significantly impacts their attitudes towards women in later life, a new study claims.
Research presented at the 125th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association claims that the earlier
Men’s 1st contact with porn dramatically impacts how they view women - study




And it's no different than telling a drug addict they are addicted, try telling someone who gets off on their porn with five fingered Rosey, that . They see no harm because they don't want to stop their drug.
Yeah you have those who claim how great their sex life is with their wives who watch it with them, bank on it it's doing more harm than good and in the end she won't accept it.
Some wives go along with it to appease their husbands while really not wanting to, some don't give a dam and your the nearest thing to a live usable penis bhaahahh.

Some can't wrap their heads around the psychology of the damage just like telling them Trump is trying to fix America there's how dunce they are.

i find it interesting that you CAN'T make this op, without putting a smear at TRump and Trump supporters in there.

FUck you.

Correll

In fairness, I dont' think she was. I think she was referring to those who oppose Trump. She just expressed it poorly. I think this is what she was trying to say.

Some can't wrap their heads around the psychology of the damage just like telling them Trump is trying to fix America there's how dunce they are.​

Translated to

• Some can't wrap their heads around the psychology of the damage [porn causes].
  
• Just like telling [those same people who don't understand the damage porn causes that] Trump is trying to fix America.
  
• [That's] how [dumb] they are.

 

[WinterBorn]

Dear it is about the morality of public policy decisions.

Why can't women simply come up to guys and ask us if we want to practice, simply because we are heterosexual?

But, there are no laws that claim women can lie to men or let men miss their turn.

Dear, women can, and do, come up to men and initiate things. But only with men that they WANT. Not just because you want them.

And there is no "turn".

 

[WinterBorn]

Reading the casual encounters section on Craigslist, impacts how I view women everyday.

There are probably 160,000,000 women in the US. They are CEOs, business owners, doctors, PhDs, and senators. But you use the "I want to fuck" listings to form your views on women? Dude, that is just wishful thinking on your part.

Why not just pursue & seduce a woman all on your own?

Time=Money; and, I am not the one who lies about not being able to handle uncommitted sex on gender studies, and complain about what liars the other gender is.

I am "upfront" about what I want. Women seem to be, mostly all talk and mostly no action, for free when the guy has not enough money, while claiming they subscribe to social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price. I, "chalk it up", to right wing, cluelessness and Causelessness.

It seems, men like sex more than women, from conversations on these boards. Yet, women have more capacity for sex.

The impression I have not gotten from women online or in person for free; is how wonderful a friend, a woman can be.

Should men play the same games with women, when women want to get serious.

You are not looking for a woman for a friend. You want to fuck her. And, in order to be your friend, she has to submit, whether she is attracted to you or not. The "Friends with Benefits" can be great. But you have to be a friend first.

 

[WinterBorn]

Women should be trolling for guys with blue balls on a full moon, just to have a Blue Moon beer.

Some of them probably are trolling for guys with blue balls.

But they will choose who to troll based on what they want. Why would they fuck you? I get that you desperately want it. But that is not what THEY want. If they have a choice between you and a very attractive man, why choose you? I don't need an answer. But YOU DO. Regardless of all the "non-porn, socialist, conservative, for free, nonsense you have posted, you still have to give a woman a reason to choose you or a reason to allow you to seduce them. Fix that and you'll get laid.

 

[danielpalos]

Dear it is about the morality of public policy decisions.

Why can't women simply come up to guys and ask us if we want to practice, simply because we are heterosexual?

But, there are no laws that claim women can lie to men or let men miss their turn.

Dear, women can, and do, come up to men and initiate things. But only with men that they WANT. Not just because you want them.

And there is no "turn".

In other words, all it takes is money under Any form of Capitalism.

 

[danielpalos]

Reading the casual encounters section on Craigslist, impacts how I view women everyday.

There are probably 160,000,000 women in the US. They are CEOs, business owners, doctors, PhDs, and senators. But you use the "I want to fuck" listings to form your views on women? Dude, that is just wishful thinking on your part.

Why not just pursue & seduce a woman all on your own?

Time=Money; and, I am not the one who lies about not being able to handle uncommitted sex on gender studies, and complain about what liars the other gender is.

