Log of Failed Liberal Policy

[P@triot]

Education programs, jobs programs and such are available regardless of your race. Conservatives still oppose them while they lavish tax breaks on the wealthy and promising trickle down jobs that never happen

You're right winger - "trickle down jobs never happen". All of us working people are employed by homeless poor people.

God almight you are such an asshole. You know what you say is a pure lie, but you say it anyway just because you want Communism. You can't even be honest about your beliefs, which says it all. 100% of ALL private sector jobs are from wealthy people. In fact, jobs from the wealthy don't "trickle down" - they pour down like Niagra Falls, stupid. A poor person has never created a job in world history.

Wealthy people do not "give you jobs". They make a profit off of each and every job. Jobs do not "trickle down" because of lower taxes. Jobs are created because there is a demand for the product or service. Rich people do not create that demand...they profit off of it

You're right - they don't "trickle down". They poor down like Niagra Falls, stupid. And the fact that you're upset that the wealthy make money just proves what a Communist idiot you are. Cuba is waiting for you.

Jobs are NOT created because their is a demand. Companies are created because there is a demand. Jobs are created because someone created that company and became wealthy enough to hire others. As I already stated and you cannot dispute, 100% of private jobs in world history have been created by the wealthy.

 

[P@triot]

Failed Liberal Policy:

Three California cities have sought bankruptcy protection in the last month. No matter how much proof of their failed Communist policy exists, the idiot liberal will keep ignorning reality and pushing for their Communism/Marxism/Socialism that ends in complete collapse.

Rising costs push California cities to fiscal brink - latimes.com

 

[rightwinger]

You're right winger - "trickle down jobs never happen". All of us working people are employed by homeless poor people.

God almight you are such an asshole. You know what you say is a pure lie, but you say it anyway just because you want Communism. You can't even be honest about your beliefs, which says it all. 100% of ALL private sector jobs are from wealthy people. In fact, jobs from the wealthy don't "trickle down" - they pour down like Niagra Falls, stupid. A poor person has never created a job in world history.

Wealthy people do not "give you jobs". They make a profit off of each and every job. Jobs do not "trickle down" because of lower taxes. Jobs are created because there is a demand for the product or service. Rich people do not create that demand...they profit off of it

You're right - they don't "trickle down". They poor down like Niagra Falls, stupid. And the fact that you're upset that the wealthy make money just proves what a Communist idiot you are. Cuba is waiting for you.

Jobs are NOT created because their is a demand. Companies are created because there is a demand. Jobs are created because someone created that company and became wealthy enough to hire others. As I already stated and you cannot dispute, 100% of private jobs in world history have been created by the wealthy.

Damn...do you ever get ANYTHING right?

Without a demand for a product or service there is no need for companies or jobs

Jobs are created because someone can make a profit off of that job. The worker provides labor and the employer makes a PROFIT off of that labor.

It is the worker who is providiing something to the employer

 

[ConzHateUSA]

The conz are so completely ignorant about economics, it makes one sad.

Even when the designer of trickle down comes out and says ENOUGH, these traitorous, rabid racists wont listen...

wow...

 

[salem.hills]

Lmao at this Guy ^_
Anyway I add welfare reform to the list although not just a liberal issue in my opinion this really helped Clinton. He was dragged to the table but did it and it worked well to get people off the government dole.

 

[ConzHateUSA]

Lmao at this Guy ^_
Anyway I add welfare reform to the list although not just a liberal issue in my opinion this really helped Clinton. He was dragged to the table but did it and it worked well to get people off the government dole.

better pray to your god that govt dole is still there when all the rules are changed and no longer benefit white males

when you idiots start to actually have to compete with the rest of the people, it will be tough

so start reading

 

[P@triot]

Damn...do you ever get ANYTHING right?

Without a demand for a product or service there is no need for companies or jobs

Jobs are created because someone can make a profit off of that job. The worker provides labor and the employer makes a PROFIT off of that labor.

It is the worker who is providiing something to the employer

I get everything right - which is why you are getting so frustrated. The fact that an employer makes money aggravates you is indisputable evidence that you are a die-hard Communist. Which also explains why everything you post is so stupid. So allow me to explain it to you one more time:

Demand causes someone to create a product or service (ie a company). Once that company starts becoming more and more successful, they have the revenue to hire employees. Demand does not create employees (and even the dumbest of dumb liberals know this).

In summary - demand creates opportunity for an entreprenuer. Success by a hard working, bright entreprenuer creating the product or service to fill the demand creates a wealthy entreprenuer. A wealthy entreprenuers creates jobs.

And idiot Communists like Rightwinger tries to take from the hardwork of those people an redistribute that wealth to themselves. Pathetic.

