Living in a Culture of Cruelty: Democracy as Spectacle

Bfgrn

Gold Member
Apr 4, 2009
16,829
2,492
245
Under the Bush administration, a seeping, sometimes galloping, authoritarianism began to reach into every vestige of the culture, giving free rein to those anti-democratic forces in which religious, market, military and political fundamentalism thrived, casting an ominous shadow over the fate of United States democracy. During the Bush-Cheney regime, power became an instrument of retribution and punishment was connected to and fueled by a repressive state. A bullying rhetoric of war, a ruthless consolidation of economic forces, and an all-embracing free-market apparatus and media driven pedagogy of fear supported and sustained a distinct culture of cruelty and inequality in the United States. In pointing to a culture of cruelty, I am not employing a form of left moralism that collapses matters of power and politics into the discourse of character. On the contrary, I think the notion of a culture of cruelty is useful in thinking through the convergence of everyday life and politics, of considering material relations of power - the disciplining of the body as an object of control - on the one hand, and the production of cultural meaning, especially the co-optation of popular culture to sanction official violence, on the other. The culture of cruelty is important for thinking through how life and death now converge in ways that fundamentally transform how we understand and imagine politics in the current historical moment - a moment when the most vital of safety nets, health care reform, is being undermined by right-wing ideologues. What is it about a culture of cruelty that provides the conditions for many Americans to believe that government is the enemy of health care reform and health care reform should be turned over to corporate and market-driven interests, further depriving millions of an essential right?

Increasingly, many individuals and groups now find themselves living in a society that measures the worth of human life in terms of cost-benefit analyzes. The central issue of life and politics is no longer about working to get ahead, but struggling simply to survive. And many groups, who are considered marginal because they are poor, unemployed, people of color, elderly or young, have not just been excluded from "the American dream," but have become utterly redundant and disposable, waste products of a society that not longer considers them of any value. How else to explain the zealousness in which social safety nets have been dismantled, the transition from welfare to workfare (offering little job training programs and no child care), and recent acrimony over health care reform's public option? What accounts for the passage of laws that criminalize the behavior of the 1.2 million homeless in the United States, often defining sleeping, sitting, soliciting, lying down or loitering in public places as a criminal offence rather than a behavior in need of compassionate good will and public assistance? Or, for that matter, the expulsions, suspensions, segregation, class discrimination and racism in the public schools as well as the more severe beatings, broken bones and damaged lives endured by young people in the juvenile justice system? Within these politics, largely fueled by market fundamentalism - one that substitutes the power of the social state with the power of the corporate state and only values wealth, money and consumers - there is a ruthless and hidden dimension of cruelty, one in which the powers of life and death are increasingly determined by punishing apparatuses, such as the criminal justice system for poor people of color and/or market forces that increasingly decide who may live and who may die.

The growing dominance of a right-wing media forged in a pedagogy of hate has become a crucial element providing numerous platforms for a culture of cruelty and is fundamental to how we understand the role of education in a range of sites outside of traditional forms of schooling. This educational apparatus and mode of public pedagogy is central to analyzing not just how power is exercised, rewarded and contested in a growing culture of cruelty, but also how particular identities, desires and needs are mobilized in support of an overt racism, hostility towards immigrants and utter disdain, coupled with the threat of mob violence toward any political figure supportive of the social contract and the welfare state. Citizens are increasingly constructed through a language of contempt for all noncommercial public spheres and a chilling indifference to the plight of others that is increasingly expressed in vicious tirades against big government and health care reform. There is a growing element of scorn on the part of the American public for those human beings caught in the web of misfortune, human suffering, dependency and deprivation. As Barbara Ehrenreich observes, "The pattern is to curtail financing for services that might help the poor while ramping up law enforcement: starve school and public transportation budgets, then make truancy illegal. Shut down public housing, then make it a crime to be homeless. Be sure to harass street vendors when there are few other opportunities for employment. The experience of the poor, and especially poor minorities, comes to resemble that of a rat in a cage scrambling to avoid erratically administered electric shocks." [1]

090209R_story.jpg


A right-wing spin machine, influenced by haters like Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage and Ann Coulter, endlessly spews out a toxic rhetoric in which: all Muslims are defined as jihadists; the homeless are not victims of misfortune but lazy; blacks are not terrorized by a racist criminal justice system, but the main architects of a culture of criminality; the epidemic of obesity has nothing to do with corporations, big agriculture and advertisers selling junk food, but rather the result of "big" government giving people food stamps; the public sphere is largely for white people, which is being threatened by immigrants and people of color, and so it goes. Glenn Beck, the alleged voice of the common man, appearing on the "Fox & Friends" morning show, calls President Obama a "racist" and then accuses him of "having a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture." [2] Nationally syndicated radio host Rush Limbaugh unapologetically states that James Early Ray, the confessed killer of Martin Luther King Jr., should be given a posthumous Medal of Honor, [3] while his counterpart in right-wing hate, talk radio host Michael Savage, states on his show, "You know, when I see a woman walking around with a burqa, I see a Nazi. That's what I see - how do you like that? - a hateful Nazi who would like to cut your throat and kill your children." [4] He also claims that Obama is "surrounded by terrorists" and is "raping America." This is a variation of a crude theme established by Ann Coulter, who refers to Bill Clinton as a "very good rapist." [5] Even worse, Obama is a "neo-Marxist fascist dictator in the making," who plans to "force children into a paramilitary domestic army." [6] And this is just a small sampling of the kind of hate talk that permeates right-wing media. This could be dismissed as loony right-wing political theater if it were not for the low levels of civic literacy displayed by so many Americans who choose to believe and invest in this type of hate talk. [7] On the contrary, while it may be idiocy, it reveals a powerful set of political, economic and educational forces at work in miseducating the American public while at the same time extending the culture of cruelty. One central task of any viable form of politics is to analyze the culture of cruelty and its overt and covert dimensions of violence, often parading as entertainment.