I am "upfront" about what I want. Women seem to be, mostly all talk and mostly no action, for free when the guy has not enough money, while claiming they subscribe to social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price. I, "chalk it up", to right wing, cluelessness and Causelessness.

It seems, men like sex more than women, from conversations on these boards. Yet, women have more capacity for sex.

The impression I have not gotten from women online or in person for free; is how wonderful a friend, a woman can be.

Should men play the same games with women, when women want to get serious.

You are not looking for a woman for a friend. You want to fuck her. And, in order to be your friend, she has to submit, whether she is attracted to you or not. The "Friends with Benefits" can be great. But you have to be a friend first.

I am a friend first. Fornication is what friends do. Why do you have a problem with it?

 

[danielpalos]

Women should be trolling for guys with blue balls on a full moon, just to have a Blue Moon beer.

Some of them probably are trolling for guys with blue balls.

But they will choose who to troll based on what they want. Why would they fuck you? I get that you desperately want it. But that is not what THEY want. If they have a choice between you and a very attractive man, why choose you? I don't need an answer. But YOU DO. Regardless of all the "non-porn, socialist, conservative, for free, nonsense you have posted, you still have to give a woman a reason to choose you or a reason to allow you to seduce them. Fix that and you'll get laid.

Time=Money. Only guys who are mostly all talk and mostly no action, do that. I expect equality from women claiming they want equal rights, especially for pay purposes in the non-porn sector.

Everybody likes a massage; except free chics when the guy has not enough money.

 

[danielpalos]

Dear chics, I prefer to be used for sex rather than, really really serious relationships.

 

[WinterBorn]

Reading the casual encounters section on Craigslist, impacts how I view women everyday.

There are probably 160,000,000 women in the US. They are CEOs, business owners, doctors, PhDs, and senators. But you use the "I want to fuck" listings to form your views on women? Dude, that is just wishful thinking on your part.

Why not just pursue & seduce a woman all on your own?

Time=Money; and, I am not the one who lies about not being able to handle uncommitted sex on gender studies, and complain about what liars the other gender is.

I am "upfront" about what I want. Women seem to be, mostly all talk and mostly no action, for free when the guy has not enough money, while claiming they subscribe to social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price. I, "chalk it up", to right wing, cluelessness and Causelessness.

It seems, men like sex more than women, from conversations on these boards. Yet, women have more capacity for sex.

The impression I have not gotten from women online or in person for free; is how wonderful a friend, a woman can be.

Should men play the same games with women, when women want to get serious.

You are not looking for a woman for a friend. You want to fuck her. And, in order to be your friend, she has to submit, whether she is attracted to you or not. The "Friends with Benefits" can be great. But you have to be a friend first.

I am a friend first. Fornication is what friends do. Why do you have a problem with it?

I have no problem at all with friends fucking. What I have a problem with is your insistence that they fuck you whether they are attracted to you or not. You have said if they won't fuck they are not your friend. That is certainly not a "friend first"

 

[WinterBorn]

Women should be trolling for guys with blue balls on a full moon, just to have a Blue Moon beer.

Some of them probably are trolling for guys with blue balls.

But they will choose who to troll based on what they want. Why would they fuck you? I get that you desperately want it. But that is not what THEY want. If they have a choice between you and a very attractive man, why choose you? I don't need an answer. But YOU DO. Regardless of all the "non-porn, socialist, conservative, for free, nonsense you have posted, you still have to give a woman a reason to choose you or a reason to allow you to seduce them. Fix that and you'll get laid.

Time=Money. Only guys who are mostly all talk and mostly no action, do that. I expect equality from women claiming they want equal rights, especially for pay purposes in the non-porn sector.

Everybody likes a massage; except free chics when the guy has not enough money.

Not everyone likes a massage that involves getting their breasts or crotch pawed.

 

[WinterBorn]

Dear chics, I prefer to be used for sex rather than, really really serious relationships.

Dear Daniel. Women prefer to use someone for sex that is attractive and arouses them. Not someone who keeps going on about their "turn".

 

[danielpalos]

Women should be trolling for guys with blue balls on a full moon, just to have a Blue Moon beer.

Some of them probably are trolling for guys with blue balls.

