Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ultimately solar power is the final answer to all energy needs of the human race, but fusion is a close second if perfected as it doesn't produce harmful chemical like CO2 or Methane. How they may have solved the conundrum of getting more energy out of the reaction than goes in is the key question. The sun uses natural gravity to power its fusion reactions, to do it on Earth they'd have to reach temps of 100 million degrees. That takes a lot of energy which makes it so hard to get more out than you put in.
Only a profound idiot would claim solar is preferable to fusion power. What's better about, the fact that it's unrealiable, that it requires millions of acres of land, that it's useless in cold climates? Your subsequent discussion of fusion only confirms that you're a dumbass.
It is already putting out more power than put in. It will work, oil and gas iks fucked as fuel! They will be needed for other products. The bad news is what this means for the nucklear arms race. It no longer takes years of spinning fuel for a bomb. This tech ends up in wrong hands, bad news!I hope they spend decades on it, and it ends up not being able to power a refrigerator.
Yu can't use it to make a bomb, moron.It is already putting out more power than put in. It will work, oil and gas iks fucked as fuel! They will be needed for other products. The bad news is what this means for the nucklear arms race. It no longer takes years of spinning fuel for a bomb. This tech ends up in wrong hands, bad news!I hope they spend decades on it, and it ends up not being able to power a refrigerator.
Solar power isn't a bus. It's a broken down bicycle.Ultimately solar power is the final answer to all energy needs of the human race, but fusion is a close second if perfected as it doesn't produce harmful chemical like CO2 or Methane. How they may have solved the conundrum of getting more energy out of the reaction than goes in is the key question. The sun uses natural gravity to power its fusion reactions, to do it on Earth they'd have to reach temps of 100 million degrees. That takes a lot of energy which makes it so hard to get more out than you put in.
Only a profound idiot would claim solar is preferable to fusion power. What's better about, the fact that it's unrealiable, that it requires millions of acres of land, that it's useless in cold climates? Your subsequent discussion of fusion only confirms that you're a dumbass.
Only a profound idiot would wait for a bus that might never come and miss the one that does.
Solar power isn't a bus. It's a broken down bicycle.Ultimately solar power is the final answer to all energy needs of the human race, but fusion is a close second if perfected as it doesn't produce harmful chemical like CO2 or Methane. How they may have solved the conundrum of getting more energy out of the reaction than goes in is the key question. The sun uses natural gravity to power its fusion reactions, to do it on Earth they'd have to reach temps of 100 million degrees. That takes a lot of energy which makes it so hard to get more out than you put in.
Only a profound idiot would claim solar is preferable to fusion power. What's better about, the fact that it's unrealiable, that it requires millions of acres of land, that it's useless in cold climates? Your subsequent discussion of fusion only confirms that you're a dumbass.
Only a profound idiot would wait for a bus that might never come and miss the one that does.
Solar power isn't a bus. It's a broken down bicycle.Ultimately solar power is the final answer to all energy needs of the human race, but fusion is a close second if perfected as it doesn't produce harmful chemical like CO2 or Methane. How they may have solved the conundrum of getting more energy out of the reaction than goes in is the key question. The sun uses natural gravity to power its fusion reactions, to do it on Earth they'd have to reach temps of 100 million degrees. That takes a lot of energy which makes it so hard to get more out than you put in.
Only a profound idiot would claim solar is preferable to fusion power. What's better about, the fact that it's unrealiable, that it requires millions of acres of land, that it's useless in cold climates? Your subsequent discussion of fusion only confirms that you're a dumbass.
Only a profound idiot would wait for a bus that might never come and miss the one that does.
Not with my tax money, asshole. You can do whatever you want with your own money.Solar power isn't a bus. It's a broken down bicycle.Ultimately solar power is the final answer to all energy needs of the human race, but fusion is a close second if perfected as it doesn't produce harmful chemical like CO2 or Methane. How they may have solved the conundrum of getting more energy out of the reaction than goes in is the key question. The sun uses natural gravity to power its fusion reactions, to do it on Earth they'd have to reach temps of 100 million degrees. That takes a lot of energy which makes it so hard to get more out than you put in.
Only a profound idiot would claim solar is preferable to fusion power. What's better about, the fact that it's unrealiable, that it requires millions of acres of land, that it's useless in cold climates? Your subsequent discussion of fusion only confirms that you're a dumbass.
Only a profound idiot would wait for a bus that might never come and miss the one that does.
Being the ultra rightwing fruitcake you are, I don't expect you to understand. But we will go ahead without your help in spite of you.
Solar power isn't a bus. It's a broken down bicycle.Ultimately solar power is the final answer to all energy needs of the human race, but fusion is a close second if perfected as it doesn't produce harmful chemical like CO2 or Methane. How they may have solved the conundrum of getting more energy out of the reaction than goes in is the key question. The sun uses natural gravity to power its fusion reactions, to do it on Earth they'd have to reach temps of 100 million degrees. That takes a lot of energy which makes it so hard to get more out than you put in.
Only a profound idiot would claim solar is preferable to fusion power. What's better about, the fact that it's unrealiable, that it requires millions of acres of land, that it's useless in cold climates? Your subsequent discussion of fusion only confirms that you're a dumbass.
Only a profound idiot would wait for a bus that might never come and miss the one that does.
You voted for a douche that had a fake university scam young people out of millions of dollars. Yes you are the person to lecture humanity on fraud.
Solar power isn't a bus. It's a broken down bicycle.Ultimately solar power is the final answer to all energy needs of the human race, but fusion is a close second if perfected as it doesn't produce harmful chemical like CO2 or Methane. How they may have solved the conundrum of getting more energy out of the reaction than goes in is the key question. The sun uses natural gravity to power its fusion reactions, to do it on Earth they'd have to reach temps of 100 million degrees. That takes a lot of energy which makes it so hard to get more out than you put in.