More...
 
Your link goes back to truthout.org and when I click on the "about" link it comes up as "under construction". The "donate" button works fine of course. :rolleyes:

I thought "truthout" was made by the tobacco companies themselves as punishment for selling a successful product, but I could be wrong.

What is "trouthout", who are it's donors and what is it trying to accomplish?
 
Your link goes back to truthout.org and when I click on the "about" link it comes up as "under construction". The "donate" button works fine of course. :rolleyes:

I thought "truthout" was made by the tobacco companies themselves as punishment for selling a successful product, but I could be wrong.

What is "trouthout", who are it's donors and what is it trying to accomplish?

You think the murder of millions of human beings should be catagorized as "successful"?

And some on this board wonder why I wish death on your ilk.
 
Your link goes back to truthout.org and when I click on the "about" link it comes up as "under construction". The "donate" button works fine of course. :rolleyes:

I thought "truthout" was made by the tobacco companies themselves as punishment for selling a successful product, but I could be wrong.

What is "trouthout", who are it's donors and what is it trying to accomplish?

Truthout.org
TruthOut.org is a political website aimed at providing an alternative to corporate news sources. It was started in the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election with the goal of, in its words, "hoping to reach a few people, have some small impact on the dialogue, and maybe try to restore a little integrity." It claims to receive more than 4 million visits per month.

The AUTHOR is what is important...
Henry Giroux
Born September 18, 1943 (1943-09-18)
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Occupation: Author, University Professor
Nationality: American
Subjects: Critical pedagogy, Cultural studies, youth studies, Higher education, Cultural politics, Social theory
wiki
 
That is probably the single most retarded bit of leftist spew I have ever had the misfortune to read through. Any Leftist who bitches about someone else being an authoritarian is just simply an idiot, a hypocrit, or a fool and chiefly concerned that the authoritarians in charge don't agree with them not with the fact that they are authoritarians. But then leftist twits like this believe everyone that disagrees with them is by definition both an authoritarian and an idiot.
 
Sorry. Couldn't finish reading your post because after the first three sentences I determined it was just a load of crap. Hope you will write a similar article telling us all about Obama's socialist activities while he was President.
 
What a surprise. Ignorant ranting on talk radio by people who obviously dont listen to it.
 
That is probably the single most retarded bit of leftist spew I have ever had the misfortune to read through. Any Leftist who bitches about someone else being an authoritarian is just simply an idiot, a hypocrit, or a fool and chiefly concerned that the authoritarians in charge don't agree with them not with the fact that they are authoritarians. But then leftist twits like this believe everyone that disagrees with them is by definition both an authoritarian and an idiot.

It is clear you have NO understanding of authoritarianism. It is an almost exclusively a right wing personality trait...

But authoritarians and their pea brain vigilante followers firmly believe they are righteous...
 
Your link goes back to truthout.org and when I click on the "about" link it comes up as "under construction". The "donate" button works fine of course. :rolleyes:

I thought "truthout" was made by the tobacco companies themselves as punishment for selling a successful product, but I could be wrong.

What is "trouthout", who are it's donors and what is it trying to accomplish?

You think the murder of millions of human beings should be catagorized as "successful"?

And some on this board wonder why I wish death on your ilk.

and someday you'll get your wish. that's a no brainer. that's why you wish it DUngDUmmie!
 
We have a left wing ideologue using the same brand of faulty, emotive logic the right wing ideologue uses and bashes the right wing ideologue with it. This is new?
 
Last edited:
For those with short attention spans:

1. The poor are demonised.

What is it about a culture of cruelty that provides the conditions for many Americans to believe that government is the enemy of health care reform and health care reform should be turned over to corporate and market-driven interests, further depriving millions of an essential right?


2. Violence and cruelty are bona fide entertainment

Underlying the culture of cruelty that reached its apogee during the Bush administration, was the legalization of state violence, such that human suffering was now sanctioned by the law, which no longer served as a summons to justice.

Support for these - and probably, other, points are contained in the piece of writing. The words when put together are called "an argument." The words produce concepts which support the argument and the main points.

Reactionaries need not bother to read it though. I mean it's not like it's a bill in the legislature or something.
 
I laughed so hard at this, "Under the Bush administration, a seeping, sometimes galloping, authoritarianism began to reach into every vestige of the culture..." that I phlegmed all over the keyboard.

People with their nose in the Kool-Aid and their lips Crazy Glued to Obama's cock write some of the funniest stuff I ever read. Hell, I have to give him a rep for the comedic value
 

Forum List

Back
Top