Marsha Blackburn Calls for Recusal of Democrat Presidential Candidates from Impeachment Process

[The Purge]

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) called for the recusal of four Democrat presidential candidates from the impeachment process against President Donald Trump on Wednesday after Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed the articles.

Blackburn said in an emailed statement:

Tomorrow, one hundred United States Senators will be sworn in to serve in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump. Four of those Senators must recuse themselves for their unparalleled political interest in seeing this President removed from office.

These four Democrats, Senators Bennet, Klobuchar, Sanders, and Warren, cannot sit in judgment of the very President they seek to replace. To participate in this trial would be a failure of the oath they took to be an ‘impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws’. Their presidential ambitions prohibit their ability to view this trial through an objective lens.

In the email sent to her supporters, Blackburn noted:

In Andrew Johnson’s impeachment trial, an objection was lodged against an Ohio senator who was next in line to become President, if Johnson were removed.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...

------------

Honestly, Schiffhead needs to recuse himself, he is a witness and needs to testify as to what he knows about the supposed whistlesucker and when he knew it and when the rule was changed to permit hearsay.....and WE NEED TO HEAR DIRECTLY FROM THIS SUPPOSED WHISTLEBLOWER, ALONG WITH BIDEN AND HIS SPAWN!

 

[kyzr]

The additional upside of them recusing is that they can then hit the road and campaign against Joe Biden. Their recusal also means that Nancy's ploy of delaying submitting the Articles to the Senate to help Joe Biden didn't work. Recusal is worth a shot.

 

[HaShev]

I'd rather let them suffer through it then charge Them with the very things they claim Trump did but droped, since they are abusing their power to subvert an opponent during an election, including using a foreign gov't to do so and doing so to manipulate an election, which are charges even Pelosi has to answer to.
Like I said many times, PELOSI fell into her own trap as any impeachment process going to Senate is clear cut evidence of her involvement in the illegal process & coup. The O.C.E. can't claim insufficient evidence to procede with abuse of power ethics violations on this illegitimate majority congress.

 

[bullwinkle]

Four of those Senators must recuse themselves for their unparalleled political interest in seeing this President removed from office.

Interesting. Does Blackburn also argue that Graham, among a whole host of others including McConnell, have already announced their decisions to ignore their oaths to be impartial jurists should recuse themselves?

 

[Penelope]

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) called for the recusal of four Democrat presidential candidates from the impeachment process against President Donald Trump on Wednesday after Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed the articles.

Blackburn said in an emailed statement:

Tomorrow, one hundred United States Senators will be sworn in to serve in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump. Four of those Senators must recuse themselves for their unparalleled political interest in seeing this President removed from office.

These four Democrats, Senators Bennet, Klobuchar, Sanders, and Warren, cannot sit in judgment of the very President they seek to replace. To participate in this trial would be a failure of the oath they took to be an ‘impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws’. Their presidential ambitions prohibit their ability to view this trial through an objective lens.

In the email sent to her supporters, Blackburn noted:

In Andrew Johnson’s impeachment trial, an objection was lodged against an Ohio senator who was next in line to become President, if Johnson were removed.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...

------------

Honestly, Schiffhead needs to recuse himself, he is a witness and needs to testify as to what he knows about the supposed whistlesucker and when he knew it and when the rule was changed to permit hearsay.....and WE NEED TO HEAR DIRECTLY FROM THIS SUPPOSED WHISTLEBLOWER, ALONG WITH BIDEN AND HIS SPAWN!

Johnson had no VP, that is the difference. The republicans have been up to their stale tricks for so long, that people forget how utterly stupid they are, and some people blindly vote for them.

 

[The Purge]

Four of those Senators must recuse themselves for their unparalleled political interest in seeing this President removed from office.

Interesting. Does Blackburn also argue that Graham, among a whole host of others including McConnell, have already announced their decisions to ignore their oaths to be impartial jurists should recuse themselves?

Why, ALL DeathRATS Have said Trump is guilty and what about the bipartisan vote for impeachment that There WASN'T!

 

[The Purge]

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) called for the recusal of four Democrat presidential candidates from the impeachment process against President Donald Trump on Wednesday after Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed the articles.

Blackburn said in an emailed statement:

Tomorrow, one hundred United States Senators will be sworn in to serve in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump. Four of those Senators must recuse themselves for their unparalleled political interest in seeing this President removed from office.

