Mark Judge, Key Witness To Alleged Brett Kavanaugh Assault, Refuses To Testify

[CrusaderFrank]

.

Kavanaugh’s apparent lies to the Judiciary Committee are totally acceptable to Siegfried, but Ford’s accusation of “frat boy” Brett’s attempted rape of her is something Siggy just can’t abide.

In his editorial, Siegfried made an even bigger fool of himself when he advised Kavanaugh that he “ 'must put the integrity of the Supreme Court and its future rulings first, and withdraw his nomination. Trump can then replace him with a nominee with stellar credentials and no controversy.’ ”

Put the integrity of the court first? That’s a laugh. The GOP has seen the USSC as a political arm of the party since the conservatives high jacked the party in the early 20th century.

There are NO Republican politicians or judicial candidates who possess even an ounce of integrity. So finding one with “stellar credentials”, as Siggy suggests, is an impossible task.

There is no Supreme Court Justice appointed by a Republican president past 100 years that has not or does not consider the U.S. nothing more than a god damned piece of paper.

Except for the last three or four paragraphs of his editorial, Siegfried’s comments only reinforce the truth, that no Republican has any integrity or honor.

Now, will come the usual nonsense from the idiot trump’s fans as they respond to this OP. Any reply to them legitimizes their pitiable foolishness.

Republican Strategist Urges Brett Kavanaugh to Withdraw His Nomination In the Wake of Sexual Assault Allegations


View attachment 217463








.

Evan Seigfreid posts at USMB under the name JakeStarkey

 

[JWBooth]

Judge was a classmate of Kavanaugh’s at Georgetown Prep when Christine Blasey Ford says the incident occurred.

Mark Judge, the man who Christine Blasey Ford has said was in the room while Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh allegedly assaulted her when they were in high school, has declined to speak before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Democrats had called for him to do so. But in a statement to committee chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Judge claimed he had no memory of the incident and declined to speak publicly about the allegation.

More: Mark Judge, Key Witness To Alleged Brett Kavanaugh Assault, Refuses To Testify

It's interesting that Judge has no memory of the incident. Well, Dr. Ford said there were also two more boys downstairs - so why doesn't someone investigate them and their memory of the gathering? Surely all of them aren't deaf and dumb.

Hard to have a memory about some made up drunken fantasy.

 

[Aldo Raine]

.

Kavanaugh’s apparent lies to the Judiciary Committee are totally acceptable to Siegfried, but Ford’s accusation of “frat boy” Brett’s attempted rape of her is something Siggy just can’t abide.

In his editorial, Siegfried made an even bigger fool of himself when he advised Kavanaugh that he “ 'must put the integrity of the Supreme Court and its future rulings first, and withdraw his nomination. Trump can then replace him with a nominee with stellar credentials and no controversy.’ ”

Put the integrity of the court first? That’s a laugh. The GOP has seen the USSC as a political arm of the party since the conservatives high jacked the party in the early 20th century.

There are NO Republican politicians or judicial candidates who possess even an ounce of integrity. So finding one with “stellar credentials”, as Siggy suggests, is an impossible task.

There is no Supreme Court Justice appointed by a Republican president past 100 years that has not or does not consider the U.S. nothing more than a god damned piece of paper.

Except for the last three or four paragraphs of his editorial, Siegfried’s comments only reinforce the truth, that no Republican has any integrity or honor.

Now, will come the usual nonsense from the idiot trump’s fans as they respond to this OP. Any reply to them legitimizes their pitiable foolishness.

Republican Strategist Urges Brett Kavanaugh to Withdraw His Nomination In the Wake of Sexual Assault Allegations


View attachment 217463








.

No accusation should ever disqualify anyone for anything. This is a dangerous and stupid door the Dems are opening and the results will change the county forever if he is stopped because of unproveable accusations


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Agreed, but what if they are.proven? She has passed a poly and there is a.witness that will not come forward because he was to drink to remember. It could be true!

Yes, it could be true. It could be true the Clinton’s were running a child sex ring out of a pizza joint, but chances are neither are true.

Why was this lady cool with the Dems holding her letter till a time when it would cause the most damage?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

What I am heading is she did not want to be identified, you can easily see why now. How do you explain away the lie detector test. Pssst, just so you know about 60% of the peeps on this sight do believe in pizzagate, just saying. Do not burst their bubbles!

 

[Penelope]

It's amusing the way people go on about polygraphs as if they are some kind of legal definitive. You people watch far too much TV.

Why doesn't he take one?

Because they are useless.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

The shaky science of lie detectors - CNN
Not according to Rand Paul.

