Los Angeles Homeless Man Punched Two People in the Face, But Was Cited and Released

They were arrested.
What "they"? One man was cited and then released. No arrest was made.

My wish for you is someone dumps a bucket of diarrhea on your head just before punching you in the face.
We'll see how blase you are about assault after that.

Internet tough guys are not impressive. For the vast majority of cases someone who hits someone does not get a jail sentence. We can't afford it. A fine and maybe community service.

Is a couple days in jail really a punishment for someone homeless? A nice bed and regular meals for a few days?

Many homeless are mentally ill. You want to pay up to build places to get them treatment?

That is sad and eye opening. In the Midwest, if you had a mentally ill relative punch someone in public, they would indeed be arrested. I don't know what kind of sentence they would get, but knowing they would be arrested tends to keep it from happening regularly. It is also illegal in the Midwest for someone who is mentally ill to pitch a tent in front of a business downtown. There is no explosion in incarceration because people don't do these things because they know they will be arrested. This stuff didn't have to become normal in the West. What shocks me the most is that the public is onboard with this stuff, and it is not just a pointy headed official. Crap, needles, and crime. But it is ok, because they are mentally ill? Mentally ill people are perfectly capable of following the law. Life is difficult for them, but they are not children.

It doesn't sound to me like you know what it is like to be mentally ill.

There are reports like this all over the country.

Be careful with assumptions, and please stop referring to the mentally ill as children, thanks.

If you have to misrepresent my statements to defend yours, don't bother.
 
Grown men stood around and watched. That's the real travesty in it. It happens way too often.
Most Leftists have been effectively trained to not judge or get involved.

The cop who blew away the guy in his own home in Dallas didn’t bother to administer CPR either when she realized her “mistake”. Freakin leftist….LOL
 
Crime fighting, Leftard style.

Yet another peak at civilization under the control of Democrats.

A Homeless Man Punched Two People in the Face, But Was Cited and Released
Did Trump promise to pay his legal fees too??

161214152504-john-mcgraw-trump-rally-punch-sentencing-01-exlarge-169.jpg
 
No, this is how it is everywhere and will only continue to get worse.
It will with who cares attitudes like yours.

Me? I want to address the issue of homelessness and mental illness but I'm told that is Socialism and evil. Since we will not do that, I can only note the inevitable. Noting the inevitable does not mean that is what you support.
 
So
What "they"? One man was cited and then released. No arrest was made.

My wish for you is someone dumps a bucket of diarrhea on your head just before punching you in the face.
We'll see how blase you are about assault after that.

Internet tough guys are not impressive. For the vast majority of cases someone who hits someone does not get a jail sentence. We can't afford it. A fine and maybe community service.

Is a couple days in jail really a punishment for someone homeless? A nice bed and regular meals for a few days?

Many homeless are mentally ill. You want to pay up to build places to get them treatment?

That is sad and eye opening. In the Midwest, if you had a mentally ill relative punch someone in public, they would indeed be arrested. I don't know what kind of sentence they would get, but knowing they would be arrested tends to keep it from happening regularly. It is also illegal in the Midwest for someone who is mentally ill to pitch a tent in front of a business downtown. There is no explosion in incarceration because people don't do these things because they know they will be arrested. This stuff didn't have to become normal in the West. What shocks me the most is that the public is onboard with this stuff, and it is not just a pointy headed official. Crap, needles, and crime. But it is ok, because they are mentally ill? Mentally ill people are perfectly capable of following the law. Life is difficult for them, but they are not children.

It doesn't sound to me like you know what it is like to be mentally ill.

There are reports like this all over the country.

Be careful with assumptions, and please stop referring to the mentally ill as children, thanks.

If you have to misrepresent my statements to defend yours, don't bother.

So you have no problem with arresting the mentally ill for committing assault, vagrancy, indecent exposure, burglary, ect? They have severe problems, but they know right from wrong. Giving them a pass on the Oprah defense doesn't do them any favors or make their lives better.
 
So
Internet tough guys are not impressive. For the vast majority of cases someone who hits someone does not get a jail sentence. We can't afford it. A fine and maybe community service.

