Londonistan

[paulitician]

Man, that photo of the British Prime Minister giggling like a little schoolgirl at Mandela's Funeral, was pretty sad. The U.S. President was just as embarrassing. They looked like two little girls giggling over how cute Justin Bieber is. Great Britain desperately needs a strong Leader again. Are there any Margaret Thatchers left over there?

Thatcher was far from perfect.
We now live in different and more enlightened times.

Margaret Thatcher - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thatcher was criticised for the neglect of the Falklands' defence that led to the war,



Margaret Thatcher - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Thatcher reformed local government taxes by replacing domestic rates—a tax based on the nominal rental value of a home—with the Community Charge (or poll tax) in which the same amount was charged to each adult resident.[101]
The new tax was introduced in Scotland in 1989 and in England and Wales the following year,[102] and proved to be among the most unpopular policies of her premiership.[101] Public disquiet culminated in a 70,000 to 200,000-strong [103] demonstration in London on 31 March 1990; the demonstration around Trafalgar Square deteriorated into the Poll Tax Riots, leaving 113 people injured and 340 under arrest.[104]
The Community Charge was abolished by her successor, John Major.[104]

Brits have lost their way. Their biggest tragedy is that they've allowed their Country to become a Police State. They've become a Surveillance State, no better than China or Iran. They've completely rolled over. They need to have a Revolution and then draw up a Constitution similar to America's. I mean, there is a reason they got their asses booted out of America. I just don't know what happened to the Brits. Is it something in their water, or food?

 

[American_Jihad]

Obsessing Over the ‘Other’

January 3, 2014 by Bruce Bawer

Now that it’s 2014, the gates of the U.K. are wide open for immigrants from Romania and Bulgaria, way over at the other end of the European Union. Some Brits are concerned: will the newcomers flood the labor market? Or the welfare offices? Or both?

For Britain’s leftist establishment, however, the question is a different one. As the Guardian put it the other day: “Now that Romanian and Bulgarian citizens are able to move to the UK to seek work, an alliance of Tory, Labour and Liberal Democrats has warned that politicians’ anti-Roma rhetoric is already inflaming community tensions. Has this debate helped those planning to migrate to the UK feel welcome?”

...

On New Year’s Day, the New York Times served up another helping of this benighted brand of leftist logic about the “Other.” It took the form of an op-ed, headlined “European United, in Hating Europe,” by Andrea Mammone, an Italian historian at the University of London. (The title was telling: for Mammone, as for so many of his ilk, “Europe” isn’t the people of Europe but the supranational institutions that have been imposed on them.) How, Mammone wondered aloud, can European voters support “far-right” types like Marine Le Pen and Geert Wilders? For Mammone, European voters’ concern about the Islamization of Europe isn’t worth serious discussion: in his view, these voters are little better than mindless robots who – unknowingly imitating earlier generations of Europeans – are simply acting on a visceral need for “an ‘other’ to oppose, exclude, resist, restrict or oppress.” In other words, they’re the ideological heirs of the Nazis.

All this leftist balderdash about the “Other” is, of course, rhetorically very useful. Instead of defending their own positions on these issues with logical, fact-based arguments (which, in many cases, is an outright impossibility), these leftists respond to their opponents by purporting to diagnose them – thus neatly leaving the impression, in the minds of impressionable and ignorant readers, that it’s those opponents who are factually and logically challenged. In reality, however, it’s the leftists who, by employing this slick dodge, neatly skirt the obligation to mount legitimate arguments for their own views. And what they manage to disguise, by doing this, is that it’s not the critics of Islam and immigration who are fixated on the “Other” – it’s these leftists themselves, whose one-note, nuance-free ideology makes even the most alarming and malignant manifestations of the “Other” hopelessly irresistible to them.

Obsessing Over the ?Other? | FrontPage Magazine

 

[American_Jihad]

UK soldiers warned not to wear uniforms in public: alert over copycat Lee Rigby-style jihad murders

Robert Spencer
Feb 24, 2014 at 4:02pm

Good thing the British authorities barred Pamela Geller and me from entering the country. If they hadn’t, Muslims might have grown enraged and started plotting jihad attacks against British soldiers. Anyway, the cowardice of British authorities is apparently inexhaustible: they don’t say, “Be alert, be vigilant, and stand up for yourself and your country. Defend yourself if attacked.” Instead, they say, “Don’t wear your uniform on the street.” Unconscionable. “Hounslow soldiers ‘on alert over threat of copycat Lee Rigby-style killings,’” by Robert Cumber for GetWestLondon, February 24 (thanks to Marc):

Police have reportedly stepped up patrols around Hounslow Cavalry Barracks amid concerns extremists are plotting a copycat Lee Rigby-style killing.

