Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It’s happening on the boards of directors of the energy companies in Ukraine that were set up as shells to funnel taxpayer money to people in our government that you’re currently trying to defend.Show me where that's happening.It is very clear from the testimony Friday which side our President is on. It's shocking and disgusting and embarrassing.Having her testify:
It's all part of introducing Giuliani, the 2 arrested/ charged goons running a shadow govt... that's the real reason she was called to testify... it is leading up to and gathering of facts in ''the story'' the impeachment inquiry will tell, once completed...
at least that is how most prosecutors do with their grand juries before indictments....
He interferes with the embezzlement of foreign aid. democrats demand that they be able to steal that money. It's what this is all about. Trump interfering with the kickbacks.
yeah...you are likely right...Having her testify:
It's all part of introducing Giuliani, the 2 arrested/ charged goons running a shadow govt... that's the real reason she was called to testify... it is leading up to and gathering of facts in ''the story'' the impeachment inquiry will tell, once completed...
at least that is how most prosecutors do with their grand juries before indictments....
Yup, and the dossier was believable to, you posted that when the Russia thing was all the rage. This woman brought nothing other then she was mad "orange man bad" reassigned her.
it only gave her time to try to correct the false record about her service to our country... not much for the impeachment case, because others can tie in the Giuliani shadow govt...
though it does confirm part of the whistleblower complaint.
Watching Marie Yovanovitch testimony I'm troubled as to why Trump would want her terminated?
According to her she did nothing wrong. Didn't any conflicts with Trump's foreign agenda.
She was pursuing ways to help insure USA tax dollars spent wisely in Ukraine.
Sounds all honest and straight forward.
So what exactly did she do wrong that caused her termination?
Oxymoron. Get rid of either fox news or Chris wallace, only one of them said this.This is Fox News. "If you were not moved by the testimony of Marie Yovanovitch, you don't have a pulse." — Chris Wallace
the people you are getting that information from are ultimately Russian operatives, yes I said it, Russians, trying to push the disinformation to Giuliani and the 2 goons, and then on to John Solomon, The Hill and the Briebart... and then KABOOM all out in to the right wing, so called, media!It’s happening on the boards of directors of the energy companies in Ukraine that were set up as shells to funnel taxpayer money to people in our government that you’re currently trying to defend.Show me where that's happening.It is very clear from the testimony Friday which side our President is on. It's shocking and disgusting and embarrassing.Having her testify:
It's all part of introducing Giuliani, the 2 arrested/ charged goons running a shadow govt... that's the real reason she was called to testify... it is leading up to and gathering of facts in ''the story'' the impeachment inquiry will tell, once completed...
at least that is how most prosecutors do with their grand juries before indictments....
He interferes with the embezzlement of foreign aid. democrats demand that they be able to steal that money. It's what this is all about. Trump interfering with the kickbacks.
there is a trail to Giuliani...the goons... Donald Trump... Sondland...yeah...you are likely right...Having her testify:
It's all part of introducing Giuliani, the 2 arrested/ charged goons running a shadow govt... that's the real reason she was called to testify... it is leading up to and gathering of facts in ''the story'' the impeachment inquiry will tell, once completed...
at least that is how most prosecutors do with their grand juries before indictments....
Yup, and the dossier was believable to, you posted that when the Russia thing was all the rage. This woman brought nothing other then she was mad "orange man bad" reassigned her.
it only gave her time to try to correct the false record about her service to our country... not much for the impeachment case, because others can tie in the Giuliani shadow govt...
though it does confirm part of the whistleblower complaint.
Look, nothing go's unnoticed. If Giuliani was doing dark work for Trump then why isn't he there? If he was trying to get her fired he would leave a trail of people and paper and an crap ton of text. There are claims against this woman that in all fairness should be investigated.
I guess the FBI missed that when they were in on the investigations into it. Dang.It’s happening on the boards of directors of the energy companies in Ukraine that were set up as shells to funnel taxpayer money to people in our government that you’re currently trying to defend.Show me where that's happening.It is very clear from the testimony Friday which side our President is on. It's shocking and disgusting and embarrassing.Having her testify:
It's all part of introducing Giuliani, the 2 arrested/ charged goons running a shadow govt... that's the real reason she was called to testify... it is leading up to and gathering of facts in ''the story'' the impeachment inquiry will tell, once completed...
at least that is how most prosecutors do with their grand juries before indictments....
