Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA

[Old Rocks]

LOL From a burger flipper that claims a degree in Atmospheric Physics.LOL Yes, a link to people who actually study this field, and not an internet pretender, a particular stupid one at that.

 

[Billy_Bob]

LOL From a burger flipper that claims a degree in Atmospheric Physics.LOL Yes, a link to people who actually study this field, and not an internet pretender, a particular stupid one at that.

Like I said... No cognitive Ability....

 

[flacaltenn]

Yes, there will inevitably be some cooler years or even groups of years in a solid long term warming trend, but 2017 wasn't one of them. The 5 hottest years included 2017 (2nd or 3rd) and have all happened since 2010. So ALL those "Cold-thanner-average-DAY/Week/LOCAL" posts you clowns made last YEAR.. are even worse Garbage now.


January 18, 2018
Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Earth’s global surface temperatures in 2017 ranked as the Second warmest since 1880, according to an analysis by NASA.

Continuing the planet's long-term warming trend, globally averaged temperatures in 2017 were 1.62 degrees Fahrenheit (0.90 degrees Celsius) warmer than the 1951 to 1980 mean, according to scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. That is second only to global temperatures in 2016.

In a Separate, independent analysis, scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) concluded that 2017 was the third-warmest year in their record. The minor difference in rankings is due to the different methods used by the two agencies to analyze global temperatures, although over the long-term the agencies’ records remain in strong agreement. Both analyses show that the five warmest years on record all have taken place since 2010.

Because weather station locations and measurement practices change over time, there are uncertainties in the interpretation of specific year-to-year global mean temperature differences. Taking this into account, NASA estimates that 2017’s global mean change is accurate to within 0.1 degree Fahrenheit, with a 95 percent certainty level.

“Despite colder than average temperatures in any one part of the world, temperatures over the planet as a whole continue the rapid warming trend we’ve seen over the last 40 years,” said GISS Director Gavin Schmidt.
[......]

can anyone explain what happened to the ice age we were promised in the 70's?

We had not past the angle of incidence to the sun yet where glaciation occurs. 24.62 degrees. We have now reached 24.57 and are well past that well known Milankovich cycle point.

Now we have not only the physical angle of the earth but the convergence of all major cycles into a cold phase and a cooling sun. The warming we have seen is natural response of the earths storage system which is now depleted... Cooling is here and there isn't a damn thing any of us can do but adapt.

Whether or not we are entering an Ice age this time around remains to be seen, but one major volcanic eruption could easily put us in one now...

Silly Billy, you get more pathetic every day. So why don't you send some of that cooling toward the West Coast of the US and Canada. We need it, because it is hot and on fire. There are people on this board that have been predicting serious cooling for the entire time they have been on the board, and all we have seen is warming. So, Mr. Westwall, where the hell is that cooling?

REGIONAL WEATHER EVENT... You think because the current La Niña flow is allowing a blocking high and temps to build in a small region that the whole earth is burning up. And you choose to ignore the other 87% of the Northern Hemisphere that is below average by 2-7 def F.

The cooling is all over you retard.. Pull your head out of your model and look a empirical observations that have not been warmed up by your failed model.

LOL Another stinky 'fact' from the ass of our burger flipper.

+0.4 for the Northern Hemisphere. LOL

Oh.. Man.... I love me some great "Climate REANALYSIS"... It's comical. And it seems to be all ya got.

These are NOT primary temperature reported data. They are TOTALLY "REANALYZED" by an algorithm that PREDICTS or backcasts what THEY THINK the temperatures should be. Run by Grad students with no accountability to scientific sharing or reporting.. And you fall for it. Consistently..

Use satellites or thermometers unless you're trying to kill me from the comedy of it all....

 

[mamooth]

These are NOT primary temperature reported data. They are TOTALLY "REANALYZED" by an algorithm that PREDICTS or backcasts what THEY THINK the temperatures should be.

For Flac, it's conspiracies all the way down.

Run by Grad students with no accountability to scientific sharing or reporting.. And you fall for it. Consistently..

I wonder why Flac suddenly started babbling about grad students. My guess is that he saw "University of Maine" somewhere on the website, and his cult brain thus assumed U of Maine grad students were running the models they wrote themselves.