Counter-terror officers have warned soldiers at the military base in Beavers Lane, Hounslow, to be alert as the British soldier’s murderers await sentencing this week.

Members of the Welsh Guards were told to avoid drawing attention to their army status by wearing their uniform in nearby pubs or Hounslow High Street, according to a report in the Mirror today , after intelligence suggested fanatics in the area supported Mr Rigby’s killing.

...

UK soldiers warned not to wear uniforms in public: alert over copycat Lee Rigby-style jihad murders : Jihad Watch

 

[paulitician]

Brits are gay and depraved. An inevitable result of centuries of inbreeding. That about sums em up. They would be just a small insignificant island nation without the backing of the U.S. They are definitely not the glorious Great Britain of old.

 

[bianco]

Brits are gay and depraved. An inevitable result of centuries of inbreeding. That about sums em up. They would be just a small insignificant island nation without the backing of the U.S. They are definitely not the glorious Great Britain of old.

Are you including those with the British flag in their flag?


Great Britain...Scotland, England and Wales
United Kingdom-UK...England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Gay and depraved?
Hmmm...not even the Romans were game enough to invade Scotland.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaNw28dSajo]Scots Black Watch Homecoming Parade Dundee Scotland April 20th - YouTube[/ame]

 

[paulitician]

Brits are gay and depraved. An inevitable result of centuries of inbreeding. That about sums em up. They would be just a small insignificant island nation without the backing of the U.S. They are definitely not the glorious Great Britain of old.

Are you including those with the British flag in their flag?


Great Britain...Scotland, England and Wales
United Kingdom-UK...England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Gay and depraved?
Hmmm...not even the Romans were game enough to invade Scotland.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaNw28dSajo]Scots Black Watch Homecoming Parade Dundee Scotland April 20th - YouTube[/ame]














Britain is the largest investor in the US economy.

Well, the Irish are still a tough lot. But Brits are gay & depraved for the most part. It's all about the centuries of inbreeding. They just don't add up to much without the U.S. backing em. With out the U.S., they are just a small insignificant island nation.

 

[bianco]

Brits are gay and depraved. An inevitable result of centuries of inbreeding. That about sums em up. They would be just a small insignificant island nation without the backing of the U.S.

The Welsh;

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kUnCwV3AYE]Welsh anthem (Land of my fathers) - YouTube[/ame]


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBsuSFJPHjo [/ame]



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fE1uuVTH7JY]1st Battalion Welsh Guards Royal welcome 06.12.12 - YouTube[/ame]

 

[bianco]

Brits are gay and depraved. An inevitable result of centuries of inbreeding. That about sums em up. They would be just a small insignificant island nation without the backing of the U.S. They are definitely not the glorious Great Britain of old.

Are you including those with the British flag in their flag?


Great Britain...Scotland, England and Wales
United Kingdom-UK...England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Gay and depraved?
Hmmm...not even the Romans were game enough to invade Scotland.

Britain is the largest investor in the US economy.

Well, the Irish are still a tough lot. But Brits are gay & depraved for the most part. It's all about the centuries of inbreeding. They just don't add up to much without the U.S. backing em. With out the U.S., they are just a small insignificant island nation.

If you think the Irish are a tough lot today, wait until you try the Welsh, the Scots, and the English you seem to be a lot misled about.

UK men today are family men, peaceful gentlemen, and all that entails.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5b4ZwupB_vU]Cookham Dean Royal Wedding street Party - YouTube[/ame]

The villagers of Cookham Dean enjoy a street party on the wedding day of William and Kate, followed by the opening of the Royal Wedding Beer Festival at the Jolly Farmer





[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60slMv2REqY]National Anthems - England vs France (2013 Six Nations R3) - YouTube[/ame]

France and England ...France in the blue.

Britain and France sign landmark 50-year defence deal | Politics | theguardian.com

Treaty envisages joint use of aircraft carriers, 10,000-strong joint expeditionary force and unprecedented new levels of co-operation over nuclear missiles.

 

[paulitician]

Are you including those with the British flag in their flag?


Great Britain...Scotland, England and Wales
United Kingdom-UK...England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Gay and depraved?
Hmmm...not even the Romans were game enough to invade Scotland.

