Listening to Jesus

[Mudda]

.
what has the Almighty to do with your vindictive hatred of socialism and not too dissimilar to their scriptural presence in your bible in regards to humanity by the sullen disregard for comradary ...

.

.

Socialism is the form evil has taken in the cosmic battle between good and evil.

Got any proof at all of a cosmic battle between good and evil?

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

I. Shafarevich. The Socialist Phenomeon, 1980 by Harper & Row

Got any real scientific proof or just more fartsmoke?

You didn't ask for scientific proof. You asked for proof, which I gave to you. So now... after I have given you the proof you asked for, you have decided that you want scientific proof. Sorry that doesn't exist. Why would you believe that science could answer that question? So what proof do you have that it isn't?

Then you have no proof that your god isn't the great spaghetti monster. Bon appétit.

 

[guno]

What is required to benefit from Jesus' sacrifice?

John 3:36-- He that exercise' faith in the son has everlasting life, he that disobeys the son will NOT see life, but the wrath of God remains upon him.
Heb 5:9-- Jesus became responsible for all those-OBEYING him.

Jesus taught--- proof of ones love for him was by listening( learning and applying every single teaching) to him.-- like this ultra important teaching--- Man does not live by bread alone, but by EVERY UTTERANCE from God = OT-NT--Years of study, over and over, and one still learns new utterances.

So then its 100% fact-- the teachers on earth who Jesus is with--teach the flock--every utterance from God, over and over, without fail. If ones teacher does not--RUN FROM THEM.

Every mortal on earth that knows Jesus has already done these things, without fail--think about it.

In last Sunday's sermon, Pastor Deacon Fred recalled a conversation he had with an unsaved cashier at a Safeway in Des Moines. "This feller was just yapping to himself, and mumbling," said Pastor. "So I asked him, who are you talking to? To which he replied, 'My 2,000 year old invisible flying friend.' I told him, as an adult, he really needed to let go of such childish things. Part of being an adult is living in the real world and not clinging to made-up stories and imaginary friends, no matter how comforting. Then, he happened to mention that his friend was called "Jesus." I told him, "Well, why didn't you say so? That's different kettle of fish entirely, my friend!"

When Your Invisible Friend Tells You His Name is Jesus

 

[ding]

Socialism is the form evil has taken in the cosmic battle between good and evil.

Got any proof at all of a cosmic battle between good and evil?

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

I. Shafarevich. The Socialist Phenomeon, 1980 by Harper & Row

Got any real scientific proof or just more fartsmoke?

You didn't ask for scientific proof. You asked for proof, which I gave to you. So now... after I have given you the proof you asked for, you have decided that you want scientific proof. Sorry that doesn't exist. Why would you believe that science could answer that question? So what proof do you have that it isn't?

Then you have no proof that your god isn't the great spaghetti monster. Bon appétit.

Sure I do. We've already discussed it like a thousand times.

 

[ding]

What is required to benefit from Jesus' sacrifice?

John 3:36-- He that exercise' faith in the son has everlasting life, he that disobeys the son will NOT see life, but the wrath of God remains upon him.
Heb 5:9-- Jesus became responsible for all those-OBEYING him.

Jesus taught--- proof of ones love for him was by listening( learning and applying every single teaching) to him.-- like this ultra important teaching--- Man does not live by bread alone, but by EVERY UTTERANCE from God = OT-NT--Years of study, over and over, and one still learns new utterances.

So then its 100% fact-- the teachers on earth who Jesus is with--teach the flock--every utterance from God, over and over, without fail. If ones teacher does not--RUN FROM THEM.

Every mortal on earth that knows Jesus has already done these things, without fail--think about it.

In last Sunday's sermon, Pastor Deacon Fred recalled a conversation he had with an unsaved cashier at a Safeway in Des Moines. "This feller was just yapping to himself, and mumbling," said Pastor. "So I asked him, who are you talking to? To which he replied, 'My 2,000 year old invisible flying friend.' I told him, as an adult, he really needed to let go of such childish things. Part of being an adult is living in the real world and not clinging to made-up stories and imaginary friends, no matter how comforting. Then, he happened to mention that his friend was called "Jesus." I told him, "Well, why didn't you say so? That's different kettle of fish entirely, my friend!"

When Your Invisible Friend Tells You His Name is Jesus

But you don't believe in God.

 

[Mudda]

Got any proof at all of a cosmic battle between good and evil?

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

I. Shafarevich. The Socialist Phenomeon, 1980 by Harper & Row

Got any real scientific proof or just more fartsmoke?

You didn't ask for scientific proof. You asked for proof, which I gave to you. So now... after I have given you the proof you asked for, you have decided that you want scientific proof. Sorry that doesn't exist. Why would you believe that science could answer that question? So what proof do you have that it isn't?