Is a couple days in jail really a punishment for someone homeless? A nice bed and regular meals for a few days?

Many homeless are mentally ill. You want to pay up to build places to get them treatment?

That is sad and eye opening. In the Midwest, if you had a mentally ill relative punch someone in public, they would indeed be arrested. I don't know what kind of sentence they would get, but knowing they would be arrested tends to keep it from happening regularly. It is also illegal in the Midwest for someone who is mentally ill to pitch a tent in front of a business downtown. There is no explosion in incarceration because people don't do these things because they know they will be arrested. This stuff didn't have to become normal in the West. What shocks me the most is that the public is onboard with this stuff, and it is not just a pointy headed official. Crap, needles, and crime. But it is ok, because they are mentally ill? Mentally ill people are perfectly capable of following the law. Life is difficult for them, but they are not children.

It doesn't sound to me like you know what it is like to be mentally ill.

There are reports like this all over the country.

Be careful with assumptions, and please stop referring to the mentally ill as children, thanks.

If you have to misrepresent my statements to defend yours, don't bother.

So you have no problem with arresting the mentally ill for committing assault, vagrancy, indecent exposure, burglary, ect? They have severe problems, but they know right from wrong. Giving them a pass on the Oprah defense doesn't do them any favors or make their lives better.

Arrest them. Then what? Are you going to pay for the billions it will cost to hold them? Then what? Release them to be homeless and still mentally ill?
 
So
That is sad and eye opening. In the Midwest, if you had a mentally ill relative punch someone in public, they would indeed be arrested. I don't know what kind of sentence they would get, but knowing they would be arrested tends to keep it from happening regularly. It is also illegal in the Midwest for someone who is mentally ill to pitch a tent in front of a business downtown. There is no explosion in incarceration because people don't do these things because they know they will be arrested. This stuff didn't have to become normal in the West. What shocks me the most is that the public is onboard with this stuff, and it is not just a pointy headed official. Crap, needles, and crime. But it is ok, because they are mentally ill? Mentally ill people are perfectly capable of following the law. Life is difficult for them, but they are not children.

It doesn't sound to me like you know what it is like to be mentally ill.

There are reports like this all over the country.

Be careful with assumptions, and please stop referring to the mentally ill as children, thanks.

If you have to misrepresent my statements to defend yours, don't bother.

So you have no problem with arresting the mentally ill for committing assault, vagrancy, indecent exposure, burglary, ect? They have severe problems, but they know right from wrong. Giving them a pass on the Oprah defense doesn't do them any favors or make their lives better.

Arrest them. Then what? Are you going to pay for the billions it will cost to hold them? Then what? Release them to be homeless and still mentally ill?
If it's ok for the president and his shit why not? Hell we let war criminals and sex trafficking recruiters walk free.
 
So
It doesn't sound to me like you know what it is like to be mentally ill.

There are reports like this all over the country.

Be careful with assumptions, and please stop referring to the mentally ill as children, thanks.

If you have to misrepresent my statements to defend yours, don't bother.

So you have no problem with arresting the mentally ill for committing assault, vagrancy, indecent exposure, burglary, ect? They have severe problems, but they know right from wrong. Giving them a pass on the Oprah defense doesn't do them any favors or make their lives better.

Arrest them. Then what? Are you going to pay for the billions it will cost to hold them? Then what? Release them to be homeless and still mentally ill?
If it's ok for the president and his shit why not? Hell we let war criminals and sex trafficking recruiters walk free.

We do. So OK, you agree. We are going to do nothing and the problem will only grow.
 
So
That is sad and eye opening. In the Midwest, if you had a mentally ill relative punch someone in public, they would indeed be arrested. I don't know what kind of sentence they would get, but knowing they would be arrested tends to keep it from happening regularly. It is also illegal in the Midwest for someone who is mentally ill to pitch a tent in front of a business downtown. There is no explosion in incarceration because people don't do these things because they know they will be arrested. This stuff didn't have to become normal in the West. What shocks me the most is that the public is onboard with this stuff, and it is not just a pointy headed official. Crap, needles, and crime. But it is ok, because they are mentally ill? Mentally ill people are perfectly capable of following the law. Life is difficult for them, but they are not children.