Britain is the largest investor in the US economy.

Well, the Irish are still a tough lot. But Brits are gay & depraved for the most part. It's all about the centuries of inbreeding. They just don't add up to much without the U.S. backing em. With out the U.S., they are just a small insignificant island nation.

If you think the Irish are a tough lot today, wait until you try the Welsh, the Scots, and the English you seem to be a lot misled about.

UK men today are family men, peaceful gentlemen, and all that entails.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5b4ZwupB_vU]Cookham Dean Royal Wedding street Party - YouTube[/ame]

The villagers of Cookham Dean enjoy a street party on the wedding day of William and Kate, followed by the opening of the Royal Wedding Beer Festival at the Jolly Farmer





[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60slMv2REqY]National Anthems - England vs France (2013 Six Nations R3) - YouTube[/ame]

France and England ...France in the blue.

Britain and France sign landmark 50-year defence deal | Politics | theguardian.com

Treaty envisages joint use of aircraft carriers, 10,000-strong joint expeditionary force and unprecedented new levels of co-operation over nuclear missiles.

I respect the Irish. They are still a tough lot. But hey, i just call it like i see it. Brits today, are gay & depraved. It's the several centuries of inbreeding. Sadly, that does sum them up at this point. The only good thing they have goin for em, is the U.S. still backing em. It gives them some shred of credibility.

 

[bianco]

I respect the Irish. They are still a tough lot. But hey, i just call it like i see it. Brits today, are gay & depraved. It's the several centuries of inbreeding. Sadly, that does sum them up at this point. The only good thing they have goin for em, is the U.S. still backing em. It gives them some shred of credibility.

They have credibility;

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqwrQZGBIwM [/ame]



Gay is legal and given equal rights in Britain.
As are all religions..."Religious freedom".
No discimination in immigration, same as in the US.

Anytime the US wants to bail from the 'special relationship' it has with Britain...and bail from the alliances it has with Commonwealth countries in Her Majesty's realm, all it has to do is say so.

Gay and depraved?

NZ...most of the White and mixed-race people there being Scottish/UK descent, with relatives in the UK.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhCgcZ0efAA]God Defend New Zealand (National Anthem): Hayley Westenra - Rugby World Cup Final 2011 - YouTube[/ame]


Australia...most of the White people there being UK descent, with relatives in the UK and Northern Ireland/Ireland.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9zDulvpTK8]Olivia Newton-John- Australian Fair (1986)(digital clear)(hi-fi) - YouTube[/ame]


Canada...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSxDHDpdNJ8]Royal Anthem of Canada - God Save The Queen - YouTube[/ame]



Without the US "still backing them", ...Britain [+ its ally France] and the Commonwealth nations would be able to survive, and defend themselves.

US leaves...all contracts/alliance would be cancelled, Her Majesty would likely have a call to arms, and nukes be distributed to some Commonwealth nations...Australia and Canada in particular.
Nuke armed India would also likely be sympathetic.

Member states of the Commonwealth of Nations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[paulitician]

I respect the Irish. They are still a tough lot. But hey, i just call it like i see it. Brits today, are gay & depraved. It's the several centuries of inbreeding. Sadly, that does sum them up at this point. The only good thing they have goin for em, is the U.S. still backing em. It gives them some shred of credibility.

They have credibility;

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqwrQZGBIwM]Thousands march for EDL in London - YouTube[/ame]



Gay is legal and given equal rights in Britain.
As are all religions..."Religious freedom".
No discimination in immigration, same as in the US.

Anytime the US wants to bail from the 'special relationship' it has with Britain...and bail from the alliances it has with Commonwealth countries in Her Majesty's realm, all it has to do is say so.

Gay and depraved?

NZ...most of the White and mixed-race people there being Scottish/UK descent, with relatives in the UK.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhCgcZ0efAA]God Defend New Zealand (National Anthem): Hayley Westenra - Rugby World Cup Final 2011 - YouTube[/ame]


Australia...most of the White people there being UK descent, with relatives in the UK and Northern Ireland/Ireland.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9zDulvpTK8]Olivia Newton-John- Australian Fair (1986)(digital clear)(hi-fi) - YouTube[/ame]


Canada...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSxDHDpdNJ8]Royal Anthem of Canada - God Save The Queen - YouTube[/ame]



Without the US "still backing them", ...Britain [+ its ally France] and the Commonwealth nations would be able to survive, and defend themselves.

