Median Household Incomes D O W N under Obama! I Do Mean D-O-W-N

I know what a citation is. I know what it means to cite something. The two words are different. An adult would thank me for the info.

One cites something. One refers to a citation. You, in your compete failure to use our language correctly, referred to a "cite". Incorrect usage. Wrong. Not right. A mistake on your part.

Now......what is your next mistake going to be? Will you acknowledge that one? I'm guessing not.

Right retard...

{quote, reproduceMore
"cite the passage in full"}

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You should have stuck it out through 4th grade.

Seriously.
 
Unemployment is way down, have you not seen the jobs numbers?
It's been discussed. Like I said, words won't help.

It has been discussed? True. And it is way down. On a downward trajectory. Lower than it was in January of 2009. Looking good.

When the minimum wage is raised nationwide and the final nail is driven into the trickle down coffin ( I'm guessing 2017 ) the median hosehold income will reach new heights.

Want to double down on Reagnomics? Take a trip to Kansas.

Liberals have a better track record when it comes to the economy. Not even close.
 
I know what a citation is. I know what it means to cite something. The two words are different. An adult would thank me for the info.

One cites something. One refers to a citation. You, in your compete failure to use our language correctly, referred to a "cite". Incorrect usage. Wrong. Not right. A mistake on your part.

Now......what is your next mistake going to be? Will you acknowledge that one? I'm guessing not.

Right retard...

{quote, reproduceMore
"cite the passage in full"}

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You should have stuck it out through 4th grade.

Seriously.

That is still a verb. You are still wrong. I think you like being wrong.
 
The OP wants to stay on topic?

Excellent.

What is the median household income today?
What was it on this date in 2011?

Finding those two numbers should be a snap for an economist.

What was it on this date in 2009?

Why would I want to use an arbitrary date of 2011? I know why the hate sites that do your thinking for you want to use it, because it was the trough of the disaster that is the Obama economy; but I have no desire to cook the books to make your little tin god look better. How does median household income today compare to the day that the fuckup in chief took office?
 
Unemployment is way down, have you not seen the jobs numbers?
It's been discussed. Like I said, words won't help.

unemployment u6 is 12% about 50% higher than before recession. Income is down about 5% from when Barry took office. Socialism does not work as East Germany found out!

Liberalism is based in pure emotion.



That's a load of BS.

Unemployment Falls To 5.9 Percent Lowest In 6 Years The Two-Way NPR
 
Tailwind bump.


Is Pee Wee Herman still bumping my thread? :) Hey Pee Weeeeee.....I know you don't know anything about the topic but if you could do me a favor and bump this thread, I'd be as happy as that HAPPY song.

:banana:

Every day........I already told you that. This is your signature thread. The one in which you expose yourself to everyone.

Expose my self as brilliant. I know. I've been that way a long time. Especially on the topic of economics.

A brilliant person usually knows that myself is one word.
 
Unemployment is way down, have you not seen the jobs numbers?
It's been discussed. Like I said, words won't help.

unemployment u6 is 12% about 50% higher than before recession. Income is down about 5% from when Barry took office. Socialism does not work as East Germany found out!

Liberalism is based in pure emotion.

Higher than before recession? Is that supposed to be meaningful? It is down since the end of the recession.

It went from 6.5 to 14 during the previous administration. It has gone from 14 to under 12 under this administration. I'll take the latter.

U6 Unemployment Rate Portal Seven

I love this thread. So many really brilliant economists. So much learning taking place.
 
Tailwind bump.


Is Pee Wee Herman still bumping my thread? :) Hey Pee Weeeeee.....I know you don't know anything about the topic but if you could do me a favor and bump this thread, I'd be as happy as that HAPPY song.

:banana:

Every day........I already told you that. This is your signature thread. The one in which you expose yourself to everyone.

Expose my self as brilliant. I know. I've been that way a long time. Especially on the topic of economics.

A brilliant person usually knows that myself is one word.

And all brilliant people know what a tailwind is......don't they?
 
That is still a verb. You are still wrong. I think you like being wrong.

You are mentally retarded;

cite
sīt/
verb
  1. 1.
    quote (a passage, book, or author) as evidence for or justification of an argument or statement, especially in a scholarly work.
    synonyms:quote, reproduce More

    [TBODY] [/TBODY]


    • [TBODY] [/TBODY]

    • [TBODY] [/TBODY]
  2. 2.
    LAW
    summon (someone) to appear in a court of law.
    "the summons cited four of the defendants"
    synonyms:summon, summons, serve with a summons, serve with a writ,subpoena
    "the writ cited four of the signatories"
    [TBODY] [/TBODY]
noun
US
  1. 1.
    a citation.
______________

Cite is a noun meaning "citation."
Fucktard.
 
That is still a verb. You are still wrong. I think you like being wrong.

You are mentally retarded;

cite
sīt/
verb
  1. 1.
    quote (a passage, book, or author) as evidence for or justification of an argument or statement, especially in a scholarly work.
    synonyms:quote, reproduce More
    [TBODY] [/TBODY]


  2. 2.
    LAW
    summon (someone) to appear in a court of law.
    "the summons cited four of the defendants"
    synonyms:summon, summons, serve with a summons, serve with a writ,subpoena
    "the writ cited four of the signatories"
    [TBODY] [/TBODY]
noun
US
  1. 1.
    a citation.
______________

Cite is a noun meaning "citation."
Fucktard.