 

[P@triot]

Failed Liberal Policy:

Today's jobs report is a broken record, with the unemployment rate stuck at 8.2 percent. The Department of Labor reports that only 80,000 jobs were added in June—consistent with other data revealing the economy has downshifted from slow to slower. This picture is starkly different from the economy President Obama promised of a strong recovery and millions of "saved or created" jobs a few years ago.

In 2009, the President promised that his "recovery plan" composed almost entirely of government spending was the only way to stave off rising unemployment. The White House even drafted a chart showing projected unemployment with the economic stimulus plan and without it—to scare lawmakers into voting for it. According to their projections, by now, unemployment should be at 5.5 percent. Instead, of course, it's 8.2 percent—and has been above 8 percent for 41 straight months.

This jobs drought is the result of counterproductive policies, many of which could be reversed immediately. But in the meantime, employers aren't hiring because they are suffering from prolonged uncertainty, as economists readily admit.

Morning Bell: Jobs, Unemployment Stuck

 

[rightwinger]

Damn...do you ever get ANYTHING right?

Without a demand for a product or service there is no need for companies or jobs

Jobs are created because someone can make a profit off of that job. The worker provides labor and the employer makes a PROFIT off of that labor.

It is the worker who is providiing something to the employer

I get everything right - which is why you are getting so frustrated. The fact that an employer makes money aggravates you is indisputable evidence that you are a die-hard Communist. Which also explains why everything you post is so stupid. So allow me to explain it to you one more time:

Demand causes someone to create a product or service (ie a company). Once that company starts becoming more and more successful, they have the revenue to hire employees. Demand does not create employees (and even the dumbest of dumb liberals know this).

In summary - demand creates opportunity for an entreprenuer. Success by a hard working, bright entreprenuer creating the product or service to fill the demand creates a wealthy entreprenuer. A wealthy entreprenuers creates jobs.

And idiot Communists like Rightwinger tries to take from the hardwork of those people an redistribute that wealth to themselves. Pathetic.

1950s rightwing propaganda technique......anyone who disagrees with you must be a commie

Glad to see there are still some of you around

 

[Neotrotsky]

Failed Liberal Policy:

Today's jobs report is a broken record, with the unemployment rate stuck at 8.2 percent. The Department of Labor reports that only 80,000 jobs were added in June—consistent with other data revealing the economy has downshifted from slow to slower. This picture is starkly different from the economy President Obama promised of a strong recovery and millions of "saved or created" jobs a few years ago.

In 2009, the President promised that his "recovery plan" composed almost entirely of government spending was the only way to stave off rising unemployment. The White House even drafted a chart showing projected unemployment with the economic stimulus plan and without it—to scare lawmakers into voting for it. According to their projections, by now, unemployment should be at 5.5 percent. Instead, of course, it's 8.2 percent—and has been above 8 percent for 41 straight months.

This jobs drought is the result of counterproductive policies, many of which could be reversed immediately. But in the meantime, employers aren't hiring because they are suffering from prolonged uncertainty, as economists readily admit.

Morning Bell: Jobs, Unemployment Stuck

Hey give Papa Obama a break

He says he is hard at work, as he says:
"Most Folks Understand How Hard I Work"

 

[rightwinger]

Failed Liberal Policy:

Today's jobs report is a broken record, with the unemployment rate stuck at 8.2 percent. The Department of Labor reports that only 80,000 jobs were added in June—consistent with other data revealing the economy has downshifted from slow to slower. This picture is starkly different from the economy President Obama promised of a strong recovery and millions of "saved or created" jobs a few years ago.

In 2009, the President promised that his "recovery plan" composed almost entirely of government spending was the only way to stave off rising unemployment. The White House even drafted a chart showing projected unemployment with the economic stimulus plan and without it—to scare lawmakers into voting for it. According to their projections, by now, unemployment should be at 5.5 percent. Instead, of course, it's 8.2 percent—and has been above 8 percent for 41 straight months.

This jobs drought is the result of counterproductive policies, many of which could be reversed immediately. But in the meantime, employers aren't hiring because they are suffering from prolonged uncertainty, as economists readily admit.

Morning Bell: Jobs, Unemployment Stuck

Hey give Papa Obama a break

He says he is hard at work, as he says:
"Most Folks Understand How Hard I Work"

Can you name a single case where Obama violated the Constitution?

 

[Neotrotsky]

Sure easy...

Trying to force states into spending money for Papa Obama care
and Medicaid

 

[rightwinger]

Sure easy...

Trying to force states into spending money for Papa Obama care
and Medicaid

The Constitution gives Congress the right to make laws. If the states don't like it, they can sue. It is all part of checks and balances.

Rightwingnuts challenged ....they lost

 

[Neotrotsky]

Technically
the ruling, including Roberts
said you could not use the commerce clause, unconstitutional
(that one just kills the left) and it was a tax.