Those who aren't braiwashed would have done something unthinkable to Flac. Instead of blindly assuming it was a conspiracy against the cult, they would have taken the time to learn where the data comes from. It takes about 10 seconds.

---
Data Source
The weather maps shown here are generated from the NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS) model. GFS is the primary operational model framework underlying U.S. NOAA/NWS weather forecasting. The model is run four times daily on a global T1534 gaussian grid (~13 km) to produce 16-day forecasts. Here, we use 0.25°x0.25° (~30 km) output grids available from NOMADS, and calculate daily averages from eight 3-hourly timeslices starting at 0000 UTC.
---

Use satellites or thermometers unless you're trying to kill me from the comedy of it all....

The GFS is the basis for most weather forecasting in the USA. It's likely that your local news uses it. And Flac thinks it's "comedy". Flac has devolved so far into conspiracy madness, he defines all weather forecasting as a socialist plot.

 

[Old Rocks]

People like Flacaltenn can pretend for a while to accept science, but eventually, they go back to being brainless political whack jobs. They simply are unable to handle the fact that things are not as they think they should be. So they ignore the science, and make up lies about the sources, knowing full well they are lies. And not caring that people can now instantly check their lies on the net.

 

[miketx]

Yes, there will inevitably be some cooler years or even groups of years in a solid long term warming trend, but 2017 wasn't one of them. The 5 hottest years included 2017 (2nd or 3rd) and have all happened since 2010. So ALL those "Cold-thanner-average-DAY/Week/LOCAL" posts you clowns made last YEAR.. are even worse Garbage now.


January 18, 2018
Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Earth’s global surface temperatures in 2017 ranked as the Second warmest since 1880, according to an analysis by NASA.

Continuing the planet's long-term warming trend, globally averaged temperatures in 2017 were 1.62 degrees Fahrenheit (0.90 degrees Celsius) warmer than the 1951 to 1980 mean, according to scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. That is second only to global temperatures in 2016.

In a Separate, independent analysis, scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) concluded that 2017 was the third-warmest year in their record. The minor difference in rankings is due to the different methods used by the two agencies to analyze global temperatures, although over the long-term the agencies’ records remain in strong agreement. Both analyses show that the five warmest years on record all have taken place since 2010.

Because weather station locations and measurement practices change over time, there are uncertainties in the interpretation of specific year-to-year global mean temperature differences. Taking this into account, NASA estimates that 2017’s global mean change is accurate to within 0.1 degree Fahrenheit, with a 95 percent certainty level.

“Despite colder than average temperatures in any one part of the world, temperatures over the planet as a whole continue the rapid warming trend we’ve seen over the last 40 years,” said GISS Director Gavin Schmidt.
[......]​

Last week, all week long was on average 20 - 30 degrees cooler here than the same time last year.

 

[polarbear]

Yes, there will inevitably be some cooler years or even groups of years in a solid long term warming trend, but 2017 wasn't one of them. The 5 hottest years included 2017 (2nd or 3rd) and have all happened since 2010. So ALL those "Cold-thanner-average-DAY/Week/LOCAL" posts you clowns made last YEAR.. are even worse Garbage now.


January 18, 2018
Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Earth’s global surface temperatures in 2017 ranked as the Second warmest since 1880, according to an analysis by NASA.

Continuing the planet's long-term warming trend, globally averaged temperatures in 2017 were 1.62 degrees Fahrenheit (0.90 degrees Celsius) warmer than the 1951 to 1980 mean, according to scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. That is second only to global temperatures in 2016.

In a Separate, independent analysis, scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) concluded that 2017 was the third-warmest year in their record. The minor difference in rankings is due to the different methods used by the two agencies to analyze global temperatures, although over the long-term the agencies’ records remain in strong agreement. Both analyses show that the five warmest years on record all have taken place since 2010.

Because weather station locations and measurement practices change over time, there are uncertainties in the interpretation of specific year-to-year global mean temperature differences. Taking this into account, NASA estimates that 2017’s global mean change is accurate to within 0.1 degree Fahrenheit, with a 95 percent certainty level.

