Mary is not the mother of God

It's not wise, nor is it particularly civilized, to mess with the deeply held religious convictions of others.

What others believe in these matters is their own personal beliefs and it's rude and pretentious to attempt to belittle their beliefs.

That is normally true, but not when you have centuries of Crusades, Inquisitions, slavery, conquistadors, Holy Roman Empires, wars of succession, massacres of reform minorities like the Huguenots, etc.
Then it is better to bring up the truth so that there can be true reformation.
 
Catholic bashing is so last millennium.

Not really.

Christianity was great, but when the Romans took over Christianity, under Constantine, Christianity was deliberately corrupted and perverted, and called Catholicism. Catholicism still has that Roman corruption, and that Roman influence is evil, and has to be removed.
It is not that one should bash any religion, but that reform to remove corruption should be encouraged.
It is clear Catholicism has to admit to past sins in order to move beyond them.
 
If we are talking about Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ, then yes she is. If we are talking about another Mary then no

Mary can not be the mother of God if God already existed.
And if God did not already exist, then Mary could not have become the mother of God.
 
I've know several gay people throughout my life. They are born that way. trust me.
All of them? Every single one?

How do you know?
Why is this an obsession with you? What have you done?
No obsession. Just making a point.

Only a few are born that way. The obvious ones.
So everyone else is faking it to suck some dick? What percentage?
Faking it? No.

That doesn’t mean they were all born gay. Most weren’t.

Its way more complicated than that.
Remember, all humans start as an ovum, and all ovum can only be female originally, because all ovum come from a female, and females only have X sex chromosomes to work with.
The only difference of a Y chromosome is the increase production of testosterone.
But one can get testosterone from things like foods, and not even know it.
And even if one get conditioned into a different sexual orientation, that does not change its legitimacy.
 
All of them? Every single one?

How do you know?
Why is this an obsession with you? What have you done?
No obsession. Just making a point.

Only a few are born that way. The obvious ones.
So everyone else is faking it to suck some dick? What percentage?
Faking it? No.

That doesn’t mean they were all born gay. Most weren’t.

Its way more complicated than that.
Remember, all humans start as an ovum, and all ovum can only be female originally, because all ovum come from a female, and females only have X sex chromosomes to work with.
The only difference of a Y chromosome is the increase production of testosterone.
But one can get testosterone from things like foods, and not even know it.
And even if one get conditioned into a different sexual orientation, that does not change its legitimacy.
Right. But that doesn’t change the fact that some males exhibit obvious signs of being feminine, right?
 
Why is this an obsession with you? What have you done?
No obsession. Just making a point.

Only a few are born that way. The obvious ones.
So everyone else is faking it to suck some dick? What percentage?
Faking it? No.

That doesn’t mean they were all born gay. Most weren’t.

Its way more complicated than that.
Remember, all humans start as an ovum, and all ovum can only be female originally, because all ovum come from a female, and females only have X sex chromosomes to work with.
The only difference of a Y chromosome is the increase production of testosterone.
But one can get testosterone from things like foods, and not even know it.
And even if one get conditioned into a different sexual orientation, that does not change its legitimacy.
Right. But that doesn’t change the fact that some males exhibit obvious signs of being feminine, right?

It would be safer to say that all humans, including all males, exhibit obvious signs of some feminine traits.
They would have to, since they start as an X only ovum, and the Y chromosome is seriously damaged and defective.
Notice there are women with XX, men with XY, but there is no YY?
That is because the Y chromosome is so defective that YY is not viable and no living organism is possible from YY combinations.
 
Homosexuality is as less love as heterosexuality is love.
No, they are both a form of love. Sorry that missed you in life.

Homosexual vs heterosexual is just is just a different visual orientation.
All you have to do is ask yourself if you were blind, would it make any difference about a deep and meaning full relationship commitment.
And the answer is that I don't think visual orientation makes that much difference once a relationship exists.
It is just involved in the initial stage of the relationship.
And in fact, sex is not that essential to a relationship at all.
Otherwise one could not love nonsexual relatives, like parents or children.
 
No obsession. Just making a point.

Only a few are born that way. The obvious ones.
So everyone else is faking it to suck some dick? What percentage?
Faking it? No.

That doesn’t mean they were all born gay. Most weren’t.

Its way more complicated than that.
Remember, all humans start as an ovum, and all ovum can only be female originally, because all ovum come from a female, and females only have X sex chromosomes to work with.
The only difference of a Y chromosome is the increase production of testosterone.
But one can get testosterone from things like foods, and not even know it.
And even if one get conditioned into a different sexual orientation, that does not change its legitimacy.
Right. But that doesn’t change the fact that some males exhibit obvious signs of being feminine, right?

It would be safer to say that all humans, including all males, exhibit obvious signs of some feminine traits.
They would have to, since they start as an X only ovum, and the Y chromosome is seriously damaged and defective.
Notice there are women with XX, men with XY, but there is no YY?
That is because the Y chromosome is so defective that YY is not viable and no living organism is possible from YY combinations.
Safer, but not addressing the point that some people are clearly homosexual.
 
