Looks like lunchbox nazi inspectors are mandated by the Feds

And most importantly check out this. This is Federal legislation right from the President and the First Lady in tandem with the USDA official.

“Everything we can do.. to make food taste good,” Rowe told students at Elkhorn Middle School in Frankfort on Wednesday.

The USDA official from Washington, DC got a first-hand look…and taste of school lunches in Kentucky.

“I think we can make it to where one day you’ll say ‘that lady was here and I like this food now.’ That’s what I’m working on,” she said.

Taylor Boggs ate lunch with Rowe, who’s worked directly with President Obama on school lunch legislation.

“She really listened to what I said about the food,” said Boggs, an 8th grader at Elkhorn .

“Usually for students, if they don’t have a good lunch, sometime around mid-afternoon, they get sluggish, start having issues,” said Rowe, who says she visited the school in-between several meetings with officials in Kentucky.

Rowe says the bottom line is that school lunches today are going to be a lot different next year.

8th graders say their meals are pretty good, but some days….

“It’s really greasy…and not fresh,” said Boggs.

Rowe says some districts have brought in chefs in to make changes.

“A few weeks ago Rachel Ray made lunch in one of the schools I was in, she made turkey tacos,” she said.

Elkhorn Middle School was given the thumbs up for already serving fat free milk and whole grain buns.

“I’m really pleased with what I see here in Kentucky. Other school districts are not as far along,” Rowe said.

Rowe says the new laws will not just change what is served in cafeterias, but what is allowed in vending machines and other areas of the school.


Frankfort school cafeteria gets visit from USDA official

Inspector, where's the inspector? KY!, what happened to NC? What's the problem with making food better? You're really going off the deep end to work your agenda, IMO. The hatred is so bad, you'd actually use children as pawns. You're doing the exact same thing you accuse Obama and liberals of doing. Have you no shame? :eusa_naughty:
 

The talking points didn't work today. And the "much ado about nothing" boat ain't going to float.

This is federal. Right from the White House and the USDA.

SHAMELESS!!! Trying to equate making sure meals are healthy with the stupid decision of one STATE employee.

No, the government RUN schools have full rights, and quite frankly the responsibility, to provide a good service for the money they take and school lunches are in need of repair. The problem is not the school making better lunches but that they are bleeding over into what parents send in their kids lunch, a place they have no business in. If I want to send my child to school with a slice of pizza every day, that's is my damn choice and the school has no place in that relationship WHATSOEVER. I support the revamping of school lunch. I do not support the government becoming big daddy and regulating what i give my child. I have heard several stories akin to this one. What I want to know: is there ANYTHING in this regulation or upcoming regulation that covers bag lunches brought by the students? I do not know and so am not sure if I support the new push. More precise information would be appreciated if anyone has it....
 
I know exactly what's going on. This is SEIU thuggery.

Look we all went to school. We all carried a lunch box. We HATED it. We couldn't wait for the day to buy our lunch. I finally got to in High School.

My youngest started in Middle school. She was ELATED.

Then this year she shocked the heck out of us by announcing she wanted to carry her lunch again. She didn't give a reason. But when pressed on it, she admitted the lunch SUCKS.

She said it was good before, but now it's awful. I looked up the website and discovered. Sure enough. The school was touting that they were under the "Healthy Lunch" initiative.

Then I discovered as I picked up my kid, more and more kids CARRYING lunch bags or boxes, who weren't before.

I mean MIDDLE SCHOOLERS carrying lunch boxes. When I was a kid that would have been a thing of derision and finger pointing.

If this keeps up, some school lunch ladies are going to be out of a job.

This is the SEIU pushing back through their government toadies trying to get the kids to go back to buying the school lunch whether they like it, eat it, or not.

That's my opinion on what's happening.
 
Well, while we still don't exactly who the agent was in the "chicken nugget" fiasco in NC, this is what I have found out.

In 2010 the Feds passed the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010.

This is right on the USDA website. I never knew that First Ladies could push legislation.

Most recently, Rowe served as Deputy Administrator for Special Nutrition Programs at FNS, leading the effort to pass the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, the legislative centerpiece of First Lady Michelle Obama's Let's Move! initiative to end childhood obesity in a generation.

Audrey Rowe | USDA

Then there is this. Right on the WH site. And you can grab a pdf link off this one to see what they have outlined as a sample nutritious school lunch.

For Immediate Release
December 13, 2010
President Obama Signs Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 Into Law

First Lady Michelle Obama, Administration Officials and Let’s Move! Advocates Reaffirm Commitment to Raise a Healthier Generation of Kids

“Today is a great day for kids throughout our country as they will soon have healthier, and more nutritious food in their schools. As we continue to focus on the twin issues of childhood obesity and hunger, we will increase access to good, quality meals in school cafeterias so the nutritional needs of our youngsters are better met.

