McCain will win,to many undeceided voters,not ready to vote for a Socialist President

52ndStreet

Gold Member
Jun 18, 2008
3,749
813
130
In the final analysis, John McCain will be victorius. To many undeceided voters are just not ready to elect a socialist as President of the United States.To many people who just wont vote for a Black man of mixed race.
And Barack Obama, is just to inexperienced.
 
In the final analysis, John McCain will be victorius. To many undeceided voters are just not ready to elect a socialist as President of the United States.To many people who just wont vote for a Black man of mixed race.
And Barack Obama, is just to inexperienced.

Sorry, I don't trust anyone's "analysis" who doesn't know the difference between to and too.
 
In the final analysis, John McCain will be victorius. To many undeceided voters are just not ready to elect a socialist as President of the United States.

I would agree with this statement if there were enough people who recognized his socialist leanings.

To many people who just wont vote for a Black man of mixed race.

I think you're wrong on this one. While there is indeed some racism in this country, I believe there are more than enough people out there who realize the color of a person's skin doesn't matter.

And Barack Obama, is just to inexperienced.

I completely agree.

All that being said, I think Obama will indeed take the day. He will be the next President.
 
I don't know if McCain will win or not but the point you make is one that Rasmussen made on the Glen Beck show this morning. Rasmussen feels the electoral college is still stacked against McCain at this point but he did feel that many of the undecideds will break for McCain as many are not actually undecided but not willing to say they are for McCain on a poll as they don't want to be thought of as racist.
 
Obama will lose for two reasons:

One: THere are many more conservatives (who don't participate in polls) than the Dems would like to imagine, and they will not vote for a socialist.

Two: Obama's own racist base, union members who cannot bring themselves to vote for a black, will throw him under the bus.
 
When Obama does win, will you still deny it?

Which socialist president are we talking about. The one who just moved closer to socializing the banks.

Hey, isn't his name: BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH?
 
Obama will lose for two reasons:

One: THere are many more conservatives (who don't participate in polls) than the Dems would like to imagine, and they will not vote for a socialist.

Two: Obama's own racist base, union members who cannot bring themselves to vote for a black, will throw him under the bus.

One: Conservatives don't participate in polls? Those are all liberals trying to fool the pollers?

Two: I guess he is lucky then that the American labor movement has pretty much been destroyed.
 
Bush is leaving. Obama wants to socialize everything, including banks.

And he won't win.
 
When you say "socialist President," are you implying Bush is running again?

Because Bush has done far more to put the government in people's economic and social lives than any President I can remember.
 
One: Conservatives don't participate in polls? Those are all liberals trying to fool the pollers?

Two: I guess he is lucky then that the American labor movement has pretty much been destroyed.


No, conservatives don't participate in polls. Not to the extent that libs do.

And the so-called "independent" or "undecided" voters are actually Dems who just for one reason or another aren't crazy for Obama.
 
Bush is leaving. Obama wants to socialize everything, including banks.

And he won't win.

Well then WTF did McInsane do when he stopped his campaign to travel to Washington then Always A Bitch?

I'll tell ya.........

HE PRIVATIZED THE FUCKING BANKS BITCH! What part of that do you still not get? If you're gonna call Obama a socialist, you're gonna have to put that same label on McInsane.

For an old woman, you're sure stupid.
 
Bush is leaving. Obama wants to socialize everything, including banks.

This is silly. He is using Clinton's economic policies as a template. We were not socialist under Clinton, but we were much more prosperous, had a budget surplus, and were paying down the debt.
 
I think you're wrong on this one. While there is indeed some racism in this country, I believe there are more than enough people out there who realize the color of a person's skin doesn't matter.

Tell that to the legions of blacks who registered JUST to put a black man in office.
 
It sounds like there are all sorts of ideas about why Obama won't win, and most of them are mutually exclusive.
 
Well then WTF did McInsane do when he stopped his campaign to travel to Washington then Always A Bitch?

I'll tell ya.........

HE PRIVATIZED THE FUCKING BANKS BITCH! What part of that do you still not get? If you're gonna call Obama a socialist, you're gonna have to put that same label on McInsane.

For an old woman, you're sure stupid.

Don't you mean socialized?

If you're going to be that harsh, you might want to make sure you know what you're talking about.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Jon
In the final analysis, John McCain will be victorius.

Praise the Lord!!!! I have been losing sleep worrying about this. This is a Christian country with no place for black muslumn commie socialist! Share the wealth indeed! I can now sleep at night knowing that the election has been decided the right-white, keep the rich rich-way...
 
We may not have been socialist under Clinton, but we damn sure are under Bush Jr.

If McInsane gets the nod, it's gonna be another 4 years of more of the same crap.

I don't think Obama is a socialist. However, McDipshit appears to be.
 

Forum List

Back
Top