Lying about a bogus Benghazi stand down!

[easyt65]

John "Tig" Tiegen has made a career out of lying about a bogus Benghazi stand down and exploiting the deaths of brave men, just so he can sell T-shirts to Obama haters.
Tiegen falsely claims the CIA Chief of Base ordered him not to go assist the diplomatic mission in Benghazi.

The problem for Tig is that he says the Security Team Leader was stand right there. And, the Security Team Leader says he never heard the Chief tell anybody not to go assist the diplomatic mission.

So Tig lies, says he has a witness and the witness says Tig lied.

Tig's claim that the CIA Chief of Base told him not to go to assist the diplomatic mission is a lie.

Plain and simple.

View attachment 217849

1. Were you there?

2. Do you PERSONALLY know anyone who was there?

3. Were you there with General Carter Ham and his team when Ham was relieved of his command?

4. Do you PERSONALLY know anyone who was?

5. Did you watch the attack as it was happening via drone video?

If your answer to any one of these is NOT ''YES' then STFU and STOP parroting liberal bullshit and lies, and STOP attacking a hero who was there and who attempted to save Americans under attack from the terrorists Hillary and Obama aided and who abandoned them there to needlessly die.

I can say 'YES' to several of those questions ... CAN YOU?

 

[easyt65]

The American Ambassador in Tripoli testified that within 15 minutes of the attack starting he had already notified the State Department that the attack had begun and that it was definitely a TERRORIST ATTACK. This message was CONFIRMED to have been received by the State Department.

ANY DENIAL BY HILLARY OR OBAMA - THAT THEY DID NOT KNOW THIS WAS A TERRORIST ATTACK - FROM 15 MINUTES AFTER THE ATTACK STARTED IS / WAS A PROVEN LIE!

The CIA in Benghazi reportedly sent a report to the WH WAR room and to the State Department within an hour of the attack starting. It was reported / recorded that prior to releasing that report - declaring this attack to be a terrorist attack - to the public the WH and State Department modified the document 13 times - every reference to terrorism was stripped from the report.

ANY DENIAL BY HILLARY OR OBAMA FROM 1 HOUR AFTER THE ATTACK STARTED - AFTER THIS REPORT WAS RECEIVED BY THE WH AND STATE DEPARTMENT - IS / WAS A PROVEN LIE!

The timing of these 2 claims and the fact that Hillary DID know this was a terrorist attack was substantiated by e-mails found / presented to have been written by Hillary showing she informed both a foreign Ambassador (Turkish) and her daughter not long after the attack started that she KNEW it was a terrorist attack.

The 'video' story was on-the-fly manufactured 'CYA' bullshit by Hillary and Barry meant to save their own asses.

22 US Embassies and compounds throughout the AOR / Middle East that day, the anniversary of 9/11/2001 - AS EXPECTED. Of those 22, w were overrun, Benghazi was the only one that suffered fatalities / injuries ... and Benghazi was the only 1 explained as a 'protest over a video's.

Hmmmm....perhaps out of the entire Muslim populace-living in the Middle East the biggest / easiest offended Muslim snowflakes lived in Benghazi?! The rest of the Middle East was not offended into violence by the video that day.

They were taking part in the Middle East-wide terrorist attack on US Embassies and compounds that had been called for and which Hillary and Obama had known about for MONTHS!

 

[Godboy]

Bob said, "Stand down." Why would Bob say that?

One can come up with many plausible scenarios as to why he said that. The better question is, why would Tig lie about it?

 

[Rustic]

After all we now know, you guys are still peddling the myth that there was no stand-down order??? If Tig is lying and there was no stand-down order, why didn't that security team, and others, immediately rush to intervene? Why? Hey?

And if you dodge that question, how about answering the question that John McCain could never get answered: Why did Team Obama claim that the nearest military air assets were "three or four hours away," when we had military aircraft on Crete, less than 90 minutes away? Why weren't any of those air assets immediately sent to Benghazi?

And shall we talk about the dozens of requests for additional security that Ambassador Stevens submitted that were rejected? Hey? What about those? And are we really, really supposed to believe that in the dozens of times that we know Stevens spoke with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the phone, not once, not one single time, did he ask her about any of those rejected requests for additional security? Are we really supposed to believe that she was "unaware" of Stevens' dire warnings about the security situation and his repeatedly rejected requests for more security? Really? Really? Really?

13 Hours: Yes There Is Evidence of a Stand-Down Order in Benghazi | National Review

Benghazi Scandal Coverup -- Clinton & Obama Administration Owe Us a Reckoning | National Review

Hillary’s Legendary Lies: Benghazi

The second rule of combat rescue is don't act in haste. Gather intelligence, analyse it, come up with a plan and request assistance.

The Obama administration did not give two shits about those people… End of story

The evidence says otherwise. Have you ever heard about Operation Jukebox Lotus, the name for the crisis response to the events at the US Special Mission Compound in Benghazi, Libya on 11-12 September 2012. The operation was led by US Africa Command, but received support from other commands, namely US European Command?

