Memo to the Left Revisited: Afghanistan wasn't about bin Laden and neither was Iraq

Memo to the Left Revisited: Afghanistan wasn't about bin Laden and neither was Iraq

I have been having this Debate with either Deliberately Dishonest or Concerningly Ignorant Liberals since just after we Invaded Afghanistan back in the Fall of 2001... Some of you may not remember, but there were plenty of Nay-Sayers around our First "War of Choice" after 9/11 at the time... From ABCNews to Slate to Tom Daschle to the average Bush Hater on the street.
associalisticpress.com©... Salon.com: A Saddam connection? <Read that from Slate Circa 2001... It might shock you.

They were subsequently drowned out in Late 2002 by the prospects of going into Iraq, and that's when everyone finally settled on bin Laden as the Reason we went into Afghanistan and started screaming, "Saddam wasn't behind 9/11"... Well, Bush NEVER said he was.

It's funny, the Authorization for Use of Military Force in 2001 that was the Justification for the War in Afghanistan, doesn't mention Afghanistan or bin Laden: Click me!

And curiously, the Joint Resolution to Authorize Use of Force Against Iraq in 2002 doesn't mention bin Laden either and in NO WAY Implicates or Accuses Saddam of being behind 9/11: Click me!

I Know the Facts are Difficult and Burdensome to the Hopes and Dreams of some about the Bush Administration, but they are the Facts.

OK, you can't Counter that Data?... So you say "Where's the WMD?"...

One of my Favorites... There were 109 Facilities in Iraq that were Documented and SEALED by the UN leading up to our Authorization for Force in 2002. The UN Documented Mass Stockpiles of WMD and Banned Long Range Missiles in these Facilities... After 5 months of playing footsies with the Frogs @ the UN so that they could get their Ducks out of Saddam's Bed, those Facilities were Emptied. By the time our Forces go to them in the Spring of 2003... Gone.

Read this as MANY times as it takes Liberals: Missing does NOT = WMD Never Existed... End of List.

And the Masses that Saddam Gassed in his History Defies your Disgusting Denials.

As for all of the Bellyaching around Torturing Terrorists @ Gitmo, Extraordinary Rendition, Drones, Assassinations, Wars of Choice, Nation Building and the rest that the Left pinned on Bush...

What is Barry doing Differently?... Libya?... Invading Pakistan, an Ally, to Assassinate an Arab we don't even Implicate by name in either of our Authorizations of Force?... And he and his Family were Unarmed in a Residential Area to boot!

Ask yourselves Liberals... What would you be saying right now if all of this were taking place in 2007?...

Be Honest... You would have been saying what I just said that probably got you angry with me... But I remember how Dismissive you were of Saddam's Capture... How angry you were by the Execution of his Sons...

Now you all are Celebrating like this is a Sporting Event and Barry is the Greatest Caesar to have ever sent Gladiators to Battle.

The Fact is that Barry used the entire Military/Counter-Terrorism Apparatus that Bush put in place, including the same SEAL Team that took out Saddam, to take out bin Laden and to keep us Safe here on our Soil for the first 2 years of his Presidency... And I applaud him for it.

But he Campaigned AGAINST getting Information out of Gitmo Detainees that way... Yet he Utilized that Intel that was Extracted there to take bin Laden out.

He Campaigned AGAINST Acting Unilaterally Militarily, yet did so 100% in Pakistan last week, not even Informing our "Ally" that we were Invading their Soil.

Bush had a Coalition in Iraq that Barry couldn't gather for ANYTHING, including getting bin Laden, yet the Liberals said that Coalition was Fake or Small and that we still Acted Unilaterally in the end...

Bush also got Congressional Approval for his "Wars of Choice".

We WAITED for 5 MONTHS to Attack Iraq... 5 MONTHS!

Obama didn't even get Congressional Approval to Attack Libya and he Certainly didn't wait... AT ALL.

There would be calls for King George's Impeachment right now, not Demands that we Kiss his Ass for being so Brilliant in Strateegery in getting bin Laden, so much so that he could've just went in himself instead of the SEALs...

Because that's how the Left sounds about this right now... You sound like you have your first taste of Blood and are Hungry for more.

And you Know that the Left would be Claiming Fraud when told that bin Laden wasn't Armed, and that we had to Bury him at Sea right away...

They would have Islamic Experts and War Crimes Experts on every program looking into how Wrong what the Cowboy President did...

But this 2011... It's not the Cowboy President... It's the Supposed "Professor" of Hope and Change who could bring a New Tone to the World and get the Islamic World on our Side...

The One who would Close Gitmo... End Iraq... Complete Afghanistan and NOT Start Wars of Choice Unilaterally or going Invading Sovereign Nations Assassinating people.

