March has meant 6,000 weather records broken

[whitehall]

You gotta admire the left's capacity for propaganda in a way. They have the argument surrounded. If we get record cold it's caused by global warming and if we get an early spring they freak out like chicken little and claim the sky is falling. The left can't ever seem to enjoy life. They thrive on crisis and are consumed with hatred for their own Country.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You gotta admire the left's capacity for propaganda in a way. They have the argument surrounded. If we get record cold it's caused by global warming and if we get an early spring they freak out like chicken little and claim the sky is falling. The left can't ever seem to enjoy life. They thrive on crisis and are consumed with hatred for their own Country.

If they are so concerned about global warming they need to reduce their own carbon foot print.
I'll start a list feel free to add to it.
1. sell their car
2.disconnect their electricity
3. discard their computer
4. make only natural fabric clothing
5. Discard their Ipod
6. no more trips to the grocery store
7. grow their own food.

 

[Synthaholic]

You gotta admire the left's capacity for propaganda in a way. They have the argument surrounded. If we get record cold it's caused by global warming and if we get an early spring they freak out like chicken little and claim the sky is falling. The left can't ever seem to enjoy life. They thrive on crisis and are consumed with hatred for their own Country.

If they are so concerned about global warming they need to reduce their own carbon foot print.
I'll start a list feel free to add to it.
1. sell their car
2.disconnect their electricity
3. discard their computer
4. make only natural fabric clothing
5. Discard their Ipod
6. no more trips to the grocery store
7. grow their own food.

^
Retard.

 

[frazzledgear]

In a typical March, particularly in the nation's northern tier, you may see, perhaps, one or perhaps two days of record warmth before a sharp cold front brings that spring tease to a screeching halt. Not so in March 2012.

International Falls, Minn., self-promoted as the "Icebox of the Nation", tied or broke daily record highs 12 of 13 days from Mar. 10-22. This includes a 79-degree reading on March 18, which was the warmest day ever recorded during March in International Falls.

Thursday, March 22, Detroit, Mich., reached 86 degrees, setting an all-time record high for the month of March.

Wow -it really is a religion for you kooks, isn't it? It doesn't matter how many scientists are proven to have lied, cheated, destroyed their raw data -you have a NEED to believe they were just "funning" with us by doing all that. Sorry but there is no getting around reality. The ONLY time you see scientists commit FRAUD -and it was REPEATEDLY committed with this issue -is because the facts aren't supporting their lying ass claims. They don't destroy their raw data, they don't cheat, they don't change the hard data -when it actually supports their theory. DUH. But maybe that idea is way above your education level.

Climate change is not measured by the day, month or a year -and given the fact we only have only been recording temperatures with any degree of accuracy for about 85 years (and the first 35 of those is "iffy") and the earth is estimated to be roughly 4.5 billion years old -then the odds of breaking records in any given year is actually quite high and will remain quite high for a few thousand years yet. In fact temperatures are NOT outside of the normal RANGE FOR THIS PLANET. And it is called a "range" for a reason -it is because they fluctuate all over the place inside that range. There are NO abnormal temperatures outside the range of NORMAL FOR THIS PLANET. So let's pretend they are anyway, right? And it is a CRISIS! Because no one loves a crisis like a liberal who goes through life just lurching from one crisis to the next as a routine way of life. (There is a reason EVERYTHING is a crisis for the left -but it has very little to do with reality and everything to do with trying to avoid debate and ram through their agenda as quickly as possible.)

Every honest scientist admits that current temperatures are still not as warm as it was during the Middle Ages -OOPS. For a fact -still not as consistently warm as it was during the Middle Ages -but only TODAY is it a CRISIS, right? But in the Middle Ages it was just called........life. Oh and let's not talk about the benefits they enjoyed living during such a warm period either.

