Mark Levin Speaks On The Steps Of The Capitol

So it is the devisive talk-radio guys taking leadership in the Conservative movement. Interesting.
 
Standing up for freedom is the new divisive

No, surely not. But, implying the evilest intentions on those you have policy disagreements with, for ratings, for incitement of anger, is grimy. I agree with many Conservative ideas, just don't like their dirty tactics. You're a prime example. Instead of having disagreements, you go the middle-school route......going to town on "libruls are brain dead socialist stalinist pigs," when in reality it's just stereotyping and sensationalism.....................same reason I disagree with talk-radio tactics. Turns me off.

It's like people wondering why there's no loud movement of Muslims denouncing terrorism. Where's Conservatives denouncing their ass-holes? Wait, Michael Steele tried and then saw it was a bad idea "politically" and he pussed out. I'm lost with that.
 
Divisive word of the Day: Liberty.

Divisive ideas: Reminding US Citizens that we own the Congress, it's our Constitution and our government; they work for us!

Is Levin a traitor to Obama and all he stands for?
 
Standing up for freedom is the new divisive

No, surely not. But, implying the evilest intentions on those you have policy disagreements with, for ratings, for incitement of anger, is grimy. I agree with many Conservative ideas, just don't like their dirty tactics. You're a prime example. Instead of having disagreements, you go the middle-school route......going to town on "libruls are brain dead socialist stalinist pigs," when in reality it's just stereotyping and sensationalism.....................same reason I disagree with talk-radio tactics. Turns me off.

It's like people wondering why there's no loud movement of Muslims denouncing terrorism. Where's Conservatives denouncing their ass-holes? Wait, Michael Steele tried and then saw it was a bad idea "politically" and he pussed out. I'm lost with that.

Pay closer attention to current events. Modern Librulism IS Socialism, IS Stalinism!
 
Standing up for freedom is the new divisive

No, surely not. But, implying the evilest intentions on those you have policy disagreements with, for ratings, for incitement of anger, is grimy. I agree with many Conservative ideas, just don't like their dirty tactics. You're a prime example. Instead of having disagreements, you go the middle-school route......going to town on "libruls are brain dead socialist stalinist pigs," when in reality it's just stereotyping and sensationalism.....................same reason I disagree with talk-radio tactics. Turns me off.

It's like people wondering why there's no loud movement of Muslims denouncing terrorism. Where's Conservatives denouncing their ass-holes? Wait, Michael Steele tried and then saw it was a bad idea "politically" and he pussed out. I'm lost with that.

Pay closer attention to current events. Modern Librulism IS Socialism, IS Stalinism!


You can deny that your Leadership and its tactics suck all you want. Here's the reality: when young persons whom were against the War, at the beginning, were called Terrorist sympathizers and anti troops and anti-American, you and your leadership Alienated those voters from all of your other initiatives. That fact, coupled with the way the Economy failed and all I could hear about from the right was name calling and sensationalism, turned off an independant young man like myself because I honor integrity and I wasn't seeing it whatsoever from your leadership.

Fast forward to 5+ years of Fox viewership and Right Wing Radio listening, and they've kept the same theme all along: sensationalize policy disagreements to imply the other side are "evil," looking to put the country into "slavery!!!" and all this other bumble-jargain, and the slimyness never changes. All I can say is ce la vie. You'll win elections here and there not because of your fucking Leadership, but because Citizens tend to vote people who have been in power for some-time out of power, when all they see is Taxing and Spending.

I think our Country is looking for an end to the sensationalism and divisive rhetoric as a TACTIC of your leadership, or the Left's. But pussies can't man the fuck up and denounce their bullyish middleschoolers and so I will remain boycotting voting at all.
 
ObamaCare IS Slavery! The reckless Spending IS Slavery!

WAKE THE FUCK UP!

Here's your problem: Mature people look to hear: "this is a bad idea because of A (facts) B (numbers), C(precedent, truth).

Not "omgz! death panels! slavery! oh noes!" with no A(facts), no B (numbers), C (precedent, truth), or D (ideas of your own).

That's the middle school shit I'm talking about, and Frankly Frank you're a fucking pro at it.
 