US leaves...all contracts/alliance would be cancelled, Her Majesty would likely have a call to arms, and nukes be distributed to some Commonwealth nations...Australia and Canada in particular.
Nuke armed India would also likely be sympathetic.

Member states of the Commonwealth of Nations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pure fantasy. It's time to drop the 'Great' from Great Britain. It's a weak little island nation at this point. A Paper Tiger for sure. It could not stand on its own in today's world. Great Britain desperately needs the U.S. backing it. It has no real power anymore. Too many of its men have gone soft, and it's no longer a moral nation. Gay & Depraved. Unfortunately, that is today's Great Britain. But you go ahead and live your fantasy if you like. I'm ok with that. But it's not reality.

 

[bianco]

I respect the Irish. They are still a tough lot. But hey, i just call it like i see it. Brits today, are gay & depraved. It's the several centuries of inbreeding. Sadly, that does sum them up at this point. The only good thing they have goin for em, is the U.S. still backing em. It gives them some shred of credibility.

They have credibility;

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqwrQZGBIwM]Thousands march for EDL in London - YouTube[/ame]



Gay is legal and given equal rights in Britain.
As are all religions..."Religious freedom".
No discimination in immigration, same as in the US.

Anytime the US wants to bail from the 'special relationship' it has with Britain...and bail from the alliances it has with Commonwealth countries in Her Majesty's realm, all it has to do is say so.

Gay and depraved?

NZ...most of the White and mixed-race people there being Scottish/UK descent, with relatives in the UK.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhCgcZ0efAA]God Defend New Zealand (National Anthem): Hayley Westenra - Rugby World Cup Final 2011 - YouTube[/ame]


Australia...most of the White people there being UK descent, with relatives in the UK and Northern Ireland/Ireland.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9zDulvpTK8]Olivia Newton-John- Australian Fair (1986)(digital clear)(hi-fi) - YouTube[/ame]


Canada...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSxDHDpdNJ8]Royal Anthem of Canada - God Save The Queen - YouTube[/ame]



Without the US "still backing them", ...Britain [+ its ally France] and the Commonwealth nations would be able to survive, and defend themselves.

US leaves...all contracts/alliance would be cancelled, Her Majesty would likely have a call to arms, and nukes be distributed to some Commonwealth nations...Australia and Canada in particular.
Nuke armed India would also likely be sympathetic.

Member states of the Commonwealth of Nations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pure fantasy. It's time to drop the 'Great' from Great Britain. It's a weak little island nation at this point. A Paper Tiger for sure. It could not stand on its own in today's world. Great Britain desperately needs the U.S. backing it. It has no real power anymore. Too many of its men have gone soft, and it's no longer a moral nation. Gay & Depraved. Unfortunately, that is today's Great Britain. But you go ahead and live your fantasy if you like. I'm ok with that. But it's not reality.

Having an empire, being powerful, and defending said empire, is an expensive business, as the US is now finding out.

Britain is still moral, more moral to be sure than the US...who still execution-homicides human beings in death chambers, including electric chairs/gas chambers/hangings etc.
Lots of gay men in America.
If there's depravity in Britain, then there's depravity in America.
If British men today are soft, then so too are men in America.
Soft is good though, for men today.

No nuke armed nation is a paper tiger.

 

[American_Jihad]

And When He Cried the Little Children Died in the Streets

March 21, 2014 by Benjamin Jefferies

...

The commitment of those British socialists of half a century ago to the cause of the national self-determination of the Jewish people was exemplary and widely shared on the British left, Jewish and Gentile alike.

Things are very different now. The left of centre is, at least in Britain, the domain of the new antisemites of the anti-Zionist movement. BDS stalks the land, not the Spectre of Communism. The left is delivered to a lethal compromise that gets into bed with clerical fascists who demand women and gays and Jews be thrown off mountains.

This modern red-brown Strasserite left spits on the socialists of yore that actually believed in such values as freedom, equality and solidarity — and does it in the name of a fictional “anti-imperialism” that is nothing but the cheer-leading of the evil and murderous. The great British writer and journalist Julie Burchill has recently written of her own similar upbringing and the sad, sad demise of that left of the past, that left of another country:

...