I also have to wonder about the education of some of these people and their outrageous claims -starting with the ridiculous notion that carbon dioxide gas traps heat. Where is the PROOF that is true? WHERE ARE THE EXPERIMENTS PROVING THE HEAT TRAPPING CAPABILITIES OF CARBON DIOXIDE? You can find lots of CLAIMS it does and you can even find a scientific equation trying to explain why it does -but no PROOF it does. Not ONE experiment where the heat trapping capabilities of carbon dioxide were indisputably proven to exist and measurable. Yet all you have to do is a CHEAP ASS experiment to prove it -if it were true, of course. Just build a bunch of black boxes and pump each full with a different atmospheric gas at 100% concentration -including carbon dioxide as well as one with normal atmosphere. Let them sit in the sun and then take the internal temperatures at intervals until you give up and get tired of waiting for something to change among the boxes. If carbon dioxide has the capability of trapping heat -the temperature should be SIGNIFICANTLY AND MEASURABLY higher than the boxes with other atmospheric gases. EXCEPT IT ISN'T! The box with carbon dioxide will provably not be any warmer than any of the other boxes with different gases and if carbon dioxide caused heat to be trapped -it would be hotter than the others preventing heat from escaping that box. But it isn't any hotter! Uh oh! Any clue why? It is because trapping heat requires a BARRIER and only that which exists in our atmosphere in barrier form can trap heat. Gas by definition is not a barrier -no matter how many molecules of a gas exist in the atmosphere, there is still lots and lots and lots of EMPTY SPACE between them -allowing heat to easily escape past it. That means VAPOR and ICE in the atmosphere have heat trapping capabilities. But not gas. And carbon dioxide doesn't exist in our atmosphere in any other form except gas. No dry ice in the atmosphere -and therefore no heat trapping abilities either. Carbon dioxide doesn't exist in sheets or clumps in the atmosphere. Even when it exists in 100% concentration inside a box it will not be any hotter than another box filled with a different atmospheric gas. Oh wow -funny how THOSE experiments that repeatedly turn out the same every time are buried, huh? Can't teach kids the truth about THAT one, huh? So now we have to pretend there are magical heat trapping abilities of carbon dioxide that only exist in the atmosphere when dispersed among other gases - but measuring just how much heat trapping capabilities exist in carbon dioxide just can't be measured in an EXPERIMENT at all - because it doesn't exist. So let's ignore that fact and teach our kids a lie and insist it does anyway because the truth about carbon dioxide just doesn't fit in with that "man is nothing but an evil destructive parasite with the AWESOME power to destroy the entire planet and must be forced to return to the living standards of the Stone Age" thing the left lives for, huh.

A greenhouse is hotter than the temperature outside of it NOT because of the gases inside it. But because the GLASS provides a BARRIER - and has even greater heat trapping capabilities than the other barrier that exists in a real greenhouse -the trapped moisture in the form of VAPOR. Both of which have KNOWN and MEASURABLE heat trapping capabilities! If our planet were truly warming in an alarming way indicating "global warming", then the amount of VAPOR in our atmosphere would be significantly changing because lacking glass in our atmosphere, VAPOR is THE main BARRIER trapping heat on earth. Not carbon dioxide which is measured in parts per MILLION -meaning that for every 1,000,000 molecules of atmospheric gases, roughly 390 are carbon dioxide. Meaning 999, 610 in that 1,000,000 are NOT carbon dioxide but some other gas instead. They have to draw an OVER-SIZED graph to show what is in reality a miniscule rise in order to pretend the non-dramatic rise is both dramatic and alarming! Targeting a gas that is actually necessary for the very existence of life and is part of the critical carbon cycle of the entire planet and pretending it exists in "dangerous" amounts is ludicrous. Carbon dioxide used to exist in significantly MUCH, MUCH higher percentages in the past -they KNOW that for a fact - and amazingly it not only was not the fault of human beings but our planet THRIVED. Your NEED to believe otherwise notwithstanding.