We tried the "There's no constitutional authority for ObamaCare" route and all we got was snores.
 
We tried the "There's no constitutional authority for ObamaCare" route and all we got was snores.

No, you didn't. You've been doing your "libruls are a dizzeaze!!!" mantra for years. It's just annoying, and not very appealing to a person looking for an intellectual discussion on an issue without the "socialist pigs!" koo-koo bullshit. That's why Radio and Fox entertainers make their dough, and their ratings. It's the Howard Stern shock-jock phenomena. The more appalling, the better. WWF/WWE was never short any fans for this reasoning, either.
 
Check again, G.T.

We asked Madame Pelosi, "Where's the Constitutional authority for ObamaCare?" and she replied, "Are you kidding?"

We're not kidding
 
Check again, G.T.

We asked Madame Pelosi, "Where's the Constitutional authority for ObamaCare?" and she replied, "Are you kidding?"

We're not kidding

I'll check again.

Speaking of Pelosi, you're a tOOn* bro just admit it. You can't mention her without a snide. "Madame."

You post pictures of ugly Democrats. You call corny assed names. What evidence is there that would lead a person to propel your, Frank's, thoughts into a critical discussion over policy(specific). Could you bother yourself to leave the middle school shit at the door, or nah? Obamalalalama is a poopy head Mooslim! Yea!
 
Last edited:
Check again, G.T.

We asked Madame Pelosi, "Where's the Constitutional authority for ObamaCare?" and she replied, "Are you kidding?"

We're not kidding

I'll check again.

Speaking of Pelosi, you're a turn bro just admit it. You can't mention her without a snide. "Madame."

You post pictures of ugly Democrats. You call corny assed names. What evidence is there that would lead a person to propel your, Frank's, thoughts into a critical discussion over policy(specific). Could you bother yourself to leave the middle school shit at the door, or nah? Obamalalalama is a poopy head Mooslim! Yea!

She's called Madame Speaker. She acts like a Madame at a brothel, but that's her formal Title.

I can do serious discussion, I can do namecalling, I can take or leave the middle school shit, it all depends on my mood.
 
She's called Madame Speaker. She acts like a Madame at a brothel, but that's her formal Title.

I can do serious discussion, I can do namecalling, I can take or leave the middle school shit, it all depends on my mood.

That you can leave it alone is alright, Rush, Sean, Beck, Levin, etc. cannot. It makes me disgusted at them, but who am I except another lost vote. :cool:
 
Hey folks. Its just spreading the wealth. Taking from those that work, pay taxes and contribute and giving it to those that don't. Isn't that what liberals and Obama are all about?

As for Congressional authority. Well, I'm still waiting for someone to show me in the Constitution where it states I and every other taxpayer are responsible for providing healthcare to anyone??
 
Standing up for freedom is the new divisive

No, surely not. But, implying the evilest intentions on those you have policy disagreements with, for ratings, for incitement of anger, is grimy. I agree with many Conservative ideas, just don't like their dirty tactics. You're a prime example. Instead of having disagreements, you go the middle-school route......going to town on "libruls are brain dead socialist stalinist pigs," when in reality it's just stereotyping and sensationalism.....................same reason I disagree with talk-radio tactics. Turns me off.

It's like people wondering why there's no loud movement of Muslims denouncing terrorism. Where's Conservatives denouncing their ass-holes? Wait, Michael Steele tried and then saw it was a bad idea "politically" and he pussed out. I'm lost with that.

Pay closer attention to current events. Modern Librulism IS Socialism, IS Stalinism!

Current events or neocon speak... You decide.

These people are not helpful to your cause if it is indeed to see the Republicans in power anytime soon.
 
Hey folks. Its just spreading the wealth. Taking from those that work, pay taxes and contribute and giving it to those that don't. Isn't that what liberals and Obama are all about?

As for Congressional authority. Well, I'm still waiting for someone to show me in the Constitution where it states I and every other taxpayer are responsible for providing healthcare to anyone??


I accidently deducted rep from you when I meant to add rep, if you post a lot I will do my best to make this up if the mods cannot fix this error.
 

Forum List

Back
Top