 

[easyt65]

Yeah, well, this is just where we are right now.

No, that's where YOU and other snowflakes are right now.

 

[easyt65]

Why do people keep comparing that self admitted pervert to brett?
Moore said HIMSELF he is emotionally and physically attracted to young teenagers.
PLEASE STOP.

If 'feelings' and 'thoughts' ever become illegal / prosecutable, let me know.

Just sayin', that's all.

 

[TNHarley]

integrity of the supreme court? LOL

 

[TNHarley]

Why do people keep comparing that self admitted pervert to brett?
Moore said HIMSELF he is emotionally and physically attracted to young teenagers.
PLEASE STOP.

If 'feelings' and 'thoughts' ever become illegal / prosecutable, let me know.

Just sayin', that's all.

If that ever happens, we moved to Canada..
BTW try to stick with what i actually wrote next time

 

[TNHarley]

Amazing how so many people rush out to defend a man that admits he is into young teenagers.
You people are just as bad as him! Goddamn partisanship is a DISEASE

 

[kyzr]

I'm hoping she won't show up on Monday so she won't commit perjury and end up in prison. Then the GOP can call the votes and Kavanaugh is on the USSC, then we can focus on the next retirement and who Trump can nominate.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

.

Kavanaugh’s apparent lies to the Judiciary Committee are totally acceptable to Siegfried, but Ford’s accusation of “frat boy” Brett’s attempted rape of her is something Siggy just can’t abide.

In his editorial, Siegfried made an even bigger fool of himself when he advised Kavanaugh that he “ 'must put the integrity of the Supreme Court and its future rulings first, and withdraw his nomination. Trump can then replace him with a nominee with stellar credentials and no controversy.’ ”

Put the integrity of the court first? That’s a laugh. The GOP has seen the USSC as a political arm of the party since the conservatives high jacked the party in the early 20th century.

There are NO Republican politicians or judicial candidates who possess even an ounce of integrity. So finding one with “stellar credentials”, as Siggy suggests, is an impossible task.

There is no Supreme Court Justice appointed by a Republican president past 100 years that has not or does not consider the U.S. nothing more than a god damned piece of paper.

Except for the last three or four paragraphs of his editorial, Siegfried’s comments only reinforce the truth, that no Republican has any integrity or honor.

Now, will come the usual nonsense from the idiot trump’s fans as they respond to this OP. Any reply to them legitimizes their pitiable foolishness.

Republican Strategist Urges Brett Kavanaugh to Withdraw His Nomination In the Wake of Sexual Assault Allegations


View attachment 217463








.

No accusation should ever disqualify anyone for anything. This is a dangerous and stupid door the Dems are opening and the results will change the county forever if he is stopped because of unproveable accusations


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Agreed, but what if they are.proven? She has passed a poly and there is a.witness that will not come forward because he was to drink to remember. It could be true!

Yes, it could be true. It could be true the Clinton’s were running a child sex ring out of a pizza joint, but chances are neither are true.

Why was this lady cool with the Dems holding her letter till a time when it would cause the most damage?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

What I am heading is she did not want to be identified, you can easily see why now. How do you explain away the lie detector test. Pssst, just so you know about 60% of the peeps on this sight do believe in pizzagate, just saying. Do not burst their bubbles!

So, she wanted to accuse a man of an unprovable crime without letting him face his accuser? And you are ok with that?


And yes, that is why I choose pizzagate.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

It's amusing the way people go on about polygraphs as if they are some kind of legal definitive. You people watch far too much TV.

Why doesn't he take one?

No knowledgeable attorney would recommend it. They do not "detect lies".

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

It's amusing the way people go on about polygraphs as if they are some kind of legal definitive. You people watch far too much TV.

Why doesn't he take one?

Because they are useless.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

The shaky science of lie detectors - CNN
Not according to Rand Paul.

It's an intimidation machine. That's all.

 

[Hiryuu]

Show me witnesses to what happened or nothing People signing letters of support that didn't see squat are useless.

There have been way more than 200 people who have signed their name (figuratively speaking) to one side of this argument, or the other. To pretend anyone, with no evidence, signing their name to anything, just because they want to support something, makes a single bit of difference, is why politics is nothing more than a bunch of highly supported bullshit nowadays.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

"Kavanaugh bears the “burden of persuasion” here"
- Anita Hill

WTF do liberals NOT understand about the established reality in this country that peep are INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty, that you don't get to wrongly destroy a good man's entire life for political party gain just by making unverified accusations?

