"Linear AGW view of climate change fundamentally flawed."

Discussion in 'Environment' started by skookerasbil, Aug 19, 2018.

  1. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    30,758
    Thanks Received:
    3,527
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +11,429
    It's a progressive thing...they fall for loose association semantics all the time. Tune in CNN any night and it is on full display.....no matter the story. They get all the suckers.....

    If you watch closely when climate crusader guys post, they always use loose association words like "increased", "higher", "up", "trends", "worsening", "decreased", "strenghtening"......crap all built in the the ruse. The suckers are too dim witted to pick up on it or are aware and perpetuating the ruse for the suckers!:2up:
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  2. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    58,546
    Thanks Received:
    7,102
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +18,491
    Loose associations are when you get your climate information from the frauds at WUWT and other such sites. You posted an article which supported AGW, and stated that things may get worse far more quickly than we expect. Then you denied that it said that. And now you are saying the the language in the article you posted is bad. LOL Next you will be claiming that someone else posted that article. Perhaps you should read the article before posting it.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1

Share This Page