But they will choose who to troll based on what they want. Why would they fuck you? I get that you desperately want it. But that is not what THEY want. If they have a choice between you and a very attractive man, why choose you? I don't need an answer. But YOU DO. Regardless of all the "non-porn, socialist, conservative, for free, nonsense you have posted, you still have to give a woman a reason to choose you or a reason to allow you to seduce them. Fix that and you'll get laid.

Time=Money. Only guys who are mostly all talk and mostly no action, do that. I expect equality from women claiming they want equal rights, especially for pay purposes in the non-porn sector.

Everybody likes a massage; except free chics when the guy has not enough money.

Not everyone likes a massage that involves getting their breasts or crotch pawed.

How many guys complain about a free sample full body massage with happy ending?

 

[WinterBorn]

Women should be trolling for guys with blue balls on a full moon, just to have a Blue Moon beer.

Some of them probably are trolling for guys with blue balls.

But they will choose who to troll based on what they want. Why would they fuck you? I get that you desperately want it. But that is not what THEY want. If they have a choice between you and a very attractive man, why choose you? I don't need an answer. But YOU DO. Regardless of all the "non-porn, socialist, conservative, for free, nonsense you have posted, you still have to give a woman a reason to choose you or a reason to allow you to seduce them. Fix that and you'll get laid.

Time=Money. Only guys who are mostly all talk and mostly no action, do that. I expect equality from women claiming they want equal rights, especially for pay purposes in the non-porn sector.

Everybody likes a massage; except free chics when the guy has not enough money.

Not everyone likes a massage that involves getting their breasts or crotch pawed.

How many guys complain about a free sample full body massage with happy ending?

For most guys it would depend on who was giving the massage. That is certainly true for most women.

And that is not an equality issue. It is about personal choices.

 

[danielpalos]

Women should be trolling for guys with blue balls on a full moon, just to have a Blue Moon beer.

Some of them probably are trolling for guys with blue balls.

But they will choose who to troll based on what they want. Why would they fuck you? I get that you desperately want it. But that is not what THEY want. If they have a choice between you and a very attractive man, why choose you? I don't need an answer. But YOU DO. Regardless of all the "non-porn, socialist, conservative, for free, nonsense you have posted, you still have to give a woman a reason to choose you or a reason to allow you to seduce them. Fix that and you'll get laid.

Time=Money. Only guys who are mostly all talk and mostly no action, do that. I expect equality from women claiming they want equal rights, especially for pay purposes in the non-porn sector.

Everybody likes a massage; except free chics when the guy has not enough money.

Not everyone likes a massage that involves getting their breasts or crotch pawed.

How many guys complain about a free sample full body massage with happy ending?

For most guys it would depend on who was giving the massage. That is certainly true for most women.

And that is not an equality issue. It is about personal choices.

How many female ranger battalions are there; how many women claim to love it when Men actually practice and get really really good at something, and, that is what nice girls can Always be good for.

 

[WinterBorn]

Some of them probably are trolling for guys with blue balls.

But they will choose who to troll based on what they want. Why would they fuck you? I get that you desperately want it. But that is not what THEY want. If they have a choice between you and a very attractive man, why choose you? I don't need an answer. But YOU DO. Regardless of all the "non-porn, socialist, conservative, for free, nonsense you have posted, you still have to give a woman a reason to choose you or a reason to allow you to seduce them. Fix that and you'll get laid.

Time=Money. Only guys who are mostly all talk and mostly no action, do that. I expect equality from women claiming they want equal rights, especially for pay purposes in the non-porn sector.

Everybody likes a massage; except free chics when the guy has not enough money.

Not everyone likes a massage that involves getting their breasts or crotch pawed.

How many guys complain about a free sample full body massage with happy ending?

For most guys it would depend on who was giving the massage. That is certainly true for most women.

And that is not an equality issue. It is about personal choices.

How many female ranger battalions are there; how many women claim to love it when Men actually practice and get really really good at something, and, that is what nice girls can Always be good for.

What? How in the hell are ranger battalions even remotely relevant to the topic?

I think most people like seeing someone work to get good at something. It doesn't mean they want you inside them in a mist intimate way. If you gave them the option of a basic massage (leaving their breasts and crotch unmolested, they might be more eager to let you.