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

This is precious. "Burden of persuasion" is a legal term. While you haven't a clue what you're talkng about Anita Hill is a legal scholar.

In a legal case, both parties may have a burden of persuasion as to different sets of alleged facts, and that burden may change (and possibly change back again) based on evidence that has been brought forward. Hill explaining that the facts as known tend to give credence to Ford's accusations, and that Kavanaugh now has the burden of convincing finders of fact that he is the one telling the truth.

 

[dannyboys]

Sociopaths and people with other mental issues can pass polygraphs in their sleep.
Why? B/c they actually believe what they claim is true.
Ford's parents were almost foreclosed on years ago. Who was the presiding judge in the case? BK's mother.

 

[easyt65]

If that ever happens, we moved to Canada..
BTW try to stick with what i actually wrote next time

Didn't say you did say that - not my intent. Just making a side comment. My point being how, while creepy and really not acceptable, one can not be prosecuted for a mental / physical attraction unless that attraction is illegally exercised. Nothing against you intended.

 

[Kilgore.t1]

But are the trains running on time?

If this turns out to be something made up...it will go down in American political history as one of the sleaziest attacks ever made upon someone.

If that's the case then it's doubly shameful because it's a woman, Diane Feinstein using the MeToo movement not against men who take advantage of women but as a political dirty trick.

How come to repubs all women molested assaulted raped ,,are liars and the scum ,like trump are innocent

Gee, Ed...why WOULD we be skeptical of Democrats these days? It's not like you used political dirty tricks in the last election! Oh, wait...that's right...you did! Well, at least the main stream media isn't biased! Oh, wait...that's right...they are!

Quite frankly...I'm growing tired of the same old game being played by the same old players.

Old what you call bias couldn't just be the media with the support of business people see the hurt Trump is putting on America? And they're calling it like they see it ?? As for Trump I know you know what Perhaps you protest too much means and with all those ready to testify Trumps pants need changing

Business is booming under Trump, moron. Many of the tech Titans have even admitted it.

 

[easyt65]

"Burden of persuasion" is a legal term.

It is a term referencing what one must revert to / use when they do not actually have any evidence.

If one can not present undeniable evidence then they have to attempt to persuade you they are right.

Ford can not produce any evidence.
She has no witnesses.
She refuses to press charges.
She refuses to testify.
IF she testifies, she refuses to do so under oath.

With all of this, even prominent / popular liberals have begun to say, 'The vote should go forward as planned on Friday - the nomination can not be held hostage by innuendo, rumor, and / or unsubstantiated accusations.'

Ms. Ford's 'ammunition' for her persuasion is a baseless accusation backed by zero evidence, her witnesses who say it never happened, an un-willingness to file charges, an unwillingness to testify, scrubbed social media that reveals she is a rabid anti-Trump, anti-Conservative Judge, pu$$y hat-wearing, Women's March participating, Progressive Socialist Democrat activist 'out'ed by a despicable, Chicomm-compromised corrupt Senator who held on to this 2nd-hand rumor until the very last desperate moment, when she pulled it out in '100% committed opposition' to the President to derail the Kavanaugh confirmation.

That's all there is.

Democrats have presented all kinds of BS support - like a letter from 200 women who say they 'believe' Ford. Who the hell cares? They have nothing to do with the case, are not part of the case, have no evidence to share, and can not counter any of the above. False accusations, smears, smoke, mirrors......

Disgusting, divisionist, immoral, unethical, hypocritical Democrats / snowflakes at their finest.....

 

[FJO]

Ford has already done her job and possibly succeeded. It’s easy to poke holes in her story but the damage will already be done. Kavanaugh will get confirmed but not without permanent black eye and bruises. Liberals Democrats will have succeeded because despite the obvious mockery, Kavanaugh will have some level of concern hanging over his head that he is anti-woman...... all because of this fabrication from the Left.

and Clarence Thomas was innocent as well, huh?

Ford has nothing to gain by lying, and EVERYTHING to lose...

Kavanaugh has everything to gain by lying... and everything to lose, by telling the truth.

Why won't he insist on an FBI interview and insist on Ford being interrogated by them? They are professionally trained investigators to spot lies...

There should be some preliminary investigation by professional investigators before the senators question them... and witnesses should be questioned too... before this dog and pony show the R's are rushing, on Monday....

/-----/ Sure she has plenty to gain by lying - a book deal for instance. BTW here is your Golden Girl - almost as slutty as Stormy.

View attachment 217477

Wow!! Sixty-four in about five years. That is like one month.

No wonder she is such a fan of Roe v Wade.