McCain turns down FEC matching funds

Discussion in 'Congress' started by Gunny, Apr 14, 2008.

  1. CrimsonWhite
    Offline

    CrimsonWhite *****istrator Emeritus Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,978
    Thanks Received:
    1,749
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Location:
    Guntucky
    Ratings:
    +1,754
    I've been all over this, I have yet to a citation of case law.
     
  2. Dogger
    Offline

    Dogger Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    979
    Thanks Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Dixie
    Ratings:
    +58
    Where is your case law for this: "You know damn good and well that there is a legal difference between collateral and security."

    I've tried to keep my language simple, (you know, for kids). I have laid out the UCC language for easy reference, but if you need case law, look it up yourself.
     
  3. jreeves
    Offline

    jreeves Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,588
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +315
    What the case law question, sorry maybe I missed it? But you have provided no case law to support your position and until you do, you look like a blubbering idiot that is highly educated.
     
  4. jreeves
    Offline

    jreeves Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,588
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +315
    Come on, Westlaw or Nexis-Lexis isn't that difficult? I know why you can't provide adequate case law because it doesn't exist.
     
  5. jreeves
    Offline

    jreeves Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,588
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +315
    Lexis-nexis I mean...sorry a few drinks tonight...LOL
     
  6. Dogger
    Offline

    Dogger Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    979
    Thanks Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Dixie
    Ratings:
    +58
    That stuff isn't free, and I don't subscribe anyway. When the DNC files its brief, it will be stuffed with case law.

    Have you even started law school yet?

    I noticed you've provided no case law either. And your debate on my argument has been mostly contradiction rather than reasoning. You disputed relevant portions of my UCC arguments, but offer no suggestion as to which body of law would apply instead, or how the principles would differ from those I've offered.

    And I have pertinent questions that would guide your understanding of the issue if you only tried to answer them. Please answer them before asking me any more questions. I'm not here to fill in where your teachers have failed.
     
  7. jreeves
    Offline

    jreeves Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,588
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +315
    LOL..no case law huh...ok...
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. Dogger
    Offline

    Dogger Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    979
    Thanks Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Dixie
    Ratings:
    +58
    Not started law school yet, poser? :eusa_wall:
     
  9. jreeves
    Offline

    jreeves Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,588
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +315
    No I understand the law perfectly, remember? You can't provide case law to support your baseless accusation though. What does me attending law school or not have to with your inability to support your accusation? This is truly funny....:rofl:
     
  10. CrimsonWhite
    Offline

    CrimsonWhite *****istrator Emeritus Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,978
    Thanks Received:
    1,749
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Location:
    Guntucky
    Ratings:
    +1,754
    Off-topic. Don't dodge questions by deflecting to statements that were not even made to you. you have been challenged. Prove your case. Provide case law to support your position or shut the hell up.
     

Share This Page