It doesn't sound to me like you know what it is like to be mentally ill.

There are reports like this all over the country.

Be careful with assumptions, and please stop referring to the mentally ill as children, thanks.

If you have to misrepresent my statements to defend yours, don't bother.

So you have no problem with arresting the mentally ill for committing assault, vagrancy, indecent exposure, burglary, ect? They have severe problems, but they know right from wrong. Giving them a pass on the Oprah defense doesn't do them any favors or make their lives better.

Arrest them. Then what? Are you going to pay for the billions it will cost to hold them? Then what? Release them to be homeless and still mentally ill?

We want the same thing. I realize it is nearly impossible for the mentally ill to get help, and I wish that were not the case. However, I do not believe making them exempt from the law is the way to go. Again, in the Midwest, the mentally ill are expected to follow the law, and to a large extent, they do. There is no exploding incarceration costs. It simply did not happen. The argument that it is cheaper to allow them to break the law is not true. I don't want to even think how much it costs to maintain and clean up after all the enabled homeless camps. If you treat them like real people, they will behave that way.
 
So
It doesn't sound to me like you know what it is like to be mentally ill.

There are reports like this all over the country.

Be careful with assumptions, and please stop referring to the mentally ill as children, thanks.

If you have to misrepresent my statements to defend yours, don't bother.

So you have no problem with arresting the mentally ill for committing assault, vagrancy, indecent exposure, burglary, ect? They have severe problems, but they know right from wrong. Giving them a pass on the Oprah defense doesn't do them any favors or make their lives better.

Arrest them. Then what? Are you going to pay for the billions it will cost to hold them? Then what? Release them to be homeless and still mentally ill?

We want the same thing. I realize it is nearly impossible for the mentally ill to get help, and I wish that were not the case. However, I do not believe making them exempt from the law is the way to go. Again, in the Midwest, the mentally ill are expected to follow the law, and to a large extent, they do. There is no exploding incarceration costs. It simply did not happen. The argument that it is cheaper to allow them to break the law is not true. I don't want to even think how much it costs to maintain and clean up after all the enabled homeless camps. If you treat them like real people, they will behave that way.

The person was arrested.
 
Crime fighting, Leftard style.

Yet another peak at civilization under the control of Democrats.

A Homeless Man Punched Two People in the Face, But Was Cited and Released
This has been going on for decades. You can't lock up mentally ill people. The cops only can send them to the nearest mental hospital for evaluation. And then the doctors release them in the mornings when they come to work. But if the hospitals are full to capacity. Then the cops cites them out.
We can pay George Soros and Bill Gates to keep them locked up in one of their detention centers. But it will be a lot cheaper to ban GMO's and vaccines that are making them deranged.


Free flu shot clinics for the homeless

2 Investigates: The true cost of incarcerating mentally ill...

https://mentalillnesspolicy.org/consequences/cost-homeless-mentally-ill.html

Illegal alien champions Gates, Soros profit by jailing them - WND

Soros’ top 5 investment shareholdings are in gold, Petrobras petroleum company, Hess Corp petroleum company, Monsanto corporation, Citigroup Inc., and Suncor Energy Inc.(petroleum company). Selfbeskikking/Self Determination

Companies Owned By George Soros
 
So
Be careful with assumptions, and please stop referring to the mentally ill as children, thanks.

If you have to misrepresent my statements to defend yours, don't bother.

So you have no problem with arresting the mentally ill for committing assault, vagrancy, indecent exposure, burglary, ect? They have severe problems, but they know right from wrong. Giving them a pass on the Oprah defense doesn't do them any favors or make their lives better.

Arrest them. Then what? Are you going to pay for the billions it will cost to hold them? Then what? Release them to be homeless and still mentally ill?
If it's ok for the president and his shit why not? Hell we let war criminals and sex trafficking recruiters walk free.

We do. So OK, you agree. We are going to do nothing and the problem will only grow.
Violent crazies should simply be put down.
 
So
Be careful with assumptions, and please stop referring to the mentally ill as children, thanks.

If you have to misrepresent my statements to defend yours, don't bother.

So you have no problem with arresting the mentally ill for committing assault, vagrancy, indecent exposure, burglary, ect? They have severe problems, but they know right from wrong. Giving them a pass on the Oprah defense doesn't do them any favors or make their lives better.

Arrest them. Then what? Are you going to pay for the billions it will cost to hold them? Then what? Release them to be homeless and still mentally ill?

We want the same thing. I realize it is nearly impossible for the mentally ill to get help, and I wish that were not the case. However, I do not believe making them exempt from the law is the way to go. Again, in the Midwest, the mentally ill are expected to follow the law, and to a large extent, they do. There is no exploding incarceration costs. It simply did not happen. The argument that it is cheaper to allow them to break the law is not true. I don't want to even think how much it costs to maintain and clean up after all the enabled homeless camps. If you treat them like real people, they will behave that way.

The person was arrested.
...and then immediately let go.
 
So
If you have to misrepresent my statements to defend yours, don't bother.

So you have no problem with arresting the mentally ill for committing assault, vagrancy, indecent exposure, burglary, ect? They have severe problems, but they know right from wrong. Giving them a pass on the Oprah defense doesn't do them any favors or make their lives better.

Arrest them. Then what? Are you going to pay for the billions it will cost to hold them? Then what? Release them to be homeless and still mentally ill?

We want the same thing. I realize it is nearly impossible for the mentally ill to get help, and I wish that were not the case. However, I do not believe making them exempt from the law is the way to go. Again, in the Midwest, the mentally ill are expected to follow the law, and to a large extent, they do. There is no exploding incarceration costs. It simply did not happen. The argument that it is cheaper to allow them to break the law is not true. I don't want to even think how much it costs to maintain and clean up after all the enabled homeless camps. If you treat them like real people, they will behave that way.

The person was arrested.
...and then immediately let go.

The guy probably made it back to his stomping grounds before the cops did.
 
Crime fighting, Leftard style.

Yet another peak at civilization under the control of Democrats.

A Homeless Man Punched Two People in the Face, But Was Cited and Released
This has been going on for decades. You can't lock up mentally ill people. The cops only can send them to the nearest mental hospital for evaluation. And then the doctors release them in the mornings when they come to work. But if the hospitals are full to capacity. Then the cops cites them out.
We can pay George Soros and Bill Gates to keep them locked up in one of their detention centers. But it will be a lot cheaper to ban GMO's and vaccines that are making them deranged.


Free flu shot clinics for the homeless

2 Investigates: The true cost of incarcerating mentally ill...

https://mentalillnesspolicy.org/consequences/cost-homeless-mentally-ill.html

Illegal alien champions Gates, Soros profit by jailing them - WND

Soros’ top 5 investment shareholdings are in gold, Petrobras petroleum company, Hess Corp petroleum company, Monsanto corporation, Citigroup Inc., and Suncor Energy Inc.(petroleum company). Selfbeskikking/Self Determination

Companies Owned By George Soros
You can’t lock up someone for assault?

Not in Laftardland, that’s for sure.
 
So
If you have to misrepresent my statements to defend yours, don't bother.

So you have no problem with arresting the mentally ill for committing assault, vagrancy, indecent exposure, burglary, ect? They have severe problems, but they know right from wrong. Giving them a pass on the Oprah defense doesn't do them any favors or make their lives better.

Arrest them. Then what? Are you going to pay for the billions it will cost to hold them? Then what? Release them to be homeless and still mentally ill?

We want the same thing. I realize it is nearly impossible for the mentally ill to get help, and I wish that were not the case. However, I do not believe making them exempt from the law is the way to go. Again, in the Midwest, the mentally ill are expected to follow the law, and to a large extent, they do. There is no exploding incarceration costs. It simply did not happen. The argument that it is cheaper to allow them to break the law is not true. I don't want to even think how much it costs to maintain and clean up after all the enabled homeless camps. If you treat them like real people, they will behave that way.

The person was arrested.
...and then immediately let go.

Let go today or in a week what difference does it make?
 

Forum List

Back
Top