Also the forcing states for the Papa Obama Care medicaid
was unconstitutional

So indeed
The left should be careful what they wish for....

Papa Obamacare: It’s not just a big f***ing deal… It’s the biggest f***ing regressive tax in history

 

[OODA_Loop]

Commerce clause and state coercion as settled law is huge.

Its the part Rachel Maddow doesn't tell you.

 

[salem.hills]

Lmao at this Guy ^_
Anyway I add welfare reform to the list although not just a liberal issue in my opinion this really helped Clinton. He was dragged to the table but did it and it worked well to get people off the government dole.

better pray to your god that govt dole is still there when all the rules are changed and no longer benefit white males

when you idiots start to actually have to compete with the rest of the people, it will be tough

so start reading

Oh show everybody isn't in competition more then ever since the GD or Carter's term?
OK what should I read you? Lol ..Ayers? NYTimes? Marx?

 

[onecut39]

those are generally policies of people who would be identified as radical right wingers today.
Except for gay rights. You can stick gay rights up your poop shute.

Did you notice one thing?

All those liberal policies were opposed by Conservatives

Abolition is the unique and exclusive history of Republicans.

Tawwy.

Democrats pushed for continuing slavery long after the civil war. Republicans held their line.

I am always amazed, and disgusted, when I hear this argument and we hear it a lot. It is a commentary on our political, and historic, ignorance. As always it takes a history lesson to correct it. as it is only necessary to advance a cause, or more exactly, a political agenda and not to spread the truth. The problem is that there is just enough truth in this to make some kind of point but it is not the point that any modern republican would care to make.

First, and most basically, this mixes apples and oranges. Liberalism and conservatism are not political parties, they are political philosophies and both the democrats and republicans have been both over our history.

Second, one must understand the definition of liberal and conservative at the most basic level. Conservatives are status quo kind of guys, resistant to change, liberals on the other hand have the tendency to embrace change. These are basic definitions so don’t so don’t get your shorts in a bind. Both can fall off the edge of the world when taken to extremes.

Lincoln was a member of the new Republican Party. That much is true. From there it gets quite murky. Lincoln himself is not as cut and dried as history displays him but that is another story.

Liberalism and conservatism must always be viewed in the context of time. What is now ultra conservative, perhaps even oppressive, was liberal at the time of the founding. It was change, not something conservatives take lightly.

So Lincoln was a member of the new Republican Party. It was anti slavery. Hardly conservative in nature, nor was Lincoln. For his time, Lincoln was a radical, flame throwing liberal, a change the entire makeup of the nation kind of liberal. That’s what liberals do although not usually as radically as when talking about abolishing slavery.

By definition neither Lincoln nor the Republican Party of 1860 were conservatives. Actually quite the opposite.

The south was defeated and defeat never sits well. In the years of reconstruction they had a lot shoved down their throat that they did not like and that would forever be associated with the Republican party. Change comes slowly, sometimes never and after reconstruction the south labored for decades to return to what it was. The Republican Party was associated their defeat and humiliation and would remain so till the Nixon administration. The democrats ruled the south but they were racist conservative democrats.

Then came the civil rights act pushed through by Johnson and the democratic administration. The south was overwhelmingly democratic, they were known as “dixiecrats” and the “solid south”. A lot of irony here, civil rights pushed through by a southern president. Worse yet it could never have passed without the support of the northern liberal Republicans. Names like Rockefeller, Percy, and Dirksen come to mind.

The south had some new people to hate. Then along came Nixon and the “southern strategy”. He had the novel idea of uniting all those civil rights sore losers behind the Republican party. It worked…….wonderfully!

In the years following, the southern racist democrats were gradually replaced, by attrition and party change into the southern racist Republicans, democrats in general being blamed for civil rights. This has become the base for the modern Republican party . Sad commentary that those who were responsible for the passage became a symbol for those who opposed it.

And the Northern Liberal Republicans? Gone the way of the do do bird. By the time Clinton came to power they were extinct, perhaps Bob Dole being just a last dismal representative of what once was.

Another irony? People like Allen West expounding on the Republican service to the black man. With friends like those…………

This is a bare outline, somewhat lacking in detail but those details are there for anyone who has the desire, and the honesty, to look into it.

Thank God for my public school education.

 

[Neotrotsky]

History indeed

The Democratic party's history is of the S

Slavery, Segregation, Socialism

 

[onecut39]

History indeed

The Democratic party's history is of the S

Slavery, Segregation, Socialism

There is a lot of truth in that (except for the socialism) but none of those are liberal causes.

They all, except for socialism, have at one time or another the been embraced by both parties.

Segregation and slavery are steeped in conservatism.

 

[onecut39]

Sure easy...

Trying to force states into spending money for Papa Obama care
and Medicaid

When the election blows over and the rhetoric stops we will see how many of our principled republican governors refuse the federal money available from both those programs