Medicare For All Fastest way to capitalism?

EdwardBaiamonte

Platinum Member
Nov 23, 2011
34,612
2,153
1,100
Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better. It would replace the convoluted socialist system we have now with a simple more efficient socialist system. Then we could require published prices and higher copays until we had capitalistic price and quality controls.
 
What specific changes made by Medicare for All would make the cost of health care cheaper AND better?

Why specifically would make health care administered by the federal government MORE efficient.

We have the power to require published prices and higher co-pays now. Why would need to change our entire health insurance delivery system to make these simple changes?

How specifically would Government run health lead to capitalistic price and quality controls.
 
that would be like going to WalMart for a colonoscopy..

"oh, you wanna tube rammed up your ass? Isle seven bitch & get the model glue to go wit dat."

How U gonna survive getting a broom stick made in China shoved up your ass from WalMart?
 
Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better. It would replace the convoluted socialist system we have now with a simple more efficient socialist system. Then we could require published prices and higher copays until we had capitalistic price and quality controls.
Because economic history is chock-full of examples where monopolies deliver superior products at greatly reduced prices!

Oh, wait......
 
What specific changes made by Medicare for All would make the cost of health care cheaper AND better?
Why specifically would make health care administered by the federal government MORE efficient.

capitalism!! Didn't you read OP????
 
Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better. It would replace the convoluted socialist system we have now with a simple more efficient socialist system. Then we could require published prices and higher copays until we had capitalistic price and quality controls.

Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better.

You're lying.
 
We have the power to require published prices and higher co-pays now..

Sure in some areas insurance pays or ER pays or companies, state govt pays so it would hard to make sweeping changes with medicare for all you could make sweeping changs and quickly to establish a few national prices and copays.
 
Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better. It would replace the convoluted socialist system we have now with a simple more efficient socialist system. Then we could require published prices and higher copays until we had capitalistic price and quality controls.

Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better.

You're lying.

Medicare for all as a prelude to capitalism is only way to go.
 
Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better. It would replace the convoluted socialist system we have now with a simple more efficient socialist system. Then we could require published prices and higher copays until we had capitalistic price and quality controls.

Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better.

You're lying.

Medicare for all as a prelude to capitalism is only way to go.

When has government ever totally taken something over and then given up that power?

Give me your top 5 examples.
 
Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better. It would replace the convoluted socialist system we have now with a simple more efficient socialist system. Then we could require published prices and higher copays until we had capitalistic price and quality controls.
Because economic history is chock-full of examples where monopolies deliver superior products at greatly reduced prices!

Oh, wait......

capitalism is not monopolistic.
 
Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better. It would replace the convoluted socialist system we have now with a simple more efficient socialist system. Then we could require published prices and higher copays until we had capitalistic price and quality controls.

Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better.

You're lying.

Medicare for all as a prelude to capitalism is only way to go.

When has government ever totally taken something over and then given up that power?

Give me your top 5 examples.
didn't say it had, merely that medicare for all as prelude to capitalism would lover prices 70% like in Europe and capitalism( published prices/higher and higher copays would lower prices still further.
 
Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better. It would replace the convoluted socialist system we have now with a simple more efficient socialist system. Then we could require published prices and higher copays until we had capitalistic price and quality controls.

Health care for all (Medicare for all) would be cheaper and better.

You're lying.

Medicare for all as a prelude to capitalism is only way to go.

When has government ever totally taken something over and then given up that power?

Give me your top 5 examples.
didn't say it had, merely that medicare for all as prelude to capitalism would lover prices 70% like in Europe and capitalism( published prices/higher and higher copays would lower prices still further.

medicare for all as prelude to capitalism would lover prices 70% like in Europe

You're full of shit.

Give me some examples where a government takeover dropped prices 70%.
Be sure to include the drop in availability and quality as well as the increase in wait times
when you give me your many examples.
 

Forum List

Back
Top