Lol, CNN Cant Get Even ONE Show in Cable Top Twenty

CNN, NBC/MSNBC (Comcast), ABC, CBS, PBS, NYT, Washpo, AP, Reuters and others bet the farm on the fake Russia narrative. Some, like CNN and MSNBC a bit more than the others but if you watched or read one, you pretty much saw them all as they were pushing the same theme.

Fox, Breitbart, some opt Talk Radio were they only, relatively SMALL voices that were reporting it, but not concluding Trump was guilty up front. So, maybe 95% were pulling for the removal of Trump due to Russian collusion. Now they are paying for it.
 
I then triangulate to get something I think is usabley close to accurate news.
That's pretty much what it takes.

Shouldn't be that way, but it is.
.
Why don't you boys go ahead and name 2 or 3 lies CNN has told, instead of just spewing bullshit?
How about 20, instead?

The List Of CNN’s Bungled Reporting Is A Sight To Behold
I don't know if you actually read what lying right bowtie Carlson related media propaganda site Daily Caller called 20 examples of CNN mistakes, I did, fact checked them and found only 3 were actually true, others were clearly not, it was the Daily Caller cherry picking certain comments, and not accurately, that appeared to show CNN mistakes or bias. The 3 were the ones where CNN admitted the errors and fired those who made the mistakes. There were two examples of Daily Caller lying that are the easiest to debunk- the one about how ending obamacare could not possibly make it harder for victims of domestic abuse, if it leaves long lasting trauma or injuries, to afford or even get insurance if the republicans ended Obamacare like they tried to do without protecting the protection of those with pre-existing conditions. Anybody can see that. If a woman was paralyzed from a domestic abuse assault in 2005, for example, then private insurance in 2019 without any protection for pre-existent conditions, could deny her. try to use your head.

the other one that was so blatant was CNN lied when they said Obama never wire tapped the Trump Towers, and the proof, they said was CNN claimed this in March of 2017, after Trump had somehow taken office, but CNN later said the FBI bugged Manafort in his Trump Tower residence in September of 2017!! that was almost a year after Obama left office, but according to the dumbass Daily Caller, Obama was still in charge of the FBI!!!

Oh, and another, lying Daily Caller said CNN claimed only democrats prayed at Scalise related softball game after he was shot, but they made a mistake of showing a screenshot of a picture of only democrats praying, and CNN rightly saying it was a picture of democrats praying, not that no one else did. \

Only an idiot would use a known piece of shit right wing blog to fact check the most trusted news media in the world, the one most people in the world watch for real news, not fox, not the daily caller.
 
I wonder what CNN's ratings would be if every TV in every fucking airport in the country was turned off?
Tucker Carlson gets more viewers than every CNN/MSNBC show combined.
 
CNN, NBC/MSNBC (Comcast), ABC, CBS, PBS, NYT, Washpo, AP, Reuters and others bet the farm on the fake Russia narrative. Some, like CNN and MSNBC a bit more than the others but if you watched or read one, you pretty much saw them all as they were pushing the same theme.

Fox, Breitbart, some opt Talk Radio were they only, relatively SMALL voices that were reporting it, but not concluding Trump was guilty up front. So, maybe 95% were pulling for the removal of Trump due to Russian collusion. Now they are paying for it.
can you actually quote an actual source where any of those news sites said they knew the Mueller Report would say anything, since there were no leaks of any kind coming from Mueller or his team? Where do you get this shit? From a dream you had?
 
CNN, NBC/MSNBC (Comcast), ABC, CBS, PBS, NYT, Washpo, AP, Reuters and others bet the farm on the fake Russia narrative. Some, like CNN and MSNBC a bit more than the others but if you watched or read one, you pretty much saw them all as they were pushing the same theme.

Fox, Breitbart, some opt Talk Radio were they only, relatively SMALL voices that were reporting it, but not concluding Trump was guilty up front. So, maybe 95% were pulling for the removal of Trump due to Russian collusion. Now they are paying for it.
can you actually quote an actual source where any of those news sites said they knew the Mueller Report would say anything, since there were no leaks of any kind coming from Mueller or his team? Where do you get this shit? From a dream you had?