Anyone actually pretending a hot day or a series of hot days, a hot year, a hot decade even somehow proves global warming -is a moron or a liar. A REAL change in climate is measured by centuries and sometimes by eons. It CANNOT BE DETERMINED BY A DAY OR BY A MONTH OR BY A YEAR. NOT EVER. Anyone who thinks the climate changes with a drop of a hat must think that dumb ass movie "The Day After Tomorrow" is actually a documentary. In spite of scientists themselves uniformly trashing it as the moronic, misleading and downright stupid piece of shit it is. Record highs or lows on any given day mean exactly that -it was really hot or cold that day. And nothing more.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You gotta admire the left's capacity for propaganda in a way. They have the argument surrounded. If we get record cold it's caused by global warming and if we get an early spring they freak out like chicken little and claim the sky is falling. The left can't ever seem to enjoy life. They thrive on crisis and are consumed with hatred for their own Country.

If they are so concerned about global warming they need to reduce their own carbon foot print.
I'll start a list feel free to add to it.
1. sell their car
2.disconnect their electricity
3. discard their computer
4. make only natural fabric clothing
5. Discard their Ipod
6. no more trips to the grocery store
7. grow their own food.

^
Retard.

You have nothing, retarded would be what you look at in the mirror.
So retard, you can't do itr but you want others to do it?

 

[editec]

A single swallow does not a summer make.

 

[waltky]

So far this year we've had 25 tornadoes here in the Louisville-So. Indiana area...

... which is usually as many as we get all season...

... which doesn't end until late June.

 

[Zander]

Science is Astronomy
"Climate science" is Astrology


Make your check payable to "the Goremons"...

 

[frazzledgear]

So far this year we've had 25 tornadoes here in the Louisville-So. Indiana area...

... which is usually as many as we get all season...

... which doesn't end until late June.

So? Are you aware of the fact the original theory of global warming said the weather would become more temperate and uniform-not wilder and more extreme? Do you know why that was altered to claim it would cause dramatically violent fluctuations in weather instead? Do you know why those pushing this fraud dropped the phrase "global warming" in favor of "climate change"? Are you politically invested in this proven fraud?

The theory was deliberately altered to claims it would lead to extremes in weather -because the hard facts on the ground proved the weather was not becoming one iota more uniform. And more uniform and temperate just doesn't carry the sense of drama and CRISIS, does it? It lets the repeatedly proven pathological liar Gore insist any uptick in the number if hurricanes, tornadoes, thunderstorms, etc. represents the CRISIS IS NEARLY UPON US, TAKE HEED O YE OF NO FAITH. Make no mistake -this is a religion and requires far more unproven faith by the individual than any real religion. I am amazed at the number of times people will ask someone if They BELIEVE in evolution or if they BELIEVE in global warming. Apparently unaware that science never requires the belief of an individual. The burden never shifts to the individual to make a leap of faith. Faith by definition means taking something as true without the proof it is. It is appropriat to ask if someone believes in God -that is an issue of faith. Not acceptable to demand my faith in science. Not ever.

Science is not a religion and lying ass, mistake prone, cheating, fallible human beings are not gods just because they chose an occupation in science instead of phys ed. My FAITH is not required at any time - nor do I ever bear the burden of explaining my lack of faith in some theory. At all times science bears the burden of providing indisputable facts and proof. After which no one's faith is required and it is accepted as fact no different from any other scientific fact. This one is not fact -it is highly disputed, there is fraud involved and it has been challenged as false at every point of the theory beginning to end. Which is why the politically invested demand I just take it on nothing but faith, bolstered by cherry picked and highly disputed tidbits -all while demanding I totally ignore the reams of consistent, reliable and totally contradictory information. Good science demands that attention must be paid to that which contradicts it. Only the politically invested demand it be ignored in favor of only the cherry picked.

Every honest climatologist will tell you that weather wildly fluctuates on this planet all the time and is normal that it does. But CLIMATE is not what the weather happens to be on any given day, month or year. They are not the same thing and they aren't measured the same way. But now my faith must include pretending these are interchangeable terms when they are not and only being used that way by the left because they are exploiting the fact weather is wildly far less consistent than climate -so much so it cannot even be reliably predicted beyond a few days. They use that normal unpredictability of weather as if it NOW indicates something dramatic about climate. But we are experiencing NO abnormal weather outside the wide range of NORMAL for this planet. No drama, no crisis.