This should make the British left choke with frustrated anger. Yet fear that it might interfere with the comrades’ digestion might well also mean that they defer reading on until they have finished debating the intricacies of transgender intersectionality. Let’s be honest with ourselves, many times even if the left collectively shakes its head in despair at the evil that walks on every side and the vilest men that are exulted… they will move to propose some daft resolution demanding immediate socialist revolution in the Sahel based on the sterling work of local jihadi and condemning Zionism for the ills of the world.

...

It is more than a delusion to condemn the only democratic and liberal state in the entire Middle and Near East as an “apartheid state”, to vilify its supporters as “Zionazis” — it is an outright slander, a defamation of the rights of an entire people. It is despicable to knowingly and falsely assert that Israel is a land without freedom and equality, when it is the only state in the entire meta-region where religious, sexual and personal liberties are not only maintained but upheld. It is an utter disgrace that the British left, almost invariably, takes the side of mass murderers of Jews, terrorists and violent antisemitic clerical fascist thugs rather than show solidarity with the Jewish State and its people. It is a betrayal of those that die in the villages of Darfur, of those that languish in the prison-state of North Korea, about whom these so-called British socialists could clearly not give a fig.

Nick Cohen, one of Britain’s most wonderful political journalists and writers, summed it up nicely: What’s left? The answer is sad, so sad: not much – a red flag stained not with the blood of our martyrs, so much as dripping with the blood of the victims of the British left’s indifference or even naked, open support for the real sources of evil and wrong in this world. The poet W. H. Auden wrote bitterly in his poem Epitaph on a Tyrant of a dictator that “When he laughed, respectable senators burst with laughter”. When Comrade Kim laughs, the comrades in Britain stand up and deliver him a round of applause, it would seem — lackeys all of a red-handed murderer. When al-Qaradawi demands the extermination of Jews, Red Ken Livingstone invites him to a nice slap-up meal in London and calls him a “moderate”. When Hamas and Islamic Jihad slam indiscriminately missiles into Jewish towns, the British left rambles on about a fictional “siege” of Gaza. When clerical fascist murderers saw off the heads of their victims, the British left rave about the ultimate responsibility of Zionism. And woe betide the uppity Jews of Israel should they respond to suicide bombers and Khaibar missiles and snipers – because, you see, the victims of terror had it coming – just in case they are Jewish.

...

And When He Cried the Little Children Died in the Streets | FrontPage Magazine

 

[American_Jihad]

UK Rapist Escapes Deportation by Posing as Syrian Refugee
Syrian refugees are magic
October 26, 2015
Daniel Greenfield

Europe has a real Syrian Refugee problem. These days any criminal or migrant can just say the magic words, "Syrian Refugee" and that's that. Because Syrian refugees are magic. They're our moral superiors because they tore their country apart killing each other over whether Sunni or Shiite Islam is right. So now they, and anyone claiming to be one of them, is empowered to do anything to Europeans.

An illegal immigrant who attacked and sexually molested a woman within days of smuggling himself into Britain looks set to avoid deportation by claiming he is a Syrian refugee.

A court heard how Abdulrahman Abunasir continues to claim he is a Syrian refugee, despite the fact he allegedly told French authorities who detained him previously that he was Palestinian.

Abunasir submitted his claim for asylum whilst serving an 18-month prison sentence for a horrific random sex attack. The immigrant attacked and molested a woman outside a cafe in London in 2013 as she walked to her boyfriend's home.

Experts who put the sex attacker through a language analysis test concluded there was a "very high degree of certainty that he was from Egypt" and confirmed he could not answer even the most basic questions about his supposed homeland.

...

UK Rapist Escapes Deportation by Posing as Syrian Refugee

 

[montelatici]

Like the Jewish invasion of Palestine on a macroscopic scale. Karma for the Europeans, especially the British, that facilitated the Jewish invasion. Now they, the Europeans, know how the Christians and Muslims of Palestine felt when a bunch of strange people of a weird and different religion announced that Judaism would take over their land.

 

[irosie91]

Like the Jewish invasion of Palestine on a macroscopic scale. Karma for the Europeans, especially the British, that facilitated the Jewish invasion. Now they, the Europeans, know how the Christians and Muslims of Palestine felt when a bunch of strange people of a weird and different religion announced that Judaism would take over their land.

the weird religion that invaded were persons----with very weird religion and language--that invaded Judea/palestina-------was-----more than 2000 years ago----ROMANS--with their corruption and barbarity------they morphed ---about 1700 years ago---- into even more barbaric Christians------and about 400 years later the vile filth of arabia invaded. In fact-----there is not one single country which was invaded by
the stink of arabia and its sickening cult----islam------that did not have a PRIOR
jewish population ------which existed at the time that the shit showed up

 

[paulitician]

Brits are gay. Nuff said.