He interferes with the embezzlement of foreign aid. democrats demand that they be able to steal that money. It's what this is all about. Trump interfering with the kickbacks.
there is a trail to Giuliani...the goons... Donald Trump... Sondland...yeah...you are likely right...Having her testify:
It's all part of introducing Giuliani, the 2 arrested/ charged goons running a shadow govt... that's the real reason she was called to testify... it is leading up to and gathering of facts in ''the story'' the impeachment inquiry will tell, once completed...
at least that is how most prosecutors do with their grand juries before indictments....
Yup, and the dossier was believable to, you posted that when the Russia thing was all the rage. This woman brought nothing other then she was mad "orange man bad" reassigned her.
it only gave her time to try to correct the false record about her service to our country... not much for the impeachment case, because others can tie in the Giuliani shadow govt...
though it does confirm part of the whistleblower complaint.
Look, nothing go's unnoticed. If Giuliani was doing dark work for Trump then why isn't he there? If he was trying to get her fired he would leave a trail of people and paper and an crap ton of text. There are claims against this woman that in all fairness should be investigated.
Really? An investigation into this woman? Don't get on the Stalin train, Crixus. You're better than that.yeah...you are likely right...Having her testify:
It's all part of introducing Giuliani, the 2 arrested/ charged goons running a shadow govt... that's the real reason she was called to testify... it is leading up to and gathering of facts in ''the story'' the impeachment inquiry will tell, once completed...
at least that is how most prosecutors do with their grand juries before indictments....
Yup, and the dossier was believable to, you posted that when the Russia thing was all the rage. This woman brought nothing other then she was mad "orange man bad" reassigned her.
it only gave her time to try to correct the false record about her service to our country... not much for the impeachment case, because others can tie in the Giuliani shadow govt...
though it does confirm part of the whistleblower complaint.
Look, nothing go's unnoticed. If Giuliani was doing dark work for Trump then why isn't he there? If he was trying to get her fired he would leave a trail of people and paper and an crap ton of text. There are claims against this woman that in all fairness should be investigated.
Okay I've ignored this as long as I can but it isthere is a trail to Giuliani...the goons... Donald Trump... Sondland...yeah...you are likely right...Having her testify:
It's all part of introducing Giuliani, the 2 arrested/ charged goons running a shadow govt... that's the real reason she was called to testify... it is leading up to and gathering of facts in ''the story'' the impeachment inquiry will tell, once completed...
at least that is how most prosecutors do with their grand juries before indictments....
Yup, and the dossier was believable to, you posted that when the Russia thing was all the rage. This woman brought nothing other then she was mad "orange man bad" reassigned her.
it only gave her time to try to correct the false record about her service to our country... not much for the impeachment case, because others can tie in the Giuliani shadow govt...
though it does confirm part of the whistleblower complaint.
Look, nothing go's unnoticed. If Giuliani was doing dark work for Trump then why isn't he there? If he was trying to get her fired he would leave a trail of people and paper and an crap ton of text. There are claims against this woman that in all fairness should be investigated.
There was a dossier, and affair, a "fixer", etc,etc, and on it go's.
Really? An investigation into this woman? Don't get on the Stalin train, Crixus. You're better than that.yeah...you are likely right...Having her testify:
It's all part of introducing Giuliani, the 2 arrested/ charged goons running a shadow govt... that's the real reason she was called to testify... it is leading up to and gathering of facts in ''the story'' the impeachment inquiry will tell, once completed...
at least that is how most prosecutors do with their grand juries before indictments....
Yup, and the dossier was believable to, you posted that when the Russia thing was all the rage. This woman brought nothing other then she was mad "orange man bad" reassigned her.
it only gave her time to try to correct the false record about her service to our country... not much for the impeachment case, because others can tie in the Giuliani shadow govt...
though it does confirm part of the whistleblower complaint.
Look, nothing go's unnoticed. If Giuliani was doing dark work for Trump then why isn't he there? If he was trying to get her fired he would leave a trail of people and paper and an crap ton of text. There are claims against this woman that in all fairness should be investigated.