You do Remember Candidate Barry 2008, don't you?... The not-quite-one-term Senator who regularly Criticized Bush for EXACTLY what President Barry does now?

All I expect out of the Left is a Concession and a, "we get it now, you guys were Right about how to Fight Islamic Terror", or I expect them to go after Barry like they did Bush for 7 years.

And even with more Energy, because at least Bush wasn't a Hypocrite about it.

Is Honesty too much to ask from my Fellow Humans?...

Is it?

Copyright ©2011 - tha malcontent/americanfreepress.org​

:)

Don't call this a Comeback!...

:)

peace...
 
Memo to the Left Revisited: Afghanistan wasn't about bin Laden and neither was Iraq

I have been having this Debate with either Deliberately Dishonest or Concerningly Ignorant Liberals since just after we Invaded Afghanistan back in the Fall of 2001... Some of you may not remember, but there were plenty of Nay-Sayers around our First "War of Choice" after 9/11 at the time... From ABCNews to Slate to Tom Daschle to the average Bush Hater on the street.
associalisticpress.com©... Salon.com: A Saddam connection? <Read that from Slate Circa 2001... It might shock you.

They were subsequently drowned out in Late 2002 by the prospects of going into Iraq, and that's when everyone finally settled on bin Laden as the Reason we went into Afghanistan and started screaming, "Saddam wasn't behind 9/11"... Well, Bush NEVER said he was.

It's funny, the Authorization for Use of Military Force in 2001 that was the Justification for the War in Afghanistan, doesn't mention Afghanistan or bin Laden: Click me!

And curiously, the Joint Resolution to Authorize Use of Force Against Iraq in 2002 doesn't mention bin Laden either and in NO WAY Implicates or Accuses Saddam of being behind 9/11: Click me!

I Know the Facts are Difficult and Burdensome to the Hopes and Dreams of some about the Bush Administration, but they are the Facts.

OK, you can't Counter that Data?... So you say "Where's the WMD?"...

One of my Favorites... There were 109 Facilities in Iraq that were Documented and SEALED by the UN leading up to our Authorization for Force in 2002. The UN Documented Mass Stockpiles of WMD and Banned Long Range Missiles in these Facilities... After 5 months of playing footsies with the Frogs @ the UN so that they could get their Ducks out of Saddam's Bed, those Facilities were Emptied. By the time our Forces go to them in the Spring of 2003... Gone.

Read this as MANY times as it takes Liberals: Missing does NOT = WMD Never Existed... End of List.

And the Masses that Saddam Gassed in his History Defies your Disgusting Denials.

As for all of the Bellyaching around Torturing Terrorists @ Gitmo, Extraordinary Rendition, Drones, Assassinations, Wars of Choice, Nation Building and the rest that the Left pinned on Bush...

What is Barry doing Differently?... Libya?... Invading Pakistan, an Ally, to Assassinate an Arab we don't even Implicate by name in either of our Authorizations of Force?... And he and his Family were Unarmed in a Residential Area to boot!

Ask yourselves Liberals... What would you be saying right now if all of this were taking place in 2007?...

Be Honest... You would have been saying what I just said that probably got you angry with me... But I remember how Dismissive you were of Saddam's Capture... How angry you were by the Execution of his Sons...

Now you all are Celebrating like this is a Sporting Event and Barry is the Greatest Caesar to have ever sent Gladiators to Battle.

The Fact is that Barry used the entire Military/Counter-Terrorism Apparatus that Bush put in place, including the same SEAL Team that took out Saddam, to take out bin Laden and to keep us Safe here on our Soil for the first 2 years of his Presidency... And I applaud him for it.

But he Campaigned AGAINST getting Information out of Gitmo Detainees that way... Yet he Utilized that Intel that was Extracted there to take bin Laden out.

He Campaigned AGAINST Acting Unilaterally Militarily, yet did so 100% in Pakistan last week, not even Informing our "Ally" that we were Invading their Soil.

Bush had a Coalition in Iraq that Barry couldn't gather for ANYTHING, including getting bin Laden, yet the Liberals said that Coalition was Fake or Small and that we still Acted Unilaterally in the end...

Bush also got Congressional Approval for his "Wars of Choice".

We WAITED for 5 MONTHS to Attack Iraq... 5 MONTHS!

Obama didn't even get Congressional Approval to Attack Libya and he Certainly didn't wait... AT ALL.

There would be calls for King George's Impeachment right now, not Demands that we Kiss his Ass for being so Brilliant in Strateegery in getting bin Laden, so much so that he could've just went in himself instead of the SEALs...

Because that's how the Left sounds about this right now... You sound like you have your first taste of Blood and are Hungry for more.