You'd have to be blind, delusional, ignorant or all three not to see it. They ran these lies 24/7 for two and a half years. Rachel Maddow's reaction as well as Chris Mathew's were priceless.

Indoctrinated much?
 
The audience is very small yet CNN is on everywhere. Who pours money into CNN so they can keep pumping out their disinformation and propaganda?
Nobody asks to see it yet you can't get away from it.
 
CNN, NBC/MSNBC (Comcast), ABC, CBS, PBS, NYT, Washpo, AP, Reuters and others bet the farm on the fake Russia narrative. Some, like CNN and MSNBC a bit more than the others but if you watched or read one, you pretty much saw them all as they were pushing the same theme.

Fox, Breitbart, some opt Talk Radio were they only, relatively SMALL voices that were reporting it, but not concluding Trump was guilty up front. So, maybe 95% were pulling for the removal of Trump due to Russian collusion. Now they are paying for it.
can you actually quote an actual source where any of those news sites said they knew the Mueller Report would say anything, since there were no leaks of any kind coming from Mueller or his team? Where do you get this shit? From a dream you had?

The audience is very small yet CNN is on everywhere. Who pours money into CNN so they can keep pumping out their disinformation and propaganda?
Nobody asks to see it yet you can't get away from it.

Far Left Progressive Time Warner.
 
With Cable TV small ratings mean nothing as revenue is massive from subscribers and the endless money from the globalists. The pay MSM shills ridiculous amounts of money for several hundred thousand viewers nationally. Cable TV reform is needed. To at least get to pick a set amount of channels to save a good amount of money on the monthly bill. Yet Repubs are oblivious to this. Cable TV is a monopoly that is Prog Socialist dominated.
 
I remember back when no one would have thought a news show should not, and was not, judged by how many people watched it, but how accurate and reliable it was. Fox does not care about accuracy, obviously, it cares about propaganda and making sure all the old bigoted white folks out there hear nothing but the stuff the republican party wants them to hear, and what the geezer white folks want to hear. Has nothing to do with the news, it has to do with kissing Trump's ass, having a lot of pretty girls with long pretty legs in short dresses being shown lounging around a desk spewing right wing pablum for the old dudes at home. Most advertisers judge a show by their rankings in the 25-54 year old market. CNN does okay in that category. Fox suffers in that prime demographic because younger people want facts more than bullshit, and are not by nature as bigoted as people over 60 years old who would ever watch Fox, even for a few minutes. Fox also has the distinct advantage of being the only game in town for elderly bigots to watch on Cable or Broadcast TV. In most markets, there are real news media, like ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, and Bloomberg, mostly business news, and there is right wing spin and infotainment media- FOX AND ONLY FOX. Even a trump voter must know the less competition you have in a market, the larger your market share will be. Fox gets every dumbass bigoted, mostly elderly viewer bored enough to watch their shit each day, while the real news media stations have to fight amongst themselves for those who want the news presented fairly and accurately, and their opinion shows leaning left, but still accurate and reliable, not full of hate and bullshit like fox's clowns.


Fox News Channel once again came out on top of the cable news ratings for the first quarter, but not without stiff competition from MSNBC and Rachel Maddow in particular.

In the primetime 8-11 p.m. slot, Fox News averaged 2.4 million total viewers (down 1% from the year-ago quarter), with including 421,000 in the key 25-54 demo, while MSNBC averaged 1.9 million total viewers (up 3% from 2018) and 333,000 in the 25-54 bracket.

MSNBC struck back in the 25-54 demo for individual shows, with Maddow beating out Sean Hannity’s FNC program in Q1. Maddow drew 549,000 viewers in the key news demo on average, compared to Hannity’s 547,000 and Tucker Carlson’s 532,000.

However, ultimately the shows split bragging rights. Hannity bested Maddow in terms of average total viewership, drawing 3.12 million compared to 3.06. Maddow was followed by three other FNC shows: “Tucker Carlson Tonight” (2.98 million), “The Five” (2.58 million) and “The Ingraham Angle” (2.43 million).