Science isn't a religion and therefore my faith is never required, I owe no one an explanation for any lack of faith in some unproven, highly disputed, repeatedly fraudulently presented POS bullshit just because the left ONCE AGAIN glommed onto a theory they believed provided them with the means to politically exploit it in order to empower the left. This is the ONLY reason they ever politicize science -when they believe doing so benefits their political agenda, otherwise the ignore it. They are now totally politically invested in this bullshit which means no number of liars, cheats and frauds exposed at the root of it will ever let them stop beating this drum until those personally pushing this shit are dead and gone. Politicizing science has never once benefitted our species or science itself. It has only increased human misery and set back science -sometimes for centuries-as one more self-inflicted stumbling block.

Those who are politically invested have put their own reputations and self worth, their political agenda on the line -not just the theory. It is a matter of THEIR credibility on the line and they don't care what the real science is or what turns out to be The real facts. Only their agenda matters. A terrific clue science has been politicized by the left (it is only the left that treats science like a religion and becomes politically invested, not the right) -is a crock of shit is when participating scientists (they are only human and just as likely to lie and cheat as anyone else) destroy their raw data, falsify their hard data and collectively agree and communicate with each other for the purpose of presenting a consistent, unified and lying ass front in order to hide their deception as long as possible. Exactly what happened here.

 

[rdean]

In a typical March, particularly in the nation's northern tier, you may see, perhaps, one or perhaps two days of record warmth before a sharp cold front brings that spring tease to a screeching halt. Not so in March 2012.

International Falls, Minn., self-promoted as the "Icebox of the Nation", tied or broke daily record highs 12 of 13 days from Mar. 10-22. This includes a 79-degree reading on March 18, which was the warmest day ever recorded during March in International Falls.

Thursday, March 22, Detroit, Mich., reached 86 degrees, setting an all-time record high for the month of March.

Wow -it really is a religion for you kooks, isn't it? It doesn't matter how many scientists are proven to have lied, cheated, destroyed their raw data -you have a NEED to believe they were just "funning" with us by doing all that. Sorry but there is no getting around reality. The ONLY time you see scientists commit FRAUD -and it was REPEATEDLY committed with this issue -is because the facts aren't supporting their lying ass claims. They don't destroy their raw data, they don't cheat, they don't change the hard data -when it actually supports their theory. DUH. But maybe that idea is way above your education level.

Climate change is not measured by the day, month or a year -and given the fact we only have only been recording temperatures with any degree of accuracy for about 85 years (and the first 35 of those is "iffy") and the earth is estimated to be roughly 4.5 billion years old -then the odds of breaking records in any given year is actually quite high and will remain quite high for a few thousand years yet. In fact temperatures are NOT outside of the normal RANGE FOR THIS PLANET. And it is called a "range" for a reason -it is because they fluctuate all over the place inside that range. There are NO abnormal temperatures outside the range of NORMAL FOR THIS PLANET. So let's pretend they are anyway, right? And it is a CRISIS! Because no one loves a crisis like a liberal who goes through life just lurching from one crisis to the next as a routine way of life. (There is a reason EVERYTHING is a crisis for the left -but it has very little to do with reality and everything to do with trying to avoid debate and ram through their agenda as quickly as possible.)

Every honest scientist admits that current temperatures are still not as warm as it was during the Middle Ages -OOPS. For a fact -still not as consistently warm as it was during the Middle Ages -but only TODAY is it a CRISIS, right? But in the Middle Ages it was just called........life. Oh and let's not talk about the benefits they enjoyed living during such a warm period either.