Homosexuality is as less love as heterosexuality is love.
No, they are both a form of love. Sorry that missed you in life.

Buddhists say the protopye of love is the love of a mother to her only child. That' a much more better picture for this what love is. By the way. This year I heard in a noble restaurant in Hamburg they threw a mother out, who started to breastfeed her baby. Looks like the world grows day by day more mad.

 
Last edited:
And not to forget: Mother Mary is the mother of god.

Mary is not the mother of Satan. Do you pray to the statue of Mary? What kind of fool are you?

I don't think you expect a serios answer on this Anti-Christian attack. I guess, you speak here about a deficite of your own weird culture - the fear of though men on the extraterrestrian species women.

 
It's not wise, nor is it particularly civilized, to mess with the deeply held religious convictions of others.

What others believe in these matters is their own personal beliefs and it's rude and pretentious to attempt to belittle their beliefs.

That is normally true, but not when you have centuries of Crusades, Inquisitions, slavery, conquistadors, Holy Roman Empires, wars of succession, massacres of reform minorities like the Huguenots, etc.
Then it is better to bring up the truth so that there can be true reformation.

The problem is you use all this words and you know less than nothing context of all this words: And I had to write a book to give you a correct answer, which you would not read.
 
So everyone else is faking it to suck some dick? What percentage?
Faking it? No.

That doesn’t mean they were all born gay. Most weren’t.

Its way more complicated than that.
Remember, all humans start as an ovum, and all ovum can only be female originally, because all ovum come from a female, and females only have X sex chromosomes to work with.
The only difference of a Y chromosome is the increase production of testosterone.
But one can get testosterone from things like foods, and not even know it.
And even if one get conditioned into a different sexual orientation, that does not change its legitimacy.
Right. But that doesn’t change the fact that some males exhibit obvious signs of being feminine, right?

It would be safer to say that all humans, including all males, exhibit obvious signs of some feminine traits.
They would have to, since they start as an X only ovum, and the Y chromosome is seriously damaged and defective.
Notice there are women with XX, men with XY, but there is no YY?
That is because the Y chromosome is so defective that YY is not viable and no living organism is possible from YY combinations.
Safer, but not addressing the point that some people are clearly homosexual.
All homos are born that way.
 
Faking it? No.

That doesn’t mean they were all born gay. Most weren’t.

Its way more complicated than that.
Remember, all humans start as an ovum, and all ovum can only be female originally, because all ovum come from a female, and females only have X sex chromosomes to work with.
The only difference of a Y chromosome is the increase production of testosterone.
But one can get testosterone from things like foods, and not even know it.
And even if one get conditioned into a different sexual orientation, that does not change its legitimacy.
Right. But that doesn’t change the fact that some males exhibit obvious signs of being feminine, right?

It would be safer to say that all humans, including all males, exhibit obvious signs of some feminine traits.
They would have to, since they start as an X only ovum, and the Y chromosome is seriously damaged and defective.
Notice there are women with XX, men with XY, but there is no YY?
That is because the Y chromosome is so defective that YY is not viable and no living organism is possible from YY combinations.
Safer, but not addressing the point that some people are clearly homosexual.
All homos are born that way.
Nope.
 
Its way more complicated than that.
Remember, all humans start as an ovum, and all ovum can only be female originally, because all ovum come from a female, and females only have X sex chromosomes to work with.
The only difference of a Y chromosome is the increase production of testosterone.
But one can get testosterone from things like foods, and not even know it.
And even if one get conditioned into a different sexual orientation, that does not change its legitimacy.
Right. But that doesn’t change the fact that some males exhibit obvious signs of being feminine, right?

It would be safer to say that all humans, including all males, exhibit obvious signs of some feminine traits.
They would have to, since they start as an X only ovum, and the Y chromosome is seriously damaged and defective.
Notice there are women with XX, men with XY, but there is no YY?
That is because the Y chromosome is so defective that YY is not viable and no living organism is possible from YY combinations.
Safer, but not addressing the point that some people are clearly homosexual.
All homos are born that way.
Nope.
Prove it with proper links, otherwise you lose. :popcorn:
 
Right. But that doesn’t change the fact that some males exhibit obvious signs of being feminine, right?

It would be safer to say that all humans, including all males, exhibit obvious signs of some feminine traits.
They would have to, since they start as an X only ovum, and the Y chromosome is seriously damaged and defective.
Notice there are women with XX, men with XY, but there is no YY?
That is because the Y chromosome is so defective that YY is not viable and no living organism is possible from YY combinations.
Safer, but not addressing the point that some people are clearly homosexual.
All homos are born that way.
Nope.
Prove it with proper links, otherwise you lose. :popcorn:
It can be prove through inspection. Just use your eyes.
 
And in fact, sex is not that essential to a relationship at all.
Neat! But both can be and are a form of love.
.
Neat! But both can be and are a form of love.

And in fact, sex is not that essential to a relationship at all.

for heterosexual, sex is the end product for an endearing relationship - without procreation / pleasure the relationship is terminable for that reason alone.
 

Forum List

Back
Top