Nope. That is not accurate. You cannot use the two words interchangeably unless you want to be wrong. Using the word "cite" in place of the word "citation" is incorrect usage.

I know you are having difficulty with this. But it is what it is.
 
Nope. That is not accurate. You cannot use the two words interchangeably unless you want to be wrong. Using the word "cite" in place of the word "citation" is incorrect usage.

I know you are having difficulty with this. But it is what it is.

Got it, the dictionary is wrong!

:thup:

You are wrong. I think you know it. The correct word is citation. You fucked up and won't admit it. Common USMB nutter problem.
 
You are wrong. I think you know it. The correct word is citation. You fucked up and won't admit it. Common USMB nutter problem.

Got it.

I'm wrong, the dictionary Ice Weasel used is wrong, the dictionary I used was wrong - you're right because, umm. uhhh.

ROFL

You are joke, and it's all the funnier that you're too dull witted to grasp it.
 
You are wrong. I think you know it. The correct word is citation. You fucked up and won't admit it. Common USMB nutter problem.

Got it.

I'm wrong, the dictionary Ice Weasel used is wrong, the dictionary I used was wrong - you're right because, umm. uhhh.

ROFL

You are joke, and it's all the funnier that you're too dull witted to grasp it.

Sometimes....you are just wrong. Especially in this case....since I did read my own citation......which was the citation that the OP cited. The OP, in fact, did not read what she cited. She didn't know that the study she cited was submitted by a particular think tank.

Now....if you would like to cite another study which shows that the median household income is on the decline...I'd love to see it.
 
Last edited:
Tailwind bump.


Is Pee Wee Herman still bumping my thread? :) Hey Pee Weeeeee.....I know you don't know anything about the topic but if you could do me a favor and bump this thread, I'd be as happy as that HAPPY song.

:banana:

Every day........I already told you that. This is your signature thread. The one in which you expose yourself to everyone.

Expose my self as brilliant. I know. I've been that way a long time. Especially on the topic of economics.

A brilliant person usually knows that myself is one word.

And all brilliant people know what a tailwind is......don't they?


There's plenty of wind coming out of EC's tail.
 
Unemployment is way down, have you not seen the jobs numbers?
It's been discussed. Like I said, words won't help.

unemployment u6 is 12% about 50% higher than before recession. Income is down about 5% from when Barry took office. Socialism does not work as East Germany found out!

Liberalism is based in pure emotion.



That's a load of BS.

Unemployment Falls To 5.9 Percent Lowest In 6 Years The Two-Way NPR

dear I said U6 you illiterate!! It takes into account all those who stopped looking and all those who work 5 hours a week. Its 12% or 50% higher than before the recession. Barry created millions of part time jobs at 7/11. There are fewer full time jobs now than when Barry took office. Why do you think everyone is so discouraged about economy's worst recovery since Great Depression.

Did you notice the socialism never worked in East Germany? What does that teach you?
 
Is Pee Wee Herman still bumping my thread? :) Hey Pee Weeeeee.....I know you don't know anything about the topic but if you could do me a favor and bump this thread, I'd be as happy as that HAPPY song.

:banana:

Every day........I already told you that. This is your signature thread. The one in which you expose yourself to everyone.


Now let me show how much power I have over you, Pee Wee.

I dare you to make another post in this thread.

There will be many more. And you'll keep posting here too. I can see the future.

I'm OP darling....it's my job to keep it going.

You're just my tool.

I want this thread title in people's faces till election day....I don't want people ever duped by you fucking Socialists again.

You fulfill my greatest fantasies of a manipulated tool. And for free no less......LMAO

I think you can't help yourself. You need some kind of human interaction. This is it for you. As good as it gets.

I'm happy to help. Median income on the rise since 2011. Good subject.

LOL, dumbass. When you finally figure out what's meant my APPLES TO APPLES comparisons, you might be able to have 1% of the clue.

Even high schoolers know why you don't just pull any number out of the air. You have to compare like sets of data to like sets of data.

I'm sure that went completely over your head.

Fact still stands: MEDIAN INCOMES ARE DOWNNNNNNNN UNDER OBAMA.
 
Unemployment is way down, have you not seen the jobs numbers?
It's been discussed. Like I said, words won't help.

unemployment u6 is 12% about 50% higher than before recession. Income is down about 5% from when Barry took office. Socialism does not work as East Germany found out!

Liberalism is based in pure emotion.



That's a load of BS.

Unemployment Falls To 5.9 Percent Lowest In 6 Years The Two-Way NPR

dear I said U6 you illiterate!! It takes into account all those who stopped looking and all those who work 5 hours a week. Its 12% or 50% higher than before the recession. Barry created millions of part time jobs at 7/11. There are fewer full time jobs now than when Barry took office. Why do you think everyone is so discouraged about economy's worst recovery since Great Depression.

Did you notice the socialism never worked in East Germany? What does that teach you?

Teaching these libs economics (and statistics) is like trying to teach a 4 year old how to make bouillabaisse.

They'll get a few of the words right......but forget any mental acuity.
 
Despite manipulation of economic statistics by libs to pretend the economy is great, everyday Americans know better. There is malaise in the air. All Americans have to do is look at their own household incomes. Study after study shows those median incomes are down under Obama. Many say it's an average of about $4,000 less.

Obama s Economy We ve Fallen And We Can t Get Up - Investors.com
omg. nobody told me the president controlled median household incomes. i really need to vote republican now. they want us all to have higher wages. they say so all the time. lol.stupid premise that pres control wages
 

Forum List

Back
Top