I also have to wonder about the education of some of these people and their outrageous claims -starting with the ridiculous notion that carbon dioxide gas traps heat. Where is the PROOF that is true? WHERE ARE THE EXPERIMENTS PROVING THE HEAT TRAPPING CAPABILITIES OF CARBON DIOXIDE? You can find lots of CLAIMS it does and you can even find a scientific equation trying to explain why it does -but no PROOF it does. Not ONE experiment where the heat trapping capabilities of carbon dioxide were indisputably proven to exist and measurable. Yet all you have to do is a CHEAP ASS experiment to prove it -if it were true, of course. Just build a bunch of black boxes and pump each full with a different atmospheric gas at 100% concentration -including carbon dioxide as well as one with normal atmosphere. Let them sit in the sun and then take the internal temperatures at intervals until you give up and get tired of waiting for something to change among the boxes. If carbon dioxide has the capability of trapping heat -the temperature should be SIGNIFICANTLY AND MEASURABLY higher than the boxes with other atmospheric gases. EXCEPT IT ISN'T! The box with carbon dioxide will provably not be any warmer than any of the other boxes with different gases and if carbon dioxide caused heat to be trapped -it would be hotter than the others preventing heat from escaping that box. But it isn't any hotter! Uh oh! Any clue why? It is because trapping heat requires a BARRIER and only that which exists in our atmosphere in barrier form can trap heat. Gas by definition is not a barrier -no matter how many molecules of a gas exist in the atmosphere, there is still lots and lots and lots of EMPTY SPACE between them -allowing heat to easily escape past it. That means VAPOR and ICE in the atmosphere have heat trapping capabilities. But not gas. And carbon dioxide doesn't exist in our atmosphere in any other form except gas. No dry ice in the atmosphere -and therefore no heat trapping abilities either. Carbon dioxide doesn't exist in sheets or clumps in the atmosphere. Even when it exists in 100% concentration inside a box it will not be any hotter than another box filled with a different atmospheric gas. Oh wow -funny how THOSE experiments that repeatedly turn out the same every time are buried, huh? Can't teach kids the truth about THAT one, huh? So now we have to pretend there are magical heat trapping abilities of carbon dioxide that only exist in the atmosphere when dispersed among other gases - but measuring just how much heat trapping capabilities exist in carbon dioxide just can't be measured in an EXPERIMENT at all - because it doesn't exist. So let's ignore that fact and teach our kids a lie and insist it does anyway because the truth about carbon dioxide just doesn't fit in with that "man is nothing but an evil destructive parasite with the AWESOME power to destroy the entire planet and must be forced to return to the living standards of the Stone Age" thing the left lives for, huh.

A greenhouse is hotter than the temperature outside of it NOT because of the gases inside it. But because the GLASS provides a BARRIER - and has even greater heat trapping capabilities than the other barrier that exists in a real greenhouse -the trapped moisture in the form of VAPOR. Both of which have KNOWN and MEASURABLE heat trapping capabilities! If our planet were truly warming in an alarming way indicating "global warming", then the amount of VAPOR in our atmosphere would be significantly changing because lacking glass in our atmosphere, VAPOR is THE main BARRIER trapping heat on earth. Not carbon dioxide which is measured in parts per MILLION -meaning that for every 1,000,000 molecules of atmospheric gases, roughly 390 are carbon dioxide. Meaning 999, 610 in that 1,000,000 are NOT carbon dioxide but some other gas instead. They have to draw an OVER-SIZED graph to show what is in reality a miniscule rise in order to pretend the non-dramatic rise is both dramatic and alarming! Targeting a gas that is actually necessary for the very existence of life and is part of the critical carbon cycle of the entire planet and pretending it exists in "dangerous" amounts is ludicrous. Carbon dioxide used to exist in significantly MUCH, MUCH higher percentages in the past -they KNOW that for a fact - and amazingly it not only was not the fault of human beings but our planet THRIVED. Your NEED to believe otherwise notwithstanding.