The President and First Lady have advocated strongly for passing the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, and, this bill, along with the resources and the powers provided under it, are going to allow USDA to be much more effective and aggressive in responding to obesity and hunger challenges for America’s kids.”

- U.S. Secretary Of Agriculture Tom Vilsack

President Obama Signs Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 Into Law | The White House

We're so fucked we might have to hit Ctl Alt Del twice and reboot the whole system
Indeed. As it is? The progressives are in the process of FORMAT C: :eusa_whistle:
 

Gee, how did I know that "story" was going to end up being a load of hogwash? Oh, right...the drug addled gasbag Rush Limbaugh reported it...

The story is true. It has gone viral world wide.

The issue at stake is the child brought a lunch that was completely within USDA guidelines and the "agent" rejected it.

The mother has the note that the 4 year old brought home from the school. You can try to make this a non issue by huffing and puffing and try to blame the story on Rush, but you risk truly looking just like a partisan hack instead of being able to go "what's wrong with this picture?".
 
I'd like to know how the USDA and the White House decided to assign calorie limitations
based on grade level?

On freaking grade level? Every child's body needs are different.

This just shows how whacked out anyone who participated in making up rules for nutrition on grade levels.
 
Yes, there is no greater proof of OBAMA'S EVIL than a non-story about how one kid got chicken nuggets at school one day.
 
Yes, there is no greater proof of OBAMA'S EVIL than a non-story about how one kid got chicken nuggets at school one day.

Try actually getting it right

It's not that a kid got chicken nuggets.... it's that the home packed lunch was scrutinized and deemed inappropriate when there is no authority to do any such thing, then forced to ingest the school lunch as the alternative

Like I said before... that happens with one of the lunches that I pack for my daughters... they will have a lawsuit against them faster than they can blink, my child will have the same lunch packed again every day, and if they have it taken away and are forced to eat the school lunch, I will show up every day to ensure my child is free to eat the lunch they bring from home
 

Nice :clap2:. Don't expect it to change the minds of those convinced that this is a nefarious federal plot to usher in the new age of Socialism in America however..........

You haven't gone to any of the links I provided which are non partisan in this thread have you?

Just rehashing yesterday's talking points to try to get out in front of this story and try to make it a "non story" by saying it's a "non story" over and over again.

My links go directly to the White House, the USDA and schools.
 
Haunting how all cultures, at some point, drift away from their founding plank on freedom, to replace it with a form of socialist oligarchy. This also seems without exception. The crux, of course, socialism fails, always...... and said culture fades into oblivion.

Robert
 
Not surprisingly, this story has been picked up in large swathes of the libertarian and conservative blogospheres…

One problem: the story is a load of bunk at worst, a non-story at best, standing for little more than the proposition that low-income children in NC’s low-income pre-K program whose parents don’t send them to school with enough healthy food will be provided with additional food to supplement what their parents send them to school with.

As usual, conservatives have no use for the truth.

Needless to say, if a story came out that poor children were discovered to not have enough healthy food and the school failed to offer a supplement, conservatives would decry the ‘incompetent pubic sector.’

That's not the issue here whatsoever.

The issue is the mother's lunch met the guidelines and frankly was more nutritious than freaking deep fried chicken nuggets. Yet the inspector told the child her lunch from mom was no good, and gave her a school lunch.

Do you know what's in chicken nuggets? Trust me, the turkey sandwich mom packed is far better.

Oh and the story has gone viral internationally in even left wing news organizations. Not just blogs.

While I don't disagree with this at all, it doesn't matter. The mom could have packed the kid a cat food sandwich . . . it isn't the feds/schools job nor their place to force their 'guidelines' on anyone and it's not the responsibility of the school to feed children, it's the parents. The fed/school have ZERO authority to come in and do what they did just because they 'feel' it's right. Fuck them.
 
This really blows me away that the USDA has this much power. I am really uncomfortable with this "one size fits all children nutritional guidelines".

Schools also will be required to set certain calorie amounts for various grade levels. Under the new standards, lunches for students in kindergarteners-through-fifth grade have 550 and 650 calories; lunches for grades six-through-eight have between 600 and 700 calories; and lunches for students in grades nine-through-12 have 750 and 850 calories.

Requirements also have been established for breakfast, but those requirements don’t begin until the 2013-14 school year.

Gordon said the calories aren’t set per item, but are taken as an average of a week’s meals.

“The calories really aren’t by day,” she said. “The government evaluates them by a week’s time, an average.”


The government evaluates.....

wow just wow.
Would you be more comfortable if the lobbyists for food processors wrote the regulations defining a healthy lunch for children? Would that be better policy all around? I'm not really convinced that those lobbyists have the nutrition of school children as a prime priority. Maybe those lobbyists would serve their clients better by advocating pizza as vegetables and high fructose corn syrup as a healthy ingredient for school aged children.
 