“Despite colder than average temperatures in any one part of the world, temperatures over the planet as a whole continue the rapid warming trend we’ve seen over the last 40 years,” said GISS Director Gavin Schmidt.
[......]​

Last week, all week long was on average 20 - 30 degrees cooler here than the same time last year.

SpaceWeather.com -- News and information about meteor showers, solar flares, auroras, and near-Earth asteroids
The Chill of Solar Minimum
Sept. 27, 2018: The sun is entering one of the deepest Solar Minima of the Space Age. Sunspots have been absent for most of 2018, and the sun’s ultraviolet output has sharply dropped. New research shows that Earth’s upper atmosphere is responding.

“We see a cooling trend,” says Martin Mlynczak of NASA’s Langley Research Center. “High above Earth’s surface, near the edge of space, our atmosphere is losing heat energy. If current trends continue, it could soon set a Space Age record for cold.”
SABER monitors infrared emissions from carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), two substances that play a key role in the energy balance of air 100 to 300 kilometers above our planet’s surface. By measuring the infrared glow of these molecules, SABER can assess the thermal state of gas at the very top of the atmosphere–a layer researchers call “the thermosphere.”

“The thermosphere always cools off during Solar Minimum. It’s one of the most important ways the solar cycle affects our planet,” explains Mlynczak, who is the associate principal investigator for SABER.

When the thermosphere cools, it shrinks, literally decreasing the radius of Earth’s atmosphere.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yes, there will inevitably be some cooler years or even groups of years in a solid long term warming trend, but 2017 was one of them. The 5 hottest years included 2017 (2nd or 3rd) and have all happened since 2010. So ALL those "Cold-thanner-average-DAY/Week/LOCAL" posts you clowns made last YEAR.. are even worse Garbage now.


January 18, 2018
Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Earth’s global surface temperatures in 2017 ranked as the Second warmest since 1880, according to an analysis by NASA.

Continuing the planet's long-term warming trend, globally averaged temperatures in 2017 were 1.62 degrees Fahrenheit (0.90 degrees Celsius) warmer than the 1951 to 1980 mean, according to scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. That is second only to global temperatures in 2016.

In a Separate, independent analysis, scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) concluded that 2017 was the third-warmest year in their record. The minor difference in rankings is due to the different methods used by the two agencies to analyze global temperatures, although over the long-term the agencies’ records remain in strong agreement. Both analyses show that the five warmest years on record all have taken place since 2010.

Because weather station locations and measurement practices change over time, there are uncertainties in the interpretation of specific year-to-year global mean temperature differences. Taking this into account, NASA estimates that 2017’s global mean change is accurate to within 0.1 degree Fahrenheit, with a 95 percent certainty level.

“Despite colder than average temperatures in any one part of the world, temperatures over the planet as a whole continue the rapid warming trend we’ve seen over the last 40 years,” said GISS Director Gavin Schmidt.
[......]​

I don't care. The sooner man destroys his climate, the sooner he wipes himself out unable to adapt and the sooner he gives the planet back to the innocent animals that the Earth will quickly recover for.

Ah yes, the "New Alamo" for denier fools:

"I just don't care."

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Oh.. Man.... I love me some great "Climate REANALYSIS"... It's comical.

Yes, fools often laugh like rabid hyenas at things they don't understand. It provides cover for the fact that they have no idea what they are talking about.

 

[karpenter]

Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA

Crops Grow And People Are Fed

 

[sparky]

As you know, Professor Phil Jones was the center of the Global Warming Scam at East Anglia University. Their program was considered the epitome of Global Warming Information. The disclosure of thousands of e-mails proving their efforts to conceal information discredit and even prevent opposing views from being published has wrecked the scam, hopefully forever. Data used by the United Nations IPCC and NASA findings came from EAU.


14th February, 2010


Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995

Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' has gone missing (it has now been disclosed that all the “raw data” was DUMPED!

There has been no global warming since 1995

Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes

Phil Jones admitted his record keeping is 'not as good as it should be.
[WHAT????]


[…]

Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.

And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.



Phil Jones has said that he considered suicide for his part in this worldwide scam.