Anyone actually pretending a hot day or a series of hot days, a hot year, a hot decade even somehow proves global warming -is a moron or a liar. A REAL change in climate is measured by centuries and sometimes by eons. It CANNOT BE DETERMINED BY A DAY OR BY A MONTH OR BY A YEAR. NOT EVER. Anyone who thinks the climate changes with a drop of a hat must think that dumb ass movie "The Day After Tomorrow" is actually a documentary. In spite of scientists themselves uniformly trashing it as the moronic, misleading and downright stupid piece of shit it is. Record highs or lows on any given day mean exactly that -it was really hot or cold that day. And nothing more.

Because that's what scientists do. They lie, cheat, and destroy their raw data that proves we are living on an unchanging earth created by God a mere 6,000 years ago. Oh those fucking scientists. Such a dirty bunch. Glad Republicans stay away from them. They don't want to become a "scientists". They know better. Besides, what have scientists ever done for this country? Nothing. They just sit on their degrees and collect government money for doing nothing.

Hey, did I get it right?

 

[Flopper]

To have an intelligence conversation about global warming, you have to think global. I find it very amusing that every time we have an usually cold or warm winter, the supporters and the opposition gleefully hit the airways with their evidence. It matters not how hot are cold it got in some place on the globe this year. What is important is the long term trend of global temperatures. Unfortunately that trend is toward higher temperatures. Nine of the 10 warmest years in the modern meteorological record have occurred since the year 2000. That is reason for concern.

NASA - NASA Finds 2011 Ninth-Warmest Year on Record

 

[Old Rocks]

In a typical March, particularly in the nation's northern tier, you may see, perhaps, one or perhaps two days of record warmth before a sharp cold front brings that spring tease to a screeching halt. Not so in March 2012.

International Falls, Minn., self-promoted as the "Icebox of the Nation", tied or broke daily record highs 12 of 13 days from Mar. 10-22. This includes a 79-degree reading on March 18, which was the warmest day ever recorded during March in International Falls.

Thursday, March 22, Detroit, Mich., reached 86 degrees, setting an all-time record high for the month of March.

U.S. News - March has meant 6,000 weather records broken
-----------------------------

dancing baby .mov - YouTube

And here we have a baby right winger learning how to spin from early age.

I dare you to go back to the 30's and compare the records broken..... Was it global warming then too?

No, goofess, that was not global.

 

[Old Rocks]

rdean this is about your education level, as a matter of fact it might be a little too advanced for you.

The "Year without a Summer"
In 1816, Savannah, Georgia, celebrated the 4th of July with a high temperature of 46°F! Because it was so cold across the eastern U.S., crops were ruined as the growing season was shortened. Snow even fell in June, the heaviest in New England between June 6th and 11th, creating snow drifts 18 to 20 inches in parts of Vermont.

Weather Encyclopedia - The Weather Channel Kids

Perhaps the explanation involving the eruption of Tambora is a bit too advanced for you, doofus.

And we had a cold year after the eruption of Krakatoa, also.

 

[skookerasbil]

To have an intelligence conversation about global warming, you have to think global. I find it very amusing that every time we have an usually cold or warm winter, the supporters and the opposition gleefully hit the airways with their evidence. It matters not how hot are cold it got in some place on the globe this year. What is important is the long term trend of global temperatures. Unfortunately that trend is toward higher temperatures. Nine of the 10 warmest years in the modern meteorological record have occurred since the year 2000. That is reason for concern.

NASA - NASA Finds 2011 Ninth-Warmest Year on Record

I agree.......you have to think global.

When people see some kind of uniformity globally, the science will be considered science. Otherwise, its about as valid as the numbers I picked for tonights 358 million dollar Lottery pick.

Computer models related to things of nature are a joke.


When the real scientists can tell me exactly where a hurricane is going days in advance, I might pay attention!!

 

[editec]

Bloody windy and cold here in Maine today.

Ranging between about 40 in the south to 30 in the north with wind speeds in the north expected to be around 45 mpg and in the south about 30 mph.

Last week it was 86 in my hometown.

Winter dies hard up here.

 

[Zander]