list wars "Russia" and USSR lost in the 20th and 21st centuries:

Litwin

Platinum Member
Sep 3, 2017
32,582
4,846
1,015
GDL&Sweden
list wars "Russia" and USSR lost in the 20th and 21st centuries:

  • "Russia" -Japanese War: The rising Empire of Japan staged a surprise attack on the Russian fleet, a tactic they would later employed against the US in World War 2. Russian made a good account of itself against the upstart, but was ultimately defeated.
  • World War 1:
  • Soviet "Russia" - Finnish war (hybrid) 1917-18
  • Soviet "Russia" - Estonian war 1917-18
  • Soviet "Russia" - Latvian war 1917-18
  • Soviet "Russia" - Lituvas war 1917-18
  • Soviet "Russia" - Georgian war 1917-18
  • Soviet "Russia" - Azerbaijan war 1917-18
  • Soviet "Russia" - Armenian war 1917-18
  • Soviet "Russia" - Ukrainian war 1917-18
  • Polish-Soviet War: The Muscovite commies had the advantage until they messed up at the decisive Battle of Warsaw.
  • Afghanistan War: A. insurgency leads to destabilization of USSR. The USSR left Afghanistan in complete mess.
  • USSR - West second part of WW2 (so - called cold war) 1991
  • Both "Russia" - Chechen wars
  • All Balkan wars, including the last one in Macedonia
have i missed something ?
 
  • Afghanistan War: A. insurgency leads to destabilization of USSR. The USSR left Afghanistan in complete mess?
  • America takes up where Russia left off two decades ago and is still there?
 
Modern Russia should likely be taken very, very seriously. Particularly their relationships with other nations over the last century or so. That's particularly something our own so-called representatives would do well to learn. That's asking quite a bit from that group, however. Our representatives are utterly clueless to such things and seem to have no interest whatsover in educating themselves about it.
 
Last edited:
Modern Russia should likely be taken very, very seriously. Particularly their relationships with other nations over the last century or so. That's particularly something our own so-called representatives would do well to learn. That's asking quite a bit from that group, however. Our representatives are utterly clueless to such things and seem to have no interest whatsover in educating themselves about it.
Stephen Cohen: perhaps it’s time for Washington to learn from Moscow rather than demand that Moscow conform to Washington’s thinking about—and behavior in—world affairs. If not, Washington is more likely to continue to isolate itself.
Russian Diplomacy Is Winning the New Cold War
 
Modern Russia should likely be taken very, very seriously. Particularly their relationships with other nations over the last century or so. That's particularly something our own so-called representatives would do well to learn. That's asking quite a bit from that group, however. Our representatives are utterly clueless to such things and seem to have no interest whatsover in educating themselves about it.
Russia is taking advantage of our moral weaknesses in which we are exhibiting here and in the world now.

Obama's fumbling of Syria brought Russia into the conflict to show resolve where America was showing confusion and inward strife over military strength, and the deployment of that strength in a moralistic Manor and way.

Russia started a bombing campaign in that region that meant business, and the whole world compared that to Obama's ridiculous red line. What a joke.
 
  • Afghanistan War: A. insurgency leads to destabilization of USSR. The USSR left Afghanistan in complete mess?
  • America takes up where Russia left off two decades ago and is still there?
man you´d see USSR 1989-91 , it was a total mess folk fought for any food in the empty shops . and USA/west saved Muscovites from famine once again

 
  • Afghanistan War: A. insurgency leads to destabilization of USSR. The USSR left Afghanistan in complete mess?
  • America takes up where Russia left off two decades ago and is still there?
man you´d see USSR 1989-91 , it was a total mess folk fought for any food in the empty shops . and USA/west saved Muscovites from famine once again


Sure, that's america, always saving others militarily.
 
Modern Russia should likely be taken very, very seriously. Particularly their relationships with other nations over the last century or so. That's particularly something our own so-called representatives would do well to learn. That's asking quite a bit from that group, however. Our representatives are utterly clueless to such things and seem to have no interest whatsover in educating themselves about it.
Russia is taking advantage of our moral weaknesses in which we are exhibiting here and in the world now.

Obama's fumbling of Syria brought Russia into the conflict to show resolve where America was showing confusion and inward strife over military strength, and the deployment of that strength in a moralistic Manor and way.

Russia started a bombing campaign in that region that meant business, and the whole world compared that to Obama's ridiculous red line. What a joke.


The US was founded upon moral weakness and violence. You should really go do some due diligence on where all the US is bombing and occupying and toppling governments.
 