Okay I've ignored this as long as I can but it isthere is a trail to Giuliani...the goons... Donald Trump... Sondland...yeah...you are likely right...Yup, and the dossier was believable to, you posted that when the Russia thing was all the rage. This woman brought nothing other then she was mad "orange man bad" reassigned her.
it only gave her time to try to correct the false record about her service to our country... not much for the impeachment case, because others can tie in the Giuliani shadow govt...
though it does confirm part of the whistleblower complaint.
Look, nothing go's unnoticed. If Giuliani was doing dark work for Trump then why isn't he there? If he was trying to get her fired he would leave a trail of people and paper and an crap ton of text. There are claims against this woman that in all fairness should be investigated.
There was a dossier, and affair, a "fixer", etc,etc, and on it go's.
goes
Let's actually see what the Inspector General's report has on that...and get the whole picture... it should have been released already, I had thought?there is a trail to Giuliani...the goons... Donald Trump... Sondland...yeah...you are likely right...Having her testify:
It's all part of introducing Giuliani, the 2 arrested/ charged goons running a shadow govt... that's the real reason she was called to testify... it is leading up to and gathering of facts in ''the story'' the impeachment inquiry will tell, once completed...
at least that is how most prosecutors do with their grand juries before indictments....
Yup, and the dossier was believable to, you posted that when the Russia thing was all the rage. This woman brought nothing other then she was mad "orange man bad" reassigned her.
it only gave her time to try to correct the false record about her service to our country... not much for the impeachment case, because others can tie in the Giuliani shadow govt...
though it does confirm part of the whistleblower complaint.
Look, nothing go's unnoticed. If Giuliani was doing dark work for Trump then why isn't he there? If he was trying to get her fired he would leave a trail of people and paper and an crap ton of text. There are claims against this woman that in all fairness should be investigated.
There was a dossier, and affair, a "fixer", etc,etc, and on it go's.
I just don't understand why a recalled ambassador needs to be investigated.Really? An investigation into this woman? Don't get on the Stalin train, Crixus. You're better than that.yeah...you are likely right...Having her testify:
It's all part of introducing Giuliani, the 2 arrested/ charged goons running a shadow govt... that's the real reason she was called to testify... it is leading up to and gathering of facts in ''the story'' the impeachment inquiry will tell, once completed...
at least that is how most prosecutors do with their grand juries before indictments....
Yup, and the dossier was believable to, you posted that when the Russia thing was all the rage. This woman brought nothing other then she was mad "orange man bad" reassigned her.
it only gave her time to try to correct the false record about her service to our country... not much for the impeachment case, because others can tie in the Giuliani shadow govt...
though it does confirm part of the whistleblower complaint.
Look, nothing go's unnoticed. If Giuliani was doing dark work for Trump then why isn't he there? If he was trying to get her fired he would leave a trail of people and paper and an crap ton of text. There are claims against this woman that in all fairness should be investigated.
No I mean look into the claims. I don't mean do what Trumps jizz towels like Hannity does, but do ask some questions. Be fair about it.
I just don't understand why a recalled ambassador needs to be investigated.Really? An investigation into this woman? Don't get on the Stalin train, Crixus. You're better than that.yeah...you are likely right...Yup, and the dossier was believable to, you posted that when the Russia thing was all the rage. This woman brought nothing other then she was mad "orange man bad" reassigned her.
it only gave her time to try to correct the false record about her service to our country... not much for the impeachment case, because others can tie in the Giuliani shadow govt...
though it does confirm part of the whistleblower complaint.
Look, nothing go's unnoticed. If Giuliani was doing dark work for Trump then why isn't he there? If he was trying to get her fired he would leave a trail of people and paper and an crap ton of text. There are claims against this woman that in all fairness should be investigated.
No I mean look into the claims. I don't mean do what Trumps jizz towels like Hannity does, but do ask some questions. Be fair about it.
What claims ? The ones the Ukranians have already retracted? The President's tweet from yesterday that every place she went turned to shit? Well, he's recalled her so what is the sense in that?
That's the only thing I don't get. Why she needs an investigation. Some people would love to see that, and only because she testified against the President.
Let's actually see what the Inspector General's report has on that...and get the whole picture... it should have been released already, I had thought?there is a trail to Giuliani...the goons... Donald Trump... Sondland...yeah...you are likely right...Yup, and the dossier was believable to, you posted that when the Russia thing was all the rage. This woman brought nothing other then she was mad "orange man bad" reassigned her.
it only gave her time to try to correct the false record about her service to our country... not much for the impeachment case, because others can tie in the Giuliani shadow govt...
though it does confirm part of the whistleblower complaint.