Only a profound idiot would claim solar is preferable to fusion power. What's better about, the fact that it's unrealiable, that it requires millions of acres of land, that it's useless in cold climates? Your subsequent discussion of fusion only confirms that you're a dumbass.
Only a profound idiot would wait for a bus that might never come and miss the one that does.
You voted for a douche that had a fake university scam young people out of millions of dollars. Yes you are the person to lecture humanity on fraud.
Snowflakes do nothing but constantly spout lies and smears.
You obviously know nothing of nuclear physics. Educate your self! The same process can make a release of alpha,beta, and gama particles. This processs can be used for quickened enrichment. Also please define eexplosion buddie. Do you see anything that might applie? Moron!Yu can't use it to make a bomb, moron.It is already putting out more power than put in. It will work, oil and gas iks fucked as fuel! They will be needed for other products. The bad news is what this means for the nucklear arms race. It no longer takes years of spinning fuel for a bomb. This tech ends up in wrong hands, bad news!I hope they spend decades on it, and it ends up not being able to power a refrigerator.
There's no such thing as gama particles, moron There are gama rays, not gama particles. There are alpha and beta particles. None of these can be used to enrich uranium. You need free nuetrons to do that. However, a fusion reaction will produce them, but you need to have it in proximity to the reaction, and there is no reason to pack uranium into a fusion reactor unless you are deliberately trying to make a bomb.You obviously know nothing of nuclear physics. Educate your self! The same process can make a release of alpha,beta, and gama particles. This processs can be used for quickened enrichment. Also please define eexplosion buddie. Do you see anything that might applie? Moron!Yu can't use it to make a bomb, moron.It is already putting out more power than put in. It will work, oil and gas iks fucked as fuel! They will be needed for other products. The bad news is what this means for the nucklear arms race. It no longer takes years of spinning fuel for a bomb. This tech ends up in wrong hands, bad news!I hope they spend decades on it, and it ends up not being able to power a refrigerator.
Not with my tax money, asshole. You can do whatever you want with your own money.Solar power isn't a bus. It's a broken down bicycle.Ultimately solar power is the final answer to all energy needs of the human race, but fusion is a close second if perfected as it doesn't produce harmful chemical like CO2 or Methane. How they may have solved the conundrum of getting more energy out of the reaction than goes in is the key question. The sun uses natural gravity to power its fusion reactions, to do it on Earth they'd have to reach temps of 100 million degrees. That takes a lot of energy which makes it so hard to get more out than you put in.
Only a profound idiot would claim solar is preferable to fusion power. What's better about, the fact that it's unrealiable, that it requires millions of acres of land, that it's useless in cold climates? Your subsequent discussion of fusion only confirms that you're a dumbass.
Only a profound idiot would wait for a bus that might never come and miss the one that does.
Being the ultra rightwing fruitcake you are, I don't expect you to understand. But we will go ahead without your help in spite of you.
you do not know shit, to a particle physicist every thing is a particle. It is nuclear and particle physicists that work on these types of things, So thank you for you hilll billy knowlege, but have a coke and a smile and shut the fuck up! To us even a photon is a particle!There's no such thing as gama particles, moron There are gama rays, not gama particles. There are alpha and beta particles. None of these can be used to enrich uranium. You need free nuetrons to do that. However, a fusion reaction will produce them, but you need to have it in proximity to the reaction, and there is no reason to pack uranium into a fusion reactor unless you are deliberately trying to make a bomb.You obviously know nothing of nuclear physics. Educate your self! The same process can make a release of alpha,beta, and gama particles. This processs can be used for quickened enrichment. Also please define eexplosion buddie. Do you see anything that might applie? Moron!Yu can't use it to make a bomb, moron.It is already putting out more power than put in. It will work, oil and gas iks fucked as fuel! They will be needed for other products. The bad news is what this means for the nucklear arms race. It no longer takes years of spinning fuel for a bomb. This tech ends up in wrong hands, bad news!I hope they spend decades on it, and it ends up not being able to power a refrigerator.
Before you call someone a dumbass, you better make sure you have your facts straight.
Now don't you feel stupid?
Yes, I am paying for them. Solar wouldn't exist without generous credits from the taxpayer. I also pay taxes for roads, schools, colleges and universities. I pay the utility company directly for water, gas and electricity. Private companies supply gas at the pump.Not with my tax money, asshole. You can do whatever you want with your own money.Solar power isn't a bus. It's a broken down bicycle.Only a profound idiot would claim solar is preferable to fusion power. What's better about, the fact that it's unrealiable, that it requires millions of acres of land, that it's useless in cold climates? Your subsequent discussion of fusion only confirms that you're a dumbass.
Only a profound idiot would wait for a bus that might never come and miss the one that does.
Being the ultra rightwing fruitcake you are, I don't expect you to understand. But we will go ahead without your help in spite of you.
WE aren't using your money. ou don't pay taxes anyway. Stay off the public roads, you aren't paying for them. Your kids shouldn't use any of the educational systems including the colleges or univervsities or tradeschools, stop using the water out of the tap, your Natural Gas needs to be shut off, your electric power needs to be shut off, no gas at the pumps, and more. If you use any of these things you just might be a socialist. Thinking otherwise you also might be inbred.
Snowflakes do nothing but constantly spout lies and smears.
Modern autos would not exist without the roads various levels of government has built. There are many things that modern society depends on that were started with taxpayer money, including what we are communicating on right now. Just because you are a little ideological asshole does not change any of that.
PHHHHHTT!I hope Lockheed Martin is successful, but until they have a working model, continue to build what works, solar and wind.