 

[montelatici]

Like the Jewish invasion of Palestine on a macroscopic scale. Karma for the Europeans, especially the British, that facilitated the Jewish invasion. Now they, the Europeans, know how the Christians and Muslims of Palestine felt when a bunch of strange people of a weird and different religion announced that Judaism would take over their land.

the weird religion that invaded were persons----with very weird religion and language--that invaded Judea/palestina-------was-----more than 2000 years ago----ROMANS--with their corruption and barbarity------they morphed ---about 1700 years ago---- into even more barbaric Christians------and about 400 years later the vile filth of arabia invaded. In fact-----there is not one single country which was invaded by
the stink of arabia and its sickening cult----islam------that did not have a PRIOR
jewish population ------which existed at the time that the shit showed up

Firstly, get professional help.

We knew you were a Christian hater, but hating the Romans, that's insane. All Europeans, even the English are heirs of the Romans, the greatest Empire ever and the Empire that brought the world "the rule of law". As opposed to the previous "rule by law" of the Greeks and some previous civilizations.. Bet you don't know the difference.

 

[irosie91]

Like the Jewish invasion of Palestine on a macroscopic scale. Karma for the Europeans, especially the British, that facilitated the Jewish invasion. Now they, the Europeans, know how the Christians and Muslims of Palestine felt when a bunch of strange people of a weird and different religion announced that Judaism would take over their land.

the weird religion that invaded were persons----with very weird religion and language--that invaded Judea/palestina-------was-----more than 2000 years ago----ROMANS--with their corruption and barbarity------they morphed ---about 1700 years ago---- into even more barbaric Christians------and about 400 years later the vile filth of arabia invaded. In fact-----there is not one single country which was invaded by
the stink of arabia and its sickening cult----islam------that did not have a PRIOR
jewish population ------which existed at the time that the shit showed up

Firstly, get professional help.

We knew you were a Christian hater, but hating the Romans, that's insane. All Europeans, even the English are heirs of the Romans, the greatest Empire ever and the Empire that brought the world "the rule of law". As opposed to the previous "rule by law" of the Greeks and some previous civilizations.. Bet you don't know the difference.

Professional help with what? the electrical circuits in my house are
in fine working order. Who is "We" in your sentence which starts "we
knew you were a Christian hater...... " when was I a Christian hater?
It is likely that I have spent more time in Christian churches than have you.
However, I am also aware of the extensive genocides enacted by Christians
in the name of Christianity----over the past approximately 1700 years----
a practice that they inherited from the romans. I am also familiar with aspects
of the barbaric roman legal system.----nothing admirable about it. The romans
did have VERY EXTENSIVE influence on the way the world of today works----
mostly because they CONQUERED AND CONTROLLED SO MUCH,
but they, certainly, did not invent 'the rule of law' The good news is that
lots of that filth that the roman catholic church inherited from the romans---
has ----over the centuries----in the most recent centuries----been
repudiated----and protestant sects followed suit. "EVEN THE ENGLISH"??
The English have aped the romans overtly---especially in terms of
barbarity but not nearly so much as have the Arabian muslims----who also
spread the filth further and wider. What the romans did do-----is manage
a very intricate and detailed and well organized code of law-------they did nice
aqueducts, too ------and an excellent show case for circuses consisting
of grown men killing each other and the feeding of lions with men women
and children.. -------finally the JUSTINIAN CODE---includes those laws that
form the basis for legal genocide-------both ADOLF and MUHUMMAD aped
those notable parts and----they also formed the basis for the Inquisition

 

[montelatici]

And When He Cried the Little Children Died in the Streets

March 21, 2014 by Benjamin Jefferies

...

The commitment of those British socialists of half a century ago to the cause of the national self-determination of the Jewish people was exemplary and widely shared on the British left, Jewish and Gentile alike.

Things are very different now. The left of centre is, at least in Britain, the domain of the new antisemites of the anti-Zionist movement. BDS stalks the land, not the Spectre of Communism. The left is delivered to a lethal compromise that gets into bed with clerical fascists who demand women and gays and Jews be thrown off mountains.

This modern red-brown Strasserite left spits on the socialists of yore that actually believed in such values as freedom, equality and solidarity — and does it in the name of a fictional “anti-imperialism” that is nothing but the cheer-leading of the evil and murderous. The great British writer and journalist Julie Burchill has recently written of her own similar upbringing and the sad, sad demise of that left of the past, that left of another country:

...