These four Democrats, Senators Bennet, Klobuchar, Sanders, and Warren, cannot sit in judgment of the very President they seek to replace. To participate in this trial would be a failure of the oath they took to be an ‘impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws’. Their presidential ambitions prohibit their ability to view this trial through an objective lens.

In the email sent to her supporters, Blackburn noted:

In Andrew Johnson’s impeachment trial, an objection was lodged against an Ohio senator who was next in line to become President, if Johnson were removed.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...

------------

Honestly, Schiffhead needs to recuse himself, he is a witness and needs to testify as to what he knows about the supposed whistlesucker and when he knew it and when the rule was changed to permit hearsay.....and WE NEED TO HEAR DIRECTLY FROM THIS SUPPOSED WHISTLEBLOWER, ALONG WITH BIDEN AND HIS SPAWN!

Johnson had no VP, that is the difference. The republicans have been up to their stale tricks for so long, that people forget how utterly stupid they are, and some people blindly vote for them.

But there was a SUCESSOR to Johnson if impeached who voted!...some people are just dishonest with everything a Muslim terrorist posts!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) called for the recusal of four Democrat presidential candidates from the impeachment process against President Donald Trump on Wednesday after Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed the articles.

Blackburn said in an emailed statement:

Tomorrow, one hundred United States Senators will be sworn in to serve in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump. Four of those Senators must recuse themselves for their unparalleled political interest in seeing this President removed from office.

These four Democrats, Senators Bennet, Klobuchar, Sanders, and Warren, cannot sit in judgment of the very President they seek to replace. To participate in this trial would be a failure of the oath they took to be an ‘impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws’. Their presidential ambitions prohibit their ability to view this trial through an objective lens.

In the email sent to her supporters, Blackburn noted:

In Andrew Johnson’s impeachment trial, an objection was lodged against an Ohio senator who was next in line to become President, if Johnson were removed.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...

------------

Honestly, Schiffhead needs to recuse himself, he is a witness and needs to testify as to what he knows about the supposed whistlesucker and when he knew it and when the rule was changed to permit hearsay.....and WE NEED TO HEAR DIRECTLY FROM THIS SUPPOSED WHISTLEBLOWER, ALONG WITH BIDEN AND HIS SPAWN!

You leave out the fact that Benjamin Wade did not recuse himself from the trial.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Four of those Senators must recuse themselves for their unparalleled political interest in seeing this President removed from office.

Interesting. Does Blackburn also argue that Graham, among a whole host of others including McConnell, have already announced their decisions to ignore their oaths to be impartial jurists should recuse themselves?

I would think no, as what McConnell and Graham have done is openly state their intentions, something that ALL the senators, on both sides, are thinking, but just havent stated vocally.

 

[wamose]

Can you imagine a party so hard up that they are trying to fix a nomination for Biden? And Bernie gets screwed by his party once again.

 

[Penelope]

Can you imagine a party so hard up that they are trying to fix a nomination for Biden? And Bernie gets screwed by his party once again.

Prove that, you assumption, an conspiracy, does not matter, you can say whatever you want , but your have no proof of your assumption.

 

[kyzr]

Can you imagine a party so hard up that they are trying to fix a nomination for Biden? And Bernie gets screwed by his party once again.

Prove that, you assumption, an conspiracy, does not matter, you can say whatever you want , but your have no proof of your assumption.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders
Super-delegates are the party bosses trump card, and they voted against Bernie
Donna Brazile gave Hillary debate questions

 

[Jitss617]

She’s got a good point

 

[Penelope]

Can you imagine a party so hard up that they are trying to fix a nomination for Biden? And Bernie gets screwed by his party once again.

Prove that, you assumption, an conspiracy, does not matter, you can say whatever you want , but your have no proof of your assumption.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders
Super-delegates are the party bosses trump card, and they voted against Bernie
Donna Brazile gave Hillary debate questions

The only thing that proves is that Russia wanted tramp to debate Bernie, Donna Brazile is guilty.

 

[kyzr]

Can you imagine a party so hard up that they are trying to fix a nomination for Biden? And Bernie gets screwed by his party once again.

