Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You certainly confirmed mine about you, however. So thanks.
I love how you couldn't even put together a sentence with any geological terms.
You guys who get off on this weird "impersonation" game where you seem to want to try to make people think you're something you clearly aren't but you don't put any EFFORT into it just fascinate me.
Why would you even TRY when you don't have any fake skills you can muster?
It is quite apparent from your post you know little of science in general, and even less about geology. The basic math concerning the amount of heat that CO2 can add to the atmosphere was done by Svante Arrhenius in 1896. But I doubt with the depth of knowledge you have failed to demonstrate that name means anything to you.This conversation isn't just "you" and me. Others are posting and reading here and the information and sources I provide are for their use and benefit, should they choose. The links and illustrations from Wiki are also to provide details and data that does not have the bias and overlay of personal opinion (such as we'd likely see in your posts.)
I'm not claiming heat from the divergent boundaries/zones produce heat on Earth's dry land surface. Only that they are a main factor in the ocean's heat ~ along with that absorbed from the Sun.
The are two(or more) ways to look at the CO2 factor in Earth's climate.
If we look at the total of CO2, it's a ratio of 400/ppm; or 400/1,000,000; or 4/10,000; or 1/2,500.
I don't recall anything in the chemistry and physics I learned decades ago that would let one molecule retain say 2 degrees F and then transfer that amount equally to the 2,499 other parts of the atmosphere.
However, it seems that when CO2 was at 280ppm (round it to 300) you gorebots have no issue and think we should get back to that level. Now that it's at the level of 400 ppm, or so, an increase of about 100 ppm, suddenly all chaos is afoot and per your hero, the great scientist Al Gore, "Earth has a fever" and "We" need to do something to reduce it.
So we are really looking at one part placing equal energy/heat to the 10,000 other parts of the atmosphere, making them just as "warm" as it is. !!! ???
Sorry, but neither math nor logic can support this absurd bit of fringe science.
However politics and a socialist, anti-Western culture agenda is trying to con the World in to buying this fairy tale.
BTW, Climate isn't like your thermostat in home/office controling heat/temp that can be set to one small range and be expected to stay there. Climate is always changing, either to cooler (Ice Ages) or warmer. Climate is always in flux and short term weather it produces isn't always an accurate gauge of the long term trends.
LOL Not much of a geologist.Ahhh, but I did. You see, that's the difference between a poseur, you, and a geologist, me.
We use geologic terms in our papers, and when we are discussing a specific subject.
Otherwise simple English is sufficient.
I suggest you look up the "Feynman Method" someday soon.
It is quite apparent from your post you know little of science in general, and even less about geology. The basic math concerning the amount of heat that CO2 can add to the atmosphere was done by Svante Arrhenius in 1896. But I doubt with the depth of knowledge you have failed to demonstrate that name means anything to you.
LOL Not much of a geologist.
Many times I have caught Westwall in basic mistakes concerning geology. If he ever was a geologist, he seems not to have kept up with the field at all. He seems not to understand the meaning of bimodal volcanism at all, and why it is important to differentiate it from adakite volcanism.I love how you couldn't even put together a sentence with any geological terms.
You guys who get off on this weird "impersonation" game where you seem to want to try to make people think you're something you clearly aren't but you don't put any EFFORT into it just fascinate me.
Why would you even TRY when you don't have any fake skills you can muster?
Many times I have caught Westwall in basic mistakes concerning geology. If he ever was a geologist, he seems not to have kept up with the field at all. He seems not to understand the meaning of bimodal volcanism at all, and why it is important to differentiate it from adakite volcanism.
[/Russia.
Really. Point to one.
The discussion was bimodal volcanism, and you referred to an area in California that was clearly not bimodal.And yet more than you. Still waiting for you to point to any geologic error I have ever made.
You keep claiming it but never seem to be able to post one.
The discussion was bimodal volcanism, and you referred to an area in California that was clearly not bimodal.
Ahhh, but I did. You see, that's the difference between a poseur, you, and a geologist, me.
So this was a weather story cross dressing as ClimateExcuse me for taking an Illegitimate tactic from the 70 IQ Climate Deniers, who confuse short term or local WEATHER with Climate/Global avg Climate/warming.
Many threads on this page alone are by those myopic clowns and their snowy days looking out their windows.
So I think it will be enlightening to have them see past their own backyard Weather, and to a very large area.
But still just Weather.
London has warmest April day in nearly 70 years, as enormous heat dome consumes Europe
London has warmest April day in nearly 70 years, as enormous heat dome consumes Europe
Washington Post - Jason Samenow - April 19
While abnormally cold weather continues to grip the Eastern United States, a full-fledged dose of summer weather has overtaken much of Europe.`
An enormous heat dome, parked over Germany, has covered a large part of the continent in record or near-record warmth. High temperatures in the 70s and 80s (roughly 20 to 30 Celsius) were widespread Thursday.
The British Met Office tweeted that St. James’s Park in London soared to 84.4° (29.1 Celsius), its warmest temperature in April since 1949, when it hit 84.9° (29.4 Celsius).
Paris also experienced historically warm April conditions. Its temperature surpassed 82° before April 20 for the first time since 1949, MeteoFrance reported. ....Paris’s preliminary high of 83.7° (28.7 Celsius) ranked as the fifth-highest April temperature there in 146 years of measurements.
Several locations in France set all-time April highs, MeteoFrance tweeted.
[......]
The discussion was bimodal volcanism, and you referred to an area in California that was clearly not bimodal.
The discussion was bimodal volcanism, and you referred to an area in California that was clearly not bimodal.
Still waiting for you to link to your tall tale. Here's a hint, the only discussions I get into regarding volcanism is with the conspiracy theorists who keep telling us Yellowstone is going to blow.
She's upset because no one believes she has a PhD in geology.
While the USGS does downplay the urgency and the fear of the Yellowstone supervolcano, it has blown and may very well blow again.
Why wouldn't it?
Alright, let's see how much of a geologist you are.
ARe you fucking kidding me????What is the main difference between an extrusive and an intrusive igneous rock? Use your own words.