Interestingly, in the month of March, Maddow was down in third place in the 25-54 demo at 509,000, behind Hannity at 533,000 and Carlson, who topped the demo for first time, with 537,000. Maddow also lagged the two Fox News hosts in total viewership, averaging 2.89 million average viewers to Hannity’s 3.15 million and Carlson’s 3.03 million.

Meanwhile, CNN grew in total viewership in the primetime 8-11 p.m. slot for Q1 with just over 1 million average total viewers, a 7% bump from the same quarter in 2018.

Fox News Tops Q1 Cable News Ratings, Maddow Bests Hannity in Key Demo
The lying never stops.
 
CNN isn`t the network that`s making you dumber by the day.
read:STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All

Oh yeah and I"'m sure they didn't gear those particular questions to reflect poorly on a conservative base or ANYthing.

Pull my other leg
They did no such thing. They asked what the Dalai Lama`s religion was, asked people to locate South Carolina on a map, which party has the most seats in the House, etc. FOX viewers are more likely to not answer these questions correctly than a normal person would. Right leaning Forbes magazine can fill you in further.
A Rigorous Scientific Look Into The 'Fox News Effect'
 
I remember back when no one would have thought a news show should not, and was not, judged by how many people watched it, but how accurate and reliable it was. Fox does not care about accuracy, obviously, it cares about propaganda and making sure all the old bigoted white folks out there hear nothing but the stuff the republican party wants them to hear, and what the geezer white folks want to hear. Has nothing to do with the news, it has to do with kissing Trump's ass, having a lot of pretty girls with long pretty legs in short dresses being shown lounging around a desk spewing right wing pablum for the old dudes at home. Most advertisers judge a show by their rankings in the 25-54 year old market. CNN does okay in that category. Fox suffers in that prime demographic because younger people want facts more than bullshit, and are not by nature as bigoted as people over 60 years old who would ever watch Fox, even for a few minutes. Fox also has the distinct advantage of being the only game in town for elderly bigots to watch on Cable or Broadcast TV. In most markets, there are real news media, like ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, and Bloomberg, mostly business news, and there is right wing spin and infotainment media- FOX AND ONLY FOX. Even a trump voter must know the less competition you have in a market, the larger your market share will be. Fox gets every dumbass bigoted, mostly elderly viewer bored enough to watch their shit each day, while the real news media stations have to fight amongst themselves for those who want the news presented fairly and accurately, and their opinion shows leaning left, but still accurate and reliable, not full of hate and bullshit like fox's clowns.


Fox News Channel once again came out on top of the cable news ratings for the first quarter, but not without stiff competition from MSNBC and Rachel Maddow in particular.

In the primetime 8-11 p.m. slot, Fox News averaged 2.4 million total viewers (down 1% from the year-ago quarter), with including 421,000 in the key 25-54 demo, while MSNBC averaged 1.9 million total viewers (up 3% from 2018) and 333,000 in the 25-54 bracket.

MSNBC struck back in the 25-54 demo for individual shows, with Maddow beating out Sean Hannity’s FNC program in Q1. Maddow drew 549,000 viewers in the key news demo on average, compared to Hannity’s 547,000 and Tucker Carlson’s 532,000.

However, ultimately the shows split bragging rights. Hannity bested Maddow in terms of average total viewership, drawing 3.12 million compared to 3.06. Maddow was followed by three other FNC shows: “Tucker Carlson Tonight” (2.98 million), “The Five” (2.58 million) and “The Ingraham Angle” (2.43 million).

Interestingly, in the month of March, Maddow was down in third place in the 25-54 demo at 509,000, behind Hannity at 533,000 and Carlson, who topped the demo for first time, with 537,000. Maddow also lagged the two Fox News hosts in total viewership, averaging 2.89 million average viewers to Hannity’s 3.15 million and Carlson’s 3.03 million.

Meanwhile, CNN grew in total viewership in the primetime 8-11 p.m. slot for Q1 with just over 1 million average total viewers, a 7% bump from the same quarter in 2018.

Fox News Tops Q1 Cable News Ratings, Maddow Bests Hannity in Key Demo
Nice hysterical rant...
Please point on the doll where Fox touched you so inappropriately... download (14).jpeg
 

Forum List

Back
Top