LWIR FAILS to Warm the Atmosphere by Empirical Experiment.

[Toddsterpatriot]

You are totally wrong.

Alas, I am not...CO2 emits everything it absorbs till such time as it reaches its equilibrium temperature of about -80F

Nope. Your "analysis" doesn't hold water. You absolutely don't understand the experiment. The heat of compression is negligible.

So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two.

Oh yes it does. I challenged you with the physics behind it several times and you ducked and dodged the question.

Reality proves your model wrong...there are literally millions of hours of testing, development, and observation from the IR heating industry that prove your models wrong.

QUOTE="SSDD, post: 21448052, member: 40906"]So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two

The absorbed swir from the sun in the plastic, heated the bottle air! Just like seats in a car does the inside of a car with the windows up! Simple[/QUOTE]

The absorbed swir from the sun

Can you post the wavelength of this "short-wave infrared" from the Sun?

 

[Billy_Bob]

No, an individual molecule does not have a temperature.

BULL SHIT!

All matter has a temperature and all matter will emit energy at that temperature..

In your world energy has no temperature?

What is the temperature of a molecule going 100 miles per hour?

LOL

Ignorant of the physics....

 

[Billy_Bob]

No, an individual molecule does not have a temperature.

BULL SHIT!

All matter has a temperature and all matter will emit energy at that temperature..

In your world energy has no temperature?

Hahahahaha. You need remedial science classes.

Go look up the definition of temperature.

Then look up the Planck curve of thermal emissions for two objects that are 10 or 20C different. The overlap in range is almost total. Only the proportions are slightly different with the warmer object producing more radiation at all of the wavelengths .

That is one of the reasons that SSDDs theory that temperature of the first object controls the emissions of the second object is so bizarre. There is the same radiation wavelengths coming off both objects!

CO2 radiates at its temperature. In our atmosphere that is generally about -80 deg F. The band of 12-16um is approximately -78 to -81 deg F.
I am amazed at the number of people on this forum who claim to have scientific back ground and fail to even understand this simple concept.

 

[Billy_Bob]

You are totally wrong.

Alas, I am not...CO2 emits everything it absorbs till such time as it reaches its equilibrium temperature of about -80F

Nope. Your "analysis" doesn't hold water. You absolutely don't understand the experiment. The heat of compression is negligible.

So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two.

Oh yes it does. I challenged you with the physics behind it several times and you ducked and dodged the question.

Reality proves your model wrong...there are literally millions of hours of testing, development, and observation from the IR heating industry that prove your models wrong.

QUOTE="SSDD, post: 21448052, member: 40906"]So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two

The absorbed swir from the sun in the plastic, heated the bottle air! Just like seats in a car does the inside of a car with the windows up! Simple

The absorbed swir from the sun

Can you post the wavelength of this "short-wave infrared" from the Sun?[/QUOTE]]
The sun radiates from about 0.1um out to around 6um Boundary LWIR is about 4-6um... But anyone with even half a brain cell can find this out by looking at the range the sun emits..

 

[jc456]

You are totally wrong.

Alas, I am not...CO2 emits everything it absorbs till such time as it reaches its equilibrium temperature of about -80F

Nope. Your "analysis" doesn't hold water. You absolutely don't understand the experiment. The heat of compression is negligible.

So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two.

Oh yes it does. I challenged you with the physics behind it several times and you ducked and dodged the question.

Reality proves your model wrong...there are literally millions of hours of testing, development, and observation from the IR heating industry that prove your models wrong.

QUOTE="SSDD, post: 21448052, member: 40906"]So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two

The absorbed swir from the sun in the plastic, heated the bottle air! Just like seats in a car does the inside of a car with the windows up! Simple

The absorbed swir from the sun

Can you post the wavelength of this "short-wave infrared" from the Sun?[/QUOTE]
Why exactly?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You are totally wrong.

Alas, I am not...CO2 emits everything it absorbs till such time as it reaches its equilibrium temperature of about -80F

Nope. Your "analysis" doesn't hold water. You absolutely don't understand the experiment. The heat of compression is negligible.

So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two.

Oh yes it does. I challenged you with the physics behind it several times and you ducked and dodged the question.

Reality proves your model wrong...there are literally millions of hours of testing, development, and observation from the IR heating industry that prove your models wrong.

QUOTE="SSDD, post: 21448052, member: 40906"]So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two

The absorbed swir from the sun in the plastic, heated the bottle air! Just like seats in a car does the inside of a car with the windows up! Simple

The absorbed swir from the sun

Can you post the wavelength of this "short-wave infrared" from the Sun?

Why exactly?

Because it sounds like something new.

 

[Billy_Bob]

You are totally wrong.

Alas, I am not...CO2 emits everything it absorbs till such time as it reaches its equilibrium temperature of about -80F

Nope. Your "analysis" doesn't hold water. You absolutely don't understand the experiment. The heat of compression is negligible.

So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two.

Oh yes it does. I challenged you with the physics behind it several times and you ducked and dodged the question.

Reality proves your model wrong...there are literally millions of hours of testing, development, and observation from the IR heating industry that prove your models wrong.

QUOTE="SSDD, post: 21448052, member: 40906"]So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two

The absorbed swir from the sun in the plastic, heated the bottle air! Just like seats in a car does the inside of a car with the windows up! Simple

The absorbed swir from the sun

Can you post the wavelength of this "short-wave infrared" from the Sun?

Why exactly?

Because it sounds like something new.

Short wave IR is more commonly known as boundary LWIR. The definition can be found in any physics 100-101 book. It simply refers to the shorter wavelength of IR.