Those people in Benghazi were a liability to the Obama administration, the Obama administration preferred them dead

 

[mikegriffith1]

After all we now know, you guys are still peddling the myth that there was no stand-down order??? If Tig is lying and there was no stand-down order, why didn't that security team, and others, immediately rush to intervene? Why? Hey?

And if you dodge that question, how about answering the question that John McCain could never get answered: Why did Team Obama claim that the nearest military air assets were "three or four hours away," when we had military aircraft on Crete, less than 90 minutes away? Why weren't any of those air assets immediately sent to Benghazi?

And shall we talk about the dozens of requests for additional security that Ambassador Stevens submitted that were rejected? Hey? What about those? And are we really, really supposed to believe that in the dozens of times that we know Stevens spoke with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the phone, not once, not one single time, did he ask her about any of those rejected requests for additional security? Are we really supposed to believe that she was "unaware" of Stevens' dire warnings about the security situation and his repeatedly rejected requests for more security? Really? Really? Really?

13 Hours: Yes There Is Evidence of a Stand-Down Order in Benghazi | National Review

Benghazi Scandal Coverup -- Clinton & Obama Administration Owe Us a Reckoning | National Review

Hillary’s Legendary Lies: Benghazi

8 (eight) different Republican led investigations found no wrongdoing on anyone`s part.

Really??? No wrongdoing on "anyone's part"? On what planet? You have not read one of those reports, have you? You certainly have not read the Benghazi committee's final report. And you clearly did not bother to read any of the links I provided.

When one of you Benghazi nuts. . . .

"Benghazi nuts"? You mean people who don't swallow the Obama administration's stream of lies and distortions about their brazen incompetence that led to American deaths in Benghazi?

. . . shows just a tiny bit of concern as to how 4,500 soldiers died looking for mythical WMDs in Iraq I may take you seriously. You "care" about the 4 dead at Benghazi but you don`t give a ---- about the 4,500 who were killed in Iraq. Why is that?

Uh. . . . Huh??? Just huh??? So people who disagree with you about the Iraq War are not allowed to discuss Obama and Hillary's Benghazi cover-up? If you ever scrape together some extra cash, you might wanna invest in a critical thinking class. Just because someone disagrees with you about the war does not mean they are wrong to note the utterly implausible, ludicrous nature of Hillary's claim that Ambassador Stevens never once voiced concern about Benghazi security when they spoke on the phone and never once asked her to overrule any of the rejections of his security requests.

And, by the way, I happen to agree with you about the Iraq War, as do many other conservatives. But that has nothing to do with being objective and truthful about Benghazi.

 

[sakinago]

John "Tig" Tiegen has made a career out of lying about a bogus Benghazi stand down and exploiting the deaths of brave men, just so he can sell T-shirts to Obama haters.
Tiegen falsely claims the CIA Chief of Base ordered him not to go assist the diplomatic mission in Benghazi.

The problem for Tig is that he says the Security Team Leader was stand right there. And, the Security Team Leader says he never heard the Chief tell anybody not to go assist the diplomatic mission.

So Tig lies, says he has a witness and the witness says Tig lied.

Tig's claim that the CIA Chief of Base told him not to go to assist the diplomatic mission is a lie.

Plain and simple.

View attachment 217849

You’re still on this. It’s a he said she said type of deal and your concluding definitely that tig MUST be the one lying. This is with the knowledge that the administration did in fact lie about the cause (the video), that it was a protest (vs a well coordinated attack), the fog of war line, and the fact they did not send help from a carrier group sitting off the coast that could’ve sent help in 20 mins. Not to forget that the CIA retains the most motivation to lie about this incident, more than the people on the ground fighting for their lives and decided to make up a story just because they hate Obama. That’s the extant of your ad hominem argument, tig and the other 4 people just wanted to make money, and they hate Obama. Vs all the shit I just mentioned

 

[Slice The Great]

Bob said, "Stand down." Why would Bob say that?

One can come up with many plausible scenarios as to why he said that. The better question is, why would Tig lie about it?

I considered the possibility that Tig may have misunderstood what the Chief meant. He comes across to me as kind of dumb.

Tig would have to be really dumb to think the Chief would have told him the mission was off, and then told him they needed to come up with a plan for the mission.

When you consider all the evidence and all the possible explanations, the simplest most plausible explanation is that Tiegen is lying.

 

[Penelope]

Why would he lie about it, really now? To put the blame on anyone else. The issue is no one could of done anything, Stevens went to bed like it was a quiet night, it was a SURPRISE attack.

 

[Slice The Great]

Why would he lie about it, really now? To put the blame on anyone else. The issue is no one could of done anything, Stevens went to bed like it was a quiet night, it was a SURPRISE attack.

They could have not left six cans of gasoline sitting next to one of the buildings at the diplomatic mission, for attackers to use to start fires.

 

[basquebromance]

Congressman Jason Chaffetz of Utah went to Benghazi the day after the attack. that takes a lotta balls!