Literally THOUSANDS of WMD's found in IRAQ - PERIOD

Making the same thread over and over doesn't change the fact that when they said "weapons of mass destruction" they were referring to nuclear weapons, and that no nuclear weapons were discovered in Iraq.

Need some help moving the goalposts?

Clearly the goalpost moving is being done by the OP and his source because it was already widely known the Saddam had chemical weapons. That narrative didn't need to be sold to anyone.

And speaking of sold...

handshake300.jpg
 
Making the same thread over and over doesn't change the fact that when they said "weapons of mass destruction" they were referring to nuclear weapons, and that no nuclear weapons were discovered in Iraq.

Need some help moving the goalposts?

Clearly the goalpost moving is being done by the OP and his source because it was already widely known the Saddam had chemical weapons. That narrative didn't need to be sold to anyone.

And speaking of sold...

handshake300.jpg

Yeah...we all knew they had chemical weapons. We sold them to them.
 
From Chuck Pfarerr's book, Seal Target: Geronimo

It is a chilling fact that thousands of chemical weapons have been uncovered in Iraq. *These weapons have been used by Al Qaeda against coalition and NATO forces on dozens of occasions. *This has been confirmed by countless sources, most recently in the released WikiLeaks cables.

So why haven't the American people been told of the stock-piled caches of chemical WMD's uncovered in Iraq or of the chemical weapon attacks by Al Qaeda?

The Republicans won’t touch this because it would reveal the incompetence of the Bush administration in failing to neutralize the danger of Iraqi WMD (instead of preventing Weapons of Mass Destruction from falling into the hands of terrorists, the 2003 invasion of Iraq has accelerated the acquisition, manufacture, and use of chemical weapons by Al Qaeda). The Democrats won’t touch it because it would show President Bush was right to invade Iraq in the first place. It is an axis of embarrassment. *And the*press won't touch it because they had already convinced themselves, and most of the American public, that Saddam Hussein didn’t have any WMD's. *The media turned a blind eye to continued reports of chemical weapon attacks because its own credibility was threatened. Several major outlets were deeply invested with the story line of an “unjustifiable war". *Not many people can bear to admit they were wrong, especially in print, and especially if they have been very wrong for a very long time.

Sarin-loaded bomb explodes in Iraq - World news - Mideast/N. Africa - Conflict in Iraq - NBCNews.com

NewsMax.com: Inside Cover Story

From the first link:

A roadside bomb THOUGHT to contain deadly sarin nerve agent exploded near a U.S. military convoy, the U.S. military said Monday. It was BELIEVED to be the first confirmed discovery of any of the banned weapons that the United States cited in making its case for the Iraq war.
 
Fact is there were no WMD (Chemical, Biological, or Nuclear) found in Iraq that were manufactured after the first Gulf War. All the ones found were manufactured during the time when Iraq was considered a valued trading partner by both the Reagan and Bush(41)'s administrations. Not to mention our European Allies who also sold a buttload of duel use equipment and pre-cursor chemicals.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top