And you Know that the Left would be Claiming Fraud when told that bin Laden wasn't Armed, and that we had to Bury him at Sea right away...

They would have Islamic Experts and War Crimes Experts on every program looking into how Wrong what the Cowboy President did...

But this 2011... It's not the Cowboy President... It's the Supposed "Professor" of Hope and Change who could bring a New Tone to the World and get the Islamic World on our Side...

The One who would Close Gitmo... End Iraq... Complete Afghanistan and NOT Start Wars of Choice Unilaterally or going Invading Sovereign Nations Assassinating people.

You do Remember Candidate Barry 2008, don't you?... The not-quite-one-term Senator who regularly Criticized Bush for EXACTLY what President Barry does now?

All I expect out of the Left is a Concession and a, "we get it now, you guys were Right about how to Fight Islamic Terror", or I expect them to go after Barry like they did Bush for 7 years.

And even with more Energy, because at least Bush wasn't a Hypocrite about it.

Is Honesty too much to ask from my Fellow Humans?...

Is it?

Copyright ©2011 - tha malcontent/americanfreepress.org​

:)
yes

so why waist a post .
but what about the twin towers , no big deal to kill 3000 people in three attacks . we shouldn't have gone after him ? now whos a liberal .
 
Sorry. Once I got to the blatant lies, I stopped reading.

There has been video after video of members of the Bush administration claiming connections and "secret meetings" between Saddam and al Qaeda including Rumsfeld and Cheney. They've posted those videos on this very site too many times for anyone to deny it.

"The reason I (Bush) keep insisting that there was a relationship between Iraq and Saddam and al Qaeda: because there was a relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda," Bush said after a Cabinet meeting. As evidence, he cited Iraqi intelligence officers' meeting with bin Laden in Sudan. "There's numerous contacts between the two," Bush said.

Bush Defends Assertions of Iraq-Al Qaeda Relationship (washingtonpost.com)

If you are going to rewrite history, you have to wait at least a decade. Otherwise, you merely look like a "liar".
 
Yet more sour grapes.

Just more weak links, but republicans are always creating DOTS to follow with massive gaps and conspiratorial "evidence." I recall following the DOTS in the Clinton impeachment, one "Gate" after another that held no substance.

I have my own theory. Piss ants tie this whole 911 together, if you just follow the DOTS. First the twin towers fell to eaisly, and piss ants had pleanty of time to eat their way through the structure, leaving piss ant trails from top to bottom. Recall the buildings could withstand a 707 jet hit.

And the same piss ants are in Iraq, connect the DOTS! So when piss ants showed up in Afghanistan, there was finally evidence that the piss ants arrived there on Saddams WMDs. Now if you look closely at the bin laden videos you will see these same piss ants in the scenery. That is how US intel was able to put all the DOTS together and have a case to invade Iraq.:eek:
 
Last edited:
Memo to the Left Revisited: Afghanistan wasn't about bin Laden and neither was Iraq

I have been having this Debate with either Deliberately Dishonest or Concerningly Ignorant Liberals since just after we Invaded Afghanistan back in the Fall of 2001... Some of you may not remember, but there were plenty of Nay-Sayers around our First "War of Choice" after 9/11 at the time... From ABCNews to Slate to Tom Daschle to the average Bush Hater on the street.
associalisticpress.com©... Salon.com: A Saddam connection? <Read that from Slate Circa 2001... It might shock you.

They were subsequently drowned out in Late 2002 by the prospects of going into Iraq, and that's when everyone finally settled on bin Laden as the Reason we went into Afghanistan and started screaming, "Saddam wasn't behind 9/11"... Well, Bush NEVER said he was.

It's funny, the Authorization for Use of Military Force in 2001 that was the Justification for the War in Afghanistan, doesn't mention Afghanistan or bin Laden: Click me!

And curiously, the Joint Resolution to Authorize Use of Force Against Iraq in 2002 doesn't mention bin Laden either and in NO WAY Implicates or Accuses Saddam of being behind 9/11: Click me!

I Know the Facts are Difficult and Burdensome to the Hopes and Dreams of some about the Bush Administration, but they are the Facts.

OK, you can't Counter that Data?... So you say "Where's the WMD?"...

One of my Favorites... There were 109 Facilities in Iraq that were Documented and SEALED by the UN leading up to our Authorization for Force in 2002. The UN Documented Mass Stockpiles of WMD and Banned Long Range Missiles in these Facilities... After 5 months of playing footsies with the Frogs @ the UN so that they could get their Ducks out of Saddam's Bed, those Facilities were Emptied. By the time our Forces go to them in the Spring of 2003... Gone.

Read this as MANY times as it takes Liberals: Missing does NOT = WMD Never Existed... End of List.

