Many questions remain about 9/11 as we near the 18th anniversary.

The evidence demonstrating the utter absuridity of many of your conspiracy claims?

Oh, its definitely out there. There's no such thing as 'silent explosives' or 'invisible thermite reactions'.

And I hightly recommend that anyone interested in the truth read the oral histories of the FDNY......with a particular emphasis on their recognition that the WTC 7 was going to collapse due to fire and structural damage, hours before it came down.

Oral Histories From Sept. 11 Compiled by the New York Fire Department - The New York Times

Frank Fellini and Daniel Nigro are insightful reads as I remember.

 

Then why did he lie? ...

 

Because he couldn't tell the truth. He was given a script and followed it.

 

i thought you said you were not going to feed the trolls anymore? and a sockpuppet no less dude,

 

That's what I said ... "Those were his instructions from the Saudis" ... he could have told the truth, but he didn't want to die, he wasn't that stupid ...

 

yeah the troll who belives in magic bullets,they would see eye to eye on that one as well.LOL

 

He here was lying again.

 

Have you actually read the pre-911 memo?

It was uselessly vague. Read it yourself.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe..._Determined_To_Strike_in_US_(August_2001).pdf

 

Gotta give him credit for something. He was the first to connect the term conspiracy theories to 9/11.

 

Nonsense. Bush didn't make that statement until 2006.

Truther conspiracy nonsense was being debunked LONG before 2006. For crying out loud, Popular Mechanics had a cover article debunking some of the more absurd Truther conspiracies back in 2005.

You're wrong again. Given the sheer volume of accusations you make, one would think that the law of averages alone would mandate that you eventually got something right.