Using common sense is something alarmists have problems with.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Alas, I am not...CO2 emits everything it absorbs till such time as it reaches its equilibrium temperature of about -80F

So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two.

Reality proves your model wrong...there are literally millions of hours of testing, development, and observation from the IR heating industry that prove your models wrong.

QUOTE="SSDD, post: 21448052, member: 40906"]So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two

The absorbed swir from the sun in the plastic, heated the bottle air! Just like seats in a car does the inside of a car with the windows up! Simple

The absorbed swir from the sun

Can you post the wavelength of this "short-wave infrared" from the Sun?

Why exactly?

Because it sounds like something new.

Short wave IR is more commonly known as boundary LWIR. The definition can be found in any physics 100-101 book. It simply refers to the shorter wavelength of IR.

Using common sense is something alarmists have problems with.

View attachment 236816

Using common sense is something alarmists have problems with.

Using science is what you and the other morons have problems with..

 

[jc456]

You are totally wrong.

Alas, I am not...CO2 emits everything it absorbs till such time as it reaches its equilibrium temperature of about -80F

Nope. Your "analysis" doesn't hold water. You absolutely don't understand the experiment. The heat of compression is negligible.

So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two.

Oh yes it does. I challenged you with the physics behind it several times and you ducked and dodged the question.

Reality proves your model wrong...there are literally millions of hours of testing, development, and observation from the IR heating industry that prove your models wrong.

QUOTE="SSDD, post: 21448052, member: 40906"]So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two

The absorbed swir from the sun in the plastic, heated the bottle air! Just like seats in a car does the inside of a car with the windows up! Simple

The absorbed swir from the sun

Can you post the wavelength of this "short-wave infrared" from the Sun?

Why exactly?

Because it sounds like something new.

So you never heard of the sun. Wow

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Alas, I am not...CO2 emits everything it absorbs till such time as it reaches its equilibrium temperature of about -80F

So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two.

Reality proves your model wrong...there are literally millions of hours of testing, development, and observation from the IR heating industry that prove your models wrong.

QUOTE="SSDD, post: 21448052, member: 40906"]So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two

The absorbed swir from the sun in the plastic, heated the bottle air! Just like seats in a car does the inside of a car with the windows up! Simple

The absorbed swir from the sun

Can you post the wavelength of this "short-wave infrared" from the Sun?

Why exactly?

Because it sounds like something new.

So you never heard of the sun. Wow

There must be a lot of SWIR from the Sun, eh?

 

[Wyatt earp]

QUOTE="SSDD, post: 21448052, member: 40906"]So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two

The absorbed swir from the sun in the plastic, heated the bottle air! Just like seats in a car does the inside of a car with the windows up! Simple

The absorbed swir from the sun

Can you post the wavelength of this "short-wave infrared" from the Sun?

Why exactly?

Because it sounds like something new.

So you never heard of the sun. Wow

There must be a lot of SWIR from the Sun, eh?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The absorbed swir from the sun in the plastic, heated the bottle air! Just like seats in a car does the inside of a car with the windows up! Simple

The absorbed swir from the sun

Can you post the wavelength of this "short-wave infrared" from the Sun?

Why exactly?

Because it sounds like something new.

So you never heard of the sun. Wow

There must be a lot of SWIR from the Sun, eh?

View attachment 236868

Thanks. Had nothing to do with my question, but thanks anyway.

 

[jc456]

QUOTE="SSDD, post: 21448052, member: 40906"]So do explain why there was a 9 degree difference between the capped bottle of plain air and the vented bottle of plain air...The vent was the only difference between the two

The absorbed swir from the sun in the plastic, heated the bottle air! Just like seats in a car does the inside of a car with the windows up! Simple

The absorbed swir from the sun

Can you post the wavelength of this "short-wave infrared" from the Sun?

Why exactly?

Because it sounds like something new.

So you never heard of the sun. Wow

There must be a lot of SWIR from the Sun, eh?

There is! Read up

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The absorbed swir from the sun in the plastic, heated the bottle air! Just like seats in a car does the inside of a car with the windows up! Simple

The absorbed swir from the sun

Can you post the wavelength of this "short-wave infrared" from the Sun?

Why exactly?

Because it sounds like something new.

So you never heard of the sun. Wow

There must be a lot of SWIR from the Sun, eh?

There is! Read up

How much? 50%? More?

 

[Crick]

View attachment 236868

 

[jc456]

The absorbed swir from the sun

Can you post the wavelength of this "short-wave infrared" from the Sun?

Why exactly?

Because it sounds like something new.

So you never heard of the sun. Wow

There must be a lot of SWIR from the Sun, eh?

There is! Read up

How much? 50%? More?

All we get

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Because it sounds like something new.

So you never heard of the sun. Wow

There must be a lot of SWIR from the Sun, eh?

There is! Read up

How much? 50%? More?

All we get

All the radiation we receive from the Sun is SWIR?

 

[jc456]

So you never heard of the sun. Wow

There must be a lot of SWIR from the Sun, eh?

There is! Read up

How much? 50%? More?

All we get

All the radiation we receive from the Sum is SWIR?

LOL, I answered your question. Re read your question

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There must be a lot of SWIR from the Sun, eh?

There is! Read up

How much? 50%? More?

All we get

All the radiation we receive from the Sum is SWIR?

LOL, I answered your question. Re read your question

You mumble.

 

[SSDD]

View attachment 236868

Did you look at your graph? What are current reconstrctions? And what might a new reconstraction be? Do they do science like they spell check? Climate science gets sloppier all the time.