Mandated defense cuts could lead to war, top US military official says

[Mr Natural]

No reason US taxpayers should make do with less while we serve as the worlds policeman

We are NOT serving "as the world's policeman." You need to stop repeating that untruth.

Yes, we are. And you need to get your head out of the sand on that issue.

 

[Unkotare]

The US should not ask our people to pay more and make do with less while we provide free military protection to the rest of the world.

Our military presence abroad is NOT to "provide free military protection to the rest of the world."

The rest of the world benefits from the US maintaining global stability and providing real time defense on short notice.

The world does benefit from the security and prosperity we have worked so hard to ensure since the end of WWII. That does not mean our purpose is to "provide free military protection to the rest of the world."

 

[Mr Natural]

Our military presence abroad is NOT to "provide free military protection to the rest of the world."

The rest of the world benefits from the US maintaining global stability and providing real time defense on short notice.

The world does benefit from the security and prosperity we have worked so hard to ensure since the end of WWII. That does not mean our purpose is to "provide free military protection to the rest of the world."

It might not be our purpose, but that is in effect what we do.

 

[Warrior102]

The US should not ask our people to pay more and make do with less while we provide free military protection to the rest of the world.

Our military presence abroad is NOT to "provide free military protection to the rest of the world."

I spent my three years in Japan shopping and partying.

Hey - someone had to do it !!!

 

[Unkotare]

No reason US taxpayers should make do with less while we serve as the worlds policeman

We are NOT serving "as the world's policeman." You need to stop repeating that untruth.

Yes, we are. And you need to get your head out of the sand on that issue.

We most certainly are not. We maintain a presence around the world to advance and secure OUR OWN interests. You are just parroting what your bumper sticker tells you.

 

[Unkotare]

The US should not ask our people to pay more and make do with less while we provide free military protection to the rest of the world.

Our military presence abroad is NOT to "provide free military protection to the rest of the world."

I spent my three years in Japan shopping and partying.

Hey - someone had to do it !!!

That's a good place to do it.

 

[Jroc]

We are NOT serving "as the world's policeman." You need to stop repeating that untruth.

Yes, we are. And you need to get your head out of the sand on that issue.

We most certainly are not. We maintain a presence around the world to advance and secure OUR OWN interests. You are just parroting what your bumper sticker tells you.

Exactly

 

[Unkotare]

The rest of the world benefits from the US maintaining global stability and providing real time defense on short notice.

The world does benefit from the security and prosperity we have worked so hard to ensure since the end of WWII. That does not mean our purpose is to "provide free military protection to the rest of the world."

It might not be our purpose, but that is in effect what we do.

It is often a happy side effect of our looking after our own interests that we are a valuable ally.

 

[bobgnote]

The world does benefit from the security and prosperity we have worked so hard to ensure since the end of WWII. That does not mean our purpose is to "provide free military protection to the rest of the world."

It might not be our purpose, but that is in effect what we do.

It is often a happy side effect of our looking after our own interests that we are a valuable ally.

The US gets away with co-opting its own US Constitution, for British Imperialist agendas becuase the US has NO VALUE. The process of co-opting the royal favors exclusion clause, separation clause, enumeration of powers clause, USCA 4, 5, 14, RICO, and Sedition Act is directed, to violate the standing army clause.

No WAY is backing Israel, Bahrain, and Taiwan some part of the "common defense."

The US gets away with shit because the US is like an island, which was an advantage, played by Britain, for hundreds of years.

But with NO REAL VALUE, the US will have to stop propping guys like Saddam and the King of Bahrain, which are minority Sunni tyrants, over Shiite majorities, or Chiang, or any assholes in Israel, which are apartheid hegemonic tyrants, or the Shah, a total tool.

When you are an asshole, you somehow think shit has VALUE. Shit has no value, if you can't put it in the ground, composted, to grow things. The US shoots depleted uranium shit all over the world, which has no value. Kids get born, without arms, legs, or faces. Get a clue, you ridiculous wingpunk. With NO VALUE, the economy is fucking up, and the time of standing army profiteering on CIA antics will come to a crashing halt.

And nothing will have been solved, during the entire episode of profiteering. Shit was driven, and more shit will happen. Because you are REALLY STUPID, you have to be told, how shit happens. If you are an ASSHOLE, you made money, maybe. But no value issued.

So tell me truthfully, tardy: did pretending the USS Maine was sunk by Spaniards have VALUE, or did it just lead to problems, we still have to solve? Did FDR blocking all intel to Pearl have VALUE, or did all the stunts just keep our battleships, out of the Guadalcanal campaign?

Did the Doolittle raid have strategic VALUE, or did it just piss off the Japanese, who whacked a lot of people, in Manchuko? It seems nukes were necessary, to strategically affect Japanese behavior, in favor of allied victory. While they were getting nuked, the Soviets re-upped their undeclared war on Japan, with a declared war, and invaded, all the way, to North Korea. Then the US pretended South Korea was out of our pretectorate, and the US played asshole, in vain opposition to Stalin, since locking up with Stalin made a lot of money, for assholes who came in over budget, a lot, but it had no VALUE. So now, deficit spending on shit has almost run its course.

Did overflying China with B-24 Liberators in 1948, from bases in Tibet and Taiwan have VALUE, or did it just get China pissed off at Tibet, now part of China, at Taiwan, with 1000 Chinese missiles pointed at it, at South Korea, where a war ensued, and at the US, with stupid people running things? Did CIA support for the Shah and Saddam have VALUE, or did shit not keep happening, including GW Bush lied to Congress, about WMDs, to get an eight-year war going? Did the Navy fraud in the Tonkin Gulf have VALUE, or did the US just want to move in, on oil-platform territory? Did support for Israel have VALUE, or did the US just get the USS Liberty whacked, and then CIA assets Saddam and UBL went off? Did the CIA and FBI suppression of the knowledge of 9/11 attackers in the US have VALUE, or did we just get sacked, for another Pearl-style attack, and now we have to pay, for a DHS and new digs, for the NSA, and eat shit, via NDAA?

Do you know what the fuck VALUE is? I don't think so, you red puppy who happens to be a blue baby! Your quote in quote in quote with wingpunk rant shows your head is way up your butt, and you can't think, for shit! Get some VALUE, shit-for-brains!