This should make the British left choke with frustrated anger. Yet fear that it might interfere with the comrades’ digestion might well also mean that they defer reading on until they have finished debating the intricacies of transgender intersectionality. Let’s be honest with ourselves, many times even if the left collectively shakes its head in despair at the evil that walks on every side and the vilest men that are exulted… they will move to propose some daft resolution demanding immediate socialist revolution in the Sahel based on the sterling work of local jihadi and condemning Zionism for the ills of the world.

...

It is more than a delusion to condemn the only democratic and liberal state in the entire Middle and Near East as an “apartheid state”, to vilify its supporters as “Zionazis” — it is an outright slander, a defamation of the rights of an entire people. It is despicable to knowingly and falsely assert that Israel is a land without freedom and equality, when it is the only state in the entire meta-region where religious, sexual and personal liberties are not only maintained but upheld. It is an utter disgrace that the British left, almost invariably, takes the side of mass murderers of Jews, terrorists and violent antisemitic clerical fascist thugs rather than show solidarity with the Jewish State and its people. It is a betrayal of those that die in the villages of Darfur, of those that languish in the prison-state of North Korea, about whom these so-called British socialists could clearly not give a fig.

Nick Cohen, one of Britain’s most wonderful political journalists and writers, summed it up nicely: What’s left? The answer is sad, so sad: not much – a red flag stained not with the blood of our martyrs, so much as dripping with the blood of the victims of the British left’s indifference or even naked, open support for the real sources of evil and wrong in this world. The poet W. H. Auden wrote bitterly in his poem Epitaph on a Tyrant of a dictator that “When he laughed, respectable senators burst with laughter”. When Comrade Kim laughs, the comrades in Britain stand up and deliver him a round of applause, it would seem — lackeys all of a red-handed murderer. When al-Qaradawi demands the extermination of Jews, Red Ken Livingstone invites him to a nice slap-up meal in London and calls him a “moderate”. When Hamas and Islamic Jihad slam indiscriminately missiles into Jewish towns, the British left rambles on about a fictional “siege” of Gaza. When clerical fascist murderers saw off the heads of their victims, the British left rave about the ultimate responsibility of Zionism. And woe betide the uppity Jews of Israel should they respond to suicide bombers and Khaibar missiles and snipers – because, you see, the victims of terror had it coming – just in case they are Jewish.

...

And When He Cried the Little Children Died in the Streets | FrontPage Magazine

And When He Cried the Little Children Died in the Streets

March 21, 2014 by Benjamin Jefferies

...

The commitment of those British socialists of half a century ago to the cause of the national self-determination of the Jewish people was exemplary and widely shared on the British left, Jewish and Gentile alike.

Things are very different now. The left of centre is, at least in Britain, the domain of the new antisemites of the anti-Zionist movement. BDS stalks the land, not the Spectre of Communism. The left is delivered to a lethal compromise that gets into bed with clerical fascists who demand women and gays and Jews be thrown off mountains.

This modern red-brown Strasserite left spits on the socialists of yore that actually believed in such values as freedom, equality and solidarity — and does it in the name of a fictional “anti-imperialism” that is nothing but the cheer-leading of the evil and murderous. The great British writer and journalist Julie Burchill has recently written of her own similar upbringing and the sad, sad demise of that left of the past, that left of another country:

...

This should make the British left choke with frustrated anger. Yet fear that it might interfere with the comrades’ digestion might well also mean that they defer reading on until they have finished debating the intricacies of transgender intersectionality. Let’s be honest with ourselves, many times even if the left collectively shakes its head in despair at the evil that walks on every side and the vilest men that are exulted… they will move to propose some daft resolution demanding immediate socialist revolution in the Sahel based on the sterling work of local jihadi and condemning Zionism for the ills of the world.

...

It is more than a delusion to condemn the only democratic and liberal state in the entire Middle and Near East as an “apartheid state”, to vilify its supporters as “Zionazis” — it is an outright slander, a defamation of the rights of an entire people. It is despicable to knowingly and falsely assert that Israel is a land without freedom and equality, when it is the only state in the entire meta-region where religious, sexual and personal liberties are not only maintained but upheld. It is an utter disgrace that the British left, almost invariably, takes the side of mass murderers of Jews, terrorists and violent antisemitic clerical fascist thugs rather than show solidarity with the Jewish State and its people. It is a betrayal of those that die in the villages of Darfur, of those that languish in the prison-state of North Korea, about whom these so-called British socialists could clearly not give a fig.