Look, nothing go's unnoticed. If Giuliani was doing dark work for Trump then why isn't he there? If he was trying to get her fired he would leave a trail of people and paper and an crap ton of text. There are claims against this woman that in all fairness should be investigated.
There was a dossier, and affair, a "fixer", etc,etc, and on it go's.
Who is saying not retracted? The Russians? Shokin? Giuliani?I just don't understand why a recalled ambassador needs to be investigated.Really? An investigation into this woman? Don't get on the Stalin train, Crixus. You're better than that.yeah...you are likely right...
it only gave her time to try to correct the false record about her service to our country... not much for the impeachment case, because others can tie in the Giuliani shadow govt...
though it does confirm part of the whistleblower complaint.
Look, nothing go's unnoticed. If Giuliani was doing dark work for Trump then why isn't he there? If he was trying to get her fired he would leave a trail of people and paper and an crap ton of text. There are claims against this woman that in all fairness should be investigated.
No I mean look into the claims. I don't mean do what Trumps jizz towels like Hannity does, but do ask some questions. Be fair about it.
What claims ? The ones the Ukranians have already retracted? The President's tweet from yesterday that every place she went turned to shit? Well, he's recalled her so what is the sense in that?
That's the only thing I don't get. Why she needs an investigation. Some people would love to see that, and only because she testified against the President.
Retracted, and some say not retracted. Nothing wrong with having a look. Just do it respectfully, not like she is some low lever crack dealer. I'm thinking they already have done this. All this negative stuff she brought on her self. Adam Schiff has done more to invade this woman's privacy then Trump. To me she didn't come off crooked. She came off pissed that she got pulled.
Who is saying not retracted? The Russians? Shokin? Giuliani?I just don't understand why a recalled ambassador needs to be investigated.Really? An investigation into this woman? Don't get on the Stalin train, Crixus. You're better than that.Look, nothing go's unnoticed. If Giuliani was doing dark work for Trump then why isn't he there? If he was trying to get her fired he would leave a trail of people and paper and an crap ton of text. There are claims against this woman that in all fairness should be investigated.
No I mean look into the claims. I don't mean do what Trumps jizz towels like Hannity does, but do ask some questions. Be fair about it.
What claims ? The ones the Ukranians have already retracted? The President's tweet from yesterday that every place she went turned to shit? Well, he's recalled her so what is the sense in that?
That's the only thing I don't get. Why she needs an investigation. Some people would love to see that, and only because she testified against the President.
Retracted, and some say not retracted. Nothing wrong with having a look. Just do it respectfully, not like she is some low lever crack dealer. I'm thinking they already have done this. All this negative stuff she brought on her self. Adam Schiff has done more to invade this woman's privacy then Trump. To me she didn't come off crooked. She came off pissed that she got pulled.
I've already gone on record that she is not the Dems strongest argument. But she did show me one thing real clearly--that Trump is fighting on the oligarchs' side. That's really ugly, to me.
I just don't understand why a recalled ambassador needs to be investigated.Really? An investigation into this woman? Don't get on the Stalin train, Crixus. You're better than that.yeah...you are likely right...Yup, and the dossier was believable to, you posted that when the Russia thing was all the rage. This woman brought nothing other then she was mad "orange man bad" reassigned her.
it only gave her time to try to correct the false record about her service to our country... not much for the impeachment case, because others can tie in the Giuliani shadow govt...
though it does confirm part of the whistleblower complaint.
Look, nothing go's unnoticed. If Giuliani was doing dark work for Trump then why isn't he there? If he was trying to get her fired he would leave a trail of people and paper and an crap ton of text. There are claims against this woman that in all fairness should be investigated.
No I mean look into the claims. I don't mean do what Trumps jizz towels like Hannity does, but do ask some questions. Be fair about it.
What claims ? The ones the Ukranians have already retracted? The President's tweet from yesterday that every place she went turned to shit? Well, he's recalled her so what is the sense in that?
That's the only thing I don't get. Why she needs an investigation. Some people would love to see that, and only because she testified against the President.