And the Masses that Saddam Gassed in his History Defies your Disgusting Denials.

As for all of the Bellyaching around Torturing Terrorists @ Gitmo, Extraordinary Rendition, Drones, Assassinations, Wars of Choice, Nation Building and the rest that the Left pinned on Bush...

What is Barry doing Differently?... Libya?... Invading Pakistan, an Ally, to Assassinate an Arab we don't even Implicate by name in either of our Authorizations of Force?... And he and his Family were Unarmed in a Residential Area to boot!

Ask yourselves Liberals... What would you be saying right now if all of this were taking place in 2007?...

Be Honest... You would have been saying what I just said that probably got you angry with me... But I remember how Dismissive you were of Saddam's Capture... How angry you were by the Execution of his Sons...

Now you all are Celebrating like this is a Sporting Event and Barry is the Greatest Caesar to have ever sent Gladiators to Battle.

The Fact is that Barry used the entire Military/Counter-Terrorism Apparatus that Bush put in place, including the same SEAL Team that took out Saddam, to take out bin Laden and to keep us Safe here on our Soil for the first 2 years of his Presidency... And I applaud him for it.

But he Campaigned AGAINST getting Information out of Gitmo Detainees that way... Yet he Utilized that Intel that was Extracted there to take bin Laden out.

He Campaigned AGAINST Acting Unilaterally Militarily, yet did so 100% in Pakistan last week, not even Informing our "Ally" that we were Invading their Soil.

Bush had a Coalition in Iraq that Barry couldn't gather for ANYTHING, including getting bin Laden, yet the Liberals said that Coalition was Fake or Small and that we still Acted Unilaterally in the end...

Bush also got Congressional Approval for his "Wars of Choice".

We WAITED for 5 MONTHS to Attack Iraq... 5 MONTHS!

Obama didn't even get Congressional Approval to Attack Libya and he Certainly didn't wait... AT ALL.

There would be calls for King George's Impeachment right now, not Demands that we Kiss his Ass for being so Brilliant in Strateegery in getting bin Laden, so much so that he could've just went in himself instead of the SEALs...

Because that's how the Left sounds about this right now... You sound like you have your first taste of Blood and are Hungry for more.

And you Know that the Left would be Claiming Fraud when told that bin Laden wasn't Armed, and that we had to Bury him at Sea right away...

They would have Islamic Experts and War Crimes Experts on every program looking into how Wrong what the Cowboy President did...

But this 2011... It's not the Cowboy President... It's the Supposed "Professor" of Hope and Change who could bring a New Tone to the World and get the Islamic World on our Side...

The One who would Close Gitmo... End Iraq... Complete Afghanistan and NOT Start Wars of Choice Unilaterally or going Invading Sovereign Nations Assassinating people.

You do Remember Candidate Barry 2008, don't you?... The not-quite-one-term Senator who regularly Criticized Bush for EXACTLY what President Barry does now?

All I expect out of the Left is a Concession and a, "we get it now, you guys were Right about how to Fight Islamic Terror", or I expect them to go after Barry like they did Bush for 7 years.

And even with more Energy, because at least Bush wasn't a Hypocrite about it.

Is Honesty too much to ask from my Fellow Humans?...

Is it?

Copyright ©2011 - tha malcontent/americanfreepress.org​

:)
yes

so why waist a post .
but what about the twin towers , no big deal to kill 3000 people in three attacks . we shouldn't have gone after him ? now whos a liberal .

You didn't Read what I Posted, did you... :lol:

:)

peace...
 
Sorry. Once I got to the blatant lies, I stopped reading.

There has been video after video of members of the Bush administration claiming connections and "secret meetings" between Saddam and al Qaeda including Rumsfeld and Cheney. They've posted those videos on this very site too many times for anyone to deny it.

"The reason I (Bush) keep insisting that there was a relationship between Iraq and Saddam and al Qaeda: because there was a relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda," Bush said after a Cabinet meeting. As evidence, he cited Iraqi intelligence officers' meeting with bin Laden in Sudan. "There's numerous contacts between the two," Bush said.

Bush Defends Assertions of Iraq-Al Qaeda Relationship (washingtonpost.com)

If you are going to rewrite history, you have to wait at least a decade. Otherwise, you merely look like a "liar".

Ramzi Yousef, an Iraqi Agent, worked Directly with KSM in the first World Trade Center Attack in 1993...

We got Ramzi...

KSM was all but Ignored until he Finally pulled off what he tried to do in 1993 on September 11, 2001.

You do Know that KSM was the Mastermind behind 9/11 and not bin Laden, correct?...

bin Laden wasn't even an Issue in 1993 when KSM tried the first time.

Anyway...

:)

peace...
 

Forum List

Back
Top