Nick Cohen, one of Britain’s most wonderful political journalists and writers, summed it up nicely: What’s left? The answer is sad, so sad: not much – a red flag stained not with the blood of our martyrs, so much as dripping with the blood of the victims of the British left’s indifference or even naked, open support for the real sources of evil and wrong in this world. The poet W. H. Auden wrote bitterly in his poem Epitaph on a Tyrant of a dictator that “When he laughed, respectable senators burst with laughter”. When Comrade Kim laughs, the comrades in Britain stand up and deliver him a round of applause, it would seem — lackeys all of a red-handed murderer. When al-Qaradawi demands the extermination of Jews, Red Ken Livingstone invites him to a nice slap-up meal in London and calls him a “moderate”. When Hamas and Islamic Jihad slam indiscriminately missiles into Jewish towns, the British left rambles on about a fictional “siege” of Gaza. When clerical fascist murderers saw off the heads of their victims, the British left rave about the ultimate responsibility of Zionism. And woe betide the uppity Jews of Israel should they respond to suicide bombers and Khaibar missiles and snipers – because, you see, the victims of terror had it coming – just in case they are Jewish.

...

And When He Cried the Little Children Died in the Streets | FrontPage Magazine

Wow, it is as if the supporters of white-ruled South Africa have been reborn!

Like the 1989 piece below (South Africa Shouldn't be Singled Out), which sounds so absurd today, the piece above (And When He Cried the Little Children Died in the Streets) seems rational to the supporters of the Apartheid state of Israel. In 20 years, it will sound just as absurd as 1989 piece by Prof. Anne-Marie Kriek sounds today.



"WHILE the violation of human rights is the norm rather than the exception in most of Africa's 42 black-ruled states, the spotlight remains on South Africa. The images of racism, white supremacy, Nazism, etc. are a most effective part of a campaign to play on white guilt and to condition hatred for South Africa. While it is true that there are many things wrong in South Africa, the facts are sensationalized and distorted. A cheap political campaign to get black and also well-meaning (though not as well-informed) white liberal votes, is being run by using the white ``racist regime'' in Pretoria as a unifying issue.

Contrary to popular belief, the whites did not take the country from the blacks. When the Dutch settled in the Cape in 1652, they found a barren, largely unpopulated land. Together with French and German settlers, they built a dynamic society.

It was not until 100 years later, as they advanced across these vast unexplored territories that they met with the blacks who were moving south. Contrary to myth, the blacks were never run off their land. They settled in tribal lands of their own choice.......In the 20th century, economic activity organized by whites gradually drew blacks out of their tribal lands into the cash economy and into the cities.

Earlier this year Randall Robinson, executive director of the anti-apartheid lobbying group TransAfrica, said: ``All we want is a better life for the people of South Africa.'' In an article in this newspaper last February, Michael L. Boyd of the University of Botswana referred to South Africa as ``a system that will never provide a decent life for millions of the blacks who live under it.''

Yet South Africa is the only country in Sub-Saharan Africa that can feed itself. Blacks possess one of the highest living standards in all of Africa. Although black living conditions in South Africa (as in America) cover a wide spectrum, the housing is unequalled anywhere on the continent. Soweto is a proper city complete with schools, stores, theaters, sport stadiums and tennis courts. In some areas, blacks drive their children to private schools in German cars. Few states in black Africa can boast such a range of features. In Mamelodi (Pretoria) four bedroom houses are made available to blacks at a total purchase price of $250.

South Africa's health care complex is the best on the continent. In Soweto, for instance, there is a large hospital facility known throughout the world as a great center for the study and treatment of traumatic injuries. Blacks going to outpatient departments of hospitals are treated by the best physicians and pay an average $2 per visit, regardless of treatment. Major surgery, performed by the best specialists in the country, costs less than $5 per day.

World Bank statistics show that the country has the lowest infant mortality rate on the continent - 82 deaths per 1,000 compared to 146. Likewise, life expectancy is the highest - 55 years versus 48.

In South Africa the literacy rate is 70 percent for blacks compared to average 40 percent in the 51 independent African states. Education is the single highest budget item as opposed to military and security spending in most of the black-ruled states...."

South Africa Shouldn't be Singled Out