Looks Like the Pelosi Shiff Show Trials are Coming to a Very Predictable Close

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Sep 25, 2011
63,590
16,753
2,220
Uncle Joe Stalin starved tens of millions of people to death in the USSR and the New York Times covered for him with their liar of a 'journalist' who I wont even bother naming, and they still show off the Pulitzer the slime bag got for all his years of lying for the cause, lol.

It wasnt untill the Stalin Moscow Show Trials were conducted that many in the Left finally broke with Stalins 'vision of the future', but most did not. They infest our colleges and university humanities departments to this day, denouncing the USA for every crime under the sun, but Communism is still the only good way to run things. Never mind Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot, they just didnt do it right.

Now we have the Pelosi Shiff Show Trials that are just as dishonest and just as flagrantly horsecrap.

Look at the video or read Shiffs comments about what 'hearsay' evidence is according to the Republicans.
.
Schiff also slammed Republican arguments, saying it was "clear to everyone" that aid was withheld from Ukraine on the condition of opening investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter.

Furthermore, he said Republicans' characterization of testimony in the impeachment hearings as "hearsay" is "absurd."

"That would be like saying you can't rely on the testimony of the burglars during Watergate because it's only hearsay,” he said. “Or you can’t consider the fact that they tried to break in because they got caught. They actually didn’t get what they came for so no harm no foul. That’s absurd.”​

The absurdity is entirely on Shiffs part as that is not anything at all resembling the Republicans explanation at all. Hearsay evidence is when you do not have someone telling you what they directly witnessed, but only heard from someone else or surmised it in some cases.

That is not admissable evidence and is hearsay or just supposition.

Adam Shiff cant even tell that straight and has to lie about it.

Trump is the big winner in all this as the Democrats have demonstrated to the whole nation what obsessive hateful people they are, ironically tying up current aid to the Ukraine so they can do this fishing expedition, lol, with constantly changing crimes being investigated, lol. But instead of doing their legislative jobs, they are trying to smear Trump with this absurdity of an impeachment, and it will be long remembered as a sham impeachment headed by Shiff in a desperate attempt by Pelosi to appease her radical AOC Squad and keep them mollified.

Republicans have seen huge donations and upswing in the relativistic BS polling we have today. The TV audience for the laughably boring Democrat Presidential debates is down to around 6 million viewers out of a nation of 125 million voters, and Republicans in 2016 were bringing in audience around 25 million.

The Deep State is being exposed for all the world to see, criminal charges are being filed on a FISA altering criminal FBI agent, and the Democrats insist this is all nothing but a conspiracy theory like the one that has Epstein being murdered, lol.

We are witnessing the death throes of the Democratic Party and its Tammany Hall Federal political machine, a.k.a. the Deep State.
 
You ought to change the channel. The president used the power of his office for personal political gain. That is undeniable. These hearings brought that FACT to light.

That will not lead to the destruction of the Democratic party.
 
The democrat party is going nowhere as long as 3rd world mass immigration continues to swell their voting base.
 
The democrat party is going nowhere as long as 3rd world mass immigration continues to swell their voting base.

Once again, it has been found the illegals do not go to the polls, and maybe if republicans wouldn't gerrymander the districts so much and suppress the vote, but that is the only way they can win.
 
The democrat party is going nowhere as long as 3rd world mass immigration continues to swell their voting base.

Once again, it has been found the illegals do not go to the polls, and maybe if republicans wouldn't gerrymander the districts so much and suppress the vote, but that is the only way they can win.

Did I say anything about illegal immigration? OP is a big fan of legal immigrants. He thinks they'll turn into perfect little conservative republicans by stepping foot on our magic soil.
 
Uncle Joe Stalin starved tens of millions of people to death in the USSR and the New York Times covered for him with their liar of a 'journalist' who I wont even bother naming, and they still show off the Pulitzer the slime bag got for all his years of lying for the cause, lol.

It wasnt untill the Stalin Moscow Show Trials were conducted that many in the Left finally broke with Stalins 'vision of the future', but most did not. They infest our colleges and university humanities departments to this day, denouncing the USA for every crime under the sun, but Communism is still the only good way to run things. Never mind Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot, they just didnt do it right.

Now we have the Pelosi Shiff Show Trials that are just as dishonest and just as flagrantly horsecrap.

Look at the video or read Shiffs comments about what 'hearsay' evidence is according to the Republicans.
.
Schiff also slammed Republican arguments, saying it was "clear to everyone" that aid was withheld from Ukraine on the condition of opening investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter.

Furthermore, he said Republicans' characterization of testimony in the impeachment hearings as "hearsay" is "absurd."