Prove that, you assumption, an conspiracy, does not matter, you can say whatever you want , but your have no proof of your assumption.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders
Super-delegates are the party bosses trump card, and they voted against Bernie
Donna Brazile gave Hillary debate questions

The only thing that proves is that Russia wanted tramp to debate Bernie, Donna Brazile is guilty.

WTF does Russia have to do with the DNC preferring Hillary? Are you saying that Russia controls the DNC? I think your TDS is getting the better of you.

 

[Penelope]

Can you imagine a party so hard up that they are trying to fix a nomination for Biden? And Bernie gets screwed by his party once again.

Prove that, you assumption, an conspiracy, does not matter, you can say whatever you want , but your have no proof of your assumption.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders
Super-delegates are the party bosses trump card, and they voted against Bernie
Donna Brazile gave Hillary debate questions

The only thing that proves is that Russia wanted tramp to debate Bernie, Donna Brazile is guilty.

WTF does Russia have to do with the DNC preferring Hillary? Are you saying that Russia controls the DNC? I think your TDS is getting the better of you.
View attachment 300654

Russia sent the emails which were cherry picked to Wikileaks and they how they were presented, cherry picked. Also YES Russia wanted tramp to win and it still does.

 

[NightFox]

Apparently Marsha has been hitting the sauce a bit too hard again, you can't demonstrate an inability to be impartial based on something that hasn't happened yet and what hasn't happened is that none of these 4 clowns has secured the Democratic Presidential Nomination nor can anyone say with any degree of certainty whether the eventual nominee would be more or less likely to win the Presidency with Donny out of the way.

If these dingbats want to start going down the road of "Senator X must recuse itself because of potential bias" then ALL of them are open to that given their allegiances to their respective partisan Crime Families; most of these dickweeds already had their minds made up regarding guilt or innocence before the Articles were even voted on based solely on partisan loyalty.

Marsha needs to STFU before people start scrutinizing her ability to be objective too closely.

 

[kyzr]

Can you imagine a party so hard up that they are trying to fix a nomination for Biden? And Bernie gets screwed by his party once again.

Prove that, you assumption, an conspiracy, does not matter, you can say whatever you want , but your have no proof of your assumption.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders
Super-delegates are the party bosses trump card, and they voted against Bernie
Donna Brazile gave Hillary debate questions

The only thing that proves is that Russia wanted tramp to debate Bernie, Donna Brazile is guilty.

WTF does Russia have to do with the DNC preferring Hillary? Are you saying that Russia controls the DNC? I think your TDS is getting the better of you.
View attachment 300654

Russia sent the emails which were cherry picked to Wikileaks and they how they were presented, cherry picked. Also YES Russia wanted tramp to win and it still does.

One more time...FACT: the DNC cheated for Hillary to win the nomination over Bernie......
1. WTF does Russia have to do with the DNC preferring Hillary? (I'm not getting how the wiki emails had anything to do w/Hillary v Bernie??)
2. Are you saying that Russia controlled the DNC in 2016? (Who are you saying Russia wanted as the dem nominee? You are not connecting any dots)

 

[The Purge]

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) called for the recusal of four Democrat presidential candidates from the impeachment process against President Donald Trump on Wednesday after Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed the articles.

Blackburn said in an emailed statement:

Tomorrow, one hundred United States Senators will be sworn in to serve in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump. Four of those Senators must recuse themselves for their unparalleled political interest in seeing this President removed from office.

These four Democrats, Senators Bennet, Klobuchar, Sanders, and Warren, cannot sit in judgment of the very President they seek to replace. To participate in this trial would be a failure of the oath they took to be an ‘impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws’. Their presidential ambitions prohibit their ability to view this trial through an objective lens.

In the email sent to her supporters, Blackburn noted:

In Andrew Johnson’s impeachment trial, an objection was lodged against an Ohio senator who was next in line to become President, if Johnson were removed.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...

------------

Honestly, Schiffhead needs to recuse himself, he is a witness and needs to testify as to what he knows about the supposed whistlesucker and when he knew it and when the rule was changed to permit hearsay.....and WE NEED TO HEAR DIRECTLY FROM THIS SUPPOSED WHISTLEBLOWER, ALONG WITH BIDEN AND HIS SPAWN!

You leave out the fact that Benjamin Wade did not recuse himself from the trial.

Yes, he acted like todays unconstitutional demonRATS!