Then you have no proof that your god isn't the great spaghetti monster. Bon appétit.

Sure I do. We've already discussed it like a thousand times.

You can't prove that you don't have nothing.

 

[ding]

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

I. Shafarevich. The Socialist Phenomeon, 1980 by Harper & Row

Got any real scientific proof or just more fartsmoke?

You didn't ask for scientific proof. You asked for proof, which I gave to you. So now... after I have given you the proof you asked for, you have decided that you want scientific proof. Sorry that doesn't exist. Why would you believe that science could answer that question? So what proof do you have that it isn't?

Then you have no proof that your god isn't the great spaghetti monster. Bon appétit.

Sure I do. We've already discussed it like a thousand times.

You can't prove that you don't have nothing.

Nice, a triple negative. There is no change in my answer. I have evidence that I accept.

 

[Mudda]

Got any real scientific proof or just more fartsmoke?

You didn't ask for scientific proof. You asked for proof, which I gave to you. So now... after I have given you the proof you asked for, you have decided that you want scientific proof. Sorry that doesn't exist. Why would you believe that science could answer that question? So what proof do you have that it isn't?

Then you have no proof that your god isn't the great spaghetti monster. Bon appétit.

Sure I do. We've already discussed it like a thousand times.

You can't prove that you don't have nothing.

Nice, a triple negative. There is no change in my answer. I have evidence that I accept.

I know, your threshold for evidence is extremely low.

 

[ding]

You didn't ask for scientific proof. You asked for proof, which I gave to you. So now... after I have given you the proof you asked for, you have decided that you want scientific proof. Sorry that doesn't exist. Why would you believe that science could answer that question? So what proof do you have that it isn't?

Then you have no proof that your god isn't the great spaghetti monster. Bon appétit.

Sure I do. We've already discussed it like a thousand times.

You can't prove that you don't have nothing.

Nice, a triple negative. There is no change in my answer. I have evidence that I accept.

I know, your threshold for evidence is extremely low.

And I am fine with you believing that. Anything else?

 

[Mudda]

Then you have no proof that your god isn't the great spaghetti monster. Bon appétit.

Sure I do. We've already discussed it like a thousand times.

You can't prove that you don't have nothing.

Nice, a triple negative. There is no change in my answer. I have evidence that I accept.

I know, your threshold for evidence is extremely low.

And I am fine with you believing that. Anything else?

Your critical thinking process is damaged.

 

[ding]

Sure I do. We've already discussed it like a thousand times.

You can't prove that you don't have nothing.

Nice, a triple negative. There is no change in my answer. I have evidence that I accept.

I know, your threshold for evidence is extremely low.

And I am fine with you believing that. Anything else?

Your critical thinking process is damaged.

Anything else?

 

[Mudda]

You can't prove that you don't have nothing.

Nice, a triple negative. There is no change in my answer. I have evidence that I accept.

I know, your threshold for evidence is extremely low.

And I am fine with you believing that. Anything else?

Your critical thinking process is damaged.

Anything else?

You live in a fantasy world.

 

[ding]

Nice, a triple negative. There is no change in my answer. I have evidence that I accept.

I know, your threshold for evidence is extremely low.

And I am fine with you believing that. Anything else?

Your critical thinking process is damaged.

Anything else?

You live in a fantasy world.

Is that it?

 

[ding]

What is required to benefit from Jesus' sacrifice?

John 3:36-- He that exercise' faith in the son has everlasting life, he that disobeys the son will NOT see life, but the wrath of God remains upon him.
Heb 5:9-- Jesus became responsible for all those-OBEYING him.

Jesus taught--- proof of ones love for him was by listening( learning and applying every single teaching) to him.-- like this ultra important teaching--- Man does not live by bread alone, but by EVERY UTTERANCE from God = OT-NT--Years of study, over and over, and one still learns new utterances.

So then its 100% fact-- the teachers on earth who Jesus is with--teach the flock--every utterance from God, over and over, without fail. If ones teacher does not--RUN FROM THEM.

Every mortal on earth that knows Jesus has already done these things, without fail--think about it.

In last Sunday's sermon, Pastor Deacon Fred recalled a conversation he had with an unsaved cashier at a Safeway in Des Moines. "This feller was just yapping to himself, and mumbling," said Pastor. "So I asked him, who are you talking to? To which he replied, 'My 2,000 year old invisible flying friend.' I told him, as an adult, he really needed to let go of such childish things. Part of being an adult is living in the real world and not clinging to made-up stories and imaginary friends, no matter how comforting. Then, he happened to mention that his friend was called "Jesus." I told him, "Well, why didn't you say so? That's different kettle of fish entirely, my friend!"

When Your Invisible Friend Tells You His Name is Jesus

Communism is naturalized humanism. Karl Marx