McCAIN CAMPAIGN MEMO: READING THE EXIT POLLS

The Paperboy

Times Square
Aug 26, 2008
1,837
117
48
Times Square
Mon Nov 03 2008 16:53:14 ET

As we have seen in previous election cycles, the exit poll results do leak early and that ends up influencing the coverage of the race before even the first state polls close at 6:00 PM Eastern.

However, we want to remind the campaign that the media’s own post-election study of the exit polls in 2004 showed that the exit polls overstate the Democratic candidate’s support. Therefore, we would discourage a rush to judgment based on the exit polls and wait until there has been a representative sampling of actual tabulated results from a variety of counties and precincts in a state.

Here are the key points to keep in mind when the exit poll data starts being leaked:

1. Historically, exit polls have tended to overstate the Democratic vote.

2. The exit polls are likely to overstate the Obama vote because Obama voters are more likely to participate in the exit poll.

3. The exit polls have tended to skew most Democratic in years where there is high turnout and high vote interest like in 1992 and 2004.

4. It is not just the national exit poll that skews Democratic, but each of the state exit polls also suffers from the same Democratic leanings.

5. The results of the exit polls are also influenced by the demographics of the voters who conduct the exit polls.

After the 2004 election, the National Election Pool completed a study investigating why the exit polls that year showed John Kerry over performing 5.5 net points better than the actual results showed him to have done. Their conclusion was that the primary reason the exit polls was that Kerry voters and Democrats were more likely to participate in the exit polls.

“Our investigation of the differences between the exit poll estimates and the actual vote count point to one primary reason: in a number of precincts a higher than average Within Precinct Error most likely due to Kerry voters participating in the exit polls at a higher rate than Bush voters. There has been partisan overstatements in previous elections, more often overstating the Democrat, but occasionally overstating the Republican.

We believe that this will hold true this year. The recent Fox News survey showed that 46% of Obama voters said they were very likely to participate in the exit polls, while just 35% of McCain supporters are.

In fact, even the 2004 exit poll report noted that higher turnout nationally and higher levels of voter interest in both 1992 and 2004 correlated with greater Within Precinct Error.

The overstating of the Democratic vote did not only occur in the national exit polls, but also occurred in the state exit polls. The 2004 exit poll report cited that the Kerry vote was overstated by more than one standard error in 26 states, while the Bush vote was overstated in just four states. So we should also expect the individual state exit polls on Tuesday to be more Democratic as well.

So given that turnout is expected to be even higher than 2004 and that Democrats are more likely to participate in the exit polls, this means we should expect greater fluctuation and variation in the exit polls from the actual election results.

The 2004 exit poll report also showed that the greatest error in the exit poll came in precincts where the interviewer was younger. The completion rates were lower and the refusal rates and Within Precinct Error was higher when the interviewers were under the age of 35.[6] Complicating this is that nearly half the interviewers were under the age of 35, including 35% who were 18-24 and another 15% were 25-34.

Conclusions

Based on the previous exit poll results, we should expect once again that Tuesday’s exit poll data could overstate the Obama vote and under represent the McCain vote.

It is important that the campaign make sure the media realizes this, so that when the exit polls do leak, people do not overreact to the early exit poll data. Rather than looking at the exit polls, we should wait until we start seeing actual election results from key precincts and counties to gauge who won the election.

Link here
 
Last edited:
Interesting, thanks for the post and the link. It'll be interesting how things play out tomorrow!
 
no one should let exit polls determine if they vote or who they vote for
everyone should get out and vote
 
Virginia closes at 7p. If O's not up 10 pts from Kerry in the big NoVA counties or SE VA cities, that'll say more about Mac's chances than having staffers spin exit polls to the media. Win or lose, Mac's campaign has been run by fools.
 
Democrats, especially over enthusiastic Obama supporters are much more likely to hang around & fill out another ballot on who they voted for.

Do not be fooled by exit polling data. In 2004 Kerry, according to exit polling data was running away with the election. Kerry lost by approximately 4 million votes.

IGNORE--exit polling data that will be going on all day tommorrow. JUST GO VOTE!
 
Last edited:

It is important that the campaign make sure the media realizes this, so that when the exit polls do leak, people do not overreact to the early exit poll data. Rather than looking at the exit polls, we should wait until we start seeing actual election results from key precincts and counties to gauge who won the election.


]


Physician Heal Thyself................:eusa_whistle:
 
Democrats, especially over enthusiastic Obama supporters are much more likely to hang around & fill out another ballot on who they voted for.

Do not be fooled by exit polling data. In 2004 Kerry, according to exit polling data was running away with the election. Kerry lost by approximately 4 million votes.

IGNORE--exit polling data that will be going on all day tommorrow. JUST GO VOTE!

Actually. exit polls are pretty accurate. And, according to this study, there is no good explananation for the discrepancy in the Kerry election and that the discrepancy should have been investigated.

In fact, exit polls are used to assess the validity of elections in foreign countries where elections are being monitored.

http://www.appliedresearch.us/sf/Documents/ExitPoll.pdf
 
Actually. exit polls are pretty accurate. And, according to this study, there is no good explananation for the discrepancy in the Kerry election and that the discrepancy should have been investigated.

In fact, exit polls are used to assess the validity of elections in foreign countries where elections are being monitored.

http://www.appliedresearch.us/sf/Documents/ExitPoll.pdf
in 2004 they released early incomplete exit polls
that was why they were wrong
after they finished they were pretty close, but they released the early data when they shouldnt have
one can only speculate as to why they did it
 
in 2004 they released early incomplete exit polls
that was why they were wrong
after they finished they were pretty close, but they released the early data when they shouldnt have
one can only speculate as to why they did it

Possible, but there was a lot of fishy crap in florida like this:

While the heavily scrutinized touch-screen voting machines seemed to produce results in which the registered Democrat/Republican ratios largely matched the Kerry/Bush vote, in Florida's counties using results from optically scanned paper ballots - fed into a central tabulator PC and thus vulnerable to hacking – the results seem to contain substantial anomalies.

In Baker County, for example, with 12,887 registered voters, 69.3% of them Democrats and 24.3% of them Republicans, the vote was only 2,180 for Kerry and 7,738 for Bush, the opposite of what is seen everywhere else in the country where registered Democrats largely voted for Kerry.

In Dixie County, with 9,676 registered voters, 77.5% of them Democrats and a mere 15% registered as Republicans, only 1,959 people voted for Kerry, but 4,433 voted for Bush.

The pattern repeats over and over again - but only in the counties where optical scanners were used. Franklin County, 77.3% registered Democrats, went 58.5% for Bush. Holmes County, 72.7% registered Democrats, went 77.25% for Bush.

there were other wholesale anomalies like losing tens of thousands of votes in one fell swoop, and etc etc.
 
Actually re-reading the article four years later is interesting.

Evidence Mounts That The Vote May Have Been Hacked

I am sure if the candidate that you (anyone) don't support is using these tricks you (anyone) would be very very pissed to have your vote stolen and the wrong guy put in office.
please find a more reliable source than commondreams, you would flat out reject a newsmax story, dont expect me to believe commondreams
 

Forum List

Back
Top