  • Afghanistan War: A. insurgency leads to destabilization of USSR. The USSR left Afghanistan in complete mess?
  • America takes up where Russia left off two decades ago and is still there?
man you´d see USSR 1989-91 , it was a total mess folk fought for any food in the empty shops . and USA/west saved Muscovites from famine once again


Sure, that's america, always saving others militarily.

no my friend , USA saved this Asiatic civilization so many times in history from cannibalism and total collapse . and its very strange that Muscovite hate USA so much today , its like hate the lord Creator .


Russian Famine Relief Act - Wikipedia

Russian Famine Relief Act - Wikipedia
The Russian Famine Relief Act of 1921 authorized the expenditure of $20,000,000 for the purchase of American foodstuffs to send to post revolutionary Russia, for relief of the Russian famine of 1921–22. The Act was overseen by Herbert Hoover, serving simultaneously as the U.S. ...



chi-mickenberg-fig02002.jpg


famine_release.jpg


hungry-russian-women-kneel-before-american-relief-administration-officials-DYEN44.jpg




the same story . from 19c.

360px-Distribution_of_Food.jpeg

Ship help (the Arrival of the steamer "Missouri" bread in Russia) by Ivan Aivazovsky: History, Analysis & Facts
arthive.com

Ship help (the Arrival of the steamer "Missouri" bread in Russia) is one of artworks by Ivan Aivazovsky. Artwork analysis, large resolution images, user comments, interesting facts and much more.

339320.jpg
 
Modern Russia should likely be taken very, very seriously. Particularly their relationships with other nations over the last century or so. That's particularly something our own so-called representatives would do well to learn. That's asking quite a bit from that group, however. Our representatives are utterly clueless to such things and seem to have no interest whatsover in educating themselves about it.
Russia is taking advantage of our moral weaknesses in which we are exhibiting here and in the world now.

Obama's fumbling of Syria brought Russia into the conflict to show resolve where America was showing confusion and inward strife over military strength, and the deployment of that strength in a moralistic Manor and way.

Russia started a bombing campaign in that region that meant business, and the whole world compared that to Obama's ridiculous red line. What a joke.


The US was founded upon moral weakness and violence. You should really go do some due diligence on where all the US is bombing and occupying and toppling governments. [/QUOTE]

.

I just wander why USA can not stop Venezuela ´s suffering today like in old days , God bless the USA and all its solders for what they have done in 20c. and 21c
 
Last edited:
Modern Russia should likely be taken very, very seriously. Particularly their relationships with other nations over the last century or so. That's particularly something our own so-called representatives would do well to learn. That's asking quite a bit from that group, however. Our representatives are utterly clueless to such things and seem to have no interest whatsover in educating themselves about it.
Russia is taking advantage of our moral weaknesses in which we are exhibiting here and in the world now.

Obama's fumbling of Syria brought Russia into the conflict to show resolve where America was showing confusion and inward strife over military strength, and the deployment of that strength in a moralistic Manor and way.

Russia started a bombing campaign in that region that meant business, and the whole world compared that to Obama's ridiculous red line. What a joke.


The US was founded upon moral weakness and violence. You should really go do some due diligence on where all the US is bombing and occupying and toppling governments.

Why don't you do that, so we can al have a good laugh at your expense?
 
Modern Russia should likely be taken very, very seriously. Particularly their relationships with other nations over the last century or so. That's particularly something our own so-called representatives would do well to learn. That's asking quite a bit from that group, however. Our representatives are utterly clueless to such things and seem to have no interest whatsover in educating themselves about it.
Russia is taking advantage of our moral weaknesses in which we are exhibiting here and in the world now.

Obama's fumbling of Syria brought Russia into the conflict to show resolve where America was showing confusion and inward strife over military strength, and the deployment of that strength in a moralistic Manor and way.

Russia started a bombing campaign in that region that meant business, and the whole world compared that to Obama's ridiculous red line. What a joke.


The US was founded upon moral weakness and violence. You should really go do some due diligence on where all the US is bombing and occupying and toppling governments.
So you are in that camp eh ? anti-American much ?
 
the post WW2 wars like Vietnam and Afghanistan were not ''winnable''
........there are not many examples in the ''modern'' era of countries invading/etc another country and totally taking over/changing that country/etc
...most end in a cease fire
 
the Great Power Britain also lost in Afghanistan
First Anglo-Afghan War - Wikipedia

has British empire collapsed in 19c. ?
?
what?
the US is still in Afghanistan .....
Russia and GB lost there
???
are you capable talk about " list wars "Russia" and USSR lost in the 20th and 21st centuries:" `?
Russia in Afghanistan - 20th century
point being Afghanistan War was unwinnable = ie GB in 1800 losing in Afghanistan
are you capable of not being a JACKASS?
 

Forum List

Back
Top