Mary is not the mother of God

Buddhists say the protopye of love is the love of a mother to her only child. That' a much more better picture for this what love is.
J dont care. If you want to waste yiur time finding a "universal definition of love" that aligns with your prejudices and magical fetishes, be my guest. That's your hobby, I'm not buying in.
 
for heterosexual, sex is the end product for an endearing relationship - without procreation / pleasure the relationship is terminable for that reason alone.
Thats fucking stupid and you should feel embarrassed of yourself for saying it. But,have fun in your mission of terminating relationships, when the woman reaches menopause. Gee, we never can have enough people with morals from the year 1000 running around... :rolleyes:
 
for heterosexual, sex is the end product for an endearing relationship - without procreation / pleasure the relationship is terminable for that reason alone.
Thats fucking stupid and you should feel embarrassed of yourself for saying it. But,have fun in your mission of terminating relationships, when the woman reaches menopause. Gee, we never can have enough people with morals from the year 1000 running around... :rolleyes:

Thats fucking stupid and you should feel embarrassed of yourself for saying it. But,have fun in your mission of terminating relationships, when the woman reaches menopause. Gee, we never can have enough people with morals from the year 1000 running around... :rolleyes:

protraction / pleasure is an essential ingredient for a heterosexual intimate relationship that itself can determine its duration. exceptions are just that where the outcome is uncertain.
 
It would be safer to say that all humans, including all males, exhibit obvious signs of some feminine traits.
They would have to, since they start as an X only ovum, and the Y chromosome is seriously damaged and defective.
Notice there are women with XX, men with XY, but there is no YY?
That is because the Y chromosome is so defective that YY is not viable and no living organism is possible from YY combinations.
Safer, but not addressing the point that some people are clearly homosexual.
All homos are born that way.
Nope.
Prove it with proper links, otherwise you lose. :popcorn:
It can be prove through inspection. Just use your eyes.
You lose. Again.
 
protraction / pleasure is an essential ingredient for a heterosexual intimate relationship
You meant procreation, but you are dead ass wrong. You are embarrassing yourself.
.
I included intimate, heterosexual relationship - and for clarity procreation / pleasure are the determining factors for its duration ... for both individuals. exceptions are at best artificial.

you kid yourself ff but then again indiana is a hell hole to live in.
 
Some are born gay and some are made gay.

The ones that are born gay are obvious.
 
Prove it with proper links, otherwise you lose. :popcorn:
It can be prove through inspection. Just use your eyes.
You lose. Again.
Not even close.
I said for you to prove it with proper links and you couldn't, so I win.
I didn’t see you prove otherwise with proper links.
You made the claim so it's up to you to back it up. You suck at this.
 
It can be prove through inspection. Just use your eyes.
You lose. Again.
Not even close.
I said for you to prove it with proper links and you couldn't, so I win.
I didn’t see you prove otherwise with proper links.
You made the claim so it's up to you to back it up. You suck at this.
I did. You can totally tell the ones that were born gay just by talking to them.

There’s your proof. You think there is a test or something. :rofl:
 
You lose. Again.
Not even close.
I said for you to prove it with proper links and you couldn't, so I win.
I didn’t see you prove otherwise with proper links.
You made the claim so it's up to you to back it up. You suck at this.
I did. You can totally tell the ones that were born gay just by talking to them.

There’s your proof. You think there is a test or something. :rofl:
I asked for proper links and you gave none, again. You're a fool.
 
Not even close.
I said for you to prove it with proper links and you couldn't, so I win.
I didn’t see you prove otherwise with proper links.
You made the claim so it's up to you to back it up. You suck at this.
I did. You can totally tell the ones that were born gay just by talking to them.

There’s your proof. You think there is a test or something. :rofl:
I asked for proper links and you gave none, again. You're a fool.
Neither did you. Where are yours? You made a claim to, Gertrude.
 
Not even close.
I said for you to prove it with proper links and you couldn't, so I win.
I didn’t see you prove otherwise with proper links.
You made the claim so it's up to you to back it up. You suck at this.
I did. You can totally tell the ones that were born gay just by talking to them.

There’s your proof. You think there is a test or something. :rofl:
I asked for proper links and you gave none, again. You're a fool.
Were you born gay?
 
I said for you to prove it with proper links and you couldn't, so I win.
I didn’t see you prove otherwise with proper links.
You made the claim so it's up to you to back it up. You suck at this.
I did. You can totally tell the ones that were born gay just by talking to them.

There’s your proof. You think there is a test or something. :rofl:
I asked for proper links and you gave none, again. You're a fool.
Neither did you. Where are yours? You made a claim to, Gertrude.
'Gay genes': science is on the right track, we're born this way. Let’s deal with it.
 
I said for you to prove it with proper links and you couldn't, so I win.
I didn’t see you prove otherwise with proper links.
You made the claim so it's up to you to back it up. You suck at this.
I did. You can totally tell the ones that were born gay just by talking to them.

There’s your proof. You think there is a test or something. :rofl:
I asked for proper links and you gave none, again. You're a fool.
Were you born gay?
Deflecting already? :lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top