Let us also recall: The e-mails leaked in the fall of 2009 allow us to trace the machinations of a small but influential band of British and US climate scientists who played the lead role in the IPCC reports. It appears that this group, which controlled access to basic temperature data, was able to produce a "warming" by manipulating the analysis of the data, but refused to share information on the basic data or details of their analysis with independent scientists who requested them -- in violation of Freedom of Information laws. In fact, they went so far as to keep any dissenting views from being published -- by monopolizing the peer-review process, aided by ideologically cooperative editors of prestigious journals, like Science and Nature.


We learn from the e-mails that the ClimateGate gang was able to "hide the decline" [of global temperature] by applying what they termed as "tricks," and that they intimidated editors and forced out those judged to be "uncooperative." No doubt, thorough investigations, now in progress or planned, will disclose the full range of their nefarious activities. But it is clear that this small cabal was able to convince much of the world that climate disasters were impending -- unless drastic steps were taken. Not only were most of the media, public, and politicians misled, but so were many scientists, national academies of science, and professional organizations -- and even the Norwegian committee that awarded the 2007 Peace Prize to the IPCC and Al Gore, the chief apostle of climate alarmism.


Climategate U-turn: Astonishment as scientist at centre of global warming email row admits data not well organised | Daily Mail Online

You forgot the rest of the supermarket tabloids .....

 

[polarbear]

People like Flacaltenn can pretend for a while to accept science, but eventually, they go back to being brainless political whack jobs. They simply are unable to handle the fact that things are not as they think they should be. So they ignore the science, and make up lies about the sources, knowing full well they are lies. And not caring that people can now instantly check their lies on the net.

People like Flacaltenn can pretend for a while to accept science, but eventually, they go back to being brainless political whack jobs. They simply are unable to handle the fact that things are not as they think they should be. So they ignore the science, and make up lies about the sources, knowing full well they are lies. And not caring that people can now instantly check their lies on the net.
That`s right people can indeed check out lies on the net, like that phony anomaly globe you posted.
Turns out there are 24 versions (of the "truth"). The most glaring contradictions appear when you dig in the archived pages and compare those with today`s claims.
Global Warming Update
August 2018 was the fifth highest August temperature since global records began in 1880 at 0.74°C above the 20th century average of 15.6°C
Only stupid people would not try and re examine that without the (fifth highest) hype and inquire which was the highest. But the AGW propaganda machine won`t mention that or any other relevant details for good reasons.
But you can find it in the archives what they said when that record was set:
Earth Temperature in 1998 Is Reported at Record High
As new global high-temperature records have been established in the 1990's,
they have usually exceeded old ones by mere hundredths of a degree at a time.
But if the new estimate holds up, 1998 will top the 1997 record by about a quarter of a degree.
According to the numbers announced yesterday, the globe is about 1.25 degrees warmer than at the beginning of this century.
That`s .51 C less for that "alarming" August 2018 than it was for 1998 which included that years colder seasons. If some skeptic would graph that you would scream "cherry picking" but it`s ok for liars and fake science to cherry pick August 2018 and make sensational statements and post red-hot planet cartoonist jpg`s on the internet.
These so called scientists cant even make up their mind how much warmer we got since the last ice age:
''This number's amazing,'' said Dr. Philip D. Jones, a climatologist at the University of East Anglia in England, speaking of a field in which records are normally set in fractions. Dr. Jones provided much of the information on which yesterday's announcement was based.
As new global high-temperature records have been established in the 1990's, they have usually exceeded old ones by mere hundredths of a degree at a time.The difference may appear small, but the world is only 5 to 9 degrees warmer now than in the depths of the last ice age. According to the numbers announced yesterday, the globe is about 1.25 degrees warmer than at the beginning of this century.
How much more ridiculous can it get hyping a 0.74 C "increase" which actually was a 0.5 C decrease from 1998 while they can`t even determine if that is 5 or 9 whole degrees warmer than the last ice age.

 

[sparky]

It's more than just heat, many records are being broken.

Remember last years 'polar vortex'? I do, i had to work out in it

Of course the deniers were all about 'fake science' , when in fact it was an anomally associated by severe climate changes

So are all the hurricanes , floods, droughts, winds & rains

Our climate has inherent interconnectability , just like all of nature

~S~