Mark Levin Highlights Obama's Pending Trouble Regarding Joe Sestak

Discussion in 'Media' started by The T, May 30, 2010.

  1. The T
    Offline

    The T George S. Patton Party Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Messages:
    48,072
    Thanks Received:
    5,473
    Trophy Points:
    1,773
    Location:
    What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
    Ratings:
    +5,502
    Like him or hate him...Mark Levin on his Friday [May 28, 2010 ] program laid out what faces Obama legally regarding the Joe Sestak affair.

    Mark laid out this law: 18 USC Section 600:

    "
    Sec. 600. Promise of employment or other benefit for political
    activity




    Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any employment,
    position, compensation, contract, appointment, or other benefit,
    provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of
    Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such
    benefit, to any person as consideration, favor, or reward for any
    political activity or for the support of or opposition to any
    candidate or any political party in connection with any general or
    special election to any political office, or in connection with any
    primary election or political convention or caucus held to select
    candidates for any political office, shall be fined under this
    title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

    ______________________________
    Mark laid it out clearly and gave the reasons why. Click on the below link to hear how this is laid out by Mark.Politics as usual out of D.C. Mr. President? You claimed you're in control. Are you really?I think either you've lost control, or [as you've shown over the past weeks with the Oil Spill]that you have LOST control unto those Statists you've suoounded yourself with.To hear Mark's comments? Click on the link below...From the beginning of the programto about 17 minutes in. Mark lays it out.

    AUDIO

    And Mark being a Lawyer with his Landmark Legal Foundation? I am more apt to belive his assesment than the crap answer we've gotten out of the Whitehouse on Friday.Read More Here...
     
    Last edited: May 30, 2010
  2. Sarah G
    Offline

    Sarah G When Nothing Goes Right, Go Left Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    47,637
    Thanks Received:
    11,826
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    NW Ohio
    Ratings:
    +23,984
    Who?
     
  3. The T
    Offline

    The T George S. Patton Party Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Messages:
    48,072
    Thanks Received:
    5,473
    Trophy Points:
    1,773
    Location:
    What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
    Ratings:
    +5,502
    Didn't listen or READ eh Sarah. This is a serious matter regarding a LAW that's been broken by this administration.

    Go back to sleep.
     
  4. Baruch Menachem
    Offline

    Baruch Menachem '

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    14,204
    Thanks Received:
    3,235
    Trophy Points:
    185
    Ratings:
    +3,305
    I didn't know what the issue was. It struck me as a pretty lame scandal.

    I don't think this quite qualifies under the law.

    I am just glad Sestak said now. I am glad to see the last of Specktor.
     
  5. The T
    Offline

    The T George S. Patton Party Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Messages:
    48,072
    Thanks Received:
    5,473
    Trophy Points:
    1,773
    Location:
    What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
    Ratings:
    +5,502
    This is very serious for Obama's Administration...it's all laid out.

    And yeah I'm relived that Arlen Specter is GONE. This is deep and cannot be dismissed regardless of the isdea "It goes on all the time". It has to Stop...here and NOW.
     
  6. Mr.Fitnah
    Offline

    Mr.Fitnah Dreamcrusher

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,480
    Thanks Received:
    2,673
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Paradise.
    Ratings:
    +2,673
    He is to big to fail.
     
  7. The T
    Offline

    The T George S. Patton Party Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Messages:
    48,072
    Thanks Received:
    5,473
    Trophy Points:
    1,773
    Location:
    What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
    Ratings:
    +5,502
    'Or so the Germans would have you belive'~ Norm MacDonald [SNL News Anchor] ;)

    Those that voted for him would like to think this. Nevermind he LIED saying Business as usual was over in the District Of Criminals.

    He's made it larger. This isn't popularity, this is Law. ;)
     
  8. Polk
    Offline

    Polk Classic

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    9,752
    Thanks Received:
    569
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Republic of Pequod
    Ratings:
    +569
    It doesn't qualify. Since Sestak could not have ran for a Senate seat while also serving in an appointed office, there is no possible way the acceptance of the position serves as a bribe.

    Don't take my word for it, Bush's ethics counsel said the same thing on a legal ethics blog he contributes to:

    Though I think Jonathan Chait over at The New Republic put it best:

     
  9. The T
    Offline

    The T George S. Patton Party Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Messages:
    48,072
    Thanks Received:
    5,473
    Trophy Points:
    1,773
    Location:
    What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
    Ratings:
    +5,502

    18 USC Section 600 applies. none of the rest of this matters PolkStain.
     
  10. Polk
    Offline

    Polk Classic

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    9,752
    Thanks Received:
    569
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Republic of Pequod
    Ratings:
    +569
    You can keep claiming it, but that doesn't make it true.
     

Share This Page