And most importantly check out this. This is Federal legislation right from the President and the First Lady in tandem with the USDA official.

“Everything we can do.. to make food taste good,” Rowe told students at Elkhorn Middle School in Frankfort on Wednesday.

The USDA official from Washington, DC got a first-hand look…and taste of school lunches in Kentucky.

“I think we can make it to where one day you’ll say ‘that lady was here and I like this food now.’ That’s what I’m working on,” she said.

Taylor Boggs ate lunch with Rowe, who’s worked directly with President Obama on school lunch legislation.

“She really listened to what I said about the food,” said Boggs, an 8th grader at Elkhorn .

“Usually for students, if they don’t have a good lunch, sometime around mid-afternoon, they get sluggish, start having issues,” said Rowe, who says she visited the school in-between several meetings with officials in Kentucky.

Rowe says the bottom line is that school lunches today are going to be a lot different next year.

8th graders say their meals are pretty good, but some days….

“It’s really greasy…and not fresh,” said Boggs.

Rowe says some districts have brought in chefs in to make changes.

“A few weeks ago Rachel Ray made lunch in one of the schools I was in, she made turkey tacos,” she said.

Elkhorn Middle School was given the thumbs up for already serving fat free milk and whole grain buns.

“I’m really pleased with what I see here in Kentucky. Other school districts are not as far along,” Rowe said.

Rowe says the new laws will not just change what is served in cafeterias, but what is allowed in vending machines and other areas of the school.


Frankfort school cafeteria gets visit from USDA official

Inspector, where's the inspector? KY!, what happened to NC? What's the problem with making food better? You're really going off the deep end to work your agenda, IMO. The hatred is so bad, you'd actually use children as pawns. You're doing the exact same thing you accuse Obama and liberals of doing. Have you no shame? :eusa_naughty:

Audrey Rowe is in charge of the program by the USDA. You really should read the article.

I never said she was the "agent" or "inspector" in NC.

USDA Biographies
Audrey Rowe
Administrator for the Food and Nutrition Service

Audrey_Rowe.jpg


Audrey Rowe is the Administrator for the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in Washington, D.C. FNS provides children and needy families with better access to food and a more healthful diet through its 15 nutrition assistance programs and nutrition education efforts.


Audrey Rowe | USDA
 
Amazing. Only rabid right wingers could object to feeding children decent food at ONE meal a day. There is nothing stopping you rw's from giving your kids donuts or pop tarts for breakfast and you can always stop at McD's on the way home. And, you have all weekend to park them in front of the boob tube with cheetos and pepsi. Quit worrying that your kids won't be fat and diabetic. I'm certain that you can more than make up for these 5 meals every week.

Funny that when Arnold Schwarzenegger was pushing good food and exercise, the rw's were humping his leg. BUT, let it come from our First Lady and the rw's go all apoplectic on us.
 
This really blows me away that the USDA has this much power. I am really uncomfortable with this "one size fits all children nutritional guidelines".

Schools also will be required to set certain calorie amounts for various grade levels. Under the new standards, lunches for students in kindergarteners-through-fifth grade have 550 and 650 calories; lunches for grades six-through-eight have between 600 and 700 calories; and lunches for students in grades nine-through-12 have 750 and 850 calories.

Requirements also have been established for breakfast, but those requirements don’t begin until the 2013-14 school year.

Gordon said the calories aren’t set per item, but are taken as an average of a week’s meals.

“The calories really aren’t by day,” she said. “The government evaluates them by a week’s time, an average.”


The government evaluates.....

wow just wow.
Would you be more comfortable if the lobbyists for food processors wrote the regulations defining a healthy lunch for children? Would that be better policy all around? I'm not really convinced that those lobbyists have the nutrition of school children as a prime priority. Maybe those lobbyists would serve their clients better by advocating pizza as vegetables and high fructose corn syrup as a healthy ingredient for school aged children.

Basing caloric needs of children based on grade level is voodoo science.

Plain and simple. I'm not against giving children more healthy choices in the school cafeterias (I remember french fries and gravy).

But this is just nuts. Every child is different and now to have a government mandated across the board calorie ceiling is well insane and authoritarian.
 
Amazing. Only rabid right wingers could object to feeding children decent food at ONE meal a day. There is nothing stopping you rw's from giving your kids donuts or pop tarts for breakfast and you can always stop at McD's on the way home. And, you have all weekend to park them in front of the boob tube with cheetos and pepsi. Quit worrying that your kids won't be fat and diabetic. I'm certain that you can more than make up for these 5 meals every week.

Funny that when Arnold Schwarzenegger was pushing good food and exercise, the rw's were humping his leg. BUT, let it come from our First Lady and the rw's go all apoplectic on us.

Nothing wrong with pushing good food and exercise, the objection comes in when the fed legislates it. That you fail to understand this does not surprise me.
 

Forum List

Back
Top