"That would be like saying you can't rely on the testimony of the burglars during Watergate because it's only hearsay,” he said. “Or you can’t consider the fact that they tried to break in because they got caught. They actually didn’t get what they came for so no harm no foul. That’s absurd.”​

The absurdity is entirely on Shiffs part as that is not anything at all resembling the Republicans explanation at all. Hearsay evidence is when you do not have someone telling you what they directly witnessed, but only heard from someone else or surmised it in some cases.

That is not admissable evidence and is hearsay or just supposition.

Adam Shiff cant even tell that straight and has to lie about it.

Trump is the big winner in all this as the Democrats have demonstrated to the whole nation what obsessive hateful people they are, ironically tying up current aid to the Ukraine so they can do this fishing expedition, lol, with constantly changing crimes being investigated, lol. But instead of doing their legislative jobs, they are trying to smear Trump with this absurdity of an impeachment, and it will be long remembered as a sham impeachment headed by Shiff in a desperate attempt by Pelosi to appease her radical AOC Squad and keep them mollified.

Republicans have seen huge donations and upswing in the relativistic BS polling we have today. The TV audience for the laughably boring Democrat Presidential debates is down to around 6 million viewers out of a nation of 125 million voters, and Republicans in 2016 were bringing in audience around 25 million.

The Deep State is being exposed for all the world to see, criminal charges are being filed on a FISA altering criminal FBI agent, and the Democrats insist this is all nothing but a conspiracy theory like the one that has Epstein being murdered, lol.

We are witnessing the death throes of the Democratic Party and its Tammany Hall Federal political machine, a.k.a. the Deep State.

Hunter Biden and Joe Biden has nothing to do with the investigation, and neither does the 2016 election, tramp wanted dirt on his political rival, and strong armed a newly elected pres. in need of security aid that got tramp in trouble and a public statement he was doing an investigation into the Bidens. Just like he colluded with the Russians. Russiagate and now Ukrainegate!

He was treating the Bidens just like he treated Clinton.

Tramp could give 10 sh.ts about corruption, all he wanted was a public statement, as it is, the Biden name has been hurt. Biden should sue him for slander.
 
The democrat party is going nowhere as long as 3rd world mass immigration continues to swell their voting base.

Once again, it has been found the illegals do not go to the polls, and maybe if republicans wouldn't gerrymander the districts so much and suppress the vote, but that is the only way they can win.

WHERE has that been found that illegals do not go to polls? Unable to find their way? No buses running? If they are that stupid and indifferent to the country, how then do you think they make such a worthwhile contribution to the country?

And if illegals aren't going to the polls, then how can you suppress their vote? Are we putting something in the water? Barking dogs and ICE agents at the polling stations? I'm just curious how a demented mind like yours thinks?
 
The democrat party is going nowhere as long as 3rd world mass immigration continues to swell their voting base.

Once again, it has been found the illegals do not go to the polls, and maybe if republicans wouldn't gerrymander the districts so much and suppress the vote, but that is the only way they can win.

Did I say anything about illegal immigration? OP is a big fan of legal immigrants. He thinks they'll turn into perfect little conservative republicans by stepping foot on our magic soil.

I suspect you are a legal immigrant or your parents or your grandparents. Do they have their papers saying they were born here, maybe they should go back to their country of origin.
 
The democrat party is going nowhere as long as 3rd world mass immigration continues to swell their voting base.

Once again, it has been found the illegals do not go to the polls, and maybe if republicans wouldn't gerrymander the districts so much and suppress the vote, but that is the only way they can win.

WHERE has that been found that illegals do not go to polls? Unable to find their way? No buses running? If they are that stupid and indifferent to the country, how then do you think they make such a worthwhile contribution to the country?

And if illegals aren't going to the polls, then how can you suppress their vote? Are we putting something in the water? Barking dogs and ICE agents at the polling stations? I'm just curious how a demented mind like yours thinks?
republican led investigation did not find illegals voting. are you saying those republican investigators are inept? hahahaha
 
Hunter Biden and Joe Biden has nothing to do with the investigation.

Hunter and Joe have EVERYTHING to do with the investigation, you useless Cluck! The very HEART of the hearings is that Trump said he was looking into election tampering and criminal conduct surrounding these people! This entire farce is like accusing a man of rape with no victim, no DNA evidence, not even a medical report, just a bunch of hearsay supposition. Until the Bidens are put on the stand and drilled with questions about their connections with the 2016 election tampering and corrupt dealings in Ukraine, you can never prove it was all just for "abusive political advantage" and not legitimate investigations in the interests of the United States by the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of this country.

We will drag the Bidens in front of the Court kicking and screaming until we get to the real truth here. You asked for it. The very fact that the Schiffs are hiding them is proof they have something to hide. The Democrats are up to their necks now in criminal conspiracy. You idiots really didn't think this one through, did you?
 
The democrat party is going nowhere as long as 3rd world mass immigration continues to swell their voting base.

Once again, it has been found the illegals do not go to the polls, and maybe if republicans wouldn't gerrymander the districts so much and suppress the vote, but that is the only way they can win.

WHERE has that been found that illegals do not go to polls? Unable to find their way? No buses running? If they are that stupid and indifferent to the country, how then do you think they make such a worthwhile contribution to the country?

And if illegals aren't going to the polls, then how can you suppress their vote? Are we putting something in the water? Barking dogs and ICE agents at the polling stations? I'm just curious how a demented mind like yours thinks?
republican led investigation did not find illegals voting. are you saying those republican investigators are inept? hahahaha
Just wondering how you suppress the vote of people who don't even want or try to or have a right to vote?
 
The democrat party is going nowhere as long as 3rd world mass immigration continues to swell their voting base.

Once again, it has been found the illegals do not go to the polls, and maybe if republicans wouldn't gerrymander the districts so much and suppress the vote, but that is the only way they can win.

WHERE has that been found that illegals do not go to polls? Unable to find their way? No buses running? If they are that stupid and indifferent to the country, how then do you think they make such a worthwhile contribution to the country?

And if illegals aren't going to the polls, then how can you suppress their vote? Are we putting something in the water? Barking dogs and ICE agents at the polling stations? I'm just curious how a demented mind like yours thinks?
republican led investigation did not find illegals voting. are you saying those republican investigators are inept? hahahaha
Just wondering how you suppress the vote of people who don't even want or try to or have a right to vote?
ask kris kobach. he is the expert in suppressing votes, and in voter fraud investigations.
 
Most blacks were born here, and you republicans want to suppress the black vote. Its unreal.
 
You ought to change the channel. The president used the power of his office for personal political gain. That is undeniable. These hearings brought that FACT to light.

That will not lead to the destruction of the Democratic party.
It appears that those on the right are watching different hearings, perhaps on the Cartoon Network.
 
You ought to change the channel. The president used the power of his office for personal political gain. That is undeniable. These hearings brought that FACT to light.

That will not lead to the destruction of the Democratic party.
It appears that those on the right are watching different hearings, perhaps on the Cartoon Network.

Those morons are convinced by stuff such as this:
Security_trumpnotes_GettyImages-1188927586.jpg




and this




and just for the obvious parallels:

this

2019291907-780x0.jpg
 
Hunter Biden and Joe Biden has nothing to do with the investigation, and neither does the 2016 election, tramp wanted dirt on his political rival, and strong armed a newly elected pres. in need of security aid that got tramp in trouble and a public statement he was doing an investigation into the Bidens. Just like he colluded with the Russians. Russiagate and now Ukrainegate!

He was treating the Bidens just like he treated Clinton.

Tramp could give 10 sh.ts about corruption, all he wanted was a public statement, as it is, the Biden name has been hurt. Biden should sue him for slander.

Trump wanted an investigation into the origins of the Steel Dossier, and also Burisma, and I think he is more wanting to get to Soros than Biden, Uncle Joe is small fry compared to Soros.

But what his specific thoughts are, no one really knows, let alone Giuliani. Trump always specifically said that he did not want a quid pro quo, but Democrats are trying to pretend that having a meeting or not is quid pro quo if based on conditional behavior.

SCOTUS has ruled that the offer of a meeting is not a bribe or the equivalent of a financial gain or a matter of bribery.

The Supreme Court’s Bribery-Blessing McDonnell Decision

Technically, the Court held that selling an “official act” can be still illegal. But it also held that the McDonnell jury heard a definition of that term that was too broad. Something as subtle—or unsubtle—as an executive calling up an aide and telling her to listen to his very good friend, or taking a check and then having a quiet word with regulators, or even a directive that an influence-buyer should be helped in every way does not constitute an official act, at least not on its own, the Court found. Instead, according to the opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, an official act "must involve a formal exercise of governmental power that is similar in nature to a lawsuit before a court, a determination before an agency, or a hearing before a committee.”

In other words, if no gavel is involved, it will probably be hard to prove bribery, after this ruling. Indeed, the few politicians whom prosecutors may be able to convict are those who are careless enough to put together corruption to-do lists, since, according Roberts, a test of whether something is a bribable official act is whether it is "the kind of thing that can be put on an agenda, tracked for progress, and then checked off as complete."​

Supreme court overturns bribery conviction for former Virginia governor

“There is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the opinion. “But our concern is not with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns. It is instead with the broader legal implications of the government’s boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute.

“A more limited interpretation of the term ‘official act’ leaves ample room for prosecuting corruption, while comporting with the text of the statute and the precedent of this court.”

Roberts said the law should not punish politicians for giving their constituents access to public officials who are willing to listen but do not actually exercise government power. Setting up a meeting, talking to another official or organising an event does not meet the definition of an “official act” under the law, he determined.​

So Trump's supposed offer of a meeting if Zelenski did him a favor is NOT a bribe or quid pro quo according to case law and SCOTUS.
 

Forum List

Back
Top