Mandation forfeits the purpose of voting.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by bartin, Feb 22, 2011.

  1. bartin
    Offline

    bartin Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    Messages:
    5
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +0
    Any person or people that propose, or incite the goal of consent are the common law that "endorse" the power to "vote".

    Any person or people that propose or incite the goal of mandation are the common law that "forfeit" the power to "vote"

    Mandation sabotages the purpose of voting.

    The power to "vote" is compelled by the purpose of consent.

    The logic of "vote" is to validate the goal to "freedom of choice".

    The power to "mutiny" is compelled by the purpose of mandation.

    The logic of "mutiny" is to validate the goal to "dictatorship".

    Does free enterprise or national business agencies support the vote or do they enhance mutiny?

    Does drug testing support the vote or does it enhance mutiny?

    Does the insurance industry support the vote or do they enhance mutiny?

    Does the institute of marriage support the vote or does it enhance mutiny?

    Dictatorship is not the boss to freedom of choice, because the purpose of "dividend" is to qualify the "mass" to its divisible individuality of common denomination by its rank of uniformity.

    Freedom of choice subordinates dictatorship, because dividend supercedes mass by divisible rank of individuality.

    Freedom of choice incites the govern of "independence".

    Dictatorship incites the govern of "slavery".

    Any person that knows the difference between freedom of choice and dictatorship is called the "emancipator".

    The goal of "emancipation" is to gain distance and direction by apprehending the recognition of dividend in order to expose, or exploit the mass to its common law of difference, separation, or super conscious awareness, for validating sensory acquisition to a criteria of intelligence that decides distinction by, "collective dividend".

    Mandation is not the boss of consent.

    "Slavery" or mass population is not the boss of "independence" or self - dividend.

    The progress of mandation sabotages the "merit"' of supply in order to prohibit or outlaw the logic of ownership.

    The progress of consent augments, summons, or conveys the proof of "merit" to validate ownership.

    Consent is the distinction to common wealth.

    Mandation is the distinction to corrupt counterfeit government.

    Consent warrants the purpose of "vote".

    Mandation warrants the purpose of "dictatorship".

    The logic of consent provokes the power to "succeed".

    The logic of mandation provokes the power to ''failure"

    The difference between consent and mandation exploits common law.

    Common law refers to the collective union of a specified network united by componency of function.

    The collective union as a specified componency of function defines how things match the involving factors of the common goal to divisible logic.

    Sponsors are made of consent; but recipients are made of mandation.

    Consent is the power of "supply"; but mandation is the power of "demand"

    "Supply" is the ability to give; but "demand." is the ability to receive.

    Its faster to give than it is to receive.

    Any legislation that promotes mandation forfeits or fails the logic of "ownership".

    Any branch of armed forces or sovereign government office that imposes any system of mandation, forfeit the logic of "territory".

    Any law enforcement agency or border patrol asset that does not endorse or promote the logic of ownership or territory forfeits the goal of custody and pursuit.

    All forfeitures will surrender to the logic of "independence".
     
  2. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,576
    Thanks Received:
    8,171
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,219
    I'm sorry. I'm sure you had some point with all this, but the format you are writing it is just too darn distracting.

    See, it makes things easier for others to read when you write in concise coherent paragraphs making a point or asking a question. I can't for the life of me follow one line after another with no rhyme or reason.
     

Share This Page