Media Report: 25% of Current Florida Primary Ballots Never Voted Before, EVER…

[NYcarbineer]

Interesting 'theory'.

The last 'registered voters' poll in Florida (as opposed to 'likely voters') was taken August 10th.

It had Clinton up by 5.

lol

 

[S.J.]

Wrong. The only poll that shows her leading by double digits anywhere is Quinnipiac. All the others are about half that.

Lol Quinnipiac is the poll you Trump losers use the most to show your idiot candidate is still in the race. Poor effort, even for you S.J.

Here, stupid. Look at it yourself.
RealClearPolitics - 2016 Latest Polls

Yep a Hillary sweep except for Florida, where 1 out of the 3 polls you linked to has Trump winning. The other 2 have Hillary.

Damn SJ. You're even stupider than usual tonight.

Do they have her winning by double digits, like you said?

Many of them yes

Show us.

 

[BettyYeti]

Lol Quinnipiac is the poll you Trump losers use the most to show your idiot candidate is still in the race. Poor effort, even for you S.J.

Here, stupid. Look at it yourself.
RealClearPolitics - 2016 Latest Polls

Yep a Hillary sweep except for Florida, where 1 out of the 3 polls you linked to has Trump winning. The other 2 have Hillary.

Damn SJ. You're even stupider than usual tonight.

Do they have her winning by double digits, like you said?

Many of them yes

Show us.

Clinton is roughly +3. Can you let it go now?

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - Florida: Trump vs. Clinton

 

[S.J.]

Here, stupid. Look at it yourself.
RealClearPolitics - 2016 Latest Polls

Yep a Hillary sweep except for Florida, where 1 out of the 3 polls you linked to has Trump winning. The other 2 have Hillary.

Damn SJ. You're even stupider than usual tonight.

Do they have her winning by double digits, like you said?

Many of them yes

Show us.

Clinton is roughly +3. Can you let it go now?

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - Florida: Trump vs. Clinton

Let what go? He claimed she is leading by double digits in all the battleground states. Anything wrong with asking the asshole to post a link?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Lol Quinnipiac is the poll you Trump losers use the most to show your idiot candidate is still in the race. Poor effort, even for you S.J.

Here, stupid. Look at it yourself.
RealClearPolitics - 2016 Latest Polls

Yep a Hillary sweep except for Florida, where 1 out of the 3 polls you linked to has Trump winning. The other 2 have Hillary.

Damn SJ. You're even stupider than usual tonight.

Do they have her winning by double digits, like you said?

Many of them yes

Show us.

Use your own link. Look at polls by state. Start with Virginia.

 

[BettyYeti]

Yep a Hillary sweep except for Florida, where 1 out of the 3 polls you linked to has Trump winning. The other 2 have Hillary.

Damn SJ. You're even stupider than usual tonight.

Do they have her winning by double digits, like you said?

Many of them yes

Show us.

Clinton is roughly +3. Can you let it go now?

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - Florida: Trump vs. Clinton

Let what go? He claimed she is leading by double digits in all the battleground states. Anything wrong with asking the asshole to post a link?

You're being childish. You know she's up but not that much in many.

RealClearPolitics - 2016 Election Maps - Battle for White House

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromo

Let it go.

 

[S.J.]

Here, stupid. Look at it yourself.
RealClearPolitics - 2016 Latest Polls

Yep a Hillary sweep except for Florida, where 1 out of the 3 polls you linked to has Trump winning. The other 2 have Hillary.

Damn SJ. You're even stupider than usual tonight.

Do they have her winning by double digits, like you said?

Many of them yes

Show us.

Use your own link. Look at polls by state. Start with Virginia.

You made the claim, YOU post them. Double digits in all the battleground states.

 

[S.J.]

Do they have her winning by double digits, like you said?

Many of them yes

Show us.

Clinton is roughly +3. Can you let it go now?

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - Florida: Trump vs. Clinton

Let what go? He claimed she is leading by double digits in all the battleground states. Anything wrong with asking the asshole to post a link?

You're being childish. You know she's up but not that much in many. RealClearPolitics - 2016 Election Maps - Battle for White House

Let it go.

Butt out. This doesn't concern you.

 

[BettyYeti]

Many of them yes

Show us.

Clinton is roughly +3. Can you let it go now?

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - Florida: Trump vs. Clinton

Let what go? He claimed she is leading by double digits in all the battleground states. Anything wrong with asking the asshole to post a link?

You're being childish. You know she's up but not that much in many. RealClearPolitics - 2016 Election Maps - Battle for White House

Let it go.

Butt out. This doesn't concern you.

Grow up.

 

[S.J.]

Show us.

Clinton is roughly +3. Can you let it go now?

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - Florida: Trump vs. Clinton

Let what go? He claimed she is leading by double digits in all the battleground states. Anything wrong with asking the asshole to post a link?

You're being childish. You know she's up but not that much in many. RealClearPolitics - 2016 Election Maps - Battle for White House

Let it go.

Butt out. This doesn't concern you.

Grow up.

Screw you, get lost, troll.

 

[owebo]

Wrong. The only poll that shows her leading by double digits anywhere is Quinnipiac. All the others are about half that.

Lol Quinnipiac is the poll you Trump losers use the most to show your idiot candidate is still in the race. Poor effort, even for you S.J.

Here, stupid. Look at it yourself.
RealClearPolitics - 2016 Latest Polls

Yep a Hillary sweep except for Florida, where 1 out of the 3 polls you linked to has Trump winning. The other 2 have Hillary.

Damn SJ. You're even stupider than usual tonight.

Do they have her winning by double digits, like you said?

Many of them yes

I don't blame you for being afraid.....

 

[oreo]

This is what is scaring the bejeezus out of Hillary: millions of new voters who registered just to vote for Trump. They aren't counted in the polls of "likely voters,"

Media Report: 25% of Current Florida Primary Ballots Never Voted Before, EVER…​

[…] We’re in unprecedented, unchartered territory,” said Florida Chamber president and CEO Mark Wilson. “Nobody’s been polling these people, nobody’s been marketing to these people.”….

The “Monster Vote“ is the name attributed to the largest voting bloc in U.S. history. The voters who have/had given up on the political process because it seemed futile to vote for a rigged system where nothing ever changes. –Outlined Here–

However, we first noted the surfacing of the Monster Vote in relation to the political outsider Donald Trump toward the end of 2015. It was, and is, a rather controversial theorem because the voting bloc would make all media polling completely irrelevant.

Throughout the latter part of 2015 and into the first quarter of 2016 we put our research antenna on high alert to see if the indications were real. We paid a statistician to model the data we collected. We made predictions which, if the bloc was accurate, would stun the professional political class.

Tracking social media, geographic “non-media polling” and alternate media matrices led us to believe Trump would dominate in the presidential primary. The predictions modeled the results with uncanny accuracy. Gobsmacking accuracy.

A few months later the New York Times began quietly evolving it’s electoral modeling. Washington Post political writer Bob Costa began talking about something that he too was noticing which tracked with our own research. Large numbers of the electorate who never engaged in the political process before were becoming increasingly visible.

Throughout this entire year there have been indications the “Monster Vote” is very real, but you have to look carefully to see them – and, obviously, you must inoculate yourself from conformational bias. 400,000 donations to Trump less than $200 in June was one such example. The social media app Zip App is yet another. 2,000,000 views of an innocuous Trump facebook video within 24 hours is another.​

Do you realize how many Latino's live in Florida--LOL

And this doesn't look real encouraging for Trump
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - Florida: Trump vs. Clinton

 

[JimBowie1958]

This has been going on all year; The polls underestimate Trumps vote and turn out almost with regularity.

If the growth in Republican voters from the 2012 primary to the 2016 primaries holds to the general election also, the Trump will get about a 50% growth on his vote over what Romney got also.

Democrats had a shrinkage of their vote (switched to GOP?) which should suggest a diminishing turnout this fall as well.

Put these two factoids together and it spells a victory for Trump of landslide proportions.

But what about the polls? The polls are of Registered voters and "likely" voters which they make a MORE RESTRICTIVE data set than simply registered voters.

The simple fact is that these polls are ignoring new voters, and the vast majority of them are for Trump.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Do you realize how many Latino's live in Florida--LOL

Trump is going to win 30% to 40% of Hispanic voters, idiot. :Lol your racism is simply astonishing in that you think a Hispanic vote is a lock for Hillary, roflmao.

 

[oreo]

Do you realize how many Latino's live in Florida--LOL

Trump is going to win 30% to 40% of Hispanic voters, idiot. :Lol your racism is simply astonishing in that you think a Hispanic vote is a lock for Hillary, roflmao.

Yeah we can see that--LOL
Clinton Has 69-Point Lead Over Trump in Latest Latino Vote Tracking Poll - Latino USA
Latino conservatives: If Donald Trump is the nominee, we will not work to elect him
GOP Win Will Need More Than 40 Percent Of Latino 2016 Vote, Says Study
Poll: 8 in 10 Hispanics don’t like Trump

This looks like a NEGATIVE 80% for Trump to me--LOL

 

[BettyYeti]

Do you realize how many Latino's live in Florida--LOL

Trump is going to win 30% to 40% of Hispanic voters, idiot. :Lol your racism is simply astonishing in that you think a Hispanic vote is a lock for Hillary, roflmao.

Yeah we can see that--LOL
Clinton Has 69-Point Lead Over Trump in Latest Latino Vote Tracking Poll - Latino USA
Latino conservatives: If Donald Trump is the nominee, we will not work to elect him
GOP Win Will Need More Than 40 Percent Of Latino 2016 Vote, Says Study
Poll: 8 in 10 Hispanics don’t like Trump

This looks like a NEGATIVE 80% for Trump to me--LOL

Not to worry, Trump loves a good taco, in a bowl, eaten with a fork. So Hispanic he might as well be making the beds and mowing the lawns - in his penthouse.

 

[bripat9643]

This is what is scaring the bejeezus out of Hillary: millions of new voters who registered just to vote for Trump. They aren't counted in the polls of "likely voters,"

Media Report: 25% of Current Florida Primary Ballots Never Voted Before, EVER…​

[…] We’re in unprecedented, unchartered territory,” said Florida Chamber president and CEO Mark Wilson. “Nobody’s been polling these people, nobody’s been marketing to these people.”….

The “Monster Vote“ is the name attributed to the largest voting bloc in U.S. history. The voters who have/had given up on the political process because it seemed futile to vote for a rigged system where nothing ever changes. –Outlined Here–

However, we first noted the surfacing of the Monster Vote in relation to the political outsider Donald Trump toward the end of 2015. It was, and is, a rather controversial theorem because the voting bloc would make all media polling completely irrelevant.

Throughout the latter part of 2015 and into the first quarter of 2016 we put our research antenna on high alert to see if the indications were real. We paid a statistician to model the data we collected. We made predictions which, if the bloc was accurate, would stun the professional political class.

Tracking social media, geographic “non-media polling” and alternate media matrices led us to believe Trump would dominate in the presidential primary. The predictions modeled the results with uncanny accuracy. Gobsmacking accuracy.

A few months later the New York Times began quietly evolving it’s electoral modeling. Washington Post political writer Bob Costa began talking about something that he too was noticing which tracked with our own research. Large numbers of the electorate who never engaged in the political process before were becoming increasingly visible.

Throughout this entire year there have been indications the “Monster Vote” is very real, but you have to look carefully to see them – and, obviously, you must inoculate yourself from conformational bias. 400,000 donations to Trump less than $200 in June was one such example. The social media app Zip App is yet another. 2,000,000 views of an innocuous Trump facebook video within 24 hours is another.​

Do you realize how many Latino's live in Florida--LOL

And this doesn't look real encouraging for Trump
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - Florida: Trump vs. Clinton

Most of them are Cubans who hate commies like you and Hillary.

 

[candycorn]

This is what is scaring the bejeezus out of Hillary: millions of new voters who registered just to vote for Trump. They aren't counted in the polls of "likely voters,"

Media Report: 25% of Current Florida Primary Ballots Never Voted Before, EVER…​

[…] We’re in unprecedented, unchartered territory,” said Florida Chamber president and CEO Mark Wilson. “Nobody’s been polling these people, nobody’s been marketing to these people.”….

The “Monster Vote“ is the name attributed to the largest voting bloc in U.S. history. The voters who have/had given up on the political process because it seemed futile to vote for a rigged system where nothing ever changes. –Outlined Here–

However, we first noted the surfacing of the Monster Vote in relation to the political outsider Donald Trump toward the end of 2015. It was, and is, a rather controversial theorem because the voting bloc would make all media polling completely irrelevant.

Throughout the latter part of 2015 and into the first quarter of 2016 we put our research antenna on high alert to see if the indications were real. We paid a statistician to model the data we collected. We made predictions which, if the bloc was accurate, would stun the professional political class.

Tracking social media, geographic “non-media polling” and alternate media matrices led us to believe Trump would dominate in the presidential primary. The predictions modeled the results with uncanny accuracy. Gobsmacking accuracy.

A few months later the New York Times began quietly evolving it’s electoral modeling. Washington Post political writer Bob Costa began talking about something that he too was noticing which tracked with our own research. Large numbers of the electorate who never engaged in the political process before were becoming increasingly visible.

Throughout this entire year there have been indications the “Monster Vote” is very real, but you have to look carefully to see them – and, obviously, you must inoculate yourself from conformational bias. 400,000 donations to Trump less than $200 in June was one such example. The social media app Zip App is yet another. 2,000,000 views of an innocuous Trump facebook video within 24 hours is another.​

Sounds like voter fraud.

 

[owebo]

Here, stupid. Look at it yourself.
RealClearPolitics - 2016 Latest Polls

Yep a Hillary sweep except for Florida, where 1 out of the 3 polls you linked to has Trump winning. The other 2 have Hillary.

Damn SJ. You're even stupider than usual tonight.

Do they have her winning by double digits, like you said?

Many of them yes

Show us.

Clinton is roughly +3. Can you let it go now?

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - Florida: Trump